Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Good effects war had on literature
Psychological impact war has on soldiers
Literature affected by wars
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Good effects war had on literature
They trudged through many battles, Eating M&Ms and chewing fear, Just some boys in big army boots Fixing the leaders’ problems. 5. They reminisce about lost loved ones Regaling while they shot the “enemy” They blocked it out the best they could but the things they carried never faded. 9. Carrying panties, pictures, or anything, To give the soldiers good luck. Reading the cards from their love ones Waiting for the day they could be reunited. 14. Fighting and fighting like theres no tomorrow. Carrying their lucky charms And loose thoughts about the pass Losing their minds in the battle field. 18. But carrying their promises all the way. Explanation This poem was made from different poems dedicated to the book, but there are also some parts
that I felt like that had to be added. This poem explain the first chapter “The Things They Carried”. Through these chapter the author explains the things that some specific soldiers would carry, some would carry physical things and other would carry emotional or even thoughts. The first stanza talks about how the soldiers weren’t grown man or simply were still some boys that had nothing to do with the war but they were still had to go and fight, also how the soldiers seem to not be afraid by “eating M&Ms” but they are scared because they are “Chewing fear”. The second stanza talks more about how some of the soldiers feel entering the war and fighting in the line. The couplet line five and six says how the soldiers think of their loved ones that are not longer with them, knowing is just them and the adversary and they know that is either shoot or get shot. The next couplet lines, seven and eight, talks about how the soldiers try to forget about their love ones but their memories never seems to go away. Third stanza focus more on a specific person since not every soldier carries their girls panties or letters from a girl. The panties are from a guy name Henry Dobbins, “Henry Dobbins carried his girlfriend’s pantyhose wrapped around his neck as a comforter” (9). And the letters were from Jimmy Cross according to the book, “...Jimmy Cross carried letters from a girl name Martha,” (1). And says how the things they carried gave them good luck, and the last couplet from that stanza talks of how the soldiers are just waiting to go back and see their family again. Every soldier carried a different thing put based on the book those two soldiers carried the things that said in the poem. In the next stanza explains how the soldiers were protecting the land but they also wanted wanted to war to end. The soldiers still had faith in the lucky charms and would use them everywhere they would go. But the last couplet said something powerful, “Losing their minds in the battlefield.” and the whole meaning to it is that even though the soldiers survive the battles scars are being left in their minds, that could be relatable to now days were a soldier will have a great chance to have PTSD. The last line is probably the best way to end the poem because it not only says how the soldiers are carrying the promises they make before leaving their town but it also says how the soldiers are trying to survive and finish the war but not everyone does it or not everyone comes out of the war complete. This poem is mainly by me (Antonio Viorato) but two poems were use, one of them is called “The Things They Carried” and the second poem is named the same but they both are completely different but mean and explain the main topic.
i. Difficulties faced by soldiers due to the nature of fighting in the Vietnam War - Personnel had difficulties with transportation supplied with adapted vehicles back seat faced rear to provide additional fire power (Source A) – It appears as if the government didn't worry enough to supply men with safe and capable equipment - Threat of traps led to fear as vehicles had to be parked on street at night (Source A) o Check for traps each morning became a daily ritual particularly in fuel tanks (Source A) o A request for a locking fuel cap was denied because weren’t entitled to one” (Source A) • What circumstances would have needed to arise for them to be entitled to one? The Offensive full guard was set up (24hrs a day), personnel got no sleep and were constantly on alert (Source A) – How significant would this have been in the personnel’s mental frame of mind?
Should the United States have participated in the Vietnam War? Some people felt that the US should have been there for two reasons. The first reason was the US was attempting to establish a stable democracy. The second reason was that our participation in Vietnam helped the US win the Cold War. Others believed the US should not have participated for two reasons. One reason was that the South Vietnamese government was a brutal dictatorship. Another reason was our strategy for winning the war was inept. While it appeared that we were trying to spread democracy and win the Cold War., in truth we were supporting a mini-Hitler, and our war strategy had little chance of success.
The human race has long been assumed to have a warlike nature, involving itself in many violent endeavors. Philosophers such as Hobbs firmly asserted such an ideal throughout their teachings, their theories revolving around said notion. Yet some occasions throughout history point to the contrary, specifically those in which war was the unpopular choice. Perhaps the most exemplary of unpopular wars was the Vietnam War, which spurred a myriad of anti-war sentiment. These ideals manifested themselves in a wide variety of protests and draft evasion. Despite its unpopularity, the government pushed forward with its efforts to remain involved for a number of years, drawing more negative attention to the divide that existed between the popular opinion
I was against the war over in Vietnam. Part of that reason was because I didn’t think that the fighting over there was all that necessary but the real reason was because my brother Mack was drafted into the war. He was drafted pretty early on when they started the draft so when he was killed that’s where my hatred for the war.. really came from. *She actually got a little quiet here so I did my best to avoid talking too much about her brother (Keeping in mind I didn’t know this happened at the beginning)*
Thesis statement: The US objective was to keep all countries from turning to "communist" and being controlled by primarily communist governments.
Links from the poem below are best read in order from the beginning of the poem to the end
The Differing Reactions to United States' Involvement in Vietnam Everyone in America had a different reaction to the Vietnam War. Some people supported the war because they feared Communism. They were afraid that if they did not stop the Communism in Vietnam, that type of government would affect all other countries. This was according to the Domino Theory. They thought that stopping the Vietnamese would be the correct and easy thing to do, but they were wrong.
The speech that I chose to analyze and critique is from John Forbes Kerry “Vietnam Veterans Against the War” to the U.S. Senate Committee on Foreign Relations. In this speech he did not represent himself, he represented the group of 1000 veterans that feels the same way he does about the war.
American Public Opinion of the Vietnam War At the beginning of the U.S. involvement in the Vietnam War, in 1965, The American public favored the idea of war because they feared the threat of communism. Polls conducted in 1965, showed 80 percent of the population agreed with President Johnson and were for the war. Rousseau 11. The U.S. got involved in the war to stop communism. from spreading throughout South Asia.
From 1965 to 1973, the United States military sent over 536,000 combat troops into the jungles, villages, and swamps of Vietnam. Of these 536,000, over 58,000 men would never return. Despite air superiority, artillery, and the most technologically advanced armed forces in the world, the United States slumped to defeat by the hands of both their enemy and themselves. Unpreventably so, the United States of America was defeated in Vietnam due egregious errors in political and military judgment, lack of popular support and an extreme unpreparedness to fight the Vietcong and North Vietnamese in a guerilla war.
Many of the democrats within the legislative branch turned against Johnson’s war. Scholar’s conflict on the reason why Johnson’s own party turned against him, some scholars attribute it to the growing number of antiwar constituents, while other scholars such as E.M. Schreiber, Burstein and Freudenburg cite the numerous deaths of American soldiers in combat. One democrat by the name of Eugene McCarthy labeled the entire Vietnam War as an “error” and describes the Johnson administration as “misguided.” McCarthy decides to run for President, but loses in the primaries by a slim margin to Johnson, further indicating that the antiwar movement was gaining significant momentum. Things were only beginning to get even worse as the Tet Offensive and the Mai Lai massacre overshadowed the propaganda speeches from Westmoreland and President Johnson. The media was once a key ally to the Johnson administration during the early stages of the war, now turned completely against American involvement. Media outlets such as Life magazine began to show pictures of dead Americans in almost every issue. In February of 1968, influential CBS News anchorman Walter Cronkite, who returned from Saigon, informs Americans during his nightly broadcast that the Vietnam War could not be won. Leaks from within the White House did not help Johnson’s strategy either; the New York Times broke the news of General Westmoreland’s request of 206,000 additional troops. In August 1968, during the Democratic national convention in Chicago, 10,000 antiwar protesters gathered and were confronted by an equipped police force. The crackdown on the protesters was broadcasted on live TV. The protests indicated that the U.S. was experiencing a profound degree of social unrests. T...
It was the evening of Christmas, 1776. The voice of an army sergeant shouted, “Everybody, up this instant! We’ve got a battle to win!” George Washington’s order awoke us soldiers, and we prepared for a rough night, as General Washington knew it would be more than strenuous to get the Continental Army, made up of 2,400 men, across the Delaware River especially in such harsh weather conditions. The plan was to attack in the morning since the Hessians would be celebrating Christmas tonight, they will hopefully be too tired to put up a fight tomorrow morning. The cold, brisk air intruded into the tent, as the rest of the soldiers arose from their slumber, not knowing what the day would bring them, or should I say, night.
A common mistake among the general public is to talk about the Vietnam War. Technically, it never was declared a war; President Johnson never asked for a declaration of war. It was called the Vietnamese Conflict. He instead only asked for a resolution that would give him the authority to take "all necessary measures to repel any armed attack" against U.S. forces and "to prevent further aggression" (Dougherty). So, with this kind of all-powerful resolution, was there even a necessity for declaring war? Some believe there was a necessity, and that there should have been a declaration of war; others would disagree and say there was no need for a declaration of war. But who really knows the right answer? That question can only be answered on an individual basis. And before anyone can make a decision on these issues, the context must be understood.
In relation to structure and style, the poem contains six stanzas of varying lengths. The first, second, and fourth stanzas
Trueman, Chris. "Ho Chi Minh." Ho Chi Minh. N.p., n.d. © 2000-2013 Web. 21 Jan. 2014.