Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Analysis of the battle of agincourt
Medieval battle tactics
Medieval tactics warfare and weapons essays
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Analysis of the battle of agincourt
I’m am writing you to know that I am alive. I miss you alot and I haven't seen you in over three months after I went away to my father's house in August. Today was a long and exhausting day, and after the fields of Agincourt were filled with French blood, there are many things I must tell you. These past hours have been the most hectic hours in my life. The Battle of Agincourt we slayed with our six foot tall longbows, the numbers and the armour of the French. Our strategy and tactics at Agincourt will always be a memory and how we came out on top. When we entered Agincourt on October 24 we stood there on the muddy ploughed ground of the fields starring the French in the face that were only a few hundred yards away. Knowing that they blocked …show more content…
My longbow that was gave to my father over fifty years ago has been crucial here in France. My father explained to me that this one and four fifth meters piece of yew wood took many years for him to learn. He said how these weapons can launch deadly arrows over two hundred meters and deliver excruciating pain through enemy’s armour . When my companions and I were in the Forest next to Agincourt we knew that the French were blocking our path to Calais, and the only thing that would help us where our longbows and our tactics that King Henry the fifth had planned for us. Every Sunday you let me go to the Bens farmland where we would practice propelling our home made Bodkin arrows at hay barrels one hundred yards away. This weapon has saved thousands of men's lives today, I can’t explain how difficult it was to fight through this battle firing arrow after arrow and the pain that came after to my shoulder. I have agonizing pain in my right shoulder from pulling one hundred pounds of draw weight when we got the command to “Let loose your strings” it went on and on, until we realized that we had the upper hand, and I knew that this Saint Crispin's day will be
During the fall of 1944, the “Atlantic Wall” had diminished after the invasion of Normandy and the American and allied forces were making their way towards Germany. One of the offensives directed to counteract this; Adolf Hitler focused in on and was attacking the inadequately defended Ardennes front. Had this plan succeeded, through the capture of Antwerp, the Germans would have divided the American and British forces in the area, depriving the American Soldiers and allies of a seaport for resupply.
Long distance weapons were essential to European combat. The main long distance weapons used by Europeans during that time were the longbow and the crossbow. Each form of weaponry had its unique advantages and their pejorative. The long bow (shown in figure 1) was the original form of distance weapons. The term ‘bow’ means to be made from wood, iron or steel. The Welsh, who inhabited England, were the first people to use longbows. Longbows were 6-7 feet long and had a range of 250 yards, and still had the ability to pierce a knight’s armor (Byam 12). A well trained archer could shot 10- 12 arrows in a single minute. Despite these pro’s the longbow had a lot of disadvantages as well. One draw back was only skilled archers, who were costly to train, could use a longbow. Another disadvantage was it didn’t have a ready loaded arrow (Edge 34). The crossbow (shown in figure 2) on the other had been emphatically different. The crossbow had a span of 2-3 feet and could kill a knight on horseback with one shot, because of good aim (Byam 30). Crossbows had ready loaded projectiles, while the longbow didn’t and the crossbow could be used by anyone since it didn’t require any skill. The crossbow did have a down side though, it had slow reloaded because of a crank and it was expensive. Crossbows were also used for other thi...
I must continue my work as a man of honor, I will not let you down. Your smile and the distant memory of your bright yet elegant laugh is what keeps me going during these long, endless days. We have lost so many good men at war and I’ve fought long and hard to make sure I am able to come home to you, my dove. I was attempting to surprise you months ago however, my papers were somehow mixed up and I’m currently staying in Oxford. I apologize for my late letters and an even later arrival my dearest.
Scourging the countryside for this evening’s meal or simply keeping wary of impending danger, one often felt naked without a trustworthy gun at their side. A firearm often made one feel invincible, for the power of a bullet could protect the weakest and cowardly from even the strongest and fiercest of animals and people. In it’s use it proved to be an action that spoke louder than words, many a quarrel has been put to rest through this instrument, whose music is often not one of good cheer.
The longbow was very crucial to the English military. In this paper I will tell people about the English longbow and how dominant it was it their military. One will be surprised by the dominance of the longbow. I will tell one about wars, power, and draw a weight.
Once you see the Medieval Times Knight battle you will have a whole new appreciation for knights; a castle garden. It all started with the stairs. When it was time for the show to begin my family and I went to the grand staircase. Once we got there two trumpet players dressed in baggy pants and shirts started playing. Their trumpets were unusually long with banners on them. One banner had a lion's head on it and the other had a shield. The trumpet players played the most crisp and majestic sound I have ever heard. The sound rang through the castle and all of the crowds fell silent.
They took position on the field, with the loss of almost half of their men. It was also the first moral boost for the Continental Army. They withstood two attacks from the British and suffered only a few casualties. With the right supplies, they could have withstood a third charge and maybe a fourth. British soldiers near death or already dead are scattered around the battlefield; many more will soon meet the same fate.
This reason for this report is to cover the Battle of Agincourt. The topics that will be discussed in this paper include: factors contributing to the Battle of Agincourt, the English forces, French forces, weapons and equipment, terrain (the effects it had on both armies), key battles prior to the Battle of Agincourt, the Battle of Agincourt, and the Battle of Agincourt in relation to selected principles of war.
On the day of the battle the English were in a defensive position awaiting the attack of the French forces at a place known as Crecy Ridge. The English armies were "trained, disciplined, well-armed and confident" meanwhile the Frenchmen and Geonese were "largely untrained, hastily collected and lacking cohesion" (Burne 186). The English were also thought to have had a crude form of a cannon, the first ever used in a battle. They also had excellent archers who easily defeated many of the French cross bowmen and knights from a distance with a longbow. The English win was enormous, and it is said that "Phillip VI fled the battlefield" (Allmand 15).
Known as one of the most famous and greatest battles of history, the Battle of Agnicourt was definitely one of the more glorious accomplishments of King Henry V as well as a significant victory in his invasion of France.
1. What is the difference between Introduction 2. What is the difference between History 3. What is the difference between a's Planning / Preparation 4.
In Joseph Plumb Martin’s account of his experiences in the Revolutionary War he offers unique insight into the perspective of a regular soldier, which differs from the views of generals and leaders such as popular characters like George Washington. Martin’s narrative is an asset to historical scholarship as a primary source that gives an in-depth look at how life in the army was for many young men during the War for Independence. He described the tremendous suffering he experienced like starvation and privation. He did not shy away from describing his criticism of the government who he believes did not adequately care for the soldiers during and after the war. While he may be biased because of his personal involvement as a soldier, he seems to relate accounts that are plausible without embellishment or self-aggrandizement. Overall, “A Narrative of A Revolutionary Soldier” is a rich source of information providing an overview of military experience during the war.
The battle at Isandlwana stunned the world and is historically acknowledged as a demoralizing defeat for the British against a less technologically advanced indigenous force. Prior to this battle, it was unfathomable that a Zulu Army primarily equipped with then low-tech weapons, could defeat a conventional fighting force. Not only did the Zulus defeat the British troops (that were fully armed with modern rifles and artillery); they completely destroyed an Infantry Battalion in only 11 days. The complete loss of a battalion of British Army troops challenged the British to fully understand the capability of the Zulu Warriors to defend their land which forced the British Military to adjust their strategy accordingly.
“Society was cut in two: those who had nothing united in common envy; those who had anything united in common terror.” The French Revolution was a painful era that molded the lives of every citizen living in France and changed their ways of life forever. Beginning in 1789 and lasting ten years until 1799, the people of France lived in a monarch society under King Louis XVI’s rule. He was a very harsh ruler and had many restrictions placed on his people. They eventually overthrow him and become a monarch society. Among his deceptive ways, the people also experienced “The Reign of Terror,” which was a period where many lives were taken by the guillotine. Other revolutionary events included rebellions, constitutions, and groups. One of the popular groups that contributed greatly to the French Revolution were the Jacobins who were led by Maximilien Robespierre.
The French Revolution and the legacy of A Tale of Two Cities & nbsp; It is a commonplace of Dickensian criticism that the writer was influenced by Carlyle's The French Revolution in A Tale of Two Cities. Taking Dickens's comment that he read Carlyle's history "five hundred times" (I. Collins 46) as a starting point, many critics have discussed Carlyle's influence on several aspects of the novel, such as the narrative technique (Friedman 481-5), the imagery associated with the Revolution (I. Collins 52; Baumgarten 166; Lodge 131-2), and the narration of the historical episodes (Lodge 134; Friedman 489). And yet, Dickens's outlook on revolutionary violence differed significantly from that of Carlyle. As Irene Collins points out, Dickens "dislikes the violence of the revolutionaries, both in its popular form (the mob) and in its institutionalised form (the Terror). Unlike Carlyle, he can no longer see justice in the violence" (53).