Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
How cell phones impact relationships
Urbanization effects
Mobile use and its impact on social life
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: How cell phones impact relationships
People are constantly moving in our fast-paced society and the connections between people are constantly tested. Perry Patetic, in his excerpt, claims that the mobile society people now live in creates a lack of close relationships in the younger generations. The author supports his position by first appealing to the audience’s emotions by bringing their families into his argument. He continues by providing examples of real life to back his assertation. The author’s purpose is to persuade people so that they feel guilty for becoming distant from their loved ones. The author establishes sincere tone for younger age people who might be thinking about moving or getting away from those close to them. Some might say that a mobile society is not a positive thing because it creates more isolation among family members and people aren't connecting to others around them as much. “People often lose track of old …show more content…
friends and never see them again”(Patetic, pg. 1). When people move or start their real lives after school, they lose track of the people they were close to because they are so wrapped up in their new life with jobs and starting their own family. This is incorrect however because technology allows people to stay in touch even when they are far away. Some might say that military families are not close to people or each other. They always move around and do not establish connections to those around them because they will just move again. That claim is false because it brings the family closer together. They depend on the individuals in the family more than their neighbors and coworkers and therefore creates a stronger bond since it is always just their family. Technology allows people to stay in touch when far away from each other and a mobile society does not weaken the bonds between loved ones, but rather strengthens them. The author’s argument that people nowadays lack close relationships because of a mobile society is wrong because the mobility allows people to grow closer to one another even when they grow physically apart. For example, my older sister moved to the border of our state on the opposite side of where we live several years ago. She has been there for almost ten years and yet no one in my family dislikes her; in fact it is quite the opposite. Her leaving has made us grow much closer because the distance makes the family miss them so when they return or visit it makes them glad and the occasion special. The distance of a relationship does not necessarily hinder how close the people can be. This can be related to another of the author’s claims that “a mobile society makes it too easy for us to move away from the people and places of our past”(Patetic, pg. 1). This is true however if it is easy to leave then it is easy to come back. One of my experiences with this is when my cousin left to go to college at Arizona State University. Everyone was so happy for him and we threw a party and he said goodbye to all his friends and family and left a few weeks later. After a year there he returned, he said he missed us too much and it was too cold. The point being that the mobile society people live in today isn’t separating families, it is bringing them closer together; it is making people realize that they depend on their loved ones more than they thought. These days, people depend on their loved ones more than they think and the closeness of their relationship is not necessarily dependent upon their distance from one another.
Also, if someone leaves those close to them it is not the end of the relationship and does not necessarily diminish it; it can bring people together more by making them realize what they are missing, so that when they do come back, the relationship is as good if not better than before. Families can grow closer by not having to count on everyone around them, just those most important to them. This can happen especially when they are moving around often because they do not get as close to their coworkers and neighbors because they will soon move again. Therefore, their connection is strong with their family because they only confide in their family and that is all they need. The argument stated in the prompt that a mobile society creates a lack of close relationships is invalid because the mobility of a society does not separate people’s relationships but rather brings them closer
together.
Going through the same thing every day can be comforting and change can create chaos in the everyday routine. After the youth leaves change will set in but will change the outcomes of the activities that occur. Some parents will enjoy the free time that has been presented and others will fade and not know what to do. Older generation parents have readjusted before and have had to change their life to incorporate the youth coming into their life; some transitions were easier than others. Some of the parents find that moving out of their community is not the way to change the pace of life that is occurring. Yet the change of moving would create a drastic change of pace; some of the parents in Ellis tell Carr and Kefalas, “They fear that the outside world will expect them to change too much of who and what they are” (21). Making a change would require something that most parents don’t have, and that would be wanting to leave. Most of the older generation are content with the life they have; yet the ability of having a change of pace is enticing.
Teens’ feelings of loneliness spiked in 2013 and have remained high since”(page 64). She has a Ph.D. in psychology which helped her establish Ethos. Twenge then collects data and performs interviews in order to form logos. She then appeals to human emotions by explaining how smartphones can drive families apart and cause mental illness in teenagers.
Yet there are infinite examples of technologies which have the exact purpose of doing these things that have had extreme success. One prominent example of this is the cellphone. Before the cellphone was invented, if a family member moved, they would be complete diverged from their family with no hope of being able to communicate with them. But today, even if a father or mother is away because of work, their children will not have to suffer from the agony of not being able to see their family. Because of the cell phone, family bonds have become stronger than ever as physical barriers between parents and children cannot inhibit emotional
A family has always been expected to be a loving and caring environment with support and communication, but this sometimes does not come naturally to soon to be parents. Some get caught up specifically in bad things, perhaps their upbringings are to blame or maybe the individual could take all of the responsibility. When a society chooses what is to be socially acceptable, that limits relatives to only one kind of family and the object becomes destroying all other kinds. The 1950s was a time when technology wasn’t a big distraction from loved ones. Joyin Shih feels her true self being targeted by others, even her own family, in attempt to destroy her true self in her article, “Chyna and Me”. Alex Williams may also be missing the 1950s an article by Stephanie Coontz called “What We Really Miss About The 1950s” because he finds that families may not be as caring as they used to be in fact he argues that families are becoming more isolated than ever in his article “Quality Time, Redefined”. Good gives people a lot of frustration, more the division than the “good” because not all families coming from different cultures, different religions, and different ideas can fit into one mold that is called “acceptable”. The more connected individuals are to the Internet the fewer individuals are connected to each other. Technology should not be the biggest tool of communication in a family.
Paul Goldberger explores this theme in his essay, “Disconnected Urbanism,” where he explains how cell phones have rendered public spaces, such as urban streets, less public. Likewise, because of cell phones and other electronic devices, humans have grown lazy and impatient. Nonetheless, Goldberger explains, “Remember when people communicated with Europe by letter and it took a couple of weeks to get a reply? Now we’re upset if we have to send a fax because it takes so much longer than e-mail” (558). This demonstrates how Americans have grown accustomed to swift communication, thus leading them to become lazy or comatose; if an individual is attempting to create plans they may prefer to send out a text message rather than a phone call since it is a rapid communication method. However, when conversing with another individual via text message and that individual does not reply immediately, the person may become agitated or anxious. This is a negative result of progress which could affect humans, especially when considering a job; a grand array of individuals may apply for a job and several may be seeking a reply immediately, however, that is highly unlikely. It is with this growing anxiety that countless individuals have become inattentive. Even so, the younger generations of Americans are also dealing with a
A common theme is taking place where as people feel that cell phones are starting to take over others daily lives. Many people go through their day to day lives not even relizing how often they are on their cell phones. In the article, “Our Cell Phones, Ourselves” the author Christine Rosen talks about how cell phones are starting to become a necessity in every way towards peoples lives. Rosen talks about both the good and bad effects of cell phones and how they have changed the way in which we work our daily life. Although I think cell phones can be necissary, the constant need for use could be the beginning of how cell phones will take over our every day lives.
Mr. Richtel, though, doesn’t seem content to let people go about their lives without realizing the potential ramifications overuse of technology might have on their lives. By shining a spotlight on an actual family, he seeks to show his readers how families in the modern age truly exist, and perhaps to have his readers recognize behaviors similar to those described in the article in themselves, and make a conscious effort to try to change their habits.
People have the fundamental desire to maintain strong connections with others. Through logic and reasoning, Sherry states, “But what do we have, now that we have what we say we want, now that we have what technology makes easy?”(Turkle). Face to face conversations are now mundane because of the accessibility to interact at our fingertips, at free will through text, phone calls and social media. Belonging, the very essence of a relationship has now become trivial.
The first influential factor to the atrophy of social life that Eitzen writes about is moving away. Americans nowadays are always on the go – if moving is the most convenient idea, they will move with no regard to formed relationships that will soon be broken. People are often forced to move in order to follow a job or because of problems within the family. Constantly moving about causes a decline in intimate relationships. This is also true in people who live alone. The lack of regular and reliable social interaction can lead to a less sociable personality and less motivation to form real relationships. Real relationships are what lead to a healthy social life.
Technology has always been at the forefront of the world’s mind, for as long as anyone can remember. The idea of “advancing” has been a consistent goal among developers. However, recently the invention of smartphones broke out into the world of technology, causing millions of people to become encapsulated in a world of knowledge at their fingertips. Jean Twenge elaborates on the impacts of the smartphone on the younger generation in her article “Has the Smartphone Destroyed a Generation?” Twenge’s article is just a sliver of the analysis that she presents in her book “IGen.” Twenge, a professor of psychology at San
Turkle believes young people are constantly connected to each other. Teenagers never get to experience time on their own, including time away from their parents, and teenagers always feel the need to instant message someone about their feelings. Another one of Turkle’s belief is that the need to be connected is stressful. To decide if Turkle had made valid points, I took time to reflect on my own personal life,
However, in spite of Mary Shelly’s warning, it seems man has gone forward with its creation. Yet the result has not been a world of death and destruction, but a world of connectivity and immediate satisfaction. Sherry Turkle writes “we look to the network to defend us against loneliness even as we use it to control the intensity of our connections” (Turkle, 274). Before the postal system it could take months before hearing from someone across the country. In today’s age a text message contains the same thought of reaching a person thousands of miles away, with the added benefit of instant gratification. This instant gratification, in the eyes of Turkle, “redraws the boundaries of intimacy and solitude,” (Turkle, 272). At face value the boundaries of intimacy and solitude are in fact merely human construction, it is impossible to change the mode of communication without changing boundaries. In this case, while some barriers are constructed between humans physically, many more paths open for human interaction on an intellectual level. Perhaps the future is not the interactions of human physically, but the interaction of minds through a common source, such as the
There are many technologies in today’s ‘smart’ world which are now being established not just as a want, but as a necessity of life. Among many technologies that can impact family life, Smartphones and computers are the two most crucial technologies that can impact family life. The functions of computers and Smartphones are not just bounded to internet surfing, gaming and assignment tools, but its variety of other functions including social networking systems, online mailing, and online face-to-face video chatting are now arguably the most critical functions that have started to impact family lives on a visible level. These technologies have both positive and negative effects on family life; more and more families are beginning to own their own computers, as computer internet users in North America reached to about “78.3 %” (Miniwatts Marketing Group, 2011), accordingly, the effects of these technologies on family life is more easily recognized. This essay will come across both the benefits and negative effects of using such technologies on family life and ultimately see out whether the positives triumph over the negatives. There are the negative effects of using computer technologies: the isolation of family members, parents bringing their work home. On the other hand, the positives include: being able to associate more easily with the use of social networking systems between relatives and family members that live away from each other.
...r phones update our minds suffer another loss. People are slowly losing their independence to think for themselves and the ability to rely on their own intelligence instead of a computer`s. When this happens, it can endanger the proper development of the personality and hamper the social relationships needed for life together in society. The more we succumb towards technology, the less personality we are capable of retaining. It`s come to the point that the smaller our devices get, the smaller our brains get as well. Technology has vastly improved over just a short amount of time, and societies` dependence on it is strengthened more and more with every day that passes. Yes, it makes life "easier", but the easy way out isn`t always the best way. People don`t just depend on their technology for help anymore. It has come to the point where they depend on it to survive.
Consider a situation where a family is sitting at the dining table, the son pull out his iPhone, connects to Wi-Fi, and starts chatting with his friends on “Facebook”. The father has a Samsung Galaxy S4 in his hands and he is reading the newspaper online and using “Whatsapp” messenger while having his meal. The mother is busy texting her friends. They are all “socializing” but none of them has spoken as much as a single word to each other. This situation can be commonly seen nowadays. Technology has brought us closer and squeezed the distances but in reality, it has taken us away from each other. The rapid growth of technology has brought about significant changes in human lives, especially in their relationships. The latest technologies have turned this world into a “global village” but the way humans interact with each other, the types of relations and their importance has changed a lot. The advancement in technology has brought us close but has also taken us apart.