Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Ku Klux Klan ideology
Early actions and belief of the kkk
Ku Klux Klan perspectives
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Ku Klux Klan ideology
What makes a person hate? Who gives the permission to hate to hate? Some claim God gives the permission; others claim hatred stems from oppression, or society. Leonard Pitts, a syndicated columnist for the Miami Herald believes that the third, society, grants the authorization to hate. However, what is society? Is society an individual or a group of individuals? What form of society bestows the consent to hate?
The major White Supremacy Groups: the Ku Klux Klan (KKK) and the Aryan Nation, both claim the Bible, thus God, gives them the permission to hate. The Klan and Aryan Nation’s members proclaim themselves Christians, and followers of the teachings of the Bible, they declare, "Do not practice homosexuality; it is a detestable sin…Whoever does any of these detestable things will be cut off from the community of Israel.” (The New Living Translation, Leviticus 18:22,29) or "The penalty for homosexual acts is death to both parties. They have committed a detestable act and are guilty of a capital offense.”(The New Living Translation, Leviticus 20:13). They claim God justifies their actions against homosexuals in the previous passages. Yet, they overlook the other laws entailed in the same chapters of Leviticus, claiming they are outdated. Examples of these laws include, “do not eat meat not drained of its blood.” (NLT, Leviticus 19:26), “you must not defile yourself by eating any animal or bird or creeping creature that I have forbidden (i.e. pork).”(Leviticus 20:25) or “Never cut your bodies…or mark your skin with tattoos.”(Leviticus19:28). However, even if the KKK and Aryan Nation did follow all the laws of the Bible, they still would have no right to condemn homosexuals, because as written in the gospel of John, “They kept demanding an answer, so he stood up again and said, ‘All right, stone her. But let those who have never sinned throw the first stones!’” (John 8:7) No one, no matter how holy, is without sin. Furthermore, when the KKK refers to non-whites, they assume they are “an unholy coalition of anti-white, anti-Christian, liberal socialists” and imply that they are “savage…killers and rapists” (The Church of the American Knights, para. 1, 3) they break the cardinal rule, “Never seek revenge or bear a grudge against anyone, but love your neighbor as yourself. I am the Lord.” (Leviticus 19:18). Finally and most importantly, they have forgotten kindness and forgiveness mandated in the words of the Bible, “Be kind to each other, tenderhearted, forgiving one another, just as God through Christ has forgiven you.
Johnny Reeves shows us this when he said “we shall form a great fist and we shall still those who oppose us, we shall strike them out, wipe them out blot them out together we cast a long shadow neighbor and with our shadow we cast our foes in darkness we cast those who are not like us into the arms of Satan” (Witness page 31). Johnny said this because he feels that everyone outside of the Klan is controlled by Satan, and are trying to stop him and his followers. Johnny feels this way even though he may have not ever talked to the person he just bases it off of what race and gender that person is. Also Reynard Alexander was sent a threat in a letter that said “advising me to be careful what I print and what I say, or the day would come when I would not print or say anything again” (Witness page 108). The reason this action was taken is because Reynard Alexander was talking about what the Klan did, and to Johnny Reeves and the Klan they thought what they did was what God wanted. After Johnny Reeves was kicked out of the Klan, Johnny said, “there is only one way to redeem myself with my Klan brothers. Only one way to redeem myself with God” (Witness page 116). Johnny Reeves called the Klan members his brothers which showed me that he greatly cared for them and thought they were good people, and he wanted back in the KKK so bad that he would do
Andrew Sullivan suggests the origins of hate to be evolutionary in his article, “What’s So Bad about Hate?” If hate really is “hard wired,” then that would mean all of the hubbub about obliterating hate is just about as useless as trying to obliterate opposable thumbs. Sullivan’s statement carries so much meaning because it illustrates such a nasty concept with an air of tolerance that is rarely ever considered. He proposes that instead of fighting hate, we accept hate for what it is: an integral part of the human experience. Instead of fighting, we should focus our energy on tolerating hate, and through toleration we can achieve much more than we ever did by trying to combat our very nature.
In the novella Anthem, this can be seen building up in the main character, Equality. As the story progresses, you can see Equality 7-2521, harbour a growing hatred for his fellow brothers. When Equality goes to show his creation to the world council, they reject his idea and shun him, possibly generating that feeling of rage. After Equality gets his idea rejected, he seems to now show the malice that was pushed away all of his life spent in the Community. The novella Anthem shows us that even though hate is a bad emotion, keeping all of those negative feelings felt towards others locked away can expand them and make them even worse.
They hated anyone who was not a white Christian, and would go as far as to kill anyone who was not. This group is the Ku Klux Klan. This group of people were known primarily for their very Nazi-based ideologies, which in turn, they ended up murdering many who were not white, or even burning down the homes and business’ of those who weren’t. They were strongly against the progressive movement of the American Government toward the African American people. Although today this group has lost many in numbers, there are still a surprisingly large amount of people who are part of
Martin Luther King Jr. declared, “Darkness cannot drive out darkness: only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate: only love can do that” ( citation ) . Many people feel as Mr. King did, that love can fight hate, and ultimately love is the answer, the fixer, to this figurative darkness. The word’s love and hate express a strong and perhaps intense feeling for something or someone. However, these intense emotions are commonly used in opposition of each other. It is crucial, though, to note that these powerful emotions can easily cross lines and become blurred. Evidence of this claim is supported by Rempel and Burris’ “...Integrative Theory of Love and Hate,” which outlines what it means to love and what it means to hate, and how humans
Vincent N. Parrillo is a professor who teaches Sociology at William Paterson University in New Jersey. In his short essay “Causes of Prejudice,” he states that there are many kinds of levels in prejudice that are based on six different theories. Within those six different theories, it includes authoritarian personality, self-justification, frustration, socialization, and social norms. According to Race/Class: A State of Being United, numerous writers such as Daniel Winer and Rosabelle Price Walkley has agreed with Vincent N. Parrillo “Causes of Prejudice” and describes the word prejudice as an “attitudinal system of negative beliefs, feelings and action orientation regarding a certain group or groups of people.” There are certainly more than
The KKK was set up to build an all white society based on Christian beliefs. They claim that
economic or social success some minorities have attained may result in increased feelings of resentment by members of the larger population. As Levin & McDevitt (1993:48) argue, resentment can be found to some extent in the personality of most hate crime offenders. It may be directed toward a part...
Hate crimes are done too frequently in the United States. Although we have laws that supposedly regulate them, many people still feel the need to commit acts of violence on people that are different than them. Many of these crimes originate with some sort of hate speech. People get ideas from other people, passed down from previous generations.
The term hate crime first appeared in the late 1980’s as a way of understanding a racial incident in the Howard Beach section of New York City, in which a black man was killed while attempting to evade a violent mob of white teenagers, shouting racial epithets. Although widely used by the federal government of the United States, the media, and researchers in the field, the term is somewhat misleading because it suggests incorrectly that hatred is invariably a distinguishing characteristic of this type of crime. While it is true that many hate crimes involve intense animosity toward the victim, many others do not. Conversely, many crimes involving hatred between the offender and the victim are not ‘hate crimes’ in the sense intended here. For example an assault that arises out of a dispute between two white, male co-workers who compete for a promotion might involve intense hatred, even though it is not based on any racial or religious differences... ...
Altman agrees that hate speech can cause serious psychological damage to those who are victim to it, but maintains that it is not reason enough to regulate hate speech. Instead, he says that the wrong involved in hate speech is the act of treating another individual as a moral subordinate. The interests of these individuals as well as the value of their life are viewed as being inherently less important than the interests and lives of the reference group. From a liberal standpoint (and the standpoint of many non-liberals as well), it is important that every individual has the right to equal existence amongst their fellow human beings. Therefore, Altman’s justification for regulation of hate speech appeals to an intrinsically valuable liberal belief. Altman’s prescription not only appeals to the concerns ...
In the same way as love, hatred requires a certain intimacy between two people. A relationship cannot consist of either love or hate without there first being a close relationship between two individuals. Hawthorne explains that for these emotions to exist, “each, in its utmost development, requires a high degree of intimacy and heart-knowledge” (Hawthorne 246). In order for either of these emotions to be conceived within an individual, the person must first make an effort to acquire a deep understanding of the other person. It is necessary to have a familiarity with someone else’s character in order to either love or hate them, and it is impossible to become close to som...
Hate speech, what is it? The definition of hate speech, according to Mari J. Matsuda, author of 'Assaultive Speech and Academic Freedom, is '?(a word of group of words) of which is to wound and degrade by asserting the inherent inferiority of a group? (151). In my own words hate speech is a humiliation and demeaning slur of words specifically used to disgrace a person for their race, religion, or sexual habits. There is now a controversy if hate speech should be regulated on college campuses or not. I have read a few articles with the author being either for or against regulating hate speech. I believe we should regulate hate speech on college campuses.
In the words of Martin Luther King Jr., “The greatest sin of our time is not the few who has destroyed, but the vast majority who sat idly by.” These words echoed while evaluating the views, knowledge, and evidence given for the consensus of Freedom of Speech and the argument, should Hate Speech be a crime? Although, I strongly am against hate speech of any kind, I am not swayed on the legitimate claim that hate speech should be considered criminal. In saying that, I agree with Kenan Malik when he states that the problem runs deeper than putting more restrictions on what constitutes as hate speech. Morally, human beings have a responsibility in speech and/or deed to treat each other with some
The use of hate should be illegal in the society. This is because the people who think that it is okay for them to commit such a thing, wouldn’t know how it would make the victim feel emotionally or physically about it. The people who would commit these types of hate speeches wouldn’t understand what the victim has gone through. For example, The “N” word is targeted towards African Americans, If a African American was called this by white male or female or any other race in general, They wouldn’t know how the African American male would feel. This is because of the African Americans past and what they have went through. In the article “The Case For Restricting Hate Speech” it states,” Hate speeches is doing something. It results in tangible