Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Impact of the media on politics
Impact of the media on politics
Impact of the media on politics
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Impact of the media on politics
Herman Cain is a well-renowned African American author, business owner, radio host, and columnist who ran for Presidential Campaign in 2012, but did not secure enough pledge delegates or funding to secure a nomination. He was also an active member of the Georgia Tea Party. Prior to his campaign for presidency, Cain has lead the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, Ohana Bench for two years. He also opposed Bill Clinton’s plan of healthcare in 1993 and fought against it. In 2011, Herman Cain announced his decision to run for 2012 presidential campaign under the Republican Party. He was the most covered candidate of the 2012 campaigns, gearing large coverage for his outspoken views. However, it is likely that his race and ideology could have …show more content…
As referred to in Campbell, the perceptual screen plays a strong role in voters when it comes to viewing issues and their own ideology. Thus, individuals only tend to see issues that are closely aligned with their own ideological views. That is, voters will lean more with issues that are dominating our society and their preferred party’s way of handling the matter. As the perceptual screen of candidates and partisanship becomes more central, it is harder to change their views. For example, in a democratic individual, when views are strong, the voter will most likely perceive issues or questions that are more in line with their own beliefs. In Cain’s campaign, Republican voters with strong ideology will tend to view Cain as a strong leader. Thus, not taking into account the other sides perspective, outlining strong perceptual bias. There are many factors that lead to partisan stereotypes, with Party Identification being one of the strong …show more content…
That is, the goal of Cain’s campaign was to show his commitment and dedication to show citizens of the United States that he can make a real difference. In his mind, he states that he has already beaten out former candidates who held an office position or had more recognition. Thus, his momentum was working well with the public as he was actively promoting himself through the use of the internet. However, what would be better is Cain attempting to face the public at conventions to further expand his recognition. Known as the method of “Going Public,” it is essential for candidates to gain support as it has been shown that those who tend to lose support will eventually have their campaigns suspended or drop out of the entire race. Months after early momentum, Cain continues to dominate in straw polls. This time, he managed to win the Florida GOP Republican presidency straw poll with 37% of the votes casted, with Rick Perry, trailing behind with 15% of the votes. A total of 2,657 votes were casted. Cain also won the TeaCon Midwest with 77% of the casted votes. From this data, it appears that Herman Cain was a popular candidate in online polls. However, he suddenly lost his momentum when accusations started to come out against
For instance, Menand writes, “The fraction of the electorates that responds to substantive political argument is hugely outweighed by the fraction that responds to slogans, misinformation...random personal association.” Mass voters mostly pursue the wrong or irrelevant information that are irrelevant to the election; thus lead them to vote for the candidates which they do not really want. Their choices mostly lack rationalities. Many voters who are slightly informative think that they are participating in a certain issue and considering the value of the candidates; yet most of them do not have adequate information and knowledge in understanding the meaning of political terms. Voters lack judgment on their government and candidates, their minds are easily being brainwashed by a small amount of people who has informative approaches in participating governmental issue, and affect their
Furthermore, he introduces the idea that popular polarization is different from partisan polarization and that sorting has occurred within the parties. Meaning that “those who affiliate with a party… are more likely to affiliate with the ideologically ‘correct’ party than they were [before]” (Fiorina et al. 61). To illustrate the concept of polarization he uses a figure with marble filled urns. These urns depict red blue and gray marbles with r for republican d for democrat and i for independent. When polarization, all gray independent marbles disappear becoming either red or blue.
In Sinclair’s analysis, voters, political activists, and politicians all play significant roles in creating and enforcing the ideological gap between the two major parties in Congress. This trend of polarization is rooted in the electorate
Millions of citizens around the United States, at some point in their lifetime, obtain a political ideology. Typically, their political values are influenced by their parents. Political scientists have identified that around age eleven, children begin to develop political opinion. According to Wilson’s, American Government: Institutions and Policies, 91% of a high school senior class indentified with the same party as their parents (American Government 158). I can attest to this since I in fact have the same party association as my parents. Ever since I was young, I categorized myself as a Democrat due to the fact that my elders were. However, as I have matured I am able to recognize the beliefs and ideologies that followers of certain parties possess. Since I have been more exposed to the political arena I am able analyze the issues more critically and hence I continuously question whether I should classify myself as a Democrat or Republican.
Bias More perceive liberal bias than conservative bias” George Gallup.Web. September 2011 [cited January 2012]
There is much debate in the United States whether or not there is polarization between our two dominate political parties. Presidential election results have shown that there is a division between the states; a battle between the Democratic blue states and the Republican red states. And what is striking is that the “colors” of these states do not change. Red stays red, and blue stays blue. Chapter 11 of Fault Lines gives differing views of polarization. James Wilson, a political science professor at Pepperdine University in California, suggests that polarization is indeed relevant in modern society and that it will eventually cause the downfall of America. On the contrast, Morris Fiorina, a political science professor at Stanford University, argues that polarization is nothing but a myth, something that Americans should not be concerned with. John Judis, a senior editor at The New Republic, gives insight on a driving force of polarization; the Tea Party Movement. Through this paper I will highlight the chief factors given by Wilson and Judis which contribute to polarization in the United States, and will consider what factors Fiorina may agree with.
...duals recall information, the goal of this study is to examine the role that these imperfections may play in the symbolic politics process. An understanding of the role that memory plays in internalizing and responding to symbolic appeals is important for three reasons. First, it can provide a more in depth understanding of how appeals are encoded and how cognitive functions coupled with individuals’ biases influence how political messages are recollected. Second, it can help scholars assess the extent to which distorted or incorrect recollections of information influence individuals’ choices. Third, understanding the role that memory plays further contributes to scholarly understandings of the psychological mechanisms that drive symbolic choice. The following section will offer a synthesis of symbolic politics and cognitive neuroscience theories of memory.
... Issues and Inheritance in the Formation of Party Identification. American Journal of Political Science, 970-988. Oakes, P., Alexander, H., & John, T. (1994). Stereotyping and social reality.
Kanai, Feidlen, Firth, and Rees (2011) captured political attitudes on a single-tem measure where participants used a five-point scale to rate themselves from very liberal to very conservative. Even though this may seem like a simple measure, it a...
Mullainathan, S., & Washington, E. (2009). Sticking with your vote: Cognitive dissonance and political attitudes. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 1(1), 86-111.
On the spectrum of politics (or any other ideologically-based matter), personal opinions will inevitably vary from one extreme on the left to the opposite on the right. In a governing system such as that of the United States, where the population directly elects representatives to govern, the position a candidate holds on the spectrum pertaining to certain issues in relation to other candidates becomes increasingly important. Theoretically, two people coming from different backgrounds and different political parties should provide contrasting opinions on major issues, allowing an individual voter to clearly and easily see the difference between his options and choose which option would be best for himself and his country. According to the Median Value Theorem, however, in most cases, the candidate's personal views and priorities cannot be considered if a victorious election is the ultimate goal, leading to nearly identical candidates at the time of election. Although this theory contains flaws, both theoretically in the actual workings and ideologically in the results, it is still valid and important to today's political strategies.
The addressed memorandum will explain the media scheduling process for Herman Cain and his potential interviews. The direct aim is to ensure the interviews garner strong impressions, specifically from Republicans, while limiting cost. The memorandum will describe the rationale behind why certain media vehicles were used. Moreover, specific media outlets have significant impressions and circulations that must be taken into account when promoting an individual such as Herman Cain. Television and print are the key choices used for highlighting Herman Cain.
It is especially true for subjects who come from Indiana. The predicted probabilities also showcase that the local frame affects the perceptions of the public on the severity of the problem. Furthermore, there was no evidence of the benefits frame changing the behavioral intentions of the subjects. The study proves that the public may see the issue of climate change as serious or not serious depending on the frame used. The public understands the local frame making them appreciate the severity of the impacts of climate change. Also, the use of local frame helps to bring together the Republicans and Democrats on the issue of climate change. In particular, it increases the probability of the Republicans to agree with the behavioral intentions making them indistinguishable to Democrats.
Such factors are their educational background, socioeconomic status, gender and other demographics. There will be a definite difference between a person who has an excellent academic background and a person who does not have such qualification. In the same way, socioeconomic status of a person also decides how well a person engages politically (Riedel and Sullivan, 2001). For instance, an individual who comes from a very lower class will not pay heed to political system of the country because his basic concern is to feed his children and family. His priorities will be different from a person who has all basic necessities. In the same way a middle aged person who has an adequate knowledge and experience regarding the political system of a country and a young person who is just an amateur will have significant differences of political attitudes and political efficacy. So attitudes and experiences also affect the political efficacy and ultimately the voting behaviors of the individuals (Sheerin and Celia Anne, 2007). Mass Media is one of the tools to build these attitudes and political
Polls have a role in political campaigns and shaping government policies but recently the reliability of polls have come into question. The Republican polls provided the information to Presidential candidate Mitt Romney that he had a strong chance of winning key battle ground states. The polls showed "he had at least 267 out of the 270 electoral votes needed to win the election" (Hoffman). When watching the election night returns the reality was Romney only received 206 Electoral College votes far away from the magic number needed to win or tie the national election. The candidate’s team used these polls and focused on states that showed a strong chance to gain votes. Romney focused his energy in Ohio and Pennsylvania, both states he eventually lost.