Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Importance of diversity in organizations
Importance of diversity in organizations
COCA-COLA COMPANY versus PEPSI COMPANY Quenching Their Customers’ Thirst for New Beverages
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Importance of diversity in organizations
With Gatorade being connected with PepsiCo, the top and number one competitor to both, Pepsi and Gatorade, would be Coca-Cola and PowerAde (under Coca-Cola). According to Hoovers, next on the list that would come close to competing with PepsiCo and Coca-Cola would be Mondelez International, Inc. (Hoovers.com). Gatorade is in the “Energy, Sports, Health & Nutritional Drink Manufacturing (primary)” industry (Hoovers.com).
With the two main competitors being with PepsiCo and Coca-Cola in the beverage manufacturing industry and both companies producing multiple products, it is no wonder why they are head to head in almost everything they produce. PepsiCo has their headquarters located in New York (Hoovers.com), with over 274,000 employees totaled for the year of 2013. PepsiCo was founded in 1919 and have their primary industry considered ‘Soft Drink Manufacturing.’ Going back on Hoovers, PepsiCo surpassed $66 billion in 2013 with a net income of $6.74 billion (Hoovers.com). PepsiCo relies heavily on their marketing skills and the ability to advertise their product and make their product the go to for consumers, “To promote its products, PepsiCo uses a combination of sales incentives, discounts, advertising, and other marketing activities. Advertising and other marketing activities totaled $3.7 billion in 2012 vs. $3.5 billion in 2011” (Hoovers.com). On Hoover, it went on further to state what PepsiCo’s strategy is, “Key to PepsiCo's growth strategy is to drive snack brands to new markets as it bolts on new and more nutritious foods categories through small acquisitions and alliances.”
When it comes to Coca-Cola, producer of PowerAde, Hoovers states, their headquarters are located in Georgia and employed 150,900 in the year 20...
... middle of paper ...
...try of sports beverages, have a low bargaining power. These particular industries of sports beverages have a low bargaining power because of the competition within the industry. Gatorade is not able to charge too much for their product because of their key competitor in PowerAde and opposite with PowerAde not being able to charge too much because of losing their consumer base to Gatorade. The two things that Gatorade and PowerAde have in common are their brands images and the loyalty created too many consumers. So their price strategies do not base completely off one another because they have buyers that will stay loyal to what they believe best works for their body, as well as taste the best and provides the highest recover factor. But, companies do have to be conscious to what their competition is doing to be able to maintain the loyal base they have created.
Pepsi by all means, will not hesitate to when promoting their products and in fact, Pepsi has been spending over one billion dollars on advertisements, gaining thirty-four millions Facebook likes and two million Twitter followers (O’Brien. "Coca Cola vs. Pepsi: Comparing Sales, Earnings & More"). They also sponsor some of the famous American sports for instance, NFL (national football league), the NHL (national hockey league), and just recently, they have also replaced Coke, as a NBA sponsor (national basketball league) who was a major sponsor for two years in a row (Alesci, Rooney). Pepsi has a huge impact of today's generation and will not balk at anything to come to the
PepsiCo, Inc. and The Coca-Cola Company are both strong companies with billions in sales each year. A creditor, investor or business planner would each evaluate the company in different ways using different ratio and financial analysis. As an investor, I see Pepsi as a larger company with more assets and I would expect them to have a larger market share as a result. Coca-Cola, however, appears to be a stable company capable of growth with investment priorities in their own companies. Slight changes by either company could propel them to the head of the industry, although they are both industry leaders.
Competitive Environment i. Market Share Coca-Cola and PepsiCo are the two largest players in the industry, with 43% and 31% of the market share, respectively. ii. Implications Key success factors in the industry are a strong brand presence, maintaining customer loyalty, exploring new markets and distribution channels, as well as offering a diversified product line.
Coca cola has always dominated the markets outside United States unlike Pepsi’s internationalization strategy that took too long. Therefore, the long-term brand of Coca cola and better pricing strategies would help in competing with Pepsi. Unlike, Pepsi, Coca cola had targeted entering into partnership and alliances with local distributors and firms. This helps to develop strong relationship within the domestic firms to reduce the domestic barriers and thus, enhance the company’s competitiveness (Thabet, 2015). Lastly, the Asian markets consist of related and supporting industries to the soft drink industry that helps the companies in gaining a strong competitive position in the markets. Based on the competitive advantage of nation’s model, Coca cola has more home based advantages to develop a competitive advantage in relation to other countries on a global
Control of market share is the key issue in this case study. The situation is both Coke and Pepsi are trying to gain market share in this beverage market, which is valued at over $30 billion a year. Just how is this done in such a competitive market is the underlying issue. The facts are that each company is coming up with new products and ideas in order to increase their market share.
The purpose of this report is to compare financial reports from the two largest soft drink manufacturers in the world. The Pepsi Co. and Coca Cola have been the industry's leaders in their market since the early 1900's. I will use relevant figures to determine profitability, and break down key ratios in profitability, liquidity, and solvency. By breaking down financial statements, and converting them to percentages and ratios, comparisons can be made between competitors regardless of size.
Carbonated soft drinks lead the Soft drink market. In the U.S. the industry is majorly dominated by two companies i.e. Pepsi and Coca-Cola, whereby they dominate about 70% of the carbonated soft drinks market share. It is a high competitive market between these two giants who fight on who will have the majority of the market. Soft drinks have monopolized the industry year after year with their market dominance. The industry has massive economies of scale, large bottling and distribution networks.
Through combining beverage, fast-food, and snack-food businesses into one conglomerate, PepsiCo has implemented a strategy that encompasses an excellent opportunity for matching up the different segments value chains, enticing skill transfers, and incurring cost sharing. A great example of a value chain match up that resulted in cost sharing would be the when PepsiCo combined its original carbonated beverage business with other beverage business such as the various juice and tea brands it acquired. These two business share many similarities between value chain activities and were very easy to incorporate into the existing beverage business. Our team also sees a great opportunity for Pepsi to cross-brand market its Frito-Lay products with its beverage product lines, particularly its carbonated beverage segment.
As the world 's largest manufacturer and distributor of non-alcoholic beverages, Coca-Cola is certainly no stranger to global marketing. Established in the US, Coca-Cola initiated its global expansion in 1919 and now markets to more than 200 countries worldwide. It is one of the most recognizable brands on the planet and also owns a large portfolio of other soft drink brands including Schweppes, Oasis, 5 alive, Kea Oar, Fanta, Lilt, Dr Pepper, Sprite and PowerAde. Despite this, Coca-Cola often struggles to maintain its market share over its main rival PepsiCo in some overseas markets, particularly Asian countries.
Another market leader Pepsi formed in 1893by Caleb Bradham, also formed in one of the drug stores in North Carolina in the 18th century. This brand gives tough competition to its competitors. Pepsi Cola still leads the beverages industry and continues to capture the hearts and minds of millions of consumers with its dazzling taste and refreshing qualities.
Place: PepsiCo uses a global network for distributing its products to consumers. Most PepsiCo products are available at retailers, such as supermarkets, grocery stores, and convenience stores. However, customers can access PepsiCo-licensed merchandise like tumblers and t-shirts through retailers and their websites. Based on this element of the marketing mix, PepsiCo’s places for distributing its products are mostly non-online
The Coca-Cola Company is the largest non-alcoholic beverage company in the world who owns, sells and distributes more than 600 different non-alcoholic beverages in 200 countries and more. “The amount of product Coca-Cola sells equates to 1.9 billion or 3.2% of the total amount of non-alcoholic beverages served worldwide” (Jurevicius, 2017). Additionally, they have a large/dominant market share, enormous brand recognition and a huge advantage in the number of consumers they can reach. Not to mention the Coca-Cola Company also owns other reputable brands such as Sprite, Fanta, Minute Maid and even Powerade to name a few that combine to earn the company, approximately, an additional $1 billion dollars annually. Because Coca-Cola are a huge presence in this industry, the company has the ability to beat out its competitors by underpricing some of its items and can exercise market power over its suppliers. Like Coca-Cola, Snapple has a strong foothold in their diverse brands they offer as well.
Coke and Pepsi have been raging war for over a century now, turning their sodas into a multi-billion-dollar industry. Coke has been able to drive more earnings for its bottom line, and while Coke’s net income has been trending downward in recent years, it manages to stay ahead thanks to superior margins. Pepsi, on the other hand, has produced consistent net profit margins of around 10%, while Coke margins have been in the 15-18% range for the past several years (O’Brien). Every company has a Market Cap, which is basically a fancy way of saying how much the company is worth, and Coca-Cola’s market cap is a whopping $180 billion. Pepsi’s Market Cap is $150 billion, which may not seem like a big difference, but $30 billion is a lot of cheddar. Therefore, Coca-Cola owns 51% of the soft drink market, whereas Pepsi only owns 22% of it. Coke claims to own a total of 35 different brands, including Fanta, Sprite, Powerade, Vitaminwater, and many others. Pepsi owns 22 different brands, including 7up, Gatorade, and Mountain Dew “Coke (Coca-Cola) vs Pepsi - Soda
PepsiCo's mission listed on their website said as follows: "Our mission is to be the world's premier consumer products company focused on convient foods and beverages. We seek to produce finanical rewards to investors, business partners, and communities in which we operate. And in everything we do, we strive for honesty, fairness, and intergrity." Their mission is done through programs with environmental care, activities that aid the society, and a commitment to build shareholder value. PepsiCo puts significant emphasis on shareholders throughout all aspects of the company.
As a leader in the market with a product that has virtually no competition, the price should be slightly higher than current products, yet still be accessible by the target audience. “Structure determines whether limiting price competition is even feasible, while relative position dictates the degree to which a leader can set and enforce limits on price warfare” (Lele, 1992, p.15). When the competition produces a comparable product, pricing should gradually lower to remain competitive.