Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Voter suppression in the united states essays
Voter turnout in the us
Voter turnout in the us
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Voter suppression in the united states essays
People who do not vote forfeit their right to complain about politics. They spit in the face of every single person who fought for their right to vote, and in the faces of people who want to but can not vote. It is for the same reason that a child who says that they do not care what the family has for dinner should not complain when dinner is broccoli.
I became politically active in 2015, shortly after Donald Trump announced his candidacy for the Republican Nomination. I saw his policy proposals online, but I could not believe that someone could seriously bring up such racist, xenophobic, and ridiculous ideas in a presidential campaign bid. Nobody thought Trump would win. But slowly Republican Primary Candidates dropped out of the race, leaving
…show more content…
The nerve of those people, for throwing their votes away like that when there were thousands of politically-minded people who had no way of voicing their opinions in politics. Many Americans seem to take the right to vote for granted and they do not see the harm in not voting. But the politically-minded who do not have that right know how important fulfilling the obligation to vote is. Non-citizen immigrants know. Ex-cons know. Minors know. People who are the victims of voter-suppression laws definitely know. But do the people who decided not to vote know? I argue that no, they do not. If they did know then they would pay attention and fulfil their duty as citizens eligible to …show more content…
Some do not care about their obligation to vote. Some intend to vote, but forget to go to the polls. Some initially do not vote out of protest. Whatever their reason the result is the same: Their voice is not heard by the government, and their opinion is not accounted for. When a person does not vote, what the government hears is not,”I disagree with both parties therefore I will not side with one,” or “The Electoral College is corrupt and prevents the citizenry from actually participating.” The government does not hear their voices at all. Because they have not made their voices heard, even though the chance was available, they lose their right to voice an opinion. As a liberal in Texas, I understand why someone would look at the Electoral College and Winner-Takes-All based votes, and decide that it does not matter either way. One vote in Wyoming is worth three in California, and if you are red in a blue state or vice-versa it may feel hopeless. When I feel like that I remember that for a few glorious minutes on election day 2016, Texas turned blue. If one of the most conservative states, with the second-highest population (and therefore the more votes it takes to make an impact) can briefly flip to the other party, then what could have happened if more democrats had voted. Maybe the past nine months since January would have been very
Assuming that they are left out and forgotten by the system, these nonparticipants feel resentment for the isolation, and perpetuate the vicious cycle of inactivity. The "silent majority" of the American people is now accepted as the status quo, the way things have always been and will be. Voter turnout is now the litmus test of political participation. Non-voters are becoming rampant in our democracy, with voter turnout hovering around a low 60% for general elections. At this rate, a candidate would have to win over 80% of that 60% vote in order to have true majority support.
Without mandatory voting, some people chose not to vote because they do not care, or are uninformed. Forcing these people to vote could lead to random choices when voters do not take responsibility to study the candidate's position on specific topics. "It may increase the number of informal votes, ballot papers which are not marked according to the rules for voting," _ Matt Rosenberg_. Compulsory voting may lead many people to not truly vote, but to put their name on a ballot and turn it in. While this is possible, a greater number of potentially interested people would also vote. If people are required to vote, the country will obtain every eligible voters’ opinions. Some of the citizens may not care who is elected, but they still can have a say if they want to. Without mandatory voting, the people who do not want to vote, do not and went about with their life. "Because a majority of the voters are turning out to cast ballots, the formation of the government can be a more accurate reflection of what the population of any nation wants," _Asia-Pacific Economics_. In a government with two different parties, the majority of the citizens decide how they want the government to be formed till the next election.
Contrary to what may seem logical, majority votes under a compulsory voting system do not necessarily represent accurate opinion. Rather, compulsion encourages apathy, characterized by “a lack of concern, enthusiasm or interest” ("Definition of Voter Apathy"). In essence, voter apathy “occurs when voters decide that they really don’t care who wins or loses” ("Definition of Voter Apathy") due to “a general feeling that a person’s vote doesn’t matter or even a distrust in regards to how the election is actually being run” ("Definition of Voter Apathy").
The Chartist movement (a working class political movement) in 1840 believed “People had no one else but themselves to blame for the actions of their politicians” (Nash). What Mr. Nash and the chartist movement believe couldn’t be more on the spot. This country has gotten to the point where people find it hard to walk down their street to the elementary school where the voting polls are, and take a few minutes to cast a vote. A vote that millions of people around the world wish they were able to have them selves. With all the political suffrage that goes on through the world and people forced to love a leader, these no-shows should be thankful to live in a democracy. A place where elections aren’t rigged and the people are truly heard. This is why the topic of voting turnout needs to be raised. Also it’s very annoying to hear people complaining about our President when they did not even vote. It’s a very bad habit to not vote, and it needs to change with the younger citizens of this country. Helping younger people see the importance of voting needs to start with technological and educational ideas while expanding all the way to social event ideas. Only then will America’s ability to find answers to voting turnout increase.
“Just Vote.” That phrase has been tossed around for years but what if people don’t want to vote? The United States of America is a democracy but many people do not vote. Since World War II, no presidential election has ever involved 65% or more of registered voters. Have you ever thought about the people that don’t vote and why they don’t vote? Here are three reasons why Americans should not be required to vote: Sometimes people can be irresponsible, government should not force us to vote if we truly don’t want to, and we need to respect people’s wishes.
It’s not an everyday thing where you need to leave your house and go vote. In primary election of 2016, I voted. When I stepped into the poll, I felt like I was making a very important decision. At the same time, I felt like how most of us feel when we vote; a little fish in the ocean. We may not notice it but every vote counts. It has been proven that when a majority of the population votes during an election, there is a higher chance of having a successful democracy. That’s how I feel. The more votes, the
In fact, according to Elections Canada, during the 2011 federal elections, only 61.1% of Canadians exerted their duty as citizen. Hence, some think compulsory voting can remediate the situation. However, mandatory voting is what really could hurt democracy. By forcing every eligible voter to go to the polls, misinformed voters will randomly cast their ballot. Sceptics may believe that by fining individuals who refuse to go to the polls, there will be less ignorant voters. For example, in Australia, where voting is compulsory, Australians who do not cast their ballots have to “pay a 20$ penalty” (Australian Electoral Commission). However, by financially penalising citizens who do not exert their duty, many will be so dissatisfied by the incumbent government that they will simply vote for a party that would not make voting an obligation. These people would ignore the party’s other policies instead of being informed on all the challenges that the country faces and how each party plans on solving them. Nonetheless, the elections are an occasion to elect a leader whose ideologies on many aspects, from immigration to the environment, matches the voter’s most. As a responsible voter, one has to know the policies of each party and has to try to obtain enough “social-scientific knowledge to [assess] these positions” (Brennan 11), which takes a lot of time. Therefore, compulsory voting would make voters more informed, but only on a narrow aspect while ignoring the other issues that should be taken into consideration when choosing the party they will vote for. All in all, mandatory voting would hurt democracy despite the higher participation
The people shake their heads and wave their fingers in disapproval towards the government from local levels to national levels--mimes of America. These mimes act out their opinion rather than using their voice to declare what they want. Pretending to perform action rather than completing action, these mimes dissimulate so they do not feel excluded. America is blessed with the opportunity to live in a country endowed with such great freedoms. In the United States, the basic freedoms for voting are often taken for granted and unutilized by many Americans, especially Texans. Despite the large size of Texas, the historic background of voting and other factors have caused the state to experience low voter turnout.
Voter suppression is no surprise to the American Government. It goes unseen by most. of the public, or they realize the suppression of voters after the damage has already been done. done.
There are two sets of theories that explains why the President’s party loses seats in the midterm election. Those two theories are 1. The coattails / surge-and-decline and 2. The economic / popularity
In Wide Sargasso Sea, Jean Rhys explored the origins of Bertha Antoinetta Rochester, the madwoman in the attic from Charlotte Brontë’s Jane Eyre. Reimagined by Rhys as Antoinette Cosway Mason, Sargasso Sea documents Antoinette’s troubled adolescence and her eventual descent into apparent insanity. Rhys’ choice to investigate the life of a character who was already doomed to a tragic end focuses the informed reader on the development of Antoinette’s madness, and a potential explanation for her inevitable fate. In this essay, I will investigate one key aspect of Antoinette’s fragile state, the complex ethnic identity she forms during her adolescence, particularly in regards to her childhood friendship with Tia, and how that confused identity relates to her tragic end. A victim of many circumstances beyond her control, Antoinette’s identification with both Black and White culture fractures her sense of self, alienates her from both, and is an important factor to how she is degraded by her husband. Between the upheaval of post-emancipation Jamaica and her own ever-changing social position, Antoinette finds herself, “caught between two cultures… but never able to identify fully with either.” (Kadhim 2011) This incomplete sense of self is incompatible with the world she lived in, and, in combination with her inability to control her own destiny, it informs her disastrous marriage and the eventual abuse and imprisonment she suffers from her husband, leading to madness, and her tragic fate.
8% of college students said they forgot to vote, and over 12% of those not in college said they forgot to vote or send in a ballot. For students in college, 12% versus 19% of those not in college said that the reason they did not vote is because they were not interested or felt their vote did not count. Another reason for not voting was being too busy or stating that voting conflicted with work for 35% of college students and 30% of those not in colleges. Lastly, “other reasons” to not vote was listed as the number one category for those not in college at 33% and 21% for those in college. With every survey taken, there are limitations.
Walking into the polling place on voting day is always a great thing. There are people of all ages casting their vote and making their opinions known. A few older members of the community walk out of the booths and a few middle aged parents walk in to take their place. A school bus from the local high school drops of a busload of twelfth grade seniors, all eager to vote for the first time. There are several other young people chatting with friends about how they are going to vote on various issues. This might seem like a rare occurrence, but the same thing is happening all over the country.
What many young people lack in voting is the motivation to do something, and if they were to truly have it they would go out and vote. Take Ben Miller, the teen in the article, who said that he didn’t really have anything he was motivated to vote about. When asked if he were to have attended a candidate forum on his own when he couldn’t vote, he said “No way!” Teens are people who need a lot of motivation to do something, and when it’s something they strongly believe in they go all
Lisa Hill a professor at the University of Adelaide who spreads the yes, in mandatory voting, “If voting were mandatory in the U.S., people would be inspired to pay more attention to campaigns... ” (Junior Scholastic). Many might think their vote doesn't count, so government should express how it does and not make it a unpleasurable activity by making it mandatory. However much, there is truth in that point, an election simplifies down to one person over another other. My point still stands that unwanted force is never good and America should not accept that. It is human nature to show displeasure to forced activities that weren't done by will before hand. It isn't convenient for some citizens, and if registering for voting was much easier that there might be a higher voter turnout (Scholastic Magazine).If the government wants a higher turnout, than people shouldn't be making time for the government, the government should make more time for the people and not stripping us of our freedom.