Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
American civil rights movement
American civil rights movement
Checks and balances in America
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: American civil rights movement
Our nation’s democracy is protected in a variety of ways. It’s protected by the soldiers who every day risk their lives for us. It’s protected by the checks and balances of the government that prevent one branch from overpowering the others. It’s protected by our freedoms of religion and speech and assembly. But one of the greatest protectors of a free society is peaceful resistance because of its ability to direct government policies to the wants of the people. The roots of this nation itself can be traced back to the peaceful resistance. After the British had imposed the Stamp Tax on the American colonies, delegates from each of the colonies convened in a council later named the “Stamp Act Congress.” Here, the delegates all agreed to boycott the overtaxed English goods. The widespread refusal to buy English goods was facilitated by the Sons of Liberty, and as a result, the British economy suffered. This first American example of peaceful resistance set the stage for the Revolutionary War, during which we liberated ourselves from the British …show more content…
motherland. If not for this act of bloodless opposition, America itself might not exist today. Peaceful resistance not only helped build a nation, it also won civil rights for the citizens in it.
Some of the most famous examples of these can be found during the African-American Civil Rights movement. In 1955, an African-American seamstress named Rosa Parks challenged her city’s segregation laws through her refusal to give up her bus seat to a white man. During the 1968 Mexico City Olympics, athletes Tommie Smith and John Carlos raised black-gloved fists during the American national anthem to acknowledge black power. The March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom happened during this time too. One of the largest political rallies for human right, the March on Washington is a prime example of how peaceful resistance can instigate social change without shedding blood. It was almost a century of amicable demonstrations like these that African-Americans were able to win the same civil rights as their fellow
countrymen. Peaceful resistance is still being used by people to fight the injustices of today and the Muslim Ban protests are a good example of this. Shortly after President Donald Trump had taken office, he signed an order banning refugees from seven different majority-Muslim countries. President Trump’s rationale behind this order was that preventing immigration from these countries would also prevent the incoming of radical terrorists into America. The public reacted by leading protests at various airports. Citizens protested with cries of “let them in” and “I stand with my Muslim brothers and sisters.” Finally, a few days later, Judge James Robart issued a restraining order against Trump’s Muslim ban. Though it is not clear if Judge Robart’s decision was directly influenced by the protests, the protests did succeed in raising awareness and demonstrating a common public feeling. Peaceful resistance helps positively impact a free society because of its powerful ability to speak out against government injustice. Famous Founding Father and third president of the United States Thomas Jefferson had written about this in the Declaration of Independence: “Whenever any form of government becomes destructive of [peoples’ rights], it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it.” It was through this method that American citizens were able to form a country, achieve equality for minorities, and provide opportunities for everyone.
On the eve of the American Revolution, colonists have signified and ensured their newly discovered identity by coming together to rid the American colonies of the British monarchical influence. Throught means of newly developed legislatures, both passive and aggressive protests, and formation of propaganda were the American colonists able to engrave their identity on the future of America forever.
“Common sense will tell us, that the power which hath endeavored to subdue us, is of all others, the most improper to defend us.” Such words scribed by the Revolutionary radical Thomas Paine epitomized the drive behind the American Revolution of the 18th century. For nearly two hundred years, the citizens of the American Colonies had been fastened securely to the wrist of the mother country, England. They had tolerated the tyrannous rule, but not without the simmer of rebellious thoughts. As England piled tax after tax onto their colonies, thoughts of revolution and revolt sprung up in the minds of the colonists and brewed there, waiting for a catalyst to drive them into action. The catalyst ignited on January 10th, 1776 when Thomas Paine published his fiery pamphlet ‘Common Sense’. The 48-page pamphlet presented before the colonists a vision for independence that had never been conceived before. It radically altered the course of the Revolution and would later find itself molding the foundation of America’s government indefinitely.
The Revolutionary War was one of America’s earliest battles and one of many. Although, many came to America to gain independence from Great Britain many still had loyalty for the King and their laws. Others believed that America needs to be separated from Great Britain and control their own fate and government. I will analyze the arguments of Thomas Paine and James Chalmers. Should America be sustained by Great Britain or find their own passage?
Patrick Henry’s statements resonates with the colonists because it adequately captures their grievances and feelings against the British, who have made their lives exceedingly difficult. Unlike many Demagogues who use their words to gain personal power or control, Patrick Henry uses his words to rally the colonists towards a good common cause that ultimately leads to the creation of the strongest nation in the world. The power, conviction and language of Henry’s speech lead to a revolution that would go n to change the course of
“Give me liberty or give me death!” This statement from Patrick Henry’s “Speech to the Virginia Convention,” delivered to the House of Burgesses, has been quoted by many, becoming almost cliché. However, the declaration is truly understood by a select few. The unjust Stamp Act passed by the British crown in 1765, brought fame and notoriety to Henry as he spoke out against the unjust taxation without representation. Ten years later on the eve of revolution, Henry calls upon the Colonial government of which he is part, to act for the betterment of the people. Patrick Henry attempts to persuade the House of Burgesses to revolt and declare war against Britain by logically convincing them that it is their natural right to be free and calling on their patriotism and pride as leaders of colonial America.
America’s triumphant victory in the Revolutionary War was an event that was crucial for the continuation and prosperous growth that would emerge and flourish in the United States. Luckily, the Americans defeated the British with their experienced generals and high spirits of Patriots that advocated democracy across the land. The winning of this war and signing of the Treaty of Paris resulted in a new world for colonists, where they were now recognized as an independent country that could create its own democratic legislature and governing documents. However, if the outcome of the war would have been different, life in the colonies would have led had a completely different path for our society today.
One of the most obvious examples of democracy’s endurance is the resistance displayed by the townspeople against their invaders. The oppression and invasion of the conquerors arouse, instead of crush, the desire in the defeated for freedom. These people, who have lived with the idea of a free rule of democracy, refuse to be chained down under the oppressive rule of the conquerors. It is for this reason that they strike back at their invaders. As said by Mayor Orden to Colonel Lanser of the aggressors, “ ‘The people don’t like to be conquered, sir, and so they will not be. Free men cannot start a war, but once it is started, they can fight on in defeat. Herd men, followers of a leader, cannot do that, and so it is always the herd men who win battles and the free men who win wars.’ ” [pp. 185-186] Thus, it is because of their freedom that people believing in the free rule of democracy do not let down and die when conquered, do not accept their being robbed of their rights, and fight against what is unjustly done to them.
“Don’t fire unless fired on. But if they mean to have war, let it begin here”(John Parker). My fellow colonists, we are here to talk about about the problem facing our colonies. The dilemma we are here to discuss is the Patriots trying to leave Britain’s rule. British government has done nothing wrong. The Patriots are completely overreacting, and The Sons of Liberty have taken this to an extreme. It is not a tremendous deal that Britain has taxed us, we should help our mother country climb out of its debt. In all of the battles our king has participated in, they have been trying to protect us, and it would not be smart to flee from their protection. My fellow colonists, if we go to war with our motherland, we shall lose the ability to protect ourselves from other lands and rivaling armies, our economy shall fail, and the cost the war shall be devastating.
While non-violent protests were politically correct, many participants often put their lives, families and property in danger. Particularly in the south, the KKK and other white supremacist groups gained a reputation for church bombings, lynching and other violent acts against minorities. Despite pacifist idealism in a public protest, it didn’t mean black were willing to let their homes, churches and loved ones go undefended. Many took it upon themselves to arm and protect their communities through any means necessary, and by acquiring as many weapons they could get their hands on. Many black southerners were prepared to meet violence with
Additionally, an example of activism comes from the Black Lives Matter Movement that was present through players in the NBA and in College Basketball. The Black Lives Matter Movement was created in the wake of several police brutality events. These events include the killing of Travon Martin and Eric Garner. After the death and police investigation many protests where sparked many protests and most notable silent protests through the phrase “I Can’t Breathe” in the NFL, NCAA, and the
America: A Nation of Defiance The United States of America were not always the United States of America. Long before the United States became an independent nation, we were under the rule of the British monarchy. Before that, we were an unknown land that was inhabited primarily by I... ...
The political structure of America changed dramatically as a consequence of the Revolution. When the colonists were divided by loyalty towards Britain and those who wished for separation, the amount of determination that Patriots had was reflected through powerful spokespeople and pieces of writing. The Pe...
As Americans, we all have rights of our own like freedom of speech, laws to abide by, and a nation that stands together. Sometimes we do not come to an arrangement with others and what we say or do does not matter to anyone. In society, we have some people who are supposed to be important to us, to protect us, and to give us the right rules to live by but who do not care, and does not want to listen to anybody. In this essay, there are two documents that explain how the nation went from a sheltered nation to an independent country. On July 4, 1776 Thomas Jefferson wrote the Declaration of Independence, which was adopted by Second Continental Congress. The purpose of the pamphlet was to achieve independence and a gain of respect. Jefferson and the colonists did not have any authority nor did the things that they tried to get British to agree with was overlooked. The King of Great Britain (King George III) did not care about what the colonists wanted, or what type of rights they were looking forward to agree with Britain It was not anything that did not matter to the King of what happened during the time of the American Revolution. The colonies suffered twenty-seven wrong doings because of King George III. The king forced taxes on the colonists without their consent. He came in between the colonists’ rights to self-government and a judicial system. He did not want any of his governors to pass a law that was important and for none to be elected as ruler. While the governments tried to come together to an agreement with Great Britain, King George continued to ignore them. Nobody was protected of wars because the war was heading toward the colonists, this King George stated in the Declaration of Independence. The town...
The Civil Rights Movement worked to end segregation in the United States. During this time, city buses were segregated: Whites could sit in the front, but Blacks were not allowed to. In an effort to end this segregation, Blacks refused to ride the city buses. This way of protesting was met with violence, yet it managed to stay nonviolent. In the end, this nonviolence worked, and “segregation on city buses was ruled unconstitutional”(Social Protests). Another example of nonviolent protests are sit-ins. The article “Social Protests” stated, “In February 1960, four black college freshman started sit-ins.” They sat at a restaurant that refused to serve black people and refused to leave. The article also stated,“By April 1960, more than 50,000 students had joined sit-ins.” These protesters were met with violence, but they refused to stop. This paid off in the end because many restaurants started to serve them. These protesters did it right. They were beaten up and constantly opposed, but they did not resort to violence. They showed that they could be the bigger person, even in the worst of times. They peacefully stood up for what they believed in and did not give up. Of course, there were violent protests during the Civil Rights Movement. According to the article “Social Protests”, in the beginning there were not many, but after the assassination of Martin Luther King Jr., violence became more common. Eventually a whole
Within democracies there is great dilemma between security (keeping the country and citizens safe) and liberty (honoring individual rights and freedoms). Many would attest that having both is vital to having a democracy. However, during specific periods, the government may value security above liberty or vice versa. In the particular scenario where a country goes to war, the true significance of the debate between security and liberty unveils. More specifically in a situation where a country orders a draft and enacts laws ordering those who protest against the war to be thrown in jail. In this situation, the government is placing the value of security above the value of liberty. Security is necessary, especially in times of war, but ignoring liberties jeopardizes the principles in which democracy was built. In addition, a lack of liberty can cause a country to be divided and citizens to become disloyal. All of which is a recipe for disaster during wartimes. While at the same time, it is important to respect people’s liberties, giving to many liberties threatens the security of the country by allowing citizens to protest and rebel against the government. Thus, a society must decide the right amount of both. People in a society with restricted liberties might begin to feel fear, anger, and resentment. This leads to protest, revolts, and mutinies such as it did in the scenario. Therefore, while security is imperative, undermining citizen’s liberties threatens the structure of democracy by restricting freedom, creating chaos and generating disloyalty in citizens.