Peaceful resistance to laws positively impacts a free society. Society has a right for peaceful protests. This ability gives citizens a voice that either the opposing side can agree or disagree with. These peaceful resistance (protests) can reflect on how a problem/situation can affect a population. For example the city of Charlotte, N.C., has lifted a midnight curfew, from the peaceful protesting over the weekend. This example shows how peaceful protesting can improve the lives of many individuals. Peaceful resistance can include famous people who took a stand for their passion. Examples of these actions include Rosa Parks, Martin Luther King Jr., and Edward Snowden. Rosa Parks gives insight on the hard times around the 60's. Rosa Park was a civil activist that had enough …show more content…
with the heavy racism surrounding African Americans. One day she sat down on a bus, which went against the rules at the time, and she angered many white citizens. Her actions portray courage of a peaceful protest that later improved lives, and helped out MLK's cause. To this day Rosa Park is known for her amazing courage for going against the rules, peacefully.
Edward Snowden gives another example of how regular people can stop an evil corporation. Edward Snowden gave information the CIA hid for a very long time. Snowden leaked out CIA applications that gave information of the government spying on calls, emails, and video recordings. These leaks caused major impact on the community and the government. These events caused citizens to not trust the government and give an explanation why this happened. Snowden has brought important information that deserved to be in the public's hand, while doing no harm to the national security of his country, the United States. Snowden then left the country to escape the authority trying to arrest him. Snowden shows the prime example of peaceful resistance and allowing individuals to find out the truth of the NSA's secret projects. This allows Snowden to be called a hero. In the film Snowden, it gives a complete analysis of how Snowden found out the truth of the NSA and showed how he used this information to spread the news of the illegal doings of a government company. Snowden proves that everyday people can make a
difference. Finally Martin Luther King Jr. is one of the famous civil activists in the United States. His peaceful protesting improved many African American lives during the 1960's. These protests include marching, giving speeches, and letters to Congress. During all of the protesting MLK did not commit any harmful or negative protest. Instead he used his voice to send a message throughout the community that changed the entire nation. His famous, "I have a dream," speech has been taught in every school and throughout the nation; that proves anyone can change reality for the greater good. MLK spend days in prison for peaceful protesting and not once did he used that time inefficiently. MLK is one of the greatest civil activists that changed a nation. Peaceful resistance should be allowed, but question is did these people use negative actions, or did the authority used negative reactions? What this means is the authority used extreme measures to bring down people for "justice." For example the fire hoses towards crowds, arresting MLK, and espionage. The authority had no right to do these actions. This shows who is the bad guy the authorities, or the protestors. Decide.
Peaceful resistance to laws positively impact a free society because if there isn't, how will people hear the voices of the oppressed and mistreated? Peaceful resistance comes a long way in trying to advance the rights and customs of the oppressed today. For example, The Salt March of 1930 was based on the Salt Act of 1882, which excluded the people the India from producing or getting salt, only British officials. Mahatma Gandhi was the leader of this protest. According to an article by time.com, it says that "The protest continued until Gandhi was granted bargaining rights at a negotiation in London. India didn’t see freedom until 1947, but the salt satyagraha (his brand of civil disobedience) established Gandhi as a force to be reckoned with and set a powerful precedent for future nonviolent protestors, including Martin Luther King Jr.(Sarah Begley,2015)" This means the salt march was a start for India's independence. Also, Gandhi's brand of civil disobedience set precedents for future nonviolent protests. Another Example of how peaceful protests
When Rosa Parks refused to give up her bus seat to a white passenger in Montgomery in 1955, she engaged in one of the most iconic acts of civil disobedience in American history. She was arrested, and her nonviolent resistance of segregation laws led to the famous Montgomery bus boycott. Although many people hail Parks’ act of civil disobedience as one of courage and great importance, today the topic of civil disobedience is controversial. Some criticize this form of protest as a path to anarchy, and others say that it is not defiant enough. However, peaceful resistance to laws positively impacts a free society because it can help marginalized groups, challenge immoral war, and combat harmful corporate interests.
Cassidy, John. "Why Edward Snowden Is a Hero." The New Yorker. N.p., 10 June 2013. Web. 15 Feb.
Edward Snowden was an American computer specialist that worked for the CIA and as a contractor for the NSA. He disclosed classified files over several media sources, that were evidence that the NSA was collecting data from the phone calls and internet activities of most Americans. Snowden thought that by revealing these secret government activities that Americans would realized that their privacy is being invaded and that they need to do something about it.
If someone broke the law trying to help the American keep their constitutional rights, would you consider them a hero or a criminal? Well that’s exactly what’s going on today with Edward Snowden. In 2013 Edward Snowden leaked classified information to the American people, information that shined a light on the dark things that the U.S government was doing behind closed doors. He revealed that the U.S government has been going against the constitution and taking away our freedoms. The U.S government has been taking away our freedoms however, Snowden is being called the criminal. Thesis Statement here.
Recently in global news, the name Edward Snowden has became quite popular as he snatched millions of people’s attention along with breaking news headlines. Snowden released numerous documents via internet that were private to the NSA; these leaks revealed the dirty work the NSA and government have ...
While the words Traitor and Hero are easy to define and understand it is the perspective of the viewer and society they exist within that gives the words relevance. A Traitor to one may be a Hero to another. In this Essay the researcher hopes to demonstrate that Edward Snowden is both a Hero and a Traitor.
Edward Snowden. This is a name that will be in the history books for ages. He will be branded a traitor or a whistleblower depending on where you look. Many Americans feel that Edward Snowden is a traitor who sold the United States’ secrets aiming to harm the nation. Others believe that he was simply a citizen of the United States who exercised his right to expose the government for their unconstitutional actions. It is important to not only know the two sides to the argument of friend or foe, but to also know the facts as well. My goal in this paper is to present the facts without bias and to adequately portray the two sides of the argument.
Peaceful resistance itself does not affect a free society. A people-group can protest any number of laws: voting rights, taxes, and the legality of murder. A majority of society must determine what is best for itself. If the principles of a resistance aligns with the ideals of the society, the pursuit of betterment positively impacts that
Before all of the top secret NSA (National Security Agency) documents on which details of a global surveillance system run by NSA were breached, Edward Snowden was an American computer specialist, a CIA member, and an NSA contractor. Edward Snowden was a regular, wealthy, government employee with some great positions and credentials. He was an American born man and was serving his country. He won the Sam Adams award which is given once a year to an intelligence professional who shows great integrity to the CIA. Many other recipients of this award have also been whistle blowers like Snowden. Before all the leaking and background information is given keep the question of hero or villain in your mind.
Rather than allow the numerous repercussions Snowden now faces stop him, Snowden chose to make the public aware of wrongs committed against them, even if it meant going against the government. The American people and their right to their privacy drove Edward Snowden to make a personal decision, and the result was not that of a traitor, but that of a hero and a man undeserving of the hatred and rejection made by the country he was striving to support.
Many people have mixed feelings about how they should differentiate Edward Snowden as a hero or a traitor. It is true what he had done was unjust and could have been handled another way without all the drama and getting nicknamed traitor by many and hero by few. His act on the NSA forced him into making a deal with Russia to stay at an asylum for a year, because some people in Russia believed in what he had done and did not doubt him unlike some people who thought of Snowden as a traitor to the government. There has been many polls, articles and interviews on Edward Snowden and how people thinks about his act of “exposing” the NSA for spying into the citizens personal life. Some may differ with Snowden by saying, what the NSA is doing is to protect the pe...
It is likely to consider Edward Snowden as a whistle blower because he wanted the people to decide what the government can or can not do. According to the article, Man behind NSA Leaks Says He Did It to Safeguard Privacy, Liberty, Edward Snowden's believes that, “the public needs to decide whether these programs or policies are right or wrong.” (Barbara, Yan). M...
Nonviolent resistance has been changing the world for at least a century since Gandhi began challenging British racism. Nonviolent resistance movements are increasingly exchanging ideas in transnational networks. Egyptian activists traveled to Serbia to consult with veterans of the "Otpor" movement that overthrew Slobodan Milosevic in 2000. The Serbs shared their own hard-won experience, as well as fundamental lessons of popular nonviolent resistance. What are these lessons? First, successful nonviolent resistance is based on overcoming fear and obedience. Despotic regimes, rather than ruling through absolute violence, typically rely on a noxious mixture of propaganda, patronage, apathy, political legitimacy, and a calibrated use of public and covert violence to generate a blanket of fear. However, it turns out that fear and apathy can be brittle. Dissidents can hammer the first cracks in the edifice by creating low-risk ways for citizens to signal solidarity with one another and see through a regime's subterfuge. In 1983, for example,
Protests, civil disobedience, boycotts, economic and political noncooperation, and satyagraha; these are all common forms of peaceful resistance which has a dominantly negative impact on society since they are dangerous, they hurt business, and they are unnecessary..