Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Death and the maiden analysis
Death and the maiden analysis
When history meets literature
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Death and the maiden analysis
“The past is never dead. It’s not even past” (William Faulkner). In Death and the Maiden by Ariel Dorfman, Paulina’s past of imprisonment and sexual assault rush back after fifteen years of efforts to declare those memories dead. The audience sees how the past is an important factor in Paulina’s journey towards vengeance. Her judgement and morality is clouded by her past memories leaving her searching for justice in the future as she was unable to attain it in the past. The past lives within Paulina and serves as a guide in the way she acts. In order to kill the power the past holds over her, Paulina must confront it as her reality.
During the opening moments of the exposition, the negative effects of Paulina’s past life is revealed to the audience as she begins to anticipate the worst. Paulina’s paranoia show the existing effects of her past. As she awaits her husbands arrival, the sight of car lights and the sound of a car prompts her to react in this way: “she goes into a sideboard, takes out a gun” (3). These
…show more content…
Having a member of a commission aimed to seek justice for those who were imprisoned and tortured living in her house, Gerardo struggles to understand the severity of the commissions unsuccessful attempts to provide justice for Paulina. Filled with rage as she tries to explain her thoughts of this commission to Gerardo, Paulina says, “‘The judges? The same judges who never intervened to save one life in seventeen years of dictatorship?...That judge?.. A judge? A judge?’”(10). The prominent use of interrogative sentences and the repetition of “judges” five times reveal a desperate quality of Paulina as she longs for closure for her past injustices. The emphasis on the judges shows Paulina’s frustration for lack of authoritative aid. Therefore, she must take the law into her own hands and seek justice for herself pertaining to her past
In the inconclusive court case on the “Scandal at the Church” of 1872 New Spain (Mexico), José de Alfaro fights in court to save his wife, Josefa Cadena, his unborn child, and his family’s honour by taking her attacker doña Theresa Bravo, her daughter, her sister, her woman deposited (her ward) and her husband to trial for their wrong doings. It was after mass at church that Mrs. Cadena brushed up against Mrs. Bravo; resulting in a violent outburst from the high class lady and her family. The six month pregnant Mrs. Cadena was brutally beaten. With the possibility of losing both his wife and child due to bleeding, Mr. de Alfaro seeks justice from those who harmed his family. Mr. de Alfaro brings his wife’s
Henry Lawson creates an image in his readers’ mind of the protagonist and all that she does for her children. ‘The Drover’s Wife’ portrays the love the mother has for her family as she does everything in her power to care for her family and home. Lawson highlights on several different occasions the lengths the Drover’s wife went to keep her children safe. She takes on the role of the man when her husband is away and there is danger, such as a raging bushfire, flood or snake nearby. “She makes a bed on the kitchen table for the children, and sits down beside it to watch all night.”
“Why? Why? The girl gasped, as they lunged down the old deer trail. Behind them they could hear shots, and glass breaking as the men came to the bogged car” (Hood 414). It is at this precise moment Hood’s writing shows the granddaughter’s depletion of her naïve nature, becoming aware of the brutality of the world around her and that it will influence her future. Continuing, Hood doesn’t stop with the men destroying the car; Hood elucidated the plight of the two women; describing how the man shot a fish and continued shooting the fish until it sank, outlining the malicious nature of the pair and their disregard for life and how the granddaughter was the fish had it not been for the grandmother’s past influencing how she lived her life. In that moment, the granddaughter becomes aware of the burden she will bear and how it has influenced her life.
I thought that Diane Guerrero who is an American actress speech about her family’s deportation was interesting. She recently appeared on an immigration themed of Chelsea handler’s talk show. Guerrero is the citizen daughter of immigrant parents. Guerrero mentioned how her family was taken away from her when she was just 14 years old. “Not a single person at any level of government took any note of me. No one checked to see if i had a place to live or food to eat, and at 14, i found myself basically on my own”, Guerrero added. Luckily, Guerrero had good friends to help her. She told handler how her family try to become legal but there were no sign or help. Her parents lost their money to scammers who they believed to be a lawyer. When her family’s
He has one task to perform - to kill the soldiers of the Free States. However, the most important line is that catches the attention of the reader is “.the eyes of a man who is used to look at death.” This is very ironic as he was earlier compared. to a student who is like a symbol of innocence where now he is spoken of a murderer as a child. He is engrossed in fulfilling his duty and is now a student of the violence of the.... ...
It seems as though in today’s society, suspicion lies in every corner. No one trusts anyone anymore, everyone lies, everyone steals, everyone pretends to be someone they are not. However true or false these statements might be, there is a need in today’s society to be able to explain everything, coming up with every possible lie or predicament within every story. Natalie Davis is from today’s society, and once again, she has found the need to investigate Bertrande Guerre’s role within The Return of Martin Guerre. The only pieces of evidence that are reliable come from Jean de Coras, the main judge in the trial.
A question arises whether they felt “coerced” to use the court system because the judicial system was the only avenue, other than violence, in trying to right perceived wrongs. A careful examination of “Scandal at the Church: José de Alfaro Accuses Doña Theresa Bravo and Others of Insulting and Beating His Castiza Wife, Josefa Cadena (Mexico, 1782),” illustrates the surprising role of an elite court system as an equalizer within a socially-stratified society. More specifically to this case, the court acted as a vehicle to restore honour in an attack from an upper class society member to someone in a class lower. The chapter chronicled a criminal proceeding initiated by the plaintiff because of the injury and insult inflicted upon his wife by the defendant and her family. The physical injuries inflicted on José de
Justine, too, is an ‘idealised figure’, described during the trial as having a countenance which, ‘always engaging, was rendered, by the solemnity of her feelings, exquisitely beautiful.’ She is the archetypal innocent, being beautiful, weak and entirely accepting of her fate to the point of martyrdom.
Subjects became so entranced in these roles that the guards started to behave as if they really were the guards of a true prison. Zimbardo had told them to think of themselves in this way and it led to the guards mentally abusing the prisoners with their cruel and degrading ro...
The past is something that, without clinical illness, is impossible to forget. No matter how horrific or emotionally damaging, it cannot be changed. What we chose to do with this memory of the past will shape our future. This lesson is one of the most important themes in Toni Morison's novel, Beloved.
We see that the author’s purpose is to allow the readers to understand that the prisoners were not treated humanly, and allows us to see the negative attitudes the authority had towards the prisoners.
She concluded that she does not want to attend the court case when she says, “It’s morbid, watching a poor devil on trial for his life. Look at all those folks, it’s like a Roman carnival”’(Lee 159). Maudie Atkinson illustrates her unique thinking because she gives her own opinion on the situation that is occurring.... ... middle of paper ...
Her tense mind is then further pushed towards insanity by her husband, John. As one of the few characters in the story, John plays a pivotal role in the regression of the narrator’s mind. Again, the narrator uses the wallpaper to convey her emotions. Just as the shapes in the wallpaper become clearer to the narrator, in her mind, she is having the epiphany that John is in control of her.
[Note: In this written work Antonio thinks of himself as an innocent person and believes that the world is doing wrong to him .He also believes that his rights have been snatched from him and no one in this world is more miserable and sympathy deserving than him.]
P. Alvarez (2015), more ethical issues have been displayed. Primarily, professor Zimbardo was supposed to intervene once the situation degenerated, but he did not in order to analyse the developments of the events. He allowed guards and prisoners to establish a conflictual environment which led to distress. Secondarily, although prisoners had the chance to meet their relatives during the imprisonment, they were strictly forbidden to divulge any information about their life in prison. To encourage them not to complain about the way the experiment was carried on, Zimbardo and his team, previously to the visit, made the prison environment seem pleasant and benign.