On the day of September 11th, 2001, in the heart of New York City, America panicked as a plane crashed into the Twin Towers. In that moment, every American paused, stricken with fear, as the Twin Towers came crashing down. It was as if someone took a remote and just paused time in America; thousands of people stood frozen. Then came the chaos as the people and the government broke into a panic. President George W. Bush knew things needed to change after 9/11 as the attack on New York showed (how about this, the ineffectiveness of the measures taken to provide safety and security to the citizens of America) how insecure our American Homeland Security was. People identifying with the terrorist group of Al-Qaeda snuck through US airport security …show more content…
at the Boston Logan Airport, without any question, leading to thousands of lost lives. The government knew there needed to be new and improved methods of security to further protect America and its people from future possible attacks. President Bush and his administration submitted a piece of legislation to Congress that was designed to expand the powers of the government into managing security more in depthly. This bill, The Patriot Act of 2001, was considered to be one of the “most important laws concerning government” (Damania). On October 11th, 2001, a month after the terrorist attack that created it, the Patriot Act of 2001 became a law. With the Patriot Act of 2001, America changed politically and socially, making it more secure and protected against any future terrorist attacks. The American government and the American people changed in both positive and negative ways following the Patriot Act.
First and foremost, the intended consequences of the Patriot Act were to help “...make it easier for U.S. law enforcement and national security agencies,...to conduct surveillance and access data for the purpose of preventing, detecting, and investigating crimes and terrorist acts”(Gilbert). Before the act, legal barriers prevented the American National Security Agency (ANSA) from investigating in depth on certain issues. Under this new law, communication between United States Government Agencies improved since it allowed those agencies to communicate more in-depth with each other on certain issues vital to national security. Therefore, the Patriot Act completely changed the American political system by making the American Security System more advanced and better equipped for any future terrorist attacks. As stated, “Politicians and pundits were quick to label the Act as … good for America and necessary for national security” (Sievert). Since the American government now had the appropriate tool at their disposal, the United States Agency became better equipped at handling domestic and international issues. However, the Patriot Act also caused significant political problems regarding the citizens and their political rights. The Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution …show more content…
stated, “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.” (Friedman, Constitution) This means that your house cannot be searched without a warrant or probable cause, and the Patriot Act violates this amendment. “[This] component of the USA Patriot Act is unconstitutional because it allows the FBI to demand information… without judicial oversight or public review”(Eggen). Politicians were forced to shift their opinions as the unconstitutionality of the act was revealed. Due to the government not recognizing the cons that the Patriot Act had before it became a bill, there was no regard to what problems the bill could have caused in America's future. The Patriot Act also had some social implications on American citizens and their ways of life. The task of the Federal Government is to maintain National Security and maintain civil liberty for the average American. This played an important role with people’s views on the new legislation. With the Patriot Act of 2001, citizens lost some of the privacy promised by the Federal Government. Though it didn’t directly violate the Fourth Constitutional Amendment, citizens of the United States still ended up losing some of their promised rights. Due to the fact that the government knew this would cause a social issue, they had to find a way to fix the Patriot Act “[so that it] will add civil liberties safeguard [for all Americans]” (Pershern). As stated above, the actions taken by the United States government demonstrated how the Patriot Act of 2001 intruded into people’s personal lives and crossed their privacy rights. As the “public sphere debated over the conflict between the government’s desire to protect its citizens and its citizens’ civil liberties”, this act did socially affect the people in America and their way of life (Ali, Abdullah). When turning toward the minority population, the Patriot Act of 2001 changed Americans views on these groups of citizens who were of the same racial class that caused the terrorist attack on 9/11. As once mentioned by a law student the, “provision of the USA PATRIOT ACT will also be a means method of wrongful discrimination against Arabs”(Brazeal). This came to show the impact of racial inequality in the United States due to the Patriot Act. This causing a serious social issue regarding people who were of similar religious views and of the same race as to the ones who attacked the United States on 9/11, 2001. Therefore, with the evidence given above, this major social change was caused because the Patriot Act that discriminates against any minorities in the United States. Although many aspects in the United States were altered by the Patriot Act becoming a law, some including both political and social changes, there were still some aspects that remained the same after this bill became a law.
With this new law, the Patriot Act allowed the Central Intelligence Agency more freedom when conducting investigations by passing laws to help speed up the process of their investigations. In doing so, this affected the American people's constitutional rights. The aspect of the American citizen and their view of government officials watching them never changes, due to the fact it only revealed more of people’s attitude toward the government. To have the ability to always have an eye on every single person in America life is seen as bad in the eyes of many Americans because they view the right to privacy as very important, which demonstrated the aspect of society that was not altered by this new law. When the Patriot Act of 2001 became a law, it did alter some of the American political system and affect its people. For what this piece of legislation has done to American society, it makes sense to consider the Patriot Act as one of the most defining pieces of legislation that the United States has passed. This law caused tension due to the conflict of, “future terrorist attacks … (or) to preserve the fundamental civil liberties and personal freedoms embodied in the Bill of Rights”(Gerdes). Which just comes to show how many problems a law can cause
citizens. While on the other hand, the Patriot Act of 2001 was meant to fix the issue on terrorism, not to cause more issues. So even though the law does hold up to the standards that were promised to United States citizens, it definitely does have some disadvantages socially and politically. Though it's no different from any other bill that has ever become a law in America. In conclusion, the Patriot Act of 2001 has changed America both politically and socially. Politically, the Patriot Act has improved the National Security System. Although a loophole was found around the 4th Constitutional Amendment, the Patriot Act still became a law leading to a negative social impact towards minorities. This resulted in discrimination and stereotyping towards people of the similar race as to those who attacked New York on 9/11. Not only minorities were affected by the passage of this law but also the average citizen of the United States. So even though some problems were caused when the Patriot Act became a law, America ended up becoming more secure against any further terrorist attacks on our own soil. Even if the bill did end up causing some minor issues, it still holds up to its promise to this very day to keep the citizens of America secure and protected from terrorist attacks.
Before the events of 9/11 the US had been attacked before and we were aware of possible threats. However, these threats, specifically those of Al-Qaeda were not taken seriously by American foreign policy makers or regular Americans alike, so on September 11, 2001 Americans were truly shocked by the scale of devastation and loss of life that occurred. The effect these attacks had on America was incredible. In the years that followed Americans became fearful and discriminatory of religious groups; the government created the Department of Homeland Security and enacted stricter search and seizure laws, and America’s foreign policy became defined by unilateral decision making and preemptive war.
On September 11, 2001 New York came upon a terrorist attack. The terrorist hijacked four airplanes the morning of the attack. The attack was part of the Al-Qaeda Islamist group, led by Osama Bin Laden. Two planes collided into the World Trade Center; one hit the Pentagon, and the other one crashed in Pennsylvania never reaching its destination. The cause of 9/11 is that Islam saw the United States as a heinous country with different and awful morals so they decided to attack. The consequences were the tensions between Americans and Muslims rose. Numerous hate crimes were committed and there was a massive economic downfall. We could have avoided this incident if the airport security would have been more strict, then the attack would have a less chance of happening (Bantista). “Make no mistake, the United States will hunt down and punish those responsible for these cowardly acts. Freedom itself was attacked this morning by a faceless coward. And freedom will be defended.” –President Bush directly after the 9/11 attacks (Tsimelkas). The government issued extreme changes in the military system and the surveillance ...
On September 11, 2001, America was forever changed. On this day, America faced the biggest terrorist attack that had ever been carried out; thousands of people lost their lives that day. Throughout the sadness and mourning of this terrible event, George Bush addressed the nation with one of the most memorable speeches. When President Bush addressed the nation, he stated that America is strong and they could try to bring us down, but we will not be broken.This speech gave hope to many Americans and helped them remember to stay strong. This day will be forever remembered for all the souls that lost their lives and the brave people who threatened their own life to save others.
The aftereffects of the September 11, 2001 attacks led to Congress passing sweeping legislation to improve the United States’ counterterrorism efforts. An example of a policy passed was Domestic Surveillance, which is the act of the government spying on citizens. This is an important issue because many people believe that Domestic Surveillance is unconstitutional and an invasion of privacy, while others believe that the government should do whatever is possible in order to keep the citizens safe. One act of Domestic Surveillance, the tracking of our phone calls, is constitutional because it helps fight terrorism, warns us against potential threats, and gives US citizens a feeling of security.
George W. Bush’s “9/11 Address to the Nation” is a speech in which he talks about the catastrophic event on September eleventh, 2001. Two airplanes crash into the Twin Towers in New York City on this day, shocking the entire world. He addresses this speech to the people of America on the night of the disastrous event, to let the people of the United States know what is going on. This speech explains how the United States is a strong country, the motives behind the event, as well as to bring the United States together and stronger.
Since the terrorist suicide bombed the world trade center and a wing of the pentagon, there has been a change in the relationship between the United States government and the people. The executive branch has taken steps that undermine the principles in the United States constitution. In order to ensure a more democratic society, we have to tell the difference between effective governing and individual freedom. There is one main topic I'm going to talk about how the 1st amendment, 4th amendment, 5th amendment, and 6th amendment are being eroded by the USA PARTRIOT Act which introduced a overabundance of legislative changes which considerably increased the surveillance and investigative powers of law enforcement agencies in the United States.
September 11, 2001 was one of the most devastating and horrific events in the United States history. Americans feeling of a secure nation had been broken. Over 3,000 people and more than 400 police officers and firefighters were killed during the attacks on The World Trade Center and the Pentagon; in New York City and Washington, D.C. Today the term terrorism is known as the unlawful use of force or violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives (Birzer, Roberson). This term was clearly not defined for the United States for we had partial knowledge and experience with terrorist attacks; until the day September 11, 2001. At that time, President George W. Bush, stated over a televised address from the Oval Office, “Terrorist attacks can shake the foundations of our biggest buildings, but they cannot touch the foundation of America. These acts shatter steel, but they cannot dent the steel of American resolve.” President Bush stood by this statement for the United States was about to retaliate and change the face of the criminal justice system for terrorism.
While this act made legislative changes that increased surveillance and the investigative powers of law enforcement agencies to protect America from further terrorist acts, the passing of the USA Patriot Act has reduced the privacy rights of Americans and also does not provide for a system of checks and balances that safeguard civil liberties. Terrorism is a serious matter that should not be handled lightly, but the act has gone over the top in trying to stop terrorism. The USA Patriot Act, enacted for protecting America from further attacks, not only does little if anything to protect Americans, but rather undermines their civil rights. The Patriot Act targets not only terrorists, but also the American people which it intended to protect.
The 9/11 attack changed America in ways that made limits on our freedom and privacy seem better than the alternative. On September 11, 2001, “...our fellow citizens, our way of life, our very freedom came under attack in a series of deliberate and deadly terrorist attacks,” President George W. Bush stated in a public address shortly after the attacks. He also stated, “Today, our nation saw evil – the very worst of human nature – and we responded with the very best of America,” to calm fears ...
“Many opponents have come to see the patriot act as a violation of the fourth amendment to the U. S constitution.” (Belanger, Newton 2). The side effect of the patriot act is that it weakens many rights. This act weakens the fourth amendment which is our privacy protection. The fourth amendment allows citizens to be protected from unreasonable searches without a warrant. The police search suspects mainly because of their race or ethnic group.
Since the terrorist attacks at Sept. 11, 2001, the surveillance issue often has turned away the table in the debate of individual privacy or counterterrorism. By passing the Patriot Act, Congress gave President Bush an immense law enforcement authority to boost U.S's counterterrorism, and the President used his enlarged powers to forward specific programs in order to reduce the threat of terrorism and defend the country’s safety.
What is the Patriot Act? The USA PATRIOT act was signed into law quickly without much debate back in 2001 right after the September 11th attacks in New York, Washington, and Pennsylvania. The Patriot Act touches almost everything from more funding for businesses that are affected by terrorist attacks all the way to funding affected families of terrorist attacks. The main reason the Patriot act was put in place was to prevent future terrorist attacks on U.S. soil and overseas attacks on Americans. With the act the government would try to stop the attacks before they take place to prevent American deaths. The Patriot Act was put in place to protect America, and at the time many agreed with the Act and went along with it. That was at first. That was when many Americans felt threatened for their safety. Now, many have had time to reflect back on the Patriot Act and feel differently (Ball 2004 p. 78-84).
The Patriot Act has been under scrutiny and opposition since its creation following 9/11. When 9/11 struck it was clear that Americas intelligence was lacking in some specific way, but it was translated that America needed greater allowance for gathering information. The Patriot Act was signed on October 26, 2001, very close to 9/11. It can be concluded that the Patriot Act was signed with such extreme ability’s applied, because of how close it was signed after 9/11. The Act Greatly expands the liberty’s if law enforcement in their efforts to gather information, which in turn imposes on the privacy of the American people. The FBI has the ability to study any citizen suspected of terrorism, and has access to all their information. Wire Taps and other invasive action are allowed and granted by the Patriot Act. Was the Patriot Act signed to quickly? Are its measures to extreme? When is the line drawn on how much power the government can have? Is the Patriot Act effective enough that it is necessary? Should we as Americans willing to trade freedom for safety? Can the Patriot Act effectively stop or hinder terrorist attacks; has its stopped enough attacks to be validated? Another question is does America want a government that has that much power, how much are we as Americans willing to sacrifice, and how much more liberty’s is the government going take. If the government can pass the patriot act, what other legislation can they pass? In reality it all comes down to the American people, we are democracy but do we have the power in are hands? When finding all these questions one asks do we need an act that is in fact this controversial? Is the Patriot Act a necessary evil? To find this answer we have to answer all the questio...
The U.S. Patriot Act was set in place to better serve our country against terrorism. The U.S. Patriot Act is an Acronym for Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Acts (Lithwick). This act is to punish terrorist actions and improve law enforcement not only in the United States but also around the world. The United States Patriot Act consists of over 1,000 sections that describe the act in great detail. The sections include, but are not limited to, the power extended to the government by The U.S. Patriot Act to deport and incarcerate non citizens. With the U.S. Patriot Act a person’s phone line can be tapped, records of any and all purchases checked, and even library records searched. This Act also has sections to help money laundering, expand our country’s border protection, strengthening the extent of criminal laws and provide for people suffering from any type of terrorism acts (Huffman).
Domestic Surveillance Citizens feeling protected in their own nation is a crucial factor for the development and advancement of that nation. The United States’ government has been able to provide this service for a small tax and for the most part it is money well spent. Due to events leading up to the terrifying attacks on September 11, 2001 and following these attacks, the Unites States’ government has begun enacting certain laws and regulations that ensure the safety of its citizens. From the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) of 1978 to the most recent National Security Agency scandal, the government has attempted and for the most part succeeded in keeping domestic safety under control. Making sure that the balance between obtaining enough intelligence to protect the safety of the nation and the preservation of basic human rights is not extremely skewed, Congress has set forth requisites in FISA which aim to balance the conflicting goals of privacy and security; but the timeline preceding this act has been anything but honorable for the United States government.