More handpicked essays just for you.
Psychological trait theories of crime
Criminal behaviour biological and psychological
Biological and psychological perspectives of crime
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Psychological trait theories of crime
Mrs.Maloney is not guilty of Patrick Maloney’s murder. What distinguishes a particular type of murder from another is one's mental state at the time of the wrongdoing. In Mary’s case she had not intended for the misdemeanor, disregarding the fact that she was stealthy and cunning when covering it up. I will begin by evaluating her condition ber the misconduct, at the instance of the misconduct, and after the misconduct.Before the incident, her husband revealed some upsetting news which triggered a moment of uncertainty. “When she walked across the room, she couldn’t feel anything except a slight sickness. She did everything without thinking. She went downstairs to the freezer and took hold of the first object she found.” This information generated …show more content…
If the misconduct was premeditated everything would have been planned out such as the weapon used to kill Mr.Maloney. Mary used “the first thing she found” during her lapse of confusion and the momentum of the situation caused her to have a mental break. “At that point, Mary Maloney simply walked up behind him without any pause she swung the big frozen leg of lamb to the back of his head.” Yet another piece of crucial information that points to a mental break, and not premeditated homicide.She is still traumatized.She is still in a fragile state. In this moment she switched gears into survival mode, she is intelligent and she comprehends the severity of the situation and she realizes she is responsible for it. “It was extraordinary,now, how clear her mind became all of a
John Maloney’s “Good!” A short (14-line) poem encompasses the fast paced events within a Basketball game. The intense play-by-play imagery Maloney gives us displays his knowledge of Basketball and his love of the sport. There
...n her confession Jane claimed to have desired the psychiatrist panel to find her insane, she felt very superior when she discovered that she had outwitted a group of specialists. She described the thrill and gratification she got from her kills and stated that she felt no regret for her actions. She tried to claim that if she had only been married then she would have been too busy being a mom and housewife to be a murderer. Her trial on June 23 took less than eight hours to complete, and after only twenty minutes of deliberation, the jury pronounced her not guilty by reason of insanity. She was sentenced to stay at the Taunton Insane Hospital for life. Jane was delivered to the hospital on June 24, where she stayed for three and a half decades. As her mind slowly deteriorated, she remained in the hospital until her death on August 17, 1938; she was in her eighties.
The novel Theodore Boone: Kid Lawyer has a very in-depth conflict that is showcased all throughout the novel. In Theo's community, there is a high-profile murder trial about to begin. Mr. Pete Duffy, a wealthy business man, is accused of murdering his wife Myra Duffy. The prosecutors have the idea that Mr. Duffy did it for the one million dollar insurance policy he took out on his wife earlier, however they have no proof to support this accusation (Grisham 53). The defendants do however have the proof that no one saw the murder, for all everyone knew, Mr. Duffy was playing his daily round of golf at the golf course right by his house. As the trial moved on, the jury was starting to lean towards letting Mr. Duffy walk a free man. To this point, there has been no proof to support the prosecutors statements that Mr. Duffy killed h...
It was a normal evening in the Maloney home. Mrs. Mary Maloney sat sewing, while waiting for her husband to return home after an involved day as a police officer. Around 5 o’clock Mr. Maloney returns home with shocking news and… Bang! …a leg of lamb hit over his head and Mr. Maloney falls to the ground dead. All evidence and theories, point to Mrs. Maloney being the killer of her husband, but why? Mrs. Maloney did not kill her husband out of anger after the recent marriage incident, but she did it as a result of mental anguish, self defense and trauma inflicted upon her by her husband. All these events explain exactly why Mrs. Maloney murdered her husband out of reasonable measures.
The punishment in the State of Texas for committing two capital crimes is life in jail or the death penalty. Andrea’s lawyer tried to show her innocence by protesting that she was insane at the time of the killings. This plea of insanity could have kept her from life in jail or the death penalty. Sure, she would have served a couple years in jail, but she would have been given the opportunity to come out on parole. Now, if this lady was insane like some believe, then how could she know she committed a crime and not know she was doing wrong when actually drowning the children? Mrs. Yates knew exactly that she hurt the innocent children and was awfully aware of what was going on. Mrs. Yates even called the police and her husband to inform them of what she had done. If the death penalty was on her mind while she was drowning the children, then she might have shown some moral awareness before drowning them instead of after they had died. I believe Andrea to be a sane woman, even though she was depressed or had postpartum depression.
This case began the day prior to the murders on August 3rd when both Abby and Andrew were suspicious of being poisoned. This was evident by the violent vomiting that they both experienced during the night of august 2nd. Abby had gone across the street to the family doctor to inquire about the sickness. The neighbor Dr. Bowen whom came over to the home of Andrew latter in the day suggested that neither Abby, nor Andrew were being poisoned but rather the issue was not serious. On the same date Lizzie attempted to purchase ten cents of prussic acid from a local drug store, but was denied for not providing prescription. The uncle of Lizzie whom was visiting and staying the night prior to visiting relatives across town, but did not have any luggage for this trip, had arrived at the home to visit. Neither Lizzie nor the uncle ha...
There are many reasons why Grace Marks would want to kill Nancy Montgomery and Thomas Kinnear. The overall review and analysis of this novel has lead readers to believe that Grace Marks is indeed guilty for the murder of Nancy Montgomery and Thomas Kinnear. She tricks James into helping her and leads him to believe that if he helps her do this dirty deed that her heart will belong to him. She took Nancy belonging and would wear them, acting like nothing had happen. Once she was found guilty and sent to prison she was examined by doctor. She pretended that she didn't remember anything that happened. As the doctors questioned her more she changed her story or statements many times which lead everyone to believe that she was indeed lying about the murders.
Life. Life is what gives you the ability to think, to speak, to breath and to be a part of this world. It is worth more than any amount of money, your life is priceless. Without it, we would seize to exist; our world would be utter darkness. Honourable Judge, Ladies and Gentlemen of the jury, today Mary Maloney stands on trial before you. A woman who took the away the life of not just an innocent citizen, but her very own husband. She was thought to be an ordinary women, a typical housewife and a soon to be loving mother. However, the facts presented before you today conclude that Mary Maloney was not just an unordinary detective’s wife, but also a murder. On April 13th 1953, the life of Patrick Maloney came to a tragic end because of leg of lamb in the hands of Mary Maloney. For the following reasons, Mary Maloney, wife of the deceased, is guilty of 1st degree murder.
If you were in this situation how would you feel? If you're patiently waiting for your husband to come home and you give him a kiss as he returns. As he walks and talks little to you then he puts it out there like it’s nothing. Would you cry or would you be shocked? would you fight or would you fall ? tell how you would feel if you were like mary maloney were your husband's going to leave you like he left her. I think that mary maloney is innocent because her husband was a cruel and not very kind man. Not only was he having an affair with another woman he was disrespectful to her he yelled at her and how do we not know he wasn't abusive to her. His fellow officers called him a “lady's man”. I think that mary should not be convicted of murder.
The first witness to take the stand was Caroline Hospers, a neighbor of Mary Barnett. Caroline gave both opinions, and facts. Caroline seemed very biased. By saying “she was thinking only of herself” Caroline made me feel that she had some sort of a grudge with Mary before the trial even began. Although Carline gave several opinions, she also gave the jury some solid facts. Caroline stated that, “Her garbage was always filled with empty whiskey and wine bottles.” By telling this to the court, we know th...
On a cold northern morning the body of a man lay still in his bed. His blood did not flow, his heart did not beat, and his chest didn’t fall with breath. His wife sits still downstairs in the gloomy house that she views as a cage. Her stare is blank and her hands move slowly as if she is in some trance that shows absolutely no remorse. Minne Foster is guilty of murdering her husband which becomes apparent through the evidence and details given by Susan Glaspell in “A Jury of Her Peers”. Glaspell gives evidence and shows the realization that both women in the story also know that Mrs. Foster is guilty. Minnie Foster is guilty of murdering her husband, but a defense could be made to protect her.
Near the middle of the story we see Mary exhibit her bad sinister character; her personality and feelings suddenly change when she murders her own husband by hitting him at the back of the head with a frozen lamb leg. After denying all of Mary’s helpful deeds, Patrick told her to sit down so that he can tell her something serious; the story doesn’t tell us what he says to her but Mary suddenly changes after he tells her something, her “instinct was not to believe any of it” (Dahl 2). She just responded with “I’ll get the supper” (Dahl 2) and felt nothing of her body except for nausea and a desire to vomit. She went down the cellar, opened the freezer, grabbed a frozen leg of lamb, went back upstairs, came behind Patrick, and swung the big leg of lamb as hard as she could to the back of his head killing him. This act of sudden violence shows how much she has gone ...
When Mr. Martin feels that his job, an important part of his life, is threatened he, decides to take action. Mr. Martin even fictionalizes a trial in his head. Through this trial Mr. Martin rationalizes Mrs. Barrows’ death as a justified homicide he states, “Gentlemen of the jury, I demand the death penalty for this horrible person”(2). The contemplation and planning that Mr. Martin put into getting rid of Mrs. Barrows reflects his systematic, wise and weak character, yet the intent of the crime does not. Mr. Martin is an introverted and submissive person therefore, he simply searched for an easier and keener way to correct Mr. Fitweiler’s error. Thus, it is confirmed that Mr. Martin did not intend to kill Mrs. Barrows, but rather wanted to prevent the destruction of the routine he lived by.
Wright is assumed to be guilty of her husband’s murder. On page 269 Henderson says, “...It’s all perfectly clear except a reason for doing it…” from this text we gather that the police have enough evidence to put her in jail. Even if the police can’t find a motive, they can still put her in jail for the murder. The men are sure that she committed the murders. The women aren’t sure. Mrs. Wright was their friend and they don’t know for sure if she killed her husband. On page 261 the women’s conversation is,”Do you think she did it? (Mrs. Hale) Oh, I don’t know. (Mrs. Peters)”. Her own friends didn’t know for sure. They had to consider it. On page 268 we have evidence that suggests her friends think she’s guilty, “If I was you I wouldn’t tell her her fruit was gone. Tell her it ain’t. Tell her it’s all right… She may never know whether it was broke or not.” Her friends want to lie to her. They know she isn’t getting out. They know she’ll never know if her fruit was really alive because she will be in jail for killing her
In my assignment I will be focusing on Pat McDonagh. Pat who is from Kilimordaly in County Galway is one of Ireland’s most successful entrepreneurs. The main reason I have picked him for my assignment is because I admire all the employment he has pumped into Irelands recovering economy and also our local economy as he would be considered a local man where I come from and live. I believe he is the perfect example of what an entrepreneur should be as he is not afraid to get involved, is never satisfied and on top of this is very passionate about what he does. Pat, who has a name for being Galway's most prominent businessmen, was named as the Galway Association of London's Person of the Year back in 2013.