More handpicked essays just for you.
14 rights of the patients
Conclusion of patients rights
Discuss the importance of patient rights and responsibilities from both an ethical and legal point of view
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
What are patient’s rights and responsibilities? In healthcare when a person seeks out services pertaining to their health, a person should expect to be treated in such a way that they are res-pected. This includes the information that is obtained while being examined by healthcare pro-fessionals. It is very important to know what rights you have as a patient and the services you will receive when seeking the professional opinions of healthcare professionals. If you are una-ware of your rights as a patient, there are a lot of things you must know. All of the rights and re-sponsibilities are unalienable, none of the following can be taken away due to age, color, race, ethnicity, national origin, religion, culture, language, physical and/or mental disability, socioeco-nomic status, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, veteran status, and/or the ability to pay. In all areas of the healthcare field, these rights must be followed by those who are providing a service to the public. As a new patient with any provider; the provider is obligated to give a person a copy of the Patient’s Rights and Responsibilities and have the person sign the form stating they have received a copy for their records.
There is a difference between a person’s rights and their responsibilities as a patient. A patient’s right is protected by the law. In the healthcare system, all the rights listed on the form given by providers is protected and if violated can be punishable by fines if found guilty in a court of law. All providers must abide by the patient’s rights. A responsibility would be the person’s obligation or duty that is accepted or put into action. This means a person accepts their responsibilities in exchange for...
... middle of paper ...
...onship with the healthcare provider. If a person understands what their rights and responsibilities mean and that they have not just signed a paper required by law; they can better understand what is needed to get the best out of the healthcare system. The person will be able to understand that they do have options and they can make their own choices. Also, one provider is not the final word when they are receiving services.
There will always be a need for healthcare as people are always sick in some way or they are out of balance with their health in some way. There are so many specialty areas in the healthcare field that it allows for a variety of specialists to be apart of a patient’s decision making process. It does pay to be knowledgable. Take the time to read each one of the patient’s rights and under-stand what it means to have a choice.
Autonomy is a concept found in moral, political, and bioethical reasoning. Inside these connections, it is the limit of a sound individual to make an educated, unpressured decision. Patient autonomy can conflict with clinician autonomy and, in such a clash of values, it is not obvious which should prevail. (Lantos, Matlock & Wendler, 2011). In order to gain informed consent, a patient
“One of those obligations is that it must exercise a proper degree of care for its patients, and, to the extent that it fails in that care, it should be liable in damages as any other commercial firm would be
According to Terrence F. Ackerman, as of the 1980s the American Medical Association had to include the respect for a person’s autonomy as a principle of medical ethics (Ackerman 14, 1982). This includes having the physician provide all the medical information to the patient even if the information could cause negative implication onto the patient. The physician is also expected to withhold all information of the patient from 3rd parties (Ackerman 14, 1982). Although it is seen as standard in today’s world, in
...the responsibility to exercise the wishing on the behalf the patient. Hospital has the right to enforce the wishes of the individual. Many time family members are so emotional and tried to reverse the patient wishes in court but the court has many times sided with a appointee the appointee has the right to make importance decision in the care of the patients, for example:
At first, I believed that a patient should have the say so and get what they demand. I didn’t feel sympathetic for the health care provider one bit. I was able to look through the eyes of a physician and see the trials that they have to go through. It is not easy making the decisions that they have to make. There job is based on decisions, and most of it is the patient’s. “There will certainly be times when I will be faced with a request from a patient or patient’s representative that I will personally find morally difficult, but one that is still legally and ethically acceptable. must be very difficult to work in an area with little control over what you want to do.” (Bradley 1). Even though I do not fully understand a health care providers everyday role, I do know that they are faced with painful options. I personally feel that I can not work in this field for that exact reason. Health care providers play an extremely important role in our society, and others need to look upon
Everyone has the right to make his or her own decisions, health and care professionals must always assume an individual has the capacity to make their own decisions unless it’s proved otherwise through capacity assessment.
In this context, new emphasis is being placed on the rights of patients. Recent federal legislation, for example, requires all health care facilities receiving Medicare or Medicaid monies to inform patients of their right to make medical treatment decisions. This includes the right to specify "advance directives," [1] which state what patients wish to be done in case they are no longer able to communicate adequately.
Providers must act in the best interest of the patient and their basic obligation is to do no harm and work for the public’s wellbeing. A physician shall always keep in mind the obligation of preserving human life. Providers must communicate full, accurate and unbiased information so patients can make informed decisions about their health care. As a result of their recommendations, providers are responsible for generating costs in health care but do not generate the need for those expenses. Every hospital has both an ethical as well as a legal responsibility to provide care, even if the care may be uncompensated.
“Patient advocacy is a process that involves a series of actions, behaviors and/or practices for preserving and safeguarding the rights, values, wellbeing and best interests of patients in the healthcare system” (Vaarito et al 2006, Bu and Jezewski 2007, Zomorodi and Foley 2009). Vaartio & Leino-Kilpi describe patient advocacy into two sectors; proactive advocacy and reactive advocacy (2004). Proactive advocacy includes actions aimed at aiding the patients in informed decision making and the protection of patient rights; reactive advocacy is focused on addressing safety concerns (Vaartio & Leino-Kilpi, 2004). Further concept analyses from Baldwin 2003 & Bu and Jezewski 2007, include four main sectors of patient advocacy: Protecting and empowering patient autonomy, protecting and representing the best interests of vulnerable patients, ensuring educated decision making while acting as a mediator for the patient to healthcare services, and lastly acting upon social justice to help create equitable access to adequate healthcare (CPD, 2015). Using Tanners model of clinical judgment; the process of patient advocacy begins with assessing for the need to advocate. The assessment should include the patient, environment, situation, resources and possible risks (Ellis
Not all cases is patient autonomy the most important thing to respect and honor. There will always be situations where Medical paternalism is justified. Justifiable paternalism in a medical perspective is prolonging patients’ lives allowing them to exercise their autonomy. Failing to respect a patient’s treatment requests or denials is a violation of the autonomy at that point in time during their illness. While the previous statement is true, the medical professional is violating a patient’s future autonomy. For this reason, medical professionals have the right to act paternalistically, therefore medical paternalism is justified by means of future autonomy and obligations to promote patient
Doctors, hospitals and other care providers dispute that they should have access to the medical records and other health information of any patient citing that they need this information to provide the best possible treatment for proper planning. Insurers on the other hand claim they must have personal health information in order to properly process claims and pay for the care. They also insist that this will provide protection against fraud. Government authorities make the same arguments saying that in providing taxpayer-funded coverage to its citizens, it has the right to know what it is paying for and to protect against fraud and abuse. Researchers both medical and none nonmedical have the same argument saying that they need access to these information so as to improve the quality of care, conduct studies that will make healthcare more effective and produce new products and therapies (Easthope 2005).
Finally , Healthcare professionals should take appropriate action if patients right is been abused or discriminated against. Discrimination issues or problems must be treated equally and appropriate action should be taken . If healthcare professionals witness any sort of discrimination or patients report any discriminatory practices , immediate action should be taken as discrimination can have an adverse effect on the individual such as low self esteem and a sense of not belonging.
...ns. Patients should not be so medically ill that they are unable to make this decision. Patients should be fully conscious and understand the implications of their decision. Everything should be documented possibly even videotaped that way the doctor doesn’t lose their job, receive a lawsuit or worst jail!
The “Patient Bill of Rights” was adopted in 1988 by the U.S. Advisory Commision on Consumer Protection and Quality in the Healthcare Industry to assure and protect patients’ rights. These rights provide the patient with