Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
British political system short note
The development of the 2 party system
Birth of the 2 party system
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: British political system short note
Party Politics in the UK Today
Since the 1970s, and the decline to the two party system, party
politics in the UK has emerged as a multi-party society with an ever
increasing sense on global politics. However, despite the 'new'
system of a multi-party political system, there have been episodes of
one party dominance in government.
Political parties pre-1970 were mainly built upon the class divide
that existed in Britain. Over time, the class divisions (for example
working class, middle class, and upper class) began to erode as the
times changed, due to more employment, and a greater spread of wealth
among the population. During Thatcher’s term in office at Number 10,
the class divisions that were prominent in the United Kingdom began to
break down, with the working class becoming (almost) nonexistent due
to the explosion of employment and ‘white collar’ work. These days,
it is the North-South Divide that tends to show divisions in politics
and not class. Although, some elements of class can still be seen in
politics and within the electorate. Over the last half of the
twentieth century, the Conservative Party had a large proportion of
the electorate in the south of Britain, with the Labour Party doing
the same in the north of Britain. This therefore leads some to wonder
how can a party call itself a national party if it only attracts
voters from certain regions of the country - this then mirrors the
class divide. Nonetheless, these divisions were not so evident during
the Conservative victory of 1979 and, more recently, the Labour
landslide victory in 1997. Regardless of this, there is an increasing
amount of voter apat...
... middle of paper ...
... party leaving
behind the days of Old Labour (along with the factions and shackles of
deep trade union links) bringing forward a 'new' political party for
the twenty first century. Which would prove to be a highly effective
opposition party, and ‘stabilise’ government in Britain. At the same
time as this, the Scottish Nationalist Party and Plaid Cymru were
developing their own forms/styles of devolved government form
Westminster. This began to change the face of British politics (and
indeed the constitution) in a way it had never been changed before.
In conclusion, British politics today is varied, but once again it is
dominated by one party (the Labour Party). The question is, how long
can the Labour Party stay in power? Will the new Leader of the
Opposition (Michael Howard) prove to be an effective opposition?
In recent times the in the UK we have seen the more frequent use of
This essay will address whether New Labour contained policies with which it wished to pursue, or was solely developed in order to win elections. It is important to realise whether a political party that held office for approximately 13 years only possessed the goal of winning elections, or promoted policies which it wished to pursue. If a party that held no substance was governing for 13 years, it would be unfair to the people. New Labour was designed to win elections, but still contained policies which it wished to pursue. To adequately defend this thesis, one must look at the re-branding steps taken by New Labour and the new policies the party was going to pursue. Through analysis, it will be shown that New Labour promoted policies in regards
Class is a key idea related to inequality, prejudice and discrimination in Australian society. It has been considered out of fashion, because some Australian people think that there is no class difference between people in Australia, everyone enjoys equality in society. In fact, the recent de-regulation of the workplace, and the widening gap in access to hospitals, schools and employment opportunities between the rich and poor, have made class more visible in Australian than ever before. Class is "a category of people who have generally similar educational histories, job opportunities, and social standing and who are conscious of their membership in a social group that is ranked in relation to others and is replicated over generations" (Kent, 1998:87). This essay argues that class cause continues to inequality in Australian society. Firstly, class structures labor market inequality. Secondly, class shapes the quality of a person's life. Thirdly, class inequality produces continuing class differences into the next generation. Finally, class has becoming a debate in Australian society, because class inequality encourages the `right' people to work more efficiently in the workforce and helps people to identify themselves in society, but continuing relevance of the concept of class is a matter in contemporary Australia.
If you have ever read the book 1984 by George Orwell, then an interesting topic may have crossed your mind. The way the classes of people break down can be quite similar, and very different at times. In the United States, we have classes like the lower class, the working class, and the middle class. In 1984, there were such classes as the Proles, the Outer Party, and the Inner Party. The way the classes are broken down in 1984 reminds me a little bit of my old history class. When I studied medieval times and the classes back then were broken down into the nobles, the bourgeois, and the serfs.
...e a lot of parties are going to be running for office. However, for the fringe parties this creates a major advantage for them. With the load of political parties in the House of Commons, there would be a wider range of interests for people but there would be a lot of indecision and coalitions.
...bour party. However in 1914 many people saw Labour as a radical group on the Left Wing of the Liberals rather than a separate party.
middle of paper ... ... d therefore the smaller parties can be considered to have very little effect on the overall political situation. In conclusion, the UK can still best be described as a two party system, provided two considerations are taken into account. The first is that Conservative dominance victories between 1979-97 was not a suggestion of party dominance and that eventually, the swing of the political pendulum will be even for both sides. This can perhaps be seen today with Labour's two landslide victories in 1997 and 2001.
have no money they will have no power. However it is said that if the
In modern society these 3 traditional social classifications, working, middle and upper class are outdated, fitting less than 40 percent of the United Kingdom's population. In April 2013 the British Broadcast Corporation introduced a new model for social classification, within the United Kingdom. Social class and socioeconomic groups traditionally have been defined by income, occupation and ed...
Political parties have been in a declining state in recent political evolution and has provoked numerous discussions/arguments whether the political parties have been indeed in such a state or whether they have been simply restructuring their organisational and/or ideological principles to withstand certain challenges. Several theories were introduced/developed in the recent years so as to distinguish the “ideal” behavioural type of political party development. The most renowned “ideal” party types are the cadre party type, the mass party type (Duverger, 1954) and the catch-all party type (Kirchheimer, 1966). Nevertheless, a recent theory regarding party types proposed initially by Richard Katz and Peter Mair (1995) was the “Cartel Party” which also drew a lot of academic interest. The “Cartel Party” is a new model of political party development suggested by Richard Katz & Peter Mair (1995) as the last decades the electoral support and partisanship levels have been decreasing substantially, while voter volatility increased; thus political parties began to seek state subsidies and other much needed resources directly through the state, in order to secure “control” of the electoral rules, subsidies from the state and the media as well. Concomitantly, political parties allegedly employ their domination power to even “control” which new political parties may join the “cartel”, and which are left out of the equation. However, this new prospect within the political parties’ mechanism, ultimately alters their organisational and ideological principles, thus in this way give rise to the so-called “Cartel Parties”. In short, the theory of Cartelisation over the political parties suggested by Katz & Mair propose that political parties progre...
The Labour Party The Labour Party has traditionally believed in Socialism, and therefore they reject capitalist ideas and values, believing that Capitalism produces huge wealth for some, and relative poverty for many others. They rejected the idea of revolution, like the Conservative party, preferring evolution, but remains committed to achieving social goals associated with fairness, justice, and equality. Clause 4 of the 1918 Labour Party Constitution committed the party to support the nationalisation of industry to provide the workers with the 'fruit' of their labour, rather than the private ownership of industry for private profit. Traditionally, the labour party has stood for a belief in equality, arguing for a permanent shift of power and wealth away from the rich, privileged and powerful, to the poor, weak, and less privileged members of society, in order to create a 'classless' society.
The US has a two party system in which two parties dominate in the US
and became a threat to the Conservative and Labour Parties. Slowly, more and more smaller parties
The Conservative party in the United Kingdom is the oldest political party and one of the most successful. It was formed in the 18th Century and became a right leaning party (Kesselman, Krieger, Joseph 2015). This party is sometimes also known the unionist party and it was preceded by the Tories. The Tories were supporters of the crown and saw it as a good way to keep Parliament and their opponents in check (Profile: The Conservative Party 2010). In the United Kingdom, the Conservative party held power from 1979-1992, in 2010 (hung parliament), and in 2015. Margaret Thatcher had a very large impact on the Conservative party in the UK and allowing it to be in power for so long during the 1900s. This party can trace its roots back to the King of York, James Stuart (Whig And Tory: Historical Political Party, England 2014).
It is well known that the British political system is one of the oldest political systems in the world. Obviously, it was formed within the time. The United Kingdom of the Great Britain and Northern Ireland is the constitutional monarchy, providing stability, continuity and national focus. The monarch is the head of state, but only Parliament has the right to create and undertake the legislation. The basis of the United Kingdom’s political system is a parliamentary democracy. Therefore, people think the role of the Queen as worthless and mainly unnecessarily demanding for funding, but is it like that?