Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Parenting styles and their importance
Literature on parental styles
Parenting styles and their importance
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The new show Parent Swap is where two sets of parents from different cultures, one from a collectivist culture and one from an individualist culture, swap families for two weeks. Each household is comprised of a multigenerational family; the paternal grandparents, the father and mother, and three children aged 1, 8, and 14-years old. We will first explore the differences between the two cultures as well as the parenting styles of each culture. Then discussing the differences in parental expectations for each of the children within each of the families. In addition, once the parents swap places the way the individualist parents react to their new surroundings brings about a culture clash as it does for the collectivist parents trying to …show more content…
Collectivist cultures, according to Shiraev and Levy (2013), tend to be traditionalists and base their behavior on traditional values (p. 9) and overall concern for the group or family unit (p. 11). Within the collectivist family, traditional family roles are observed for example daughters, wives and mothers must obey fathers, husbands, and sons. In addition, rules within the society are predetermined and are accepted and followed without question (Shiraev & Levy, 2013, p. 9). The parenting style of the collectivist parents leans more towards the authoritarian style of parenting which is based on behavioral controls such as obedience and high demands of the parents on the children (Shiraev & Levy, 2013, p. 193-194). This authoritarian style is not to show the parents’ superiority over the children nor to dominate them, moreover, it is a practice used for the collectivist parents to organize the family by promoting structure. Whereas individualistic cultures tend to base their actions and behaviors on the belief that their own personal needs are more important than those of the group and compete to achieve them (Shiraev & Levy, 2013 p. 11). The parenting style of the individualist family may be more permissive or more egalitarian. Shiraev and Levy (2013) discuss how this parenting style focuses on building the child’s self-esteem (p. 194) and teaches self-expression as well as autonomy (p. 204). This egalitarian style is not to say the parents are weak but to encourage the concept of fairness and that people should advocate for equal rights and equal opportunities, instilling a sense of
Families are becoming more diverse and they come in all shapes and sizes. Some people consider families to be strictly biological, while others consider people they love to be their family. Although two-parent families, also known as a nuclear family are the majority, one-parent families are becoming more common in today’s society. A sole-parent is considered to be a parent without a partner or spouse who is the primary care giver of one or more children in a household (Ministry of Social Development, 2010). From the age of 14 onward I was raised by m...
Throughout the evolution of television shows, one thing that is evident in them is that the families follow some sort of sociological theory. By observing these shows, it is easy to perceive what the struggles and achievements these families may experience. Specific examples of television families that display a sociological theory is: Switched at Birth showing conflict theory, Full House presenting symbolic interactionalism, and finally, The 100 which showcases feminist theory. In all of these shows, the families involved each go through their own issues with themselves and each other as well as barriers that may get in the way of their success. Analyzing families through the sociological perspectives open up opportunity for people to better
Growing up, two group of people, parents, and grandparents, took the time and the energy to raise me. Both of them had different approaches when raising me. These approaches were different parenting styles. According to Baumrind, parenting style was the “[capturing] normal variations in parents’ attempts to control and socialize their children” (Darling, 1999). To put it simply, parenting style goal was to lecture, influence, and discipline a child. In general, there are four parenting styles with their own specific benefits and disadvantages. Furthermore, parenting style, granted the dynamic of the family was understood, can be identified in families.
The type of parenting style used by parents may be determined by the parent’s own cultural heritage. As immigrants move to a new country, it will take time to learn the new culture and to be accustomed to their ways. Therefore, it would not be surprising if first generation immigrant parents place the hardest strain on their children. Since they have not yet been accustomed to American culture, they will be more likely to adhere to their traditional ways. Immigrants who have been in the country longer may have slowly compromised traditional views with new
Wife Swap is a television program in which two families swap mother for two weeks to invite them to a new way of living. The program involves, two families form different part of the country with very different values, are chosen to take part in a two-week long trial. The mothers from these two families exchange husbands, children, and lives to realize what it 's like to live another woman 's life. I had watched Wife Swap before, and I liked it because it is a good example of mixing two different cultures. I watched three episodes for this paper; I will compare between the cultures of the two families each episode.
One noticeable cultural difference between the society pictured in this chapter and our American society seems to be a collectivist ideology. In America we value the individual and place emphasis on distinction from the group. This causes a strong sense of competition, and leads people to take actions that would benefit themselves in spite of negative effects that may trickle to other members of the community. The culture pictured in our reading, however, seems to place greater value on family and community goals rather than the needs or wants of specific individuals.
When a baby is born and enters the world, people feel emotions such as joy and excitement as they welcome a new member to their family. In Everybody Loves… Babies, viewers gain a glimpse of how families from four different countries raise their new baby. Throughout the documentary, it is easy to see the differences amongst the environments, cultural traditions, and societal norms. However, there are also similarities as well, and it serves as a reminder that no matter how “different” family may look on the outside, there are commonalities at the core of it all too.
Parenting styles have been widely defined by Baumrind into three categories, authoritative, authoritarian and permissive. Parenting styles can be defined as a pattern of attitudes in how parents choose to express and communicate with their children. These styles are categorized based on the level of nurturance, parental control and level of responsiveness (Dwairy, 2004). Authoritative style exhibits high levels of demand, responsiveness and nurturance; authoritarian style exhibits high levels of demand but low levels of responsiveness, permissive style exhibits low levels of demand but high in responsiveness and nurturance (Dwairy, 2004). These parenting styles have been proposed to have a significant impact on a child’s development as well as academic achievement and psychological well-being. Children reared by authoritative parents are stated to have the highest levels of academic achievement, self-esteem, emotional adjustment and well-being according to Baumrind’s category of styles (Dwairy, 2004). However, these three categories are based on Western samples and have been said to describe parenting styles mainly in the West and question its limitations in describing parenting across cultures, as each style’s defining patterns may have different meanings across cultures.
The universality versus cultural specificity debate both have aspects that make sense and can be applied to childhood development. On one side, supporters of the argument for the universality of parenting suggest that certain types of parenting styles will produce the same child development outcomes in different cultures. On the other hand, the argument for cultural specificity states that different parenting practices vary from culture to culture, and that culture ultimately determines the outcomes of child development. Each culture has specific styles of parenting that instill values on children particular to that culture. Each individual has characteristics of what their parents taught them, which gives every individual their own personality. Both sides present logical information on the cultural impacts of parenting on child development outcomes.
With over three hundred million Americans and over six billion people worldwide parenting skills are essential to maintain a healthy society. Parenting involves many aspects and requires many skills. It is a time to nurture, instruct, and correct to develop fundamental skills children will need to be mature, responsible, and contributing adults to a society. There are four commonly identified parenting styles; authoritarian, authoritative, permissive, and uninvolved parenting. Of the four parenting styles, two remain on opposite ends of the parenting spectrum. These two styles; authoritarian, and permissive both have deleterious results that are often visible throughout different developmental stages, such as rebellious behavior. As well each style has its own advantages such as; acceptance by peers with commonality. Child rearing for most parents is an evolving set of skills. It could be said that, with any style of parenting, there is no explicit set of rules for every situation, and what works for one child may not be effective for another.
Those in collectivist cultures value their group membership, respect group processes and decisions, and expect other in-group members to look after or protect them in case of needs or crisis. For them, keeping good and harmonious relationships inside their in-group is a priority; and avoiding loss of face is important. Their identity is based on the strong and cohesive in-groups to which they belong. In collectivist cultures, cooperation is high within in-groups, but is unlikely when the other person belongs to an out-group. As a comparison, people in individualist cultures are good at forming new in-groups and getting along with those from out-groups.
Authoritarian parents, show very little acceptance, have very high expectations of their children and are extremely controlling. These parents are strict, and use a prohibitive and punishment method. According to a research done by Kimberly Kopko from Cornell University, it “reveals that adolescents of authoritarian parents learn that following parental rules and adherence to strict discipline is valued over independent behavior. As a result, adolescents may become rebellious or dependent” (2). The adolescents who come to be rebellious may showcase hostile behaviors, while those who are passive are likely to stay relying on their parents (2).
This paper will explore the strict parenting whether it has positive effects or negative effects on children. Before I begin my discussion, I want to ask you a question. How do you define an authoritarian parent? In response to this question, you can think about someone who has a complete control over his or her children. According to Kendra Cherry, the author of “What Is Authoritarian Parenting?”, she explains that, “Authoritarian Parenting is a style characterized by high demands and low responsiveness.” In this sentence, authoritarian parenting, also known as helicopter parenting, is parents who force their children to follow their needs without any explanations, so their children must be under their regulations even though children do not
Well first off to discuss the advantages and disadvantages of the parenting styles between the Harsh-Hearts and the Easy-Goings, their styles of child rearing must be categorized first. Child-rearing are combinations of parenting behaviors that occur over a wide range of situations. There are four different categories of combinations in child-rearing: authoritarian, authoritative, permissive, and uninvolved. After studying these two different cases, it can be declared that Mr. and Mrs. Harsh- Heart use an authoritarian child-rearing approach while the Easy- Goings use the authoritative child-rearing style. Authoritarian child-rearing is “low in acceptance and involvement, however high in coercive control, and low in autonomy granting.” (Laura 216)Authoritarian parents have a lot of punishment and usually resort in spanking for discipline. The parents are the boss, there are rules, its tyrannical, there’s structure, and the parents are directive. Meanwhile on the other hand, authoritative is the complete opposite and it is said to be the most successful approach. Authoritative child-rearing “involves high acceptance and involvement, ad...
The authoritarian child rearing style is connected with guardians who stress acquiescence and congruity and expect that standards be obeyed without clarification in a less warm environment. Also, authoritarian guardians show low levels of trust and engagement toward their youngster, demoralize open correspondence, and take part in strict control. All the more particularly, verbal antagonistic vibe and mental control were observed to be the most inconvenient of the authoritarian unmistakable, coercive force emphatic practices. Young people from most Caucasian tyrant families have been found to show poor social aptitudes, low levels of self-regard, and abnormal amounts of sadness. In any case, the impacts of this child rearing style differ in view of the groups in which the immature lives. These discoveries will be examined in more noteworthy subtle element in the covariates of and logical impacts on child rearing