Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Profitability analysis of a company
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Profitability analysis of a company
Profitability ratios are a category of financial tools that are utilized to evaluate a company’s capability to produce revenue as associated to its expenditures and costs suffered during a specific timeframe. Profitability ratios present numerous gauges of the achievements of a company’s ability to produce revenue. For most of these ratios, having a greater figure in relation to a competitor or previous timeframe is suggestive that the business is flourishing. Common profitability ratios are profit margin, return on assets, and return on equity.
Profit margin is a ratio of prosperity computed as net income divided by revenues. Profit margin is shown as a percentage. Exploration of just the income of a business frequently does not reveal all the facts. Improved income is great, but a growth does not necessitate that the profit margin of a business is improving. For example, if a business has expenditures that have gotten bigger more than the rate of sales it will result in a lesser profit margin and may signify that expenditures need to be managed better. Profit margin will gauge out of each dollar of sales how much a business
…show more content…
retains in income. A greater profit margin designates a more lucrative business that has superior command over its expenses. Panera Bread’s profit margin for the 2014 fiscal year was 7.09% compared to the 2013 fiscal year profit margin of 8.23%. Panera Bread saw a reduction in profit margin in 2014 to levels similar to its 2010 profit margins. A review of competitors showed that while Panera Bread’s profits declined, both Chipotle Mexican Grill and Starbucks Corp. saw profit margins remain steady around 10.84% and 12.57% respectively. With the deterioration in profit margin in 2014, Panera Bread executed worse than the industry average which is at 11.8%. The first and third quarters of 2014 created the biggest impact with profit margins of 7.0% and 6.3% respectively. Revenues increased while both gross margin and net income declined in 2014, due to investing in enhancement of operating resources, technical assets, and customer encounters. Return on assets (ROA) is a gauge of how efficiently the business's assets are being utilized to produce income. It is a display of how lucrative a business is compared with its total assets. It is analyzed by dividing a business' annual income by its total assets, and is shown as a percentage. The assets of the business are consisting of debt and equity. The greater the ROA amount, the better, since the business is producing more cash on less capital spending. Panera Bread’s return on assets ratio for the 2014 fiscal year was 13.46%, compared to their 2013 fiscal year ending ratio of 16.02%.
The return on assets ratio for 2014 were similar to those Panera Bread had for the 2011 fiscal year signifying a decline. When compared to its competitors, Panera Bread had a lower return on assets ratio that both Starbucks Corp. and Chipotle Mexican Grill who were at 18.57% and 19.55% respectfully. Over the last 5 years, Panera Bread’s asset revenue has been an average of a 13.7% profit. The industry profit on assets has produced a lesser ratio of 12.02%. Panera Bread has been increasing its return on assets over the last five years except for 2014, where Panera Bread had a fall in net income. This signifies that compared to the industry Panera Bread is superior at translating its assets into
earnings. Return on equity (ROE) is the end product ratio for the stockholders, gauging the earnings for each dollar spent in the company's stock. Return on equity is the sum of net income kept as a proportion to stockholders equity. It gauges a business' success by exposing how much income a business produces with the cash stockholders have financed. Contrasting the ROA, this ratio concentrates exclusively on the shareholders equity and does not take into account debt. Return on equity is computed as net income divided by its average shareholder equity. The ROE is valuable for relating the success of a business to others in the industry. Panera Bread’s return on equity ratio for the 2014 fiscal year was 24.97%, compared to their 2013 fiscal year ending ratio of 25.78%. For Panera Bread’s stockholders they have averaged a profit of 24.97% for every dollar spent. Panera Bread’s competitors, Starbucks Corp and Chipotle Mexican Grill, had a 2014 return on equity of 42.41% and 25.09% respectfully. Over the last 5 years, Panera Bread’s assets have averaged a profit return of 22.9%. The industry return on equity has a 30.7% rate of return, outperforming Panera Bread. Panera Bread has been enhancing its return on equity over the last five years except for 2014. The decline in ROE for 2014 was not because of a reduction in shareholder equity, but rather a drop in net income. An explanation as to why Panera Bread’s ROE has improved almost every year is due to the fact that they retain earnings with the purpose of reinvesting to develop and expand the business.
With a high turnover, it can mean two things for a company. Panera Bread is either ineffective in
Ratio analysis are useful tools when judging the performance of a company by weighing and evaluating the operating performance (Block-Hirt). There are 13 significant ratios that can separate by four main categories, profitability, asset utilization, liquidity and debt utilization ratios. The ratio analysis covered here consists of eight various ratios with at least one from each of these main categories. These ratios were used to compare and contrast the performance of Verizon versus AT& T over the years 2005 and 2006.
Some strengths that Panera Bread has over it’s competition is that is provides the high and good quality ingredients to its customers. It also gives these customers a difference dining experience compared to McDonalds and Five Guys just to name two competitors. They have catering, fresh baked goods and quickly prepared foods. They also have a great brand name over the years. They have been able to continue on growing financially over the years. Studies also show that majority of customers are very satisfied with Panera Bread.
Panera is in a state of continuous improvement in adding to their menu to satisfy consumer wants. Panera also capitalizes on competitor weaknesses by offering higher quality pastries than the average Quick Service Restaurant. Most other breakfast restaurants do not have the variety and quality of gourmet pastries of Panera. Panera also uses preemptive strikes by attracting people with comfortable seating, an atmosphere conducive to study, and by the offering of WIFI. Panera exhibits low cost leadership by keeping behind the scenes and production costs lower making the company able to bring down the price to take business from competitors, but not so much that it takes away all of the profit. Panera has captured a niche by catering to the desires of those who want gourmet food without the gourmet price and also by their attention to creating the whole experience for that niche and not just
The main challenge is to determine how Panera Bread can continue to achieve high growth rates in the future. Panera Bread is operating in an extremely high competitive restaurant market which forces the company to improve and to grow steadily for staying profitable. The company’s mission statement of putting “a loaf of bread in every arm” is just underlying Panera’s commitment for growing. They are now in a good financial situation and facing growth rates of up to 20% per year in a niche market that has a great growth potential. In the next 7 years the fast-casual market is expected to grow by 500% in sales to a total of $30 billion.
1. As stated in Case 6 of Peter and Donelly’s Marketing Management, Panera Bread strategy is to provide “a premium specialty bakery and café experience to urban workers and suburban workers”. This strategy included proiding its customers with specialized baked goods, soups, salads, custom roasted coffees alongside other beverages aimed at a customer base that would be mostly composed of urban workers and suburban dwellers that were looking for a quick-service meal with a more aesthetically pleasing environment than a traditional fast-food restaurant. With a distinctive menu, signature design of the premises, an inviting ambience, operating systems, and a location placement strategy that would allow it to compete in various submarkets; breakfast, lunch dinner, etc. Panera gradually enhanced their menu to attract more customers with a goal of becoming “better than the guys across the street” and thus making their dinning experience more attractive than other fast-casual dinning competitors.
Strong financial conditions- Panera expand its business by franchise and its own stores (Annual Stock Report, 2010). It increases its profit each year from 2000 to 2006. These revenue increased optimally (Report, 2010)
Profitability ratios express ability of the company to produce profit. This shows how well a company is performing in a given period of time. To compare the profitability for the companies, the investors use profitability ratios that are return on equity, profit margin, asset turnover, gross profit, earning per share. Return on asset indicates overall profitability of assets. It is the relationship between net income and average total assets. GM has 0.034 and Ford has 0.036. This indicates Ford is more profitable. Profit margin is how much of every dollar of sales the company keeps. Computing profit margin, net income divided by net sales. This indicates higher profit margin is more profitable and it has better control. Thus, GM’s profit margin is 3.4 percentages and Ford’s is 4.9 percentages. This indicates Ford has better control profitably compared to GM. Next ratio is gross profit rate. It is how much of every dollar is left over after paying costs of goods sold. Assets turnover represents how efficiency a company uses its assets to sales. This ratio is relationship between net sales and average total assets. GM’s is 0.98 and Ford’s is 0.75. This result represents GM is using its assets more efficiently. Gross profit margin is dividing gross profit, which is equal to net sales less cost of gods sold, by net sales. This ratio indicates ability to maintain selling price above its cost of goods sold. GM’s gross profit rate is 11.6 percentages. Ford’s is 5.7 percentages. GM is higher ratio, and it indicates strong net income. Also, it indicates the company has to spend lower operating expenses and the company is able to spend left money for covering fixed costs. Earnings per share indicate the company’s net earnings to each share common stock. This ratio shows margin between selling price and cost of goods sold. From these companies’ income statement, GM is $2.71 and Ford is $1.82. Because GM’s value is higher relative to Ford’s,
Thompson, Arthur A. "Panera Bread Company in 2012 Pursuing Growth in a Weak Economy." Thompson, Peteraf, Gamble, Strickland. Crafting & Executing Strategy. New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin, 2014. C-96-C-113.
The key element of Panera’s growth strategy focused on growing store profit, increasing transaction and gross profit per transaction, using its capital smartly, and putting in place drivers for concept differentiation and competitive advantage. Panera has always kept an eye on the market, the new markets as well as existing markets. In 2009 Panera had a strategy that was different than others. This is the time when the economy took a turn for the worst. Some restaurants lowered their prices to get customers, while Panera kept their prices the same. They e...
Panera seems poised to continue to dominate the bakery-café market and continued sustainable growth is very likely. Works Cited The “Annual Report” (2010). Retrieved from http://www.panerabread.com/pdf/10k-2010.pdf “Company Overview.” (2011). Retrieved from http://www.panerabread.com/about/company/ “News Release.”
Panera Bread’s market to book ratio for the 2014 fiscal year was 6.6 compared to 2013’s yearend ratio of 7.0. During the 2014 year, Panera Bread’s competitors, Starbucks Corp. and Chipotle Mexican Grill, saw ratios of 12.6 and 9.2 respectfully. Over the last five years, the market to book ratio of Panera Bread had been from 5.2 to 7.0. The S&P 500 average for 2014 was 2.7 and the industry average was 9.6. Panera Bread’s market to book ratio is lower than the industry average, but higher than the stock market average represented by the S&P 500. This implies that the stock may be presently
Any successful business owner or investor is constantly evaluating the performance of the companies they are involved with, comparing historical figures with its industry competitors, and even with successful businesses from other industries. To complete a thorough examination of any company's effectiveness, however, more needs to be looked at than the easily attainable numbers like sales, profits, and total assets. Luckily, there are many well-tested ratios out there that make the task a bit less daunting. Financial ratio analysis helps identify and quantify a company's strengths and weaknesses, evaluate its financial position, and shows potential risks. As with any other form of analysis, financial ratios aren't definitive and their results shouldn't be viewed as the only possibilities. However, when used in conjuncture with various other business evaluation processes, financial ratios are invaluable. By examining Ford Motor Company's financial ratios, along with a few other company factors, this report will give a clear picture of how the company is doing now and should do in the future.
Panera has dominated the marketplace over the previous fifteen years; in 2009 their returns reached over one billion in revenue. Ronald Shaich, was succeeded in 2011 by a gentleman named William Moreton, who now operates “Panera Bread.” Organization’s Resources: There are now over 1,300 franchises across North America; due to William Moreton over the last six years Panera revenue has risen. Panera promotes and train from within which in turn displays their employee’s appreciation by providing better customer service, this is only one attribute that brought Panera a large degree of success.
Ratios traditionally measure the most important factors such as liquidity, solvency and profitability, as well as other measures of solvency. Different studies have found various ratios to be the most efficient indicators of solvency. Studies of ratio analysis began in the 1930’s, with several studies of the concluding that firms with the potential to file bankruptcy all exhibited different ratios than those companies that were financially sound.