Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Pay gap between genders essay
Equality for women getting paid the same as men
Pay gap between genders essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Pay gap between genders essay
practice in issue here is the payment to women employed as stewardesses of salaries lower than those paid to men serving as pursers for work found by the court to be substantially equal. Others are the provision to stewardesses of less desirable layover accommodations and allowances for maintenance of uniforms, and the imposition of weight restrictions upon stewardesses only (Laffey v. Northwest Airlines Inc P Laffey, 1976).
In PHILLIPS v. MARTIN MARIETTA CORP (1971), Petitioner Mrs. Ida Phillips commenced an action in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 alleging that she had been denied employment because of her sex. The District Court granted summary judgment
According to the court case on Pam Huber v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., I am in agreement with the fact that the “district court granted summary judgment in favor of Huber” (Morgan, p.413) and that Wal-Mart gave Pam Huber, a maintenance associated job due to her disability. In doing so, I am also in agreement with the fact that Wal-Mart did not breach the American with Disability Act of 1990 due to the fact that Wal-Mart specifically stated what was required of Pam Huber to do on the job. Due to that, I am in agreement with Wal-Mart’s decision to hire a capable candidate in replace of Pam Huber due to their policy.
My Response. I think the court made the right decision by granting the defendants’ motion for summary judgement as to the plaintiff’s sexual harassment claim, since her gender was not a contributing factor in this case. However, regarding the law in this case, I find it strange that just because Lynch treated both men and women equally badly, this would nullify Smith’s claim for hostile work environment sexual harassment, when such harassment clearly took place. Why does the harassment have to be towards one sex only for there to be a valid legal case? Should it not be enough that she was subjected to unwelcome sexual harassment?
Issue: Did the State of Illinois violate the Equal Protection Clause when it denied Peter Stanley a hearing on his fitness to keep his children?
Pansdell, Hollace. "Report on the Scottsboro, Ala. Case ." American Civil Liberties Union 27 May 1931. 11 Mar. 2001 http://www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/FTrials/scottsboro/SB_HRrep.html.
"Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964." ():-. Retrieved from http://www.eeoc.gov/laws/statutes/titlevii.cfm on Mar 17, 2014
To resolve the gender wage gap, the government should consult with employers in federally-regulated sectors to apply a gender-based analysis to the design, development, implementation and evaluation of the policy. The law should clearly outline the systematic discrimination that women face in the workforce. This policy would entail employers to determine whether gender-based disparities exists and reevaluate the current pay system from an equity perspective to ensure and promote pay transparency. The law of ensuring pay equity should first be applied to the public sector, including federal public servants, employees of Crown cooperation and federally regulated companies. After this law has been found to be effective, it is also recommended that private corporations follow the same suit and comply with the pay equity
"Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is the single most important piece of legislation that has helped to shape and define employment law rights in this country (Bennett-Alexander & Hartman, 2001)". Title VII prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, age, gender, disability, religion and national origin. However, it was racial discrimination that was the moving force of the law that created a whirlwind of a variety of discriminations to be amended into Title VII. Title VII was a striving section of legislation, an effort which had never been tried which made the passage of the law an extremely uneasy task. This paper will discuss the evolution of Title VII as well as the impact Title VII has had in the workforce.
Bennett, Alexander, Hartman (2003), Employment Law for Business, Fourth Edition II. Regulation of Discrimination in Employment 3. Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, The McGraw-Hill Companies.
Distributive injustice is shown in the investigations that proved male employees were paid more relatively to their female counterparts. It is also evident in the scandal involving ex-CEO Harry and a female vice president; Harry is inconsistent towards the company’s code of conduct which he wants his employees to uphold. Due to their personal relationship, she might have gained exclusive rewards and privileges which her colleagues could not enjoy.
The Civil Rights Act of 1964, is specific to this case concerning Marwan’s conduct and is clearly stated under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act. This regulation protects employees against workplace discrimination on the basis of gender, race, creed, origin and religion and relates to all employers whether local, state or national. Organizations that employ fifteen or more employees has to stand by this regulation (Civil Rights Act, n.d.). According to this law, a commission called Equal Employment Opportunities Commission has been arranged, to protect individuals in contradiction of discrimination and enforce this as well as additional pertinent laws such as discrimination. Discrimination within the workplace has been in existence for a long time and was initiated by the U.S. Authorities once hearing several cases of harassment. The discrimination law protects applicants, employers and employees. The law states that no employer can take recruitment decision solely on the basis of the race, origin, gender, handicap of the applicant and is unable to take favor over anyon...
According to Corley, Reed, Shedd, and Morehead, (2001) “the most important statue eliminating discriminatory employment practices, however, is the federal Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended by the Equal Employment Opportunity Act o 1972 and the Civil Rights Act of 1991.” The appropriation section o...
The majority group, whose ruling settled matters, included Breyer, Roberts, Ginsburg, Sotomayor, Kagan, and Alito. The minority dissenting group included Scalia, Kennedy, and Thomas. The majority held that Peggy Young was right, and gave a sufficient explanation of her claim of pregnancy discrimination. The court overturned the District Court and the Court of Appeal Fourth Circuit, indicating that both erred in their decisions. Justice Breyer read out the opinion held by the court that Title VII of the Pregnancy Discrimination Act is clear on the prohibition of sex discrimination, which applies to pregnancy-based discrimination. The law states that: “employers must treat women affected by pregnancy... the same for all employment-related purposes… as other persons not so affected but similar in their ability or inability to work” (Legal Information
Laws and regulation are put in place to govern the grounds of fairness. If these rules are broken, they are enforced by the justice system. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 serves as the foundation and building block for all equal employment opportunity acts. One act that benefited from the Civil Rights Act is the Pregnancy Discrimination Act of 1978. This act prohibits discrimination against women affected by pregnancy, childbirth, or related condition; requires that they are treated as all other employees for an employment-related purpose including benefits (Mathis & Jackson, 2011). The Pregnancy Discrimination Act gained notoriety from the General Elec. Co. v. Gilbert case. In this case, General Elec. Offered disability absence sickness
Women’s right to equal pay or gender pay gap has been a subject of discussion over the years in the united states, women perform similar jobs to men, but are paid
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits employers from discriminating against applicants and employees because of their race, color, religion, sex or national origin. Religious Discrimination as part of the Civil Rights Act is the subject of this term paper.