Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Gender roles throughout literature
How is gender represented in literature
Gender in literature
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Gender roles throughout literature
The effect marriage in Virginia Woolf’s Orlando has upon the modern individual will be the focus of this essay, whilst also considering the role the wedding ring plays in defining the terms of marriage. Woolf portrays Orlando as a modern individual largely because she is free from a number of social conventions and familial pressures other women of the time are subjected to. Despite this, it is the pressure of marriage that she cannot escape: even after she has married Shelmerdine, Orlando is thinking of ways to live her life as before. In contrast to her statement of being forced to consider ‘the most desperate of remedies, which was to yield completely and submissively to the spirit of the age, and take a husband’ (121) Orlando is sincere in her affection for Shelmerdine, suggesting it is the idea of what marriage entails rather than the act itself which provides the pressure to conform and desire for escape. Orlando can be seen as a modern individual in terms of the contemporary, representing the emancipated free woman: this is visible as ‘the cry that rose to her lips was ‘Life! A lover!’ not ‘Life! A husband!’ (120) Without thinking, she automatically associates a husband with restrictions, which, as the text demonstrates, was not always the case in the nineteenth century: a husband would add to freedom whilst a lover could damage her reputation, making her an outsider in the patriarchal and strict Victorian society. Woolf displays this fact through the character of Orlando with marriage as a partial way of achieving freedom. Her decision to pretend to be married in order to live as she had previously done as a man shows marriage as a way to increase liberty; this is enhanced by her union with Shelmerdine, ultimately reflec... ... middle of paper ... ...ctorian England. Works Cited Caine, Barbara. English Feminism. New York: Oxford University Press. 1997. Print. Chesser, Barbara Jo. “Analysis of Wedding Rituals: An attempt to make weddings more sfdsdfffdmeaningful”. Family Relations. Vol. 29, No. 2. (Apr., 1980) pp. 204-209. [JSTOR] Goldman, Jane. The Feminist Aesthetics of Virginia Woolf. New York: Cambridge University Press. fsfdfsdgg2001. Print. Shanley, Mary Lyndon. Feminism, Marriage and the Law in Victorian England. Princeton: Princeton dfsdfdfsdfUniversity Press. 1989. Print. Simmel, Georg. ‘The Metropolis and Mental Life’ in Kolocotroni, Vassiliki; Goldman, Jane; Taxidou, sfdfsfdfsdOlga, ‘Modernism: An Anthology of Sources and Documents.’ Edinburgh: Edinburgh ffffffffffffUniversity Press. 1998. Print. Wolff, Janet. ‘Feminism and Modernism’, The Polity Reader in Social Theory.
Throughout the works of Jane Austen’s Pride and Prejudice and William Shakespeare’s A Midsummer Night’s Dream, the themes of marriage and love are developed through the complexity of the situations that the characters encounter with one another. In Pride and Prejudice, the Bennet girls feel a pressure by society to find a man and get married by a certain age and that is simply how life is supposed to go for these young women. The women’s desires to settle are for the sole purpose of security and this can lead to unhappiness in a marriage of convenience. In A Midsummer Night’s Dream, the characters feel real true love and want to marry for the sole purpose of being together for the rest of their lives. This contrast of motives for marriage ultimately leads to a contention with a partner or love affair that will last a lifetime. Although the desire to marry in Pride and Prejudice may often lead to a dull relationship, the fairy world of A Midsummer Night’s Dream is not present and able to allow for everything to work out, therefore, Austen does a superior job at showing
Lilienfeld, Jane. "Where the Spear Plants Grew." New Feminist Essays on Virginia Woolf. Ed. Jane Marcus. London: Macmillan Press, 1981.
Edith Wharton, the victim of a loveless marriage of twenty-five years, critiques the absurd manners in which New York society regarded marriage during the 1870’s in her ninth novel, The Age of Innocence. In the rapidly changing society that was New York City during the late 19th century, strict societal rules were put in place in order to create structure for those who yearned for it. Rules regarding marriage were included in this need for structure. However, whilst the ridiculous traditions and rules were put in place to create stability, and perhaps in turn naïve happiness, they actually resulted in a society that based marriage in a façade. Throughout The Age of Innocence, Edith Wharton satirises marriage in this society through the ridiculous protocols of the wedding day, Newland Archers and May Wellands behaviour on the day of the wedding, and the behaviour of the other characters in attendance on the day of the wedding.
The stark divide between love and marriage shown right the way through cannot be comprehended fully by the twenty-first century reader: in today’s society marriage and love are mutually exclusive - you very rarely get one without the other, and if you do it is a big controversy. In the nineteenth century, however, marriage was considered a business transaction, with feelings swept to the side. As women did not have control of their assets nor much in the way of career opportunities, marriage was the only way to gain financial security; if not, they were reliant on their male relations. This is illustrated through the predicament facing the female Bennets. The Longbourne Estate is entailed so upon Mr Bennet’s death, Mr Collins would inherit, rather than any of the daughters. It is due to this that marriage is such a prominent idea within the Bennet household: they, none more so then Mrs Bennet, are fully aware that their future depends on a swift marriage.
As a person looks around themselves and their surroundings they can pick up little details about themselves as well as their society. Society has a lot to do with the things that are bought, taken home, displayed. Society depicts what things are fashionable and what’s not. This alludes to the fact that one acquires the ideals of the society around them. Though conforming seems like the best way to make one’s self seem respectable, does it mean that one must lose themselves in order to gain the respect of society? That is the very struggle that presents itself in Virginia Woolf’s Orlando.
The idea of the novel shows the different kinds of marriages and how each character’s pride and prejudices get them there. The union of Mr. Collins and Charlotte demonstrates the ideas of Charlotte’s prideful ambition and a one-sided marriage, whereas the union between Elizabeth and Mr. Darcy shows one of compassion and mutual love because they learned to love each other once they got to know one another. Lydia’s marriage to Mr. Wickham shows the darker side of society and how his character can easily take advantage of an innocent and foolish child. The novel is an example of human interaction in 19th century England and could even be useful for studying that period in history.
In her novel Orlando, Virginia Woolf tells the story of a man who one night mysteriously becomes a woman. By shrouding Orlando's actual gender change in a mysterious religious rite, we readers are pressured to not question the actual mechanics of the change but rather to focus on its consequences. In doing this, we are invited to answer one of the fundamental questions of our lives, a question that we so often ignore because it seems so very basic - what is a man? What is a woman? And how do we distinguish between the two?
“Could I, however, leap overboard and swim in clothes like these? No! Therefore I should have to trust to the protection of a blue-jacket. Do I object to that? Now do I? She wondered, here encountering the first knot in the smooth skein of her argument.” (Woolf, 154-155). Orlando also discovers that there are new expectations for her now that she is a woman and no longer a man. Having been both a man and a woman, Orlando knows what it is like to experience the criticisms and social expectations of both sexes. Orlando knows what limits both sexes and the secrets of their bodies. The biographer states that Orlando knows these criticisms and social expectations by stating, “And here it would seem from some ambiguity in her terms that she was censuring both sexes equally, as if she belonged to neither; and indeed, for the time being she seemed to vacillate; she was man; she was woman; she knew the secret, shared the weaknesses of each.” (Woolf,
Ronchetti, Ann. The Artist, Society, and Sexuality in Virginia Woolf's Novels. New York: Routledge, 2004. Print.
“Marriage and Divorce in Victorian England.” Charlotte's Web: A Hypertext on Charlotte Bronte's Jane Eyre. .
Orlando is the paragon of Virginia Woolf’s literary genius. Published in 1928, the novel is a fictional biography of Woolf’s friend Vita Sackville-West. The novel is dedicated to Vita and "has been called ‘the longest and most charming love letter in literature’" (Meese 469). This crucial biographical context is often overlooked, a displacement which hinders the f...
In Charlotte Bronte’s Jane Eyre, The marriage of Jane and Rochester strengthens the idea of gender equality by promoting the idea focusing on love rather than status and the idea of promoting individuality as it relates to a woman’s views on marriage. The first piece of evidence where the idea of promoting love rather than status is Jane discussing marriage. Jane does not wish for marriage to be a chore she wishes to support her husband in a loving way rather than just by being purely subservient.
Austen showed her fiction view of ideal marriage throughout both stories. While Austen’s ideas that women should be equal to men in marriage may have been revolutionary, she was still very much rooted in the old ideas of class and knowing one’s place in the fiction of her novels. The perfect marriage Austen presents through these comparisons should be founded on equality and shared responsibility, but still must be between parents of an equal rank in society and be undertaken with blessings of both spouses’ families. Only that way could be a happily ever after.
In the Victorian novel marriage is preeminently the foundation of social stability. As a quasi-contractual agreement, it sets up the participants as a center for other integrating relationships. These relationships are not simply necessary for society; they constitute it. And that larger social and historical life, the world of symbolic relationships, forms in dialectical turn the structure that orders individual behavior in Hardy’s novels. (Ramon Saldivar, 615)
Orlando, too, is in love with Rosalind. But his view of love requires him to write drippy poems and walk through the forest hanging them on trees. He sentimentalizes the experience (that is, falsifies it), so that he can luxuriate in his feelings of love rather than focusing sharply on the reality of the experience. In their conversations, Rosalind/Ganymede pointedly and repeatedly deflates his conventional rhetoric. This comes out most clearly in her famous reply to his claim that, if Rosalind rejects him, then he will die.