Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay on criminological theories
Essay on criminological theories
Essay on criminological theories
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
First we need to look at what is Victimology and where did it come from? The origins of Victimology can be traced back to the 1940’s to the 1950’s and early 1960’s it erupted after World War II to seek and understand the relationship between criminal and victim. It began when criminologist had came together to examine the victims of crime at a university. ‘Criminology is the science upon which victimology is founded’ (Wallace; Roberson 2) and when two criminologists, “The founding fathers of Victimology” Mendelsohn and Von Hentig first began the field of victimology by using charts and analysis of different types of crimes of victims. They studied the behaviors and vulnerabilities of victims like, rape victims and murder victims. How some of the ways that some of us can relate to of what a victim is. As Wallace; Roberson writes: …show more content…
The members of a murder victim’s family are more than a “third party”.
According to Nash, the definition of “victim” is a slippery concept. Nast notes that as a matter of law, whether someone is a victim of a crime may depend, among other things, on the type and extent of injury sustained, the tenuousness of the connection of injury to the offender’s conduct, and whether the victim was at fault in the criminal transactions. Nash also note that that the term, “victim” is inconsistently applied in the various arenas of federal criminal law. While the definitions of “victim found in the federal restitution and victim’s rights statutes are functionally identical, the federal Rules of Criminal Procedure define “victim” differently. (Wallace; Roberson
2) After that statement, no wonder why people are so scared not to call themselves victims of crime and are emotionally upset. I agree with part of this statement, but I don’t see where it is the “victims” fault if someone criminally harmed them. That is why in 2004 Crime Victims’ Rights Act passed. When this bill had passed, it was put into place to ensure that victims of such horrible crimes are protected by threats and know where the offender is at when they are released from jail and be able to attend and testify at parole hearings. Also, within this bill was to help fund over a five year span and grants to state, tribal and local prosecutors’ offices were also created to enforce victims’ rights, which how it should be. I believe that victims of any crime should not keep repeating the tarmac events over and over again. Time can only heal that truly can have a positive outlook on it and for some will be scared for live. Which brings me to, “Office for Victims of Crime,” or the abbreviation “OVC” was created in 1982 but wasn’t until October 12th 1984 that President Reagan passed it and signed it into law. This Act is about the main source of federal support for the victims of crime during hardship of the emotional and physical trauma the offender did to the victim. In a way I see it as kind of help, but victims also need therapy to help as well as when hardship comes like this to when the attackers had scared them and are unable to work due to the fear of it happening and many other scenarios. With that Act pass brings me to the next one I will briefly talk about, “1984 Victims of Crime Act passed by Congress.” When this “VOCA” was passed it was to help states in provide good quality services dealing with the emotional healing and recovering victims through these services to also help the victims with ongoing support when the victims try to rebuild their lives after the impact of them being victimized. In 1976 Nova was formed and it is the oldest national victim assistance organization and is largely well known within the U.S. This organization is a private, charity and non- profit organization. Its main function is to have compassion with victims and be respectful to one another.
Generally, the study of crime mainly focused on the offender until quite recently. In fact, Shapland et al (1985) described the victim as ‘the forgotten man’ of the criminal justice system and ‘the non-person in the eyes of the professional participants’. A new perspective was brought with victimology, an expanding sub-discipline of crimin...
1. There are a couple of differences and similarities between the classical and biological theories of criminology. The biological theories of crime support the idea that an individual commits a crime due to their biological make-up and had criminal tendencies because of certain abnormalities that an individual may have had and not because the offender in their right mind chose to commit the crime. The classical theory has the belief that every individual has their own right in the way in which they act upon, so they commit a crime because they choose to do so, not because it is in their biological make-up.
…many people now acquire "victimhood" through counseling. Being a "victim" draws sympathy. It explains the tragedies, the failures, the hardships, the health problems and the disappointments of life. It relieves people of some of life's natural burdens: dealing with complexity, facing things beyond their control, and accepting responsibility for decisions and actions.
Victimology is the scientific study of the physical, emotional, and financial harm people suffer from illegal activities. A common struggle Victimologists face is determining who the victim is. In general, crimes don 't have an “ideal victim”. The term ideal victims refer to someone who receives the most sympathy from society (Christie, 2016). An example of this would be a hardworking, honest man who on his way to work, had his wallet taken by force. Most people in society would have sympathy for him. He spent his life making an honest living to earn what he has and was a victim of a robbery. Victimologists study the interactions victims have with criminals, society, and the criminal justice system (Karmen, 2015). According to (Karmen, 2015)
When the victim does not fit the ideal victim attributes which society has familiarised themselves with, it can cause complications and confusion. Experts have noticed there is already a significant presence of victim blaming, especially for cases involving both genders. The fear of being blamed and rejected by the public is prominent in all victims. Victim blaming proclaims the victim also played a role in the crime by allowing the crime to occur through their actions (Kilmartin and Allison, 2017, p.21). Agarin (2014, p.173) underlines the problem of victim blaming is due to the mass of social problems and misconceptions within society. The offender can have “an edge in court of public opinion” if victim blaming exists, resulting in the prevention of the case accomplishing an effective deduction in court (Humphries, 2009, p.27). Thus, victims will become more reluctant to report offences because of their decrease in trust in the police and criminal justice system, leading to the dark figure of
Elias, R. (1986). Rising Stars: Victims and Victimology. The Politics of Victimization: Victims, Victimology and Human Rights. New York. Oxford University Press, 9-26.
One of the biggest concerns of criminology is the reason why the criminals commit the crimes that they do. Whether it’s due to a mental disease or genetics. Even if the criminal is healthy and has been planning it for months analyzing the consequences and results. Could the society that the criminal has grown up in ever be at fault causing him to act the way he or she did? People have been trying to find the reason that criminals commit these crimes for many years, and the numbers of theories that have been come up with looks to be the same number of criminologists. A criminologist is “one who studies the biological and sociological causes and consequences of crime and criminal behavior (such as the effects of mental defects and social environment).” Their job is to figure out why criminals acted the way they did and how to change the person in order to not repeat it, in other words rehabilitate them. Rehabilitation teaches the prisons to live a better life when let out instead of being punished in prison. When a criminal commits a crime the reason for the action is a very important part of the case and after the prisoner is behind bars, then they can find a solution for the crime to not be repeated by the same convict.
The definition of justice and the means by which it must be distributed differ depending on an individual’s background, culture, and own personal morals. As a country of many individualistic citizens, the United States has always tried its best to protect, but not coddle, its people in this area. Therefore, the criminal justice history of the United States is quite extensive and diverse; with each introduction of a new era, more modern technologies and ideals are incorporated into government, all with American citizens’ best interests in mind.
The three eras that have characterized the field of criminology over the past 100 years are the “Golden Age of Research,” the “Golden Age of Theory,” and an unnamed era that was “’characterized by extensive theory testing of the dominant theories, using largely empirical methods’” (28). The “Golden Age of Research” era spanned from 1900 to 1930 according to John H. Laub. This era is identified as focusing heavily on the collection of data surrounding crime and the criminal. This data was assessed without “any particular ideational framework” (28). The second era, the “Golden Age of Theory,” spanned from 1930 to 1960, also according to Laub. This era is also rather self-explanatory, it is described by the development of theories; however, Laub
Wolhuter, Lorraine, Neil Olley, and David Denham. Victimology: victimisation and victims’ rights. London: Routledge-Cavendish, 2009.
The prosecutor is supposed to represent the victim, however it is the interest of the prosecutor to represent the state. Due to this trend, many victims started to experience economical and psychological problems and most importantly a sense of injustice emerged. As a result of these factors, many agencies and local governments started to put in place some laws that guaranteed the basics rights of victims in the early 1970s. For example crime victims compensation was put in place and rape shield provisions (Paul G. Cassell). However, it wasn’t until 1982 that President Ronald Reagan appointed a Task Force on Victims of Crime; their biggest conclusion was that “ The Criminal Justice System had lost the balance that has been the cornerstone of its wisdom” (Presidents Task Force on Victims of Crime) and recommended various reforms to the way victims were treated in the Criminal Justice System. The task force recommended, “victims, no less than defendants, are entitled to have their views considered at sentencing” (President Task Force, Pg
In recent years the role of victims in the criminal justice system has risen into prominence, inspiring much research into victim experience and possible reform. There are a multitude of factors that influence policy makers in relation to reforming the criminal justice system, one of which is victims. However, victims while they can be catalysts for reforms such as the case of James Ramage among others, they still play a relatively minor role in influencing policy change.
The classical and positivist approaches to criminology theory were both highly influential in their definition of dealing with criminal punishment. Through understanding, the reasons a person commits a crime, one can come up with ways to prevent and control crime. There are many theories in which some link crime to a person. Positivist theory is a philosophical theory stating that positive knowledge is based on natural phenomena and their properties and relations. Classical theory rooted from the theories of the Italian nobleman and economist Cesare Beccaria and an English philosopher, Jeremy Bentham.
Victims of crime will deal with a wide range of immediate, short-term and long-term reactions. All victims will experience shock, distress, numbness and disconnection. It can affect their emotional, psychological, physical, social, financial and spiritual wellbeing, causing people to change their behaviour and lifestyles. Victims who have suffered violent crimes and threats to their lives and personal injury will have a different reaction and have a harder time coping with their feelings than those who are victims of nonviolent crimes. As everyone reacts differently to similar offences it is impossible to predict what effects the individual victim will suffer.
If you look up the word criminology in the dictionary it would be defined as a scientific study of crime as a social phenomenon. Social phenomenon? Say what?