Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Organizational management theories
Essay on organisational culture
Culture influences our ways of living
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Organizational management theories
Organisation culture
Organisation culture can be defined as the collection of relatively
uniform and enduring beliefs, values, customs, traditions and
practices which are shared by an organisation’s members and which are
transmitted from one generation of employees to the next. One view in
the field of organisation culture is the culture metaphor. A metaphor
is a word or phrase applied to an object or action which it does not
literally denote.1 Metaphor can be powerful means of communicating
ideas and are in common use in many organisations. It asserts that
culture is a mental state that has to be tolerated since it is
incapable of being changed by management. It adopted a
phenomenological standpoint and conceptualised culture as a ‘process
of enactment’ – not as something that exists ‘out there’ separate from
people, but which was actually manufactured by company employees as
they interacted with one another on a daily basis within the
workplace.2 In highlighting the symbolic significance of virtually
every aspect of organisation life, the culture metaphor thus focuses
attention on a human side of organisation that other metaphors ignore
or gloss over. The culture metaphor opens the way to a
reinterpretation of many traditional managerial concepts and
processes. It also helps to reinterpret the nature and significance of
organisation environment relations.
Culture of the organisation plays a key role in determining a
structure that would suit. The organisation stance towards
participation and risk-taking will have an impact on the decision
pertaining to number of levels and delegation of authority. Congruence
between culture and structure is important. Lack of congruence can
result in mixed signals across the organisation. Organisational
culture is based on differences in norms and shared practices which
are learned in the workplace and are considered as valid within the
boundaries of a particular organisation. Therefore the efficiency of
an organization structure is determined by how well it fits into the
culture in which it is set.
The environments affect the structures chosen by organizational
decision-makers through their society’s cultural expectations.
Organisational structures are designed to insure survival through
social legitimacy by reflecting the surrounding culture’s values and
beliefs (Birnbaum-More a...
... middle of paper ...
...se of authority here. For the most
part individuals are encouraged to perform their tasks with few
questions asked though important decisions are likely to be made as a
result of political manoeuvring. The greatest strength of power
cultures is their ability to react quickly but their success largely
depends on the abilities of the person or people at the centre.
In conclusion, organisational culture exercises a potent form of
control over the interaction of organisational members with each other
and outsiders. By supplying people with a toolbox of values, norms,
and rules that tell them how to behave, organisation culture is
instrumental in determining how they interpret and react to a
situation. Thus, an organisation’s culture can be a source of
competitive advantage.
References
1. Andrew Brown.1995, ‘Organisational Culture’ Chap1, p13
2. David Buchanan & Andrzej Huczynski. 1997, ‘Organizational
Behaviour’ Chap 18, p514
3. David Buchanan & Andrzej Huczynski. 1997, ‘Organizational
Behaviour’ Chap 22, p681
Additional References
l Gaeth Morgan. 1986 ‘Images of Organization’
2 Laurie J Mullins. 2005 ‘Management and Organisational Behaviour’
that are said like that might not always add up to make sense with an
...f their family (Jackson 867). In everyday life, we posses the same selfish attitude portrayed in the story. What is one of a child’s favorite words? It’s "mine!" We constantly say well "it’s better you than me" and "it’s every man for himself." It’s pretty scary _when you actually think about it, because you realize we really are that selfish.
In this book Charles Dickens basically explains to us how human beings were being turned into machines. Repression caused by the Industrial Revolution dulled fantasies and feelings and people became almost mechanical themselves. This novel shows us that a person's natural tendencies or urges need to be handled carefully by that person's environment and education. Through the processes of sowing, reaping and garnering he was able to explain the mechanizing effects of industrialization.
Centuries apart Robert Herrick and Robert Frost wrote poems illustrating the brevity of life. “To the Virgins, to Make Much of Time'; by Herrick and “Nothing Gold Can Stay'; by Frost are the two poems which address the limited time humanity, especially the time of youth, has to spend in this life. Both authors use nature to symbolize the shortness of life and the time spent in youth.
...roughout her essay, but she stretches them to make them fit a Darwinian reading, and she ignores Christian wording that attributes the course of Great Expectations and the growth of characters to the influence of the Judeo-Christian God. Rather, in direct opposition to Darwin, Dickens denies that inherited genetic traits control a person. If all people are equally low, they are also equally capable of a Christian love, goodness, and grace. And if Dickens emphasizes this theme more distinctly in Great Expectations than in previous works, the effect is only to create a novel that is more, not less, profoundly Christian.
Our Mutual Friend, Dickens' last novel, exposes the reality Dickens is surrounded by in his life in Victorian England. The novel heavily displays the corruption of society through multiple examples. These examples, that are planted within the novel, relate to both the society in Dickens' writing and his reality. In order to properly portray the fraud taking place within his novels, Dickens' uses morality in his universe to compare to the reality of society. He repetitively references to the change of mind and soul for both the better and the worst. He speaks of the change of heart when poisoned by wealth, and he connects this disease to the balance of the rich and the poor. This is another major factor to novel, where the plot is surrounded by a social hierarchy that condemns the poor to a life of misery, and yet, condones any action that would normally be seen as immoral when it occurs in the aristocracy. It expands on the idea that only an education and inheritance will bring success in society, with few exceptions. Lastly, Dickens expands his opinions of society through his mockery of ...
In Charles Dickens' novel Hard Times, he uses the characters to present the reader with many messages. One of these messages presented is that the Gradgrind system of education is faulty. Dickens is critical of an education system that only regards things that can be weighed or measured as being worthy. Thus, intangibles like imagination, emotion, and compassion are not considered worthy. The Gradgrind system of education can be seen as flawed through the examples of Sissy Jupe. The lack of individuality and creativity can be proven to be detrimental to those who ascribe to the Gradgrind system, which denies anything that isn't factual. Sissy's caring; thoughts of fancy, and individualism have kept her from long-term sorrow, pity and loneliness. The Gradgrind system is also proven as flawed through Sissy in that her caring and ingenuity helps the other characters potentially realize how they have let the system flaw them. Also, Sissy's ability to ward of the system's teachings will prove useful and helping others escape the system, be it short term.
Charles Dickens' Exploration of the Victorian Society's Awful Treatment Of The Children Of The Poor
A clever choice of words can make things seem different than they are. For instance, during the Vietnam War, the Defense Department of the United States. States used many misleading phrases in news reports. Instead of "forced" transfer of civilians" they said "relocation", and instead of "lies" they said "elements in the credibility gap." Cirino 18:
To be, the names Charles Dickens picks for each character always either has a word within the characters name that describes the character or rather gives a feel of the name. Thomas Gradgrind is the main character in this story. Gradgrind teaches and educates children in this novel all based around the cold hard facts and nothing else. Anything else said does not have any meaning to him the only ...
...n of science to the place religion once held. The result of this worship of fact is a "conscious death" (described by Louisa) – not a death of consciousness, but a consciousness in spite of death: an ability to think but not feel, or more literally, to think but not live. Since Dickens is implying that the meaning and enjoyment of life cannot be explained by science, he is then also implying that not everything valuable – including that most valuable – is explainable by science. So, even if religion doesn't have a place in Victorian society, its values still ought to. This is emphasized by the switch in Gradgrind from thinking things like "the Good Samaritan was a Bad Economist" (215) to, at the end of the novel, "making his facts and figures subservient to Faith, Hope, and Charity; and no longer trying to grind that Heavenly trio into his dusty little mills" (291).
In this novel, no one commits an entirely unselfish act. Even those characters that appear to be unselfish, help others only to fulfill their need to be seen as benevolent. For Dickens to rail against social inequality and not rail against the immoral and inherent selfishness of man, is an oversight that helped to embed the social caste system in England that pervades it to this day.
Expressions such as these can cause miscommunications, misunderstandings, and basically just a lot of confusion.
...human nature” makes for a bare-bones human existence, replete with crime, immorality, greed, and as especially demonstrated in Louisa’s case, unhappiness. Mr. Sleary’s compassion gives voice to Dickens’s hope for a more unselfish perspective on human motivation. His critique concludes that the success of government lies in realistically evaluating humanity in all of its general and idiosyncratic tendencies. As Nussbaum says in her essay, Dickens does not call for a “relativistic” approach to governance but one more in touch with the realities and complexities of being human.