Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Social media and its effect on this generation
Social media and its effect on this generation
History of social media essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Social media and its effect on this generation
Today’s generation utilizes a different medium of communication which is social networking. Different social networking sites are introduced over the years such as Facebook, Twitter, Formspring and lastly, Tumblr. Tumblr, a social networking site that gained popularity in the Philippines, is becoming an avenue for people to express themselves which is being overused through pseudonymity and degrades the self esteem of an individual.
Tumblr is defined by Pearson (2009) as a social-networking site which is a photo-blog platform which enables its users to post anything that they wish. David Karp created it because he wanted something less verbose yet it mediates between the capabilities of Facebook and Wordpress: Facebook enables its users to post photos and “like” them while Wordpress is the best medium to start a blog. Karp’s idea became successful because Tumblr allows the users to have an account, or as they call it the “tumble blog” which permits them to post texts, photos, quotations, links, videos and the like. The difference between Tumblr and the aforementioned social networking sites is its capability to reblog or repost another user’s posts without the permission of the original owner of the post. According to Tumblr itself, an average Tumblr user reposts at least 3 posts per month. According to Alexa.com, Tumblr was cited as the 11th most popular website in the Philippines.
On Tumblr, a person can impersonate a different person’s identity through posting different pictures, videos and blog posts to become an ideal teenager in the society. Tumblr focuses on the idea of popularity that is why people tend to reblog things for them to be appealing to the others, and for users to obtain more followers. The number of ...
... middle of paper ...
...Program Transcript]. Australia: Australian Broadcasting Corporation.
Pearson, E. (2009). All the World Wide Web’s a Stage: The Performance of Identity in Online Social Networks. First Monday, 14(3). 11 September 2011, from http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/viewArticle/2162/2127
Thompson, C. (2008, September 5). Brave New World of Digital Intimacy. The New York Times. Retrieved 1 April, 2011, from http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/07/magazine/07awareness-t.html?_r=1.
Jobling, V. (2011). Anonymity: The Default Identity for Cyber-bullies on Social Networks. Retrieved 11 September, 2011 from http://networkconference.netstudies.org/2011/04/anonymity-the-default-identity-for- cyber-bullies-on-social-networks/
Anonymous. Top Sites in the Philippines. Retrieved 11 September, 2011 from http://www.alexa.com/topsites/countries/PH
One identity is the person an individual is online, and the second identity is the personality an individual is in real life. Most online personalities are more open and talkative. Online, people are not afraid to say what is on their mind. What they share is open to the world, but is behind a screen and typed up, so there is no face-to-face conversation or debate going on. Not having anyone to say what is on the individual’s mind in person lets down the guard of what others think of the specific
Individuals conceived between the years of 1980 and 2000, as indicated by this article, experience serious difficulties finding their actual self due to the online networking outlets; they regularly depict another person life of a fantasy dream American life on the web. As today’s more youthful era makes the transition to adulthood, trying to accommodate between online and offline characters can be hard. “Van den Bergh asked 4,056 individuals, ages 15 to 25, when they felt they were or weren't being genuine online or logged off, with companions, folks, accomplices or employers.” Through this research he found,
Meghan Daum, born in1970 in California, is an American author, essayist, and journalist. Her article “Virtual Love” published in the August 25-September 1, 1997 issue of The New Yorker follows the author’s personal encounter with cyberspace relationships. Through this article the author presents to us the progress of an online relationship that after seeming entertaining and life changing at the beginning becomes nothing more than a faded memory. In fact she even ends the text stating that “reality is seldom able to match the expectations raised by intoxication of an idealized cyber romance.”(Daum, 1997, P.10) Daum concludes that online-dating or virtual love rarely survives the physical world when confronted by its obstacles such as its pace, idealization, and mainly expectations. However, although the message of the author is true, yet the way by which it was conveyed is found faulty.
Advances in technology have complicated the way in which people are connecting with others around them and how it separates people from reality. In “Virtual Love” by Meghan Daum, she illustrates through the narrator 's point of view how a virtual relationship of communicating through emails and text messages can mislead a person into thinking that they actually have a bond with a person whom they have stuck their ideals onto and how the physical worlds stands as an obstacle in front of their relationship when the couple finally meets. In comparison, the article … While Daum and X discuss that technology pushes us apart and disconnects us from the physical world, they evoke a new light into explaining how technology creates the illusion of making
In an article called “Relationships, community, and Identity in the New Virtual Society” Arnold Brown explains two different identities one that he calls “found identity” and the other “made identity” (34). The found identity is one that is created by one true self, it’s based off your background, your religion, your sex, everything that truly defines who you really are. And then there’s your made identity the one you make for yourself and how you wished to be seen. As technology advances, the easier it will be for young girls to create these made identity’s of out these famous celebrities, having them focus on things that don’t matter instead of valuing who they really are.
In her article “How the Internet Has Changed Bullying”, Maria Konnikova explained how bullying has reached technology, and in the workplaces of many adults. The Internet has made it harder to escape from bullying, and easier for bullies to escape from confronting their victims. Furthermore, the author stresses that cyberbullying not only targets high schoolers, but it’s affecting the lives of college students as well (Konnikova 1). Cyberbullying takes place in the Internet world where is easier for a bully to gossip and humiliate multiple of victims in a faster pace. The studies have shown that cyberbullying is making a greater impact in the victims’ and the bullies’ lives more than the traditional bullying and many people are not aware of it; therefore the schools, witnesses, and employers should work together to fight against cyberbullying and provide help to the victims and bullies.
Multiple identities have been increased by the creation of cyberspace communications according to "Cyberspace and Identity" by Sherry Turkle. Turkle uses four main points to establish this argument. Her first point is that online identity is a textual construction. Secondly she states that online identity is a consequence-free moratorium. Turkle's third point is online identity expands real identity. Finally, her last point states that online identity illustrates a cultural concept of multiplicity. I disagree with many aspects of her argument and I have found flaws in her argument. Technology is an area that does not stand still and consequently outpaced Turkle's argument.
This world as we know is heading towards a more virtual era, where everything we need to know is under the palm of our hands. We have many devices such as smart phones, tablets, computers, which gives us access to an infinite amount of information. This virtual life style we are becoming accustomed to introduced us to social media. An increase amount of interaction is being built between known and unknown users from all around the world. Social networks such as Facebook, MySpace, twitter, and even tumbler have become an everyday routine of our daily lives. In this modern society, all these social media websites have brought about a significant amount of impact in many of us. It has really influenced its users on how to conduct their lives.
Before the internet, our characteristics such as style, identity, and values were primarily exposed by our materialistic properties which psychologists define as the extended self. But people’s inferences to the idea of online self vs. offline self insisted a translation to these signals into a personality profile. In today’s generation, many of our dear possessions have been demolished. Psychologist Russell W belk suggest that: “until we choose to call them forth, our information, communications, photos, videos, music, and more are now largely invisible and immaterial.” Yet in terms of psychology there is no difference between the meaning of our “online selves” and “offline selves. They both assist us in expressing important parts of our identity to others and provide the key elements of our online reputation. Numerous scientific research has emphasized the mobility of our analogue selves to the online world. The consistent themes to these studies is, even though the internet may have possibly created an escape from everyday life, it is in some ways impersonating
Hordila - Vatamanescu, E., & Pana, A. (2010). The Application of the Communication Accommodation Theory to Virtual Communities: A Preliminary Research on the Online Identities. International Journal Of Interdisciplinary Social Sciences, 5(4), 279-290.
Whitty, M. T (2008). Liberating or debilitating? An examination of romantic relationships, sexual relationships and friendships on the Net. Computers in Human Behavior [Online] 24 (5) p.1837–1850.
To begin with, we technically are not born with identity; it is a socially constructed attribute. Identity is a transient thing, which changes over time as we grow and mature. The self-concept, which is our own personal understanding of who we are, combines with self awareness to cultivate a cognitive representation of the self, called identity (Aronson, Wilson, & Akert, 2010, p.118). In other words, who we are is controlled by internal and external factors that combine to make us who we become. Bring new media outlets into the equation, such as the internet, and media is now regarded as an "extension of everyday life and a tool of cultural change" (Singh, 2010). Thus, identity formation, as a social concept, is being transformed in new and even more global ways.
Santos, J. (2013). On Sharing and Losing Control of an Online Persona. Retrieved March 12, 2014 from Media Commons website: http://mediacommons.futureofthebook.org/question/what-are-major-sociallegalprofessional-stakes-sharing-online/response/sharing-and-losing-co
In the world of social media, perception is everything. Everyone has an optimal vision of themselves. With this in mind, the ideal image that one creates for himself is the one that they portray on social media. Whether their platform is Facebook, Twitter, or Instagram, people have the ability to design and produce the image that they want everyone to see. It is important to recognize that this image may at times be exaggerated or fabricated. When realizing that someone’s identity may not always be as it seems, it demonstrates the intricate nature of the human disposition. Saul Mcleod addresses the different categories of social identity in his article Social Identity Theory. “Similarly, we find out things about ourselves by knowing what categories we belong to. We define appropriate behavior by reference to the norms of groups we belong to, but you can only do this if you can tell who belongs to your group. An individual can belong to many different groups” (Mcleod, par. 12). In today’s society there are a wide variety of categories that can potentially indicate how people define themselves. These subdivisions may illustrate their idealistic view of themselves. Social identity is not an artificial idea, it is a part of that person. Their social identity is a part of what makes them who they are. Many people define themselves as followers or feel that they are lost in the crowd. This happens as some tend to
Whitley, E, Gal, U, & Kjaergaard, A 2014, 'Who do you think you are? A review of the complex interplay between information systems, identification and identity', European Journal Of Information Systems, 23, 1, p. 17, Publisher Provided Full Text Searching File, EBSCOhost, viewed 13 April 2014.