Omnivore's Dilemma Book Report

573 Words2 Pages

The Omnivore’s Dilemma addresses what food is “good” for us and why. There are many foods that we can eat, but to figure out what is healthy and obtained naturally is difficult. The author, Michael Pollan, goes on multiple trips to find food that was made without any unnecessary chemicals. Many vegetables grown by large companies have countless chemicals sprayed on them. These chemicals can be poisonous to humans, but the companies leave it out long enough for the chemical concentration to lessen. Industrial companies also have feedlots for the animals. Feedlots are enclosed buildings where animals are kept in one spot for all of their lives. They are treated unfairly and the industry will not let you go into the slaughterhouses, unlike other …show more content…

The main problem with America is that we do not have a major custom having to deal with meal times. For many cultures, meals are a social affair. America has fast food and many do not care about socializing when we have meals. Researching further into the topic, France and Mexico have meal times that almost everyone follows.
A meal you hunted, gathered, and grew all by yourself can be hard to obtain. It is definitely exhausting doing this, as shown in the book. It is a big task and takes a lot of time. The main point of the book tells us that we don’t always have to produce our meal 100% by ourselves, but if we make small decisions that are healthier for us, we can make the world a better place. Industry-produced food burns many fossil fuels. The ratio of energy burned to energy obtained is about 50:1.
The Omnivore’s Dilemma presents a detailed review of the food industry and what foods provide the best health benefits. More people are realizing that fresh foods are better for them and for the Earth. The convenience of processed foods is losing its charm and place in the market. The ultimate decision is yours to decide what you will or will not

Open Document