Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Compare and contrast market structure
Compare and contrast market structure
Evaluating the various market structures
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Compare and contrast market structure
To what extent does Ital Automotive (Shanghai) Co., Ltd, China, approximate an oligopolistic market structure?
Dealers’ respective locations are shown on the Fig. 1 and Fig. 2. They are all surrounded by malls and business centers in central areas of Shanghai.
Ital Automotive (Shanghai) Co., Ltd is likely to share the features of oligopolistic market structure, for its relative dominance of the luxury car industry, high barriers to entry, differentiated products and interdependence of the Ferrari and its competitors. Thus, I researched the extent to which it approximates an oligopolistic market structure.
Different types of markets
Market refers to the place where the interactions of buyers and sellers of goods and services happen,
…show more content…
This distinct feature of the luxury sports car market in Shanghai makes Ital Automotive (Shanghai) Co., Ltd a less approximation to monopoly.
Monopolistic Competition:
Monopolistic competition shares certain features from both monopoly and perfect competition, so it could lie between perfect competition and monopoly. However, unlike that of perfect competition, monopolistic competition has relatively differentiated products; different from that of monopoly, there are low barriers to entry or exit, which resembles perfect competition. The real examples of monopolistic competition are ubiquitous: numerous clothing stores atNanjing road pedestrian street in Shanghai, different restaurants along the Bund, etc.
Specifically, its market structure exhibits the following traits:
• There are a relatively significant number of sellers and buyers in the market, although not as large as that of the perfect competition.
• Individual firms produce slightly differentiated products, though the fundamental characteristics of products remain unaltered. Firms may alter the appearance, design, quality, additional service of the products in order to become more competitive and gain more leverage on pricing in the
…show more content…
However, firms would make normal profits in the long run, as in the perfect competition. For instance, if existing firms have made economic profits, more firms may be attracted to the potential profits and may enter the market freely due to the ease of entry. Consequently, previously firms that benefited from economic profits would lose part of their demand, thus continuing reducing outputs and losing profits until all previous profits are eliminated. When existing firms have made short-run losses, some of them might exit the market due to the shutdown. Therefore, each of the remaining firms would gain more demand from consumers, potentially increasing their outputs and the long-run profits until previous losses are cleared out and normal profits
Topic A (oligopoly) - "The ' An oligopoly is defined as "a market structure in which only a few sellers offer similar or identical products" (Gans, King and Mankiw 1999, pp.-334). Since there are only a few sellers, the actions of any one firm in an oligopolistic market can have a large impact on the profits of all the other firms. Due to this, all the firms in an oligopolistic market are interdependent on one another. This relationship between the few sellers is what differentiates oligopolies from perfect competition and monopolies.
This organization belongs to the oligopoly market structure. The oligopoly market structure involves a few sellers of a standardized or differentiated product, a homogenous oligopoly or a differentiated oligopoly (McConnell, 2004, p. 467). In an oligopolistic market each firm is affected by the decisions of the other firms in the industry in determining their price and output (McConnell, 2005, P.413). Another factor of an oligopolistic market is the conditions of entry. In an oligopoly, there are significant barriers to entry into the market. These barriers exist because in these industries, three or four firms may have sufficient sales to achieve economies of scale, making the smaller firms would not be able to survive against the larger companies that control the industry (McConnell, 2005, p.
Large players can offer competitive prices if they buy in bulk. Smaller players can differentiate themselves by offering niche products and superior customer delight at a premium price.
It is a well-known fact that every firm wants to be successful in its business. Sometimes it is difficult to decide what kind of actions to take in order to achieve it. Especially, it is hard on oligopoly market because this is one of the most complicated market structures. Oligopoly includes many models and theories such as duopoly where are just two producers and which pricing decisions remind monopoly, kinked demand curve, which decreases economic profit, and cartel, which brings economic profit just for the short-run. However, to be a successful oligopolistic firm in the long run, managers should include in the planning process such economic theories and models as producer interdependence, the prisoner’s dilemma, price leadership, nonprice adjustments, and correct using of barriers to entry.
Can you imagine the world with a limited amount of choices when it comes to purchasing different products and services? How does perfect competition and monopolistic competition differ and effect our buying power? As stated by Investopedia (2016), “Perfect competition is the opposite of a monopoly, in which only a single firm supplies a particular good or service, and that firm can charge whatever price it wants because consumers have no alternatives and it is difficult for would-be competitors to enter the marketplace (para 1)”.
No single firm can influence market price in a competitive industry; therefore a firm’s demand curve is perfectly elastic and price equals marginal revenue. Short-run profit maximization by a competitive firm can be analyzed by comparing total revenue and total cost or applying marginal analysis. A firm maximizes its short-run profit by producing that output at which total revenue exceeds total cost by the greatest amount.
There are four major market structures; perfect competition, monopolistic competition, oligopoly, and monopoly. Perfect competition is the market structure in which there are many sellers and buyers, firms produce a homogeneous product, and there is free entry into and exit out of the industry (Amacher & Pate, 2013). A perfect competition is characterized by the fact that homogeneous products are being created. With this being the case consumers have no tendency to buy one product over the other, because they are all the same. Perfect competitions are also set up so that there is companies are free to enter and leave a market as they choose. They are allowed to do with without any type of restriction, from either the government or the other companies. This structure is purely theoretical, and represents and extreme end of the market structure. The opposite end of the market structure from perfect competition is monopoly.
Difference Between Oligopoly and Monopolistic Competition An oligopoly market structure is one in which there are a few large producers who are present in the industry and account for most of the output in the industry, there are many small firms but few large. firms dominate and have concentrated market share. Whereas monopolistic competition is a market structure that has a large number of sellers, each of which is relatively small and posse a very small market share. Another feature of an oligopoly is that there are some barriers to entry and exit into the industry.
The second market structure is a monopolistic competition. The conditions of this market are similar as for perfect competition except the product is not homogenous it is differentiated; thus having control over its price. (Nellis and Parker, 1997). There are many firms and freedom of entry into the industry, firms are price makers and are faced with a downward sloping demand curve as well as profit maximizers. Examples include; restaurant businesses, hotels and pubs, specialist retailing (builders) and consumer services (Sloman, 2013).
Markets have four different structures which need different "attitudes" from the suppliers in order to enter, compete and effectively gain share in the market. When competing, one can be in a perfect competition, in a monopolistic competition an oligopoly or a monopoly [1]. Each of these structures ensures different situations in regards to competition from a perfect competition where firms compete all being equal in terms of threats and opportunities, in terms of the homogeneity of the products sold, ensuring that every competitor has the same chance to get a share of the market, to the other end of the scale where we have monopolies whereby one company alone dominates the whole market not allowing any other company to enter the market selling the product (or service) at its price.
In a perfectly competitive market, the goods are perfect substitutes. There are a large number of buyers and sellers, and each seller has a relatively small market share. Perfect competition has no barriers to information regarding prices and goods, meaning there is no risk-taking behaviour – sellers and buyers are rational. There is also a lack of barriers for entry and exit.
AutoEdge is facing crisis since millions of its automobiles has had to be recalled due to product quality issues. Many things should be considered in order to implement a proactive response to rectify the situation. As the research analysis, I have been tasked will helping to rebuild AutoEdge’s reputation as well as to reduce and control operating costs. When making any decision on implementing change within the organization market analysis must look at the market structure of the organization. Market structure is made up of the relationship that exists between buyers, sellers, competition, product differentiation, and ease of entry into and exit from the market. The article “Review of Market Structure” (n.d.) defines market structure as the “microeconomic characteristics of different markets” and include such elements as competition level, high versus low entry barriers, and scale (Review of Market Structure, n.d.) To make the decision the decision to relocate, AutoEdge must analysis and evaluate of market structure. This report will discuss the four different types of market structures: monopoly, oligopoly, monopolistic competition, and pure competition. Additionally, it will outline the type of market structure AutoEdge fits into, how that market structure impacts the level of competition, elasticity of demand, price, and position in the industry.
The Structure Of The Market Structure Of Oligopoly And The Difficulty In Predicting Output And Profits
The type of firm we are going to investigate in this assignment is an oligopolistic firm. The essence of an oligopolistic market is that here are only a few sellers. As a result, the actions of any one seller in the market can have a large impact on the profits of all the other sellers. Oligopolistic firms are interdependent in a way that competitive firms are not. The company we chose to study is Petronas.
BMW, like any other oligopolistic firm operating under competition (will be detailed in chapter 4), will face a kinked demand curve (fig 1). Since BMW operates in a market with few firms and highly differentiated products, it will have an inelastic demand for its products as there are no close substitutes. In other words, BMW has some market power, which is the ability to raise...