Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Achieving justice for indigenous people
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The Oka Crisis was a violent conflict that occurred between the First Nation Mohawks and the Canadian government during the summer of 1990 in Quebec, Canada. It arose from a proposed expansion of a golf course and new luxury homes by the Oka Golf Club and town municipality. The crisis was sustained for 78 days and astonished the world. It became a major issue and won a great deal of attention on the first Nations’ a serious dilemma, engendered profound and lasting political and social impacts between the Canadian government and the Indigenous peoples. Moreover, the crisis has had a critical impact on the Mohawks' self-awareness. However, lamentably, there is still something that has not been changed from within the government and it should …show more content…
The Oka Crisis awakened the whole range of Indigenous peoples in Canada. The Mohawks in three reserves (Kahnawake, Akwesasne and Kanesatake) had a profound impact on them. Oka set the tone for Indigenous resistance throughout the 1990s, and inspired many people and communities to take action. The people who were involved in the crisis, they are still proud of that time. At that time, no one was frightened, not even the children. (Tatum, 2013) The whole community united as one in order to defend their homeland. (Diable, 2013) Since the crisis, the community has become politicized and more concerned with what they must do to preserve their identity and strengthen the …show more content…
There’s still work to be done. There’s not enough support for the rights of Indigenous peoples on their lands.”(Ahooja, Burrill, & Higgins, 2010) She is a Montreal-based activist, over the past three decades she’s worked on Canadian social justice issues related to poverty reduction, illiteracy, and the rights of First Nations. She emphasized that Canada is one of the three countries that has yet to sign the UN Resolution on Indigenous Peoples. Attempts were made to get Quebec to put pressure on the federal government and to sign a declaration itself – maybe not the one from the UN because it’s only a province – but that did not work either. This means that, at all levels of government, there haven’t been many changes. (Ahooja et al., 2010) Moreover, the UN Resolution is not very constraining. Boucher deemed, “It could probably have an important impact if they followed it to its endpoint; but the governments deny any rights to Indigenous peoples.” In sum, the Canadian government has kept their attitude to the First Nations and cannot avoid falling into the same old trap
The Mohawk warriors at Oka did carry the burden of peace because they were peacefully protecting their land, there was no act of violence shown by the Mohawk warriors at Oka against the army, and in the end they had peacefully walked out without putting a fight. According to Marian Scott form the Montreal Gazette, the Mohawks had used the Pines, to graze their livestock and cut wood. Since the 18th century Mohawk members and Mohawk warriors have been protesting peacefully and pressing the government to recognize their land claims, but their requests would always be
The Grassy Narrows (Asubpeeschoseewagong) First Nation is an Ojibwa First Nation located north of Kenora, ON. The community has been fighting against environmental injustices imposed on them from various actors over the last 40 years (Rodgers, 2009, para. 10), involving issues with mercury poisoned fish (para. 1) clear cutting of their lands (para. 27) and subsequent degradation of their land, water and food sources. This essay will detail the environmental justice struggles of the Grassy Narrows First Nation, point out the unfair treatment and environmental racism they have been subject to and will also question the role that authority, power and litigation have played within the community.
The Oka Uprising was initially a peaceful protest over the expansion of a golf course on Mohawk territory that turned violent after Quebec’s provincial police, the Sûreté du Québec, responded to the protest with tear gas and flash-bang grenades, eventually escalating to a gun battle between protesters and police. Years after the stand-off, revisionist military historians have praised the Canadian military for avoiding bloodshed because of their “personal commitment [and] calm and attentive approach to native reality,” in which they ought to be commended for “carrying the burden of peace” (Conradi 548). However, Robinson rejects this notion and instead proposes a re-imagining of the Oka conflict through the “adjustment” of First Nations people who fought at Oka with the “bombing of the last Canadian reserve” (Robinson 211). Through “carrying the burden of peace” the Officers are given the power to destroy any semblance of Indigenous tradition, such as the potlatch, and to violently corral all First Nations people to sectioned off “Urban Reserves”. By disrupting popular Canadian perception of law enforcement Robinson succeeds in creating a dystopian image of corrupted power that allows readers to sympathize with the subjection of First Nations people of
Throughout the history of Canada the indigenous population of the country have been voiceless. They have been both suppressed and oppressed by the Federal and various Provincial governments within Canada. Many organizations tried to provide a voice for the native population but failed in their attempt. These organizations eventually merged together to become what is now known as The Assembly of First Nations. The Assembly of First Nations gives voice to the issues and problems facing the different components of the aboriginal community in Canada.
Living in Canada, there is a long past with the Indigenous people. The relationship between the white and First Nations community is one that is damaged because of our shameful actions in the 1800’s. Unnecessary measures were taken when the Canadian government planned to assimilate the Aboriginal people. Through the Indian Act and Residential schools the government attempted to take away their culture and “kill the Indian in the child.” The Indian Act allowed the government to take control over the people, the residential schools took away their culture and tore apart their families, and now we are left with not only a broken relationship between the First Nations people but they are trying to put back together their lives while still living with a harsh reality of their past.
In Canada, there are roughly 617 first nations groups spanning from the east to the west coast. The were the first people to cultivate the land, explore the territory, and created permanent community. Since the introduction of European settlers to today's multicultural society. The First Nations groups have experienced many difficulties. These days the Peoples of Plateau located in B.C. have united to take "The Trans Mountain pipeline" to court. The Peoples of the Plateau feel this pipeline expansion project affects their nation socially, economically, politically and environmentally.
The efforts toward Reconciliation from the Canadian Government have been historically inadequate due to the conservative party led by stephen harper prioritizing other financial and social issues before important Aboriginal issues, which has ultimately affected their decision to follow through with proposed initiatives, such as the Kelowna Accord. The Kelowna Accord was a list of conditions and policies agreed upon between the Canadian Government, the leaders of every province and territory with the leaders of the First Nations People. Unfortunately when the conservative party took over, they decided that they did not have the funds necessary to implement the previously agreed upon accord, and insisted that it “did not exist” This decision unquestionably wounded the opportunity for reconciliation between the Government and First Nations People, which was a shame due to the benefits which are outlined in reconciliation.
Presently, access to programs and health care services is fragmented given the nature of the health care system for Aboriginal peoples (Wilson et al., 2012). The federal government is responsible for providing limited health services among Inuit living within traditional territories and status/registered Indians living on reserves (Chen et al., 2004). This responsibility is vested in the First Nations and Inuit Health Branch organizations to carry out protection activities and health promotion, and provide funding for community health programs in Inuit communities and reserves (Chen et al., 2004). Firstly, the complexity of the health care system for Aboriginal peoples has resulted in an unequal access to health services due to the First Nations and Inuit Health Branch program (FNIHB), which only applies to Inuit and Indians. Therefore, Metis and other Aboriginal peoples who do not qualify for registration under the Indian Act do not receive health services provided by FNIHB (Chen et al., 2004). Secondly, the transfer of responsibility to health boards, communities and other authorities has resulted in unequal supply of health services between territories and provinces, uneven distribution among communities, and leaves limited opportunity for increased funding (Loppie et al., 2009). It has also lead to controversy between various levels of government over the responsibility to pay for particular health services. Jurisdictional limitations, which have failed to recognize Metis identity and rights, have resulted in health disparities among the Metis population (Wilson et al., 2012). While the federal government recently decided to include Metis status in Aboriginal initiatives, the funding has not been equitable when compared to those of Inuit and First Nations or to the non-Aboriginal populations in Canada (Loppie et al., 2009). The Aboriginal health
“In about half of the Dominion, the aboriginal rights of Indians have arguably been extinguished by treaty” (Sanders, 13). The traditions and culture of Aboriginals are vanishing at a quick pace, and along it is their wealth. If the Canadian Government restore Native rights over resource development once again, Aboriginals would be able to gain back wealth and help with the poverty in their societies. “An influential lobby group with close ties to the federal Conservatives is recommending that Ottawa ditch the Indian Act and give First Nations more control over their land in order to end aboriginal poverty once and for all” (End First). This recommendation would increase the income within Native communities, helping them jump out of
As soon as the federal government stepped in and offered to buy the land, this was seen as a dispute all over Canada. It was the main topic on many Montreal radio talk shows. Many of the events were being broadcasted throughout the country on the nightly news. Everyone became aware of the crisis. This seventy-eight day crisis brought native issues up to Canada. It allows the Canadian people to learn about what hardships the indigenous people go through. Many Canadians had sympathy while there were some who others built a negative attitude towards the indigenous. The Oka Crisis led to a document and many different books and films. The most important one was the “Kanehsatake: 270 Years of Resistance”. Even people involved in the Oka Crisis went
Fleras, Augie. “Aboriginal Peoples in Canada: Repairing the Relationship.” Chapter 7 of Unequal Relations: An Introduction to Race, Ethnic and Aboriginal Dynamics in Canada. 6th ed. Toronto: Pearson, 2010. 162-210. Print.
Canada likes to paint an image of peace, justice and equality for all, when, in reality, the treatment of Aboriginal peoples in our country has been anything but. Laden with incomprehensible assimilation and destruction, the history of Canada is a shameful story of dismantlement of Indian rights, of blatant lies and mistrust, and of complete lack of interest in the well-being of First Nations peoples. Though some breakthroughs were made over the years, the overall arching story fits into Cardinal’s description exactly. “Clearly something must be done,” states Murray Sinclair (p. 184, 1994). And that ‘something’ he refers to is drastic change. It is evident, therefore, that Harold Cardinal’s statement is an accurate summarization of the Indigenous/non-Indigenous relationship in
In New York, on the 13th of September 2007, The United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples was accepted by the United Nations General Assembly. A General Assembly Declaration isn’t actually a legal binding instrument under the International Law, the UN press says it does “represent the dynamic development of international legal norms and it reflects the commitment of the UN’s member states to move into certain directions’. The UN portrays it as setting ‘an important standard for the treatment of indigenous peoples that will definitely be a an important tool towards wiping out human rights violations against the world’s 370 million indigenous people and assisting them in repelling discrimination and marginalisation. UNDRIP summarizes "Indigenous historical grievances, contemporary challenges and socio-economic, political and cultural aspirations". It is generations upon generations of long tiresome efforts to achieve international attention, to secure their aspirations and also to get support for their political agendas.
This paper supports Thomas Flanagan's argument against Native sovereignty in Canada; through an evaluation of the meanings of sovereignty it is clear that Native sovereignty can not coexist with Canadian sovereignty. Flanagan outlines two main interpretations of sovereignty. Through an analysis of these ideas it is clear that Native Sovereignty in Canada can not coexist with Canadian sovereignty.
The abuse of native populations has been a common theme throughout history, especially for the rising nations of the 1800s. Of the many guilty nations, Canada is one of the few to have apologized for their actions. Canada’s formal apology, titled “Statement of Apology to Former Students of Indian Residential Schools”, was delivered on Canada Day of 2008 by former Prime Minster of Canada, Stephen Harper. This apology speech not only serves as a reminder to Canadian citizens about their past actions as a nation, but also demonstrates how the Canadian perspective on native peoples has changed over one-hundred years from disgust and apathy to respect and sympathy. Specifically, this shift of attitude is demonstrated through Harper’s manner of