Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Use of drones to combat terrorists
How have drones changes war
Use of drones in the war on terror
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The Meaning of Ode to a Drone
“Hell-raiser, razor-feathered risers, windhover over Peshawar,”(Majmudar Lines 1-3) That was the first stanza of the poem “Ode to a Drone” by Amit Majmudar. This poem is written by a Muslim American who grew up in Cleveland, Ohio. The first stanza is the beginning to an ode to a drone, but immediately, you know he is not praising the drone for being powerful, he is explaining how it is unnecessarily destructive. A drone is an unmanned flying vehicle that shoots missiles or drops bombs on targets in modern warfare. Modern warfare today is taking place in the Middle East which is a transcontinental region centered on Western Asia and Egypt. Many terrorist groups such as ISIS, which is the largest threat right now.
…show more content…
They believe in Islam and establishing a caliphate. A caliphate is a radical extremist state, with a supreme ruler. Their leader, who is Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi sees himself as the caliph, or ruler. ISIS has been killing and executioning a colossal number of Innocent people who did not do anything wrong to them. “At least 18,802 civilians have been killed in Iraq in ISIS-linked violence in under two years.”(ISIS Death Toll: 18,800 Killed in Iraq in 2 Years, January 2016) That is many lives of people who did not do anything wrong, they were just at the wrong place at the wrong time. 18,802 people, just in Iraq. They have also killed many people all over Europe and the United States. That is unacceptable, they need to be stopped. I believe drones might be a vital object in the process of putting an end to Terrorism. Amit Majmudar is saying people who use these drones are idiotic scientists who are fools of God,”But fuel and bombs, fool of God, Savage Idiot savant”(Majmudar Lines 13-15) A savant is a distinguished scientist. It is plain and simple to easily pick out Amit’s point of view. He thinks these drones are terrible and killing many innocent people. In reality, these people are not innocent, they are terrorists, and they need to be stopped immediately. They are doing things that easily identify them as enemies to everyone but themselves. If you think about it, drones substitute for manned aircrafts which takes death out of the equation for the people using the drones. So, if the United States, and our allies use them we will have less deaths for people who actually deserve to live. I can see how Amit hates these drones because they do kill people, those people might be Amit's family members or friends.
It is a fact that he is the son of immigrants who traveled to the United States to have a better life, and I am glad they did because it is more safe here than the Middle East. There are still some minor and major acts of terrorism that still happen in the United States of America, but it is a number far less of the ones taking place in the Middle East. Amit is a citizen of the United States, so that means we protect him as a country, if he was a citizen of Iraq, he could easily be part of the increasing number of 18,802 civilians that have been killed in Iraq in ISIS-linked violence in under two years. “ISIS lacks any sophisticated air defense system or any other way to challenge unmanned air supremacy, dozens of armed drones could enter the air space and fire weaponry but low enough for precision target identification and strike.” (How America’s Drones Can Defeat ISIS by Defense One) This means drones can easily get the job done to shrink down this terrorist state. That easily proves Amit’s biased opinion of drones wrong. I do not think he realizes that drones are useful and used with precision and strategy, we do not use them because we have a “trigger-finger gamer’s thumb.” (Lines
17-18) As of now, it is very easy for disguised terrorists to enter our beloved country. President Obama has a very open foreign policy that allows basically anyone into our country if their records are “good.” Good meaning that if they have a family, being a child, or having no criminal records means that you are welcome into our country. To me this is still wrong and it is illegal, if you want to become a United States citizen you should have a passport or green card first and enter the country and try to become a citizen legally. The United States has a terrible refuge program as well in the past seven years, the United States has added around 55,000-80,000 per year. Most of the refuges nowadays are from the Middle East due to the corruption taking place there, seeing those stats makes me feel unsafe living in my own country. Even know those people are leaving their country because of the terrorism taking place there, that does not mean that all of them aren’t linked to terrorist groups. I am not saying they are all terrorists but I know not all of them are clean, and that is not good for our country's safety. When refugees arrive into the United States, they are provided for food, housing, clothing, employment counseling, medical care, and other necessities. I also think this is unacceptable because we are wasting money on a bunch of people that should not even be allowed in our country. “In January 2014, communities across America identified 49,933 homeless veterans during point-in-time counts, which represents eight point six percent of the total homeless population.” That is really unbelievable, those are homeless Americans who fought for our country, and we still manage to let refugees into our country and give them care for everything when almost fifty thousand American veterans are homeless. This is all ISIS’s fault because they made the Middle East corrupt which sends us refugees that we take care of for some reason when there are almost fifty thousand American veterans who are homeless and aren’t given the attention that a foreigner is receiving. To help out the citizens of the United States, both the ones who went to war and the ones who didn’t, drones can easily suppress terroristic activities in our country, Europe, and in the Middle East as well. An “Ode to A Drone” by Amit Majmudar is just his personal opinion that I do not agree with, I do not think drones are “hellraisers,” I think they are American savers. (1084 Words) (High Proficient Prompt #1)
“Flight Patterns,” by Sherman Alexie, tells an interesting story of a man named William, who is a Spokane Indian and lives in Washington State with his wife Marie and five-year-old daughter Grace. William struggles with living between the traditionalist American and Indian worlds by appearing confident and assured, but on the inside, he is actually weak, fearful, and has an abundance of obsessions. He loves his job and hates it at the same time, He needs to fly for his job, but flying scares him since the terrorist attacks that happened on September 11th. He seems very indecisive and unassured at times. He stays in the same hotel chain, eats at the same restaurants, and has the same exercise routine while
Controversy has plagued America’s presence in the Middle East and America’s usage of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) contributes vastly to this controversy. Their usefulness and ability to keep allied troops out of harm’s reach is hardly disputed. However, their presence in countries that are not at war with America, such as Pakistan and Yemen, is something contested. People that see the implications of drone use are paying special attention to the civilian casualty count, world perspective, and the legality of drone operations in non-combative states. The use of drone technology in the countries of Yemen and Pakistan are having negative consequences. In a broad spectrum, unconsented drone strikes are illegal according to the laws of armed conflict, unethical, and are imposing a moral obligation upon those who use them. These issues are all of great importance and need to be addressed. Their legality is also something of great importance and begins with abiding to the Laws of Armed Conflict.
In the article ‘’Confessions of a Drone Warrior’’, published in the GQ in October 22, 2013, by Matthew Power, the author talks about a drone pilot’s experience after working with military drones for 6 years. In this article, the main point the author is trying to prove is that flying military drones is not some kind of video game, it’s as real as it gets, even though the pilot doesn’t actually take part in combat. It can change people. During his service, the Airman First Class Brandon Bryant killed 1626 people. It’s terrifying, considering that the pilot had to watch every person die. His job was to monitor people(normally high-value targets in Afghanistan) from the sky and when he got the command to kill from the authorities, he fired a missile
The book Flight written by Sherman Alexie is about a 15 year old part Native American
In addition, Byman argues that “drones have devastated al Qaeda and associated anti-American militant groups... and they have done so at little financial cost” (Byman 1). In the article, Byman compares the financia...
On the use of drones, NYT’s Peter M. Singer (“Do Drones Undermine Democracy?”) makes the comprehensive argument that the use of drones goes against the how wars are meant to be fought—human participation. It can be counter argued that these automatons are better in terms of expendability; personnel are not easily replaced while drones are easily replaceable. The Bush 43 strategy relied more on men, and it did yielded adverse results politically. The switch to drones presented dynamic political benefits, for which Singer argued allowed for circumvention of aggravated/emotive discourse among members of the American populace, academics and mass media. It is imperative to remember that the cost of the campaigns in Afghanistan and Iraq—increases in casualties—was detrimental to the American credibility and brought about victory to Obama in 2008 elections.
Roggio, Bill. "US Drones Kill 2 AQAP Fighters in Eastern Yemen." The Long War Journal. The
department store to pick up a single item, you can receive just within 30 minutes of ordering it. It
(Custom Reader 104) This topic intrigued me because I haven’t really thought about if the American citizens had to run in fear for their lives, knowing a drone flying around your safe territory could randomly eliminate you at any time. This made me wonder if situations like this created enmity or jealousy towards the safeguarded citizens belonging to the aggressor. The article highlights O’Connell’s dismay that the misuse and misplacement of drones within ethical bounds has fanned fire into the flames, only making those opposed to the United States angrier. (106) While O’Connell’s argument is definitely sincere in caring for the well-being of other beings, I believe that there can definitely situation in which another hostile would resort to hiding within the safe zones, which would endanger those who are immediately surrounding him and those who he may be plotting against. While this does not intrinsically warrant deployment of drones to search for and eliminate the target, it forces a great burden on to the shoulders of the CTU and the government that I’m sure no person would
Ratnesar, Romesh. "Ground Zero: Exaggerating the Jihadist Threat." TIME.com. N.p., 18 Aug. 2010. Web. 19 Dec. 2014. .
The use of drones as weapons of war and delivery and surveillance systems should not be dismissed because many people do not realize the real capabilities of drones and how they can be used to better the world through efficient air strikes, faster delivery times, and useful surveillance. Some of the most common misconceptions about drones arise due to the lack of knowledge about what drones are. A drone is a remote controlled, pilotless aircraft that can be used to survey an area, conduct stealth missions, and deliver supplies into difficult to reach areas (Drone). Unmanned aircraft are also, contrary to popular belief, not solely machines that kill without even a thought to who is being fired upon. They have proved to be effective surveillance units in areas that may be dangerous for manned aircraft to fly, along with the potential to be reliable delivery units (Drones).
Second, the terza rima scheme helps the narrator to express his thoughts. In A Defense of Poetry, Shelley states that there exists harmony between the language that poets employ and the sounds that are contained in each word because both sounds and thoughts are intertwined to convey the message that they attempt to represent (763). In other words, there exists a close proximity between the sense of words and their sound; it is the enchainment of both ideas and sounds that creates an effect of harmony. Thus, language and sound work in conjunction to create a stylized and harmonious message which comes to life each time the poem is either read or recited out loud. We mentioned earlier that the Ode to the West Wind is an ode that addresses, that
...only imagine how hazardous this world we live in become. Amongst countries this can become an international competition to make drones to be used as a factor. When other nations see this particular country is using some type of technology to improve their military system then they would want part of it as well. The drone practice can cause to escalate if other countries adopt to this new technology for their own reason of protection. There will be no turning back because the government of that country would take advantage of these drones to use it towards the citizens instead of using for “terrorist”. The use of these drones is definitely immoral and unethical but some may argue that the of drones as protection against “terrorist” even though as we can see it kills innocent people, creates more terrorists, causes psychological disorders, and violates privacy. (Cole)
Every day the world is evolving, different types of technology are being made for different kinds of uses. Some people in the army want to use drones to carry out different types of missions, in other places in the world. Using will help soldiers carry out missions, quicker, easier, and much more efficient. 60% of Americans agree on the usage of drones for army purposes. Many people say that the army should not use drones because drones will increase the number of terrorists, drones can kill and injure innocent civilians, and that drones will “...allow the United States to become emotionally disconnected from the horrors of war” (ℙ8, Drones). There are many advantages with having drones aid military bases, because
Living in the digital age where we enjoy the various fruits of latest technological tools and advancements, then at the same time we cannot escape from their hidden or apparent harms. Also, it is a fact that some gadgets supported by these technological advancements are much capable to bring destruction and disaster then construction and convenience. The same goes for the Drone Technology which since past 200 years is being used to create turbulence at the global level. It has proved to be a powerful investigator and bomber at the same time. Drones are specifically associated with military actions and the countries having used them for surveillance purposes include UK, USA, Italy, Japan, Austria, Australia etc. The list of victim counties or nations is much bigger in contrast. Some prominent victims of Drone Air Strikes include Congo, Venice, Afghanistan, and Pakistan. However, it is also an undeniable fact that the massive production and usage of Drones got multiplied in the 21st century.