Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Ayn rand collectivism
Ayn rands opinion on collectivism vs individualism
Ayn rand, individualism and collectivism
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Ayn rand collectivism
Imagine a world in which Altruistic philosophy took over the American public. Each citizen would help everyone in need instead of improving the quality of America by working towards a better economy. According to Ayn Rand, objectivism influences one to follow their own will by partaking in an activity that makes one feel happiness. She believes that helping others simply does not fulfill a human’s hunger for joy. Rand emulates the ideas of objectivism in Anthem: “It is in We the Living that the moral code of objectivism is presented: If one's survival depends on one's own mind, then to claim another's mind is to claim another's life. The only moral course of action is to support one's own life by one's own mind—to live for one's own sake—and …show more content…
to allow others to do the same” (Gould). Growing up in Stalinist Russia, Rand exposed herself to an era in which people followed others because of their “immense power.” Finding herself sickened by this, Rand fled from Russia to America, and soon began to collectively form an idea that would soon lead to the objectivism philosophy. In agreement with Ayn Rand, the author of Anthem, switching America to follow objectivism would benefit the American government to execute the goal of working on the state of America’s economy, strive to control the people of their country, and regulate modern-day politics. Objectivism may very well help the American government take control of economic deflation that previously damaged hard working citizens. Equality from Anthem states: “ But I am done with this creed of corruption. I am done with the monster of “We”, the word of serfdom, of plunder, of misery, falsehood and shame” (97; ch. 12). The downfall of Russia proves how Marxism, or in similarity, collectivism will have the same effects on America if the government ever decided to dump our system of democracy. Witalec explains: “In essence, Marxists believe that a work of literature is not a result of divine inspiration are pure artistic endeavor, but that it arises out of the economic and ideological circumstances surrounding its creation.” The given quotation explains how practices like collectivism can be very inclusive and ideological. Furthermore, America would simply lose the economy that consumers have built over the years. While portraying selfless behavior may be a great character trait to have, too much will drag America’s economy and morale down. It is important to have competition and a goal to fight for. Equality explains his thoughts on his life after the World Council: “We could also rise, or run, or leap, or fall down again. We were thinking that these were thoughts without sense, but before we knew it our body had risen in one leap” (78; ch. 8). The drive in competition will motivate American citizens to work harder at work and help more in their communities. To further a previous point, Equality realized that after he left the society that promoted collectivism, he found himself to feel more powerful and enlightened than ever before. Along with the economic benefit, the American government could also achieve the goal of getting more control over the American people.
However, this is not an idea that promotes a dictatorship, but an opportunity to control more over what occurs inside American borders. Equality speaks his last words in the novella: “For The coming of the day shall I fight, I am my sons and my children friends. For the freedom of man. For his rights. For his life. For his honor” (104; ch. 12). The previous quotation allows the reader to understand how Equality gained control over his life in the end of the novella. In resemblance to Equality, the American government and citizens themselves can achieve the same kind of control. Following objectivism would allow every American citizen to gain control of their futures, as well as their mental states. In the midst of escaping his life, Equality finally finds the forbidden word in which he wishes to say: “I am. I think. I will.… This earth of mine… What must I say besides? These are the words. This is the answer” (94; ch. 11). Executing the objectivism philosophy into one’s life will open up their eyes much like how Equality enables himself near the end of the novella. Ayn Rand especially implements these values into her life by publicly speaking about the benefits of choosing to follow …show more content…
objectivism. One of the final perks of objectivism enables the people of America to properly regulate modern politics.
Understanding his purpose Equality exclaims: “I understood that centuries of chains and lashes will not kill the spirit of man nor the sense of truth within him” (98; ch. 12). By enforcing objectivism into politics, the politicians of America can help create a better country for its citizens. Many people would be able to offer extremely effective advice to American officials that could make everyone in America ecstatic about the progress of the country. After Liberty and Equality flee collectivism, Equality tells himself how he chooses to live his life: “The fortune of my spirit is not to be blown into coins of brass and flung to the wins as alms for the poor of the Spirit. I guard my treasures: my thought, my will, my freedom. And the greatest of these is freedom” (95-96; ch. 11). With the gift of understanding comes the gift of freedom. Through objectivism, people and politicians could be free with their thoughts. If the government continued to allow citizens to freely voice their opinions while following objectivism, America could become a better place for all of its citizens to live
in. In conclusion of the idea of including objectivism into American politics, the closing message tells one that objectivism can greatly impact the lives of many Americans. The economy and well being of America can introduce itself to a philosophy in which competition and selfishness improves one’s health. The spike in competition always succeeds in the goal of impacting the morale of a person. With this, Americans across the world have the potential and enough influence to become more than just a citizen. Empowered civilians will find themselves in a position in which they can control their own destiny, and change the philosophies that hold modern-day Americans back from achieving the American dream.
Equality eventually escapes from the place that never felt like home, and runs off with his love, Liberty 5-300, who he calls the Golden One. After learning about the men from the Unmentionable Times, Equality would agree with Ayn Rand’s words in her short essay, “How Does One Lead a Rational Life in an Irrational Society?”, where she not only talks about the importance of having moral judgment, but also about being brainwashed by your leaders and government. Equality can relate because, for his whole life, he was in a society where their version of wrong and right were opposites to what they should have been. Individualism and moral judgement weren't encouraged, they were prevented, and that is where the society became
As Equality stops to devour the supper he caught, he notices a, “great satisfaction to be found in the food by which we obtain by our own hand” (Rand 80). For once, Equality puts the hunting skill he possesses to use, and the pleasure that comes with consuming an adequate meal made completely by him is far beyond that of meals prepared by others. And by residing in the Uncharted Forest, Equality experiences joy because he essentially is free and can pursue tasks he desires, like hunting, at any time. Furthermore, as Equality proceeds through his day he, “walks on til the sun had set” (Rand 80). Equality now does not have to conform his life to regulations, such as having a curfew, set by the World Council of Scholars. He has the power to choose where he wants to settle and the time at which he must be home, a decision that would not be left up to him back in the city. Ultimately, Equality for the first time broke the chains of uniformity that bound him since birth, and because of this he scoffs at the idiocy of the Scholars to realize that true happiness is achieved through liberty, not
Ayn Rand's classic story of one man's desire to become an individual in a nameless society presents a compelling refutation of collectivism in all forms. The hero, labeled "Equality 7-2521" by the State, chooses to challenge conventional authority as he learns the joys of experimentation and discovery, the ecstasy of human love, the challenge and fairness of liberty, and the happiness of self-interest. Equality 7-2521 writes three unique phrases in his journal: 1. "My happiness needs no higher aim to vindicate it. My happiness is not the means to an end. It is the end.", 2. "We know that we are evil, but there is no will in us and no power to resist it.", 3. "The word 'We' . . . must never be placed first within man's soul.". These phrases will be discussed individually in the remainder of this essay.
In the novel, Anthem, written by Ayn Rand takes place when mankind has entered another dark age. A man named Equality 7-2521 lives in a society where he struggles to live equal within the brotherhood. In the world he lives in people are told they exist only for the sake of serving society, and have no other purpose. Therefore, each individual is assigned a vocation as a permanent life career which determines who they socialize and live with. However, Equality being very different from his brothers, believes in individualism and rejects the collectivism society around him. The concept of individualism vs collectivism is portrayed in the story because individuality is unknown to the people where no one is unique or excellent in any way. The people
Anthem, by Ayn Rand, is a very unique novel. It encircles individualism and makes the reader think of how people can conform to society and do as they are told without knowing the consequences and results of their decisions. Also, it teaches the importance of self expression and the freedom that comes along with being your own person and having the power to choose what path to take in life. Figurative language is used often in this book and in a variety of quotes that have great importance to the theme, plot, and conflict of the novel.
At the start of Anthem, Equality is a collectivist who knows there is something wrong with the world he lives in. This allows him to evolve into an individualist. Equality says , “It is a sin to think words no others think and to put them down upon a paper no others are to see. It is base and evil. It is as if we were speaking alone to no ears but our own” (Rand 17). Equality admits he has committed a transgression and hopes to be forgiven. Equality, at this moment, is living to the standards of others because he lives in a society where no man is to think differently than another. This contradicts Rand’s philosophy because she says that a man is entitled to his own happiness and that you are in charge of it, but since Equality is living to the rules of his society, he cannot find his own happiness, for he is almost forbidden to do so. Likewise, it states in the text, “I owe nothing to my brothers, nor do I gather debts from them. I ask none to live for me, nor do I live for any others. I covet no man’s soul, nor is my soul theirs to covet” (Rand 96). Equality realizes that he is not to live nor commit himself to the standards of others. He has come to the understanding, as Ayn Rand says in her interview, “That he cannot demand that others give up their lives to make him happy, nor should he wish to sacrifice himself for the happiness of others.” Equality finds his own happiness because he has found himself, and he has learned that he cannot put his happiness in the hands of others nor put the happiness of others in his own hands. This allowed him to find himself, and to find
...at he wants. Through example, he is also showing the city people that they have a choice too, whether they want to follow him or reject his ideals in favor of their collective ones. Equality isn’t helping anyone unless they want to be helped. He is merely giving them something that they were never given, a fundamental right to make their own decisions about what is best for them in their minds.Giving people a chance to choose for themselves what they truly want is what objectivism is for.
Children are taught the value in sharing, in ensuring that everyone is extended the same opportunities and the same kindness. Ayn Rand, however, had a different perspective. Her philosophy, called objectivism, favors morality that is based upon one’s own desires. Clearly, Rand by no means encouraged the citizens of every city to run amok in the streets, doing whatever they pleased, but she did believe that any man is responsible for himself and himself alone. Altruism is defined by a duty to others, and by the value in sacrificing oneself for the greater common good. Because this concept allows all of society an equal fighting chance, it is widely supported and well loved. Altruism is the go-to template for standup moral character: selfishness must never be practiced, think only of others, build your life around the lives around you, and so on. Objectivism runs in stark contrast to this, encouraging individuals to define their goals and adjust their behavior accordingly. Objectivism’s primary claim is that selfishness is, indeed, a positive thing, and that it brings about considerable success in
You and I do not exist; government deems it so. We are one, a single body functioning for the collective good of society. Ayn Rand’s Anthem speaks to this collectivist doctrine while highlighting the implicit contradictions that impede its successful implementation. Collectivism is any philosophic, political, religious, economic, or social outlook that emphasizes the interdependence of every human. Collectivism is a basic cultural element that exists as the reverse of individualism in human nature (in the same way high context culture exists as the reverse of
The beginning of the story opens with Equality being chastised because he is too tall and too smart. He noticed that “to be free, a man must be free of his brothers” (Rand 101). This quote shows that when society controls him, and he relies on everyone else, a lack of progress is inevitable. Even the higher powers control their city with aggressive strength; the Council of Vocations assigns Equality to be a street sweeper even though he wants to be a scholar. Out of curiosity, he finds a tunnel while on duty. He begins to write about himself, even though “it is a sin to think words no others are to see” (Rand 1). Having no obligation to others allows one to work towards their own goals, Equality is able to pass his previous instinct where “all men are one” (Rand 20). With the revelation of himself as being a separate indiv...
Many people have trouble being apart of a society. These troubles come from trying to fit in, which is also known as conforming. Another trouble is trying to express one’s own style with one’s own opinion. This is a trouble due to the fact that many people have the fear of being frowned upon when being the black sheep of the group if one’s opinion does not correspond with other opinions. This is where one’s own sense of who they are, individuality, and trying to fit in, conformity, can get confused. A nickname for conformity is “herd behavior” which is the name of an article where the author relates animals that herd with people that conform. Many people have a different philosophy of this topic which will be expressed in this essay. An important
It is a rare conception where a human being is completely and utterly alone. One problem we tend to overlook due to our primitive ideals of staying as a group, is the fact of us becoming solely to that group. In the book Anthem ,by Ayn Rand, a man named Equality 7-2521 sees this problem evolve and how it becomes a nuisance to his society. The book has made me open my mind up to the ideals of doing things for yourself and not always for those around you. The feeling of the story showing a world where many are brought down for being unique and talented hurts me as I imagine a time where all are mere specs of the world. The book hits the hard points of what can easily go wrong with our society if we decide to go over the line. I can see a life
The infamous author Ayn Rand dedicated her life wholly to the study and furthering of her political dogma, Objectivism, the uniting theme throughout all of her published literary works. One of the most obtrusive examples is her novella Anthem, which is set in a futuristic yet inept dystopia that is entirely founded on principles of collectivism. Page by page Rand’s sentiments become glaringly obvious, subsequently causing the reader to question her motivation behind this story, their own agreement with her egocentric philosophy, how Christianity aligns with every aspect of it, and if, overall, it was adeptly written.
Throughout history dictators such as Hitler, Mussolini and Kim Jong-Iland have used fear to manipulate thousands, if not millions, of people. Anthem by Ayn Rand explores a dystopian world where man is completely controlled. He complies to every order and demand without hesitation and is wholly satisfied with the way life is because it is all he knows. It is said to fully dominate a man, dictators must not only enslave his body but also destroy his mind. The manipulation in Anthem is far past fear alone; the leaders in Anthem also strip individuals of their identities, turn people into “robots” and leave the population naïve.
Ayn Rand uses objectivism in her writing to demonstrate the collectivist idea about society. Objectivism is Rand's philosophy in which she believes, or according to the philosophy, that everyone in this world has the opportunity to become rich as long as they take a chance. It's not about being a whole, but, about being an individual.