Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The traditional values of a “Nuclear Family” that were set up in the 1960’s are a reoccurring theme throughout “The Country Husband” by John Cheever. Francis Weed demonstrates the strain of a domestic lifestyle, and his character communicates the chaos that pressure ensues. With changes in attitude, the struggles of a traditional suburban community, characterization of a middle-aged man who suffers with morality and the desperation for escape from reality, Francis Weeds finds himself in what would be identified as a “mid-life crisis.” In the short story, Francis portrays reckless behavior due to the adolescent yearnings. He wants to pursue an unattainable affair with the engaged babysitter that his wife hires. With his codependent characteristics, Francis is unable to escape his reality. When Julia, his wife, threatens to leave him due to his uncaring demeanor he persuades her to stay because he realizes that he is hopeless without her and he simply …show more content…
cannot let her go. Through Cheever’s characterization, Francis Weed transforms from an irritated attention-seeker to a displeased middle-aged man.
“Francis says that he must be understood; he was nearly killed in an airplane crash…” (Cheever 76). After this tragic event he wants a reaction from his family, which they are not giving him the sympathy that he wants. “The photograph of his four children laughing into the camera on the beach at Gay Head reproached him” (82). Looking back on how his life is, it is easy to infer that Francis is unhappy with his life after the airplane crash. The even helps him realize what he desires in life. He knows he has a pleasant family and a caring wife but yet; he yearns for something more. Cheever uses stereotypical characterization of suburban communities in all of his writings including “The Country Husband”. “… a writer who wrote about people on the Upper East Side and in the suburbs” (Gordon 1). Based on the journals of Cheever, the common similarities in his characters, settings, and
scenarios. In a traditional setting, like Shady Hill, morals are extremely important and are viewed highly. “It was not the kind of household where, after prying open a stuck cigarette box, you would find an old shirt button and a tarnished nickel” (75). The Weeds live in a tidy house that is taken care of by Julia; she plays the typical wife role. The traditional setting sets up the mood and atmosphere throughout the short story that takes place in an ideal community. “I don’t know what makes you think that in a community like this you can indulge every impulse you have to be insulting, vulgar, and offensive” said by Julia (86). Francis starts acting out in his behavior because he is stuck in a dilemma between what he wants to do and what he has to do. Cheever is able to captivate what a society is afraid of through his writing. “…the story is sleekly written and beautifully paced…” (Martin 2). “The Country Husband” starts out with a chaotic event that leads to the events that cause Francis Weeds’ displeased attitude and his desires. Francis Weed has come across a challenge in his life; being in love with the engaged babysitter, Anne. He has many ways to come about this but none of which are morally correct. “… There had not been a divorce since he lived there; there had not been a breath of a scandal…” (Cheever 82). He can either wreck his life the way he knows it or he can live out the rest of it miserable. “… his arms spread over the steering wheel and his head buried in them for love” (Cheever 85). Stuck in a predicament, Francis continues to hide his wants and pretend as though nothing is wrong and everything is simply perfect. Cheever has a way of demonstrating society’s influence on personal relationships through the misery of desires versus needs. “[Cheever] seemed to veer between visions of human depravity and nobility…” (Gordon 2). Cheever’s writing captured the feeling empowered by everyday life and the temptation that tends to go along with it. Francis continues to act out childishly about being in love with the babysitter, Anne, after he finds out that she is engaged to a fellow neighbor, Clayton Thomas. Clayton needs a job and even through Francis could easily help him, he doesn’t, “the kid’s worthless” (89). Knowing full well that Clayton has potential and is intelligent, Francis does not want to give Clayton the advantage to continue keeping Anne as his instead of Francis’. Cheever is able to communicate the desperation of wanting to leave the confines of traditional values through Francis’ misbehaviors. “…between human visions of human depravity and nobility…” (Gordon 2). Again, through Cheever’s writing style the same concepts occur; what should be done versus what shouldn’t be done. Francis is constantly dreaming of what he can do to leave his current life so he can be his idea of happy with Anne. He wants to take Anne down to “lover’s lane” so he can get away from his unpleasant lifestyle (83). Cheever uses this type of characterization to emphasize the moral that people, like Francis, were subjected to back when traditional values were deemed more important over modern. “Individuals can heighten their perception of life by concentrating on the small pleasures of physical life” (The Country Husband Themes 1). Cheever illustrates how despite having other fantasies can interrupt daily life. Through Francis’ bored demeanor there is a sense of change with his relationship with Julia, his imaginative state interferes with husbandly duties. “You have no idea how much you hate me” said by Julia (87). The neglect Francis displays towards his everyday life becomes noticeable around the community and it reflects on his displeased demeanor. “[Francis] will never be happy until he again, finds a way to make real contact with himself” (Bernardo 2). Cheever is able to project these instances through Francis’ behavior and how the others react. Francis becomes wary of his wife’s threats of leaving him that he realizes his displeasure of his life is not something he can escape. “Oh, my darling, I can’t let you go!” Francis exclaims repeatedly as Julia tries to leave him (88). This contributes to Francis’ realization that despite his wants and desires he can’t get rid of the life he has set up with Julia and their children. He is unable to carry out the rest of his life due to desperation and the lack of ability to escape his reality without Julia because she is the one who drives his desperation. Cheever’s writing has “always contained its own contradiction” (Gordon 1). Cheever amplifies the conflict that Francis Weed is struggling to go through by making it clear that his current life is trapping but also his desired life. In conclusion, the change in attitude, the struggles of a traditional suburban community, characterization of a middle-aged man who suffers with morality and the desperation for escape from reality is put into a new perspective. John Cheever, author of “The Country Husband”, describes how through an ideal community the human temptation and wants are constantly inconvenienced.
The nature of familial relationships are ever-changing and can be strongly affected by the societal values and expectations of the time. This is underpinned in Alan Seymour’s One Day of the Year (One Day) and Gwen Harwood’s “Father and Child” as well as “Suburban Sonnet”. These texts explore how differences in ideas due to external influences can cause tension which can either further estrange individuals or bring them closer together. They also delve into how gender roles can greatly impact familial relationships.
Elaine Tyler May's Homeward Bound weaves two traditional narratives of the fifties -- suburban domesticity and rampant anticommunism -- into one compelling historical argument. Aiming to ascertain why, unlike both their parents and children, postwar Americans turned to marriage and parenthood with such enthusiasm and commitment, May discovers that cold war ideology and the domestic revival [were] two sides of the same coin: postwar Americans' intense need to feel liberated from the past and secure in the future. (May, p. 5-6, 10) According to May, "domestic containment" was an outgrowth of the fears and aspirations unleashed after the war -- Within the home, potentially dangerous social forces of the new age might be tamed, where they could contribute to the secure and fulfilling life to which postwar women and men aspired.(May, p. 14) Moreover, the therapeutic emphases of fifties psychologists and intellectuals offered private and personal solutions to social problems. The family was the arena in which that adaptation was expected to occur; the home was the environment in which people could feel good about themselves. In this way, domestic containment and its therapeutic corollary undermined the potential for political activism and reinforced the chilling effects of anticommunism and the cold war consensus.(May, p.14)
John Cheever’s childhood was riddled with troubles and adversities. He was born in Quincy, Massachusetts on May 27. His father owned a shoe factory, but lost everything in the Great Depression. Cheever’s mother sustained the family through her gift shop. Cheever attended grammar school for seventh and eighth grade and then transferred to Thayer Academy for high school. He was a mediocre student, and was eventually expelled for poor grades. However, Cheever later hinted that this was more likely do to an unnamed rule violation. The experience led Cheever to write his first short story, “Expelled”. Cheever sent “Expelled” into a progressive magazine, where it was noticed by editor Malcolm Cowley. Cheever and Cowley would become close friends and Cowley helped launch Cheever’s writing career. By age eighteen, Cheever had his first short story published in a successful magazine (Bosha).
It’s not easy to build an ideal family. In the article “The American Family” by Stephanie Coontz, she argued that during this century families succeed more when they discuss problems openly, and when social institutions are flexible in meeting families’ needs. When women have more choices to make their own decisions. She also argued that to have an ideal family women can expect a lot from men especially when it comes to his involvement in the house. Raymond Carver, the author of “Where He Was: Memories of My Father”, argued how his upbringing and lack of social institutions prevented him from building an ideal family. He showed the readers that his mother hide all the problems instead of solving them. She also didn’t have any choice but to stay with his drunk father, who was barely involved in the house. Carvers’ memoir is relevant to Coontz argument about what is needed to have an ideal family.
I chose to analyze the The Family, 1941 portray and The Family, 1975 portray, both from Romare Bearden, for this essay because they are very similar paintings but at the same time very different. To write a critical analyzes it was necessary to choose two different paintings that had similar characteristics. The text about critical comparison said that to compare things they have to be similar, yet different, and that’s what these paintings look to me. As I had already written an analysis of The Family, 1941 portray I chose to analyze and compare The Family, 1975 this time. Both works have a lot of color in it and through the people’s faces in the pictures we can feel the different emotions that the paintings are conveying.
Talcott Parsons and Robert Bales, two of the leading figures in sociology, may be considered the founding fathers for the ideas of the “modern family” and the “male-breadwinner family.” Collectively, their work has influenced how Americans analyze families and has sparked new ideas regarding the American family from sociologists such as Stephanie Coontz and Arlie Hochschild. However, when studying the American family, Parsons and Bales fail to understand that the “ideal” family may not be so ideal for everyone. They neglect to consider societal influences and economic changes when discussing patriarchal social norms as the most optimal family structure. Their description of the male-breadwinner family consists of the father being the “instrumental leader” within the home, providing economically for his family based on his occupational earnings. Meanwhile, the mother is considered the manager of the household, providing for her husband and children physically, emotionally, and mentally.
Having to live in a culturally diverse country such as the U.S. would influence many interpretations and adaptations to lifestyles from all over the world. Due to this, it has become customary to develop a social stereotype just being in a certain part of the world. But, everyone does their own things a little differently than the next, speak a little differently, eat different foods, and live their life a different way - but it works out. Two great example of this is in In A Good Man is Hard to Find by Flannery O’Connor, and Why I Live at the P.O. by Eudora Welty. These two short stories seek to expose myths about family relationships. Most people would assume that many Southern families are close knit and that there is a healthy relationship between every member. Welty and O’Connor challenged those stereotypes with their two short stories. It goes to show that although family relationships aren’t always perfect and these two examples show how these families fail to recognize the importance of each other.
In “Up the Coulee,” Hamlin Garland depicts what occurs when Howard McLane is away for an extended period of time and begins to neglect his family. Howard’s family members are offended by the negligence. Although his neglect causes his brother, Grant McLane, to resent him, Garland shows that part of having a family is being able to put aside negative feelings in order to resolve problems with relatives. Garland demonstrates how years apart can affect family relationships, causing neglect, resentment, and eventually, reconciliation.
Cheever begins the story explaining the Westcotts’ social class standing, stating, “Jim and Irene Westcott were the kind of people who seem to strike that satisfactory average of income, endeavor, and respectability that is reached by the statistical reports in college alumni bulletins.” (Cheever 101) It is assumed that the other residents of their apartment complex live a similar lifestyle. Through the development of the Westcotts’ neighbor’s personal lives via “the enormous radio,” Irene realizes that the middle-class households surrounding her are living...
John Cheever was born on May 27th, 1912 in Quincy, Massachusetts to parents Fredrick and Mary Cheever. Growing up, Cheever lived a life that was perpetually characterized by various hardships. For one, the Cheever family fell victim to a financial crisis in the mid-1920s when Cheever’s father lost his job due to the demise of the New England shoe and textile industry. This, coupled with his poor performance in any other academic subject besides writing, spurred the then eighteen-year-old John Cheever to go live with his older brother, Fred Cheever, in Boston. The brother’s relationship would soon grow stronger and stronger as they spent more and more time with each other. As a result of their close relationship, Cheever soon started to draw inspiration from Fred. Literary crit...
I think every man between 20 and 40 needs to read Elizabeth Gilbert's "The Last American Man". Without going into details (like I said, you should read the book), this is a biography/profile of Eustace Conway - a man who is, among other things, capable of and prefers to (or would prefer to) live the kind of frontier lifestyle we have read about: hunting and gathering his food, living in a house he built using his own hands, making his own clothes from the skins of animals he captured, etc. I suspect that for many people the story, at least initially, will arouse the sort of Romantic feelings that tend to come with fantasies of a "simple life" of rugged self-sufficiency. However, even for those who are quite certain that they prefer their modern urban lifestyle (air conditioning, direct deposit, grocery stores, ebay, cable TV, &c.), I think this book raises fundamental questions about what it means to be a man at the dawn of the twenty-first century.
In the short story The Country Husband, the author John Cheever uses the character of Francis Weed to portray the struggle of living within the suburbs of Shady Hill in the 1950’s. The story starts off with Francis surviving a plane crash. However, when he arrives home and tries to tell his family about what happened, no one seems to care about what he has to say. Instead, everyone seems to be more engrossed with their materialistic items and possessions. The actions of not only his family but also everyone around him help to develop and expand the theme throughout the length of the story. Cheever uses the behavior of the characters around Francis to capitalize upon his idea of suburbia as being an entity which serves to repress the individual
Currently, families face a multitude of stressors in their lives. The dynamics of the family has never been as complicated as they are in the world today. Napier’s “The Family Crucible” provides a critical look at the subtle struggles that shape the structure of the family for better or worse. The Brice family is viewed through the lens of Napier and Whitaker as they work together to help the family to reconcile their relationships and the structure of the family.
The lives of women in the nineteenth-century were drastically different than they are today. A woman in that time period had very little autonomy, and were considered as possessions to males. A young lady in the nineteenth-century could expect for her father to choose a suitable husband for her. She would be married to this man and eventually bear him children. In Kate Chopin’s “The Story of an Hour” the reader is introduced to Louise Mallard, who as a result of the social conditioning of the time period is in a marriage— while although happy feels constrained in the relationship. In William Faulkner’s “A Rose for Emily” the reader becomes aware of how her father’s failure to accept a suitor, has grave consequences on her later romantic life.
“17C Social Hierarchy and Character Interpretation in The Country Wife.” faculty.winthrop.edu. N.p., n.d. Web 18 Mar. 2014. http://faculty.winthrop.edu/vorderbruegg/winthropweb/current/CountryWifeinterpretiveessay—revised11Feb.pdf.