The opinions about non-radar procedures in Air Traffic Control seem to vary. Most people I have heard or read from over the past few years have said that non-radar is pointless when you have radar. Others have said that it is a good way to coordinate with other controllers and that you cannot always rely on technology. I find this scenario similar to movies and literature. Nowadays for example, most people would rather watch the movie The Hunger Games rather than read the book. The same goes with those who say why we don’t need non-radar procedures when there is radar. Every new generation seems to be absorbing more technology at a younger age to the point where it becomes preferable, and they become dependent on it. However, it is smart to learn how to read before depending on any fancy technology. Because long before radar even existed, there was non-radar separation. Non-radar separation was the backbone and foundation for the separation of aircraft. There are advantages to be gained from using non-radar, and with the implementation of next-gen technologies these procedures should still be taught.
There are advantages to using non-radar procedures in Air Traffic Control. Learning to identify conflicts with aircraft using flight progress strips is difficult, but important. It is easy to get tunnel vision while looking at a radar screen, so learning to recognize conflicts without the screen can be beneficial. Non-radar helps controllers practice coordinating with other controllers as well. It is important to efficiently pass off aircraft when an aircraft is changing airspace. I found an article where a pilot described a certain time where he was flying over west Kansas towards Santa Fe, New Mexico, and lost radar ...
... middle of paper ...
.... (2009, October 12). Non-radar air-traffic system debuts. In USA TODAY.
Retrieved November 16, 2013, from
Schank, J. L. (2013). Next Generation Air Traffic Control: Looking at the Big Picture.
In Eno Center for Transportation. Retrieved November 23, 2013
Sethumadhavan, D. A. (2009, February 5). Selection in air traffic control: is nonradar training a predictor of radar performance?. In National Center for Biotechnology Information. Psychology Department, Texas Tech University. Retrieved November 16, 2013, from PubMed.
Turner, T. P. (2010, January 11). Non-radar IFR: once you're off the beaten path, ATC can't see you or provide the services--like obstacle clearance--we've taken for granted. They're now your responsibility. (INSTRUMENT FLIGHT). Retrieved November 22, 2013, from Factiva.
WGN needs to put out the money to have their personnel proficient in using all radar system they have on their towboats even though, it is not required by law. Amtrak and CSX must keep safety first and Keep up with
American Psychological Association. (2001) Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (5th ed). Washington, DC: McLaughlin & Reinking
Schacter, D. L., Gilbert, D. T., & Wegner, D. M. (2010). Psychology. (2nd ed., p. 600). New York: Worth Pub.
Reading, Gwem. "Radar Operator in WW2." Letter. 8 Nov. 2003. N.p.: n.p., n.d. N. pag. BBC WW2 People's War. Web. 23 Apr. 2014.
"Radar during World War II." - GHN: IEEE Global History Network. N.p., n.d. Web. 16 Feb. 2014. .
Gall, S. B., Beins, B., & Feldman, A. (2001). The gale encyclopedia of psychology. (2nd ed.). Detroit, MI: Gale Group.
Gravetter, F. J., & Wallnau, L. B. (2008). Essentials of Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences
Rogers, Chris . "What Is the Relationship Between Physical Exercise & Learning Ability?." LIVESTRONG.COM. N.p., 16 Aug. 2013. Web. 6 Jan. 2014. .
...yone wants. Radar is also frequently used by law enforcement for the detection of speeds to see if passing motorists are speeding.
Gall, S. B., Beins, B., & Feldman, A. (2001). The gale encyclopedia of psychology. (2nd ed., pp. 271-273). Detroit, MI: Gale Group.
Continued growth of air travel and recent advances in new technologies for navigation, and communication have led to the proposals by FAA. Air Traffic Controllers direct planes on both the ground and in the air to prevent collisions. The main goal of ATC is the management of Air Traffic movements and ensure to keep safe distance from one another. Several of the ATC’s are engaged at the Federal Aviation Administration. The FAA is located in Herndon, Virginia. Federal Aviation Administration is the main controller of the air traffic system. Now FAA is known as National Airspace System. There are thousands of people who are flying in air system, are controlled by Air Traffic Control. This system takes responsibility of leaving thousands of passengers safely and leave to their gate. This is one of the most stressful job in the world. In many countries, ATC provide services to all private, military and commercial aircraft.
Signals Intelligence (SIGINT) has access to many traditional and non-traditional dynamic elements that provide superior capabilities to collect and monitor visual, seismic, and acoustic signatures of motorized vehicles. SIGINT is the only system that can be operational and maintainable in any type of climate and terrain, which provides an advantage over the United States’ (U.S.) adversaries. The process of obtaining the intelligence starts with the collection of any type of signal, whether it be infrared, electro-optical, or electronic. After the signals are collected, analysts encounter the tasks of cryptanalysis, transcription, traffic analysis, and translations of the enemy information systems; analyst then determine size, location, distance, and terrain features. The data is usually processed in overlays and graphic displays within the United States. End products are then populated into National databases for the use of the Intelligence Community. The increasing utilization of computers, the internet, satellites, sophisticated encryption, and cellular telephones have streamlined effective and accurate Human Intelligence (HUMINT); implementation of Signals Intelligence has became an important role to maintain superiority over adversaries.
Weiner, I. Healy, A. Freedheim, D. Proctor,R.W., Schinka,J.A. (2003) Handbook of Psychology: Experimental psychology,18, pp 500
4. Christopher Michael Hormann AWF2 (NAC): U.S. Navy GPS Trained User, 1995-2010, HS-1, VP-30, VQ-1, VAW-117, VP-64, VR-52.
(Porter, Woodworth & Birt, 2000) However after training there was a significant increase in all groups. The parole officers increased their deception detecting up to 76% percent accuracy, students with feedback and training increased to 70%, students with only feedback increased to 65% and the control group rose to 62%. (Porter & Woodworth & Birt, 2000) This work implies that it is indeed possible to raise an individual’s ability to above chance when significant training is involved. Porter et al., (2000) speculates that the control group was able to increase the detection rate because of the fact that they were observing critically or possibly pursued research outside of the