Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Comparison-contrast college essay
College level compare and contrast essay
Essay about comparison
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Noah V.S. Utnapishtim: Battle of the Flood Stories The Biblical flood story in Genesis 6-9, and the flood story in the Gilgamesh Epic Tablet have a similar storyline. That being said, there aren’t many similarities in the details between the Genesis flood and the Gilgamesh flood stories either. Well yes, if people think in basic terms, there are several things that could be seen as similar traits. Both stories involve a god instructing a human with specific instructions to build an ark and save all species of animals. Each ark had only one door and both stories consist of birds being released as a test to find land. If people were to get more specific though, and go deeper into the words of each story, they’ll encounter that some of those similarities can be viewed as differences. In the Genesis flood, Noah (meaning rest) was spoken to directly …show more content…
from God about the flood, and his reason for building the ark was due to righteousness.
Utnapishtim (meaning finder of life), had it revealed to him in a dream by Ea, a god, and Utnapishtim’s reason for building the ark was to save himself. Ea is one of the gods that were sworn to secrecy concerning the flood, which also included the gods Anu, Enlil, Ennugi and Ninurta. This shows that the gods had no order since they obviously did not agree with each other. The reason for the flood in the Gilgamesh story is not specified, but God instructed the flood of Genesis due to the evil sinful ways of the people in the world. The ark God instructed Noah to build was 300 cubits long and 50 cubits wide, making it more of a rectangular shape. The ark Ea instructed Utnapishtim to build was both equal in width and length, making it more of a square shape. As a test to find land, Utnapishtim released first a dove, then a swallow, and then a raven. Noah in turn
released a raven, and then a dove three times to find land. In the Genesis story, the flood lasted more than 40 days and 40 nights where as in the Gilgamesh story, the flood only lasted 6 days and 7 nights, a great deal shorter. The blessing that each hero received after the flood were also quite different. Utnapishtim was granted eternal life, while Noah was to multiply and fill the earth, and have dominion over the animals. God also made a covenant to all life on Earth, promising a flood will never again destroy all life. God gave the world a rainbow as a symbol of His everlasting promise, which shows He is a God of grace. Although these two stories are very different in their own respects, they share a common thread in that each hero was doing what was expected of them. The arks, each one built for a specific reason, were distinct for each man with specific instructions from the God/god. The fact that both men shared a communal view of surviving the flood, and the difference as to why each man did it, goes to show that their differences were just as polar in their similarities. Therefore, when comparing the Gilgamesh Epic Tablet flood story and the flood story in Genesis 6-9, both stories should be considered unique because each one tells a different story.
Noah and Utnapishtim both were told to do something similar by their God or gods. The two differences that I noticed the most between these two texts include; the duration of the flood and the landing spot of the ark. In both the Epic of Gilgamesh and the Bible a person is approached and told to abandon the possessions they have and to build an ark. Noah is approached by God and told to build an ark. Utnapishtim had a different experience. He was told of what to do through a dream that was caused by one of the gods. Another similarity is the way that Noah and Utnapishtim were told about the ark was that they both were given specific measurement of how to build the ark.
The Sumero-Babylonian version of the epic of Gilgamesh, after two and a half millennia of dormancy, was resurrected by British archaeologists in the nineteenth century. Amid the rubble of an Assyrian palace, the twelve clay tablets inscribed the adventures of the first hero of world literature – King Gilgamesh, whose oral folk tales go back to at least 3000 years before Christ (Harris 1). Tablet XI contains the story of the Flood. In this essay let us compare this flood account to the more recent Noah’s Flood account in Genesis of the Old Testament.
The theme in Gilgamesh, Genesis and Sur 11 are comparably the same in that the people in each story were with sin and wickedness. In all three literatures, the people in the beginning were mean and sinful. The people in the Epic of Gilgamesh were evil and when Gilgamesh came to power he did not known what to since it was his first time beinging king. So, he would rule in a stern way to keep the people from sin. On Genesis God wanted to flood the Earth from the people who were sinful. God asked Noah to build an ark and to take his family and two of each animal.
Some of the simpler similarities are that the extent of the flood reaches every part of the earth, the flood is intended to destroy mankind, aside from the heros and their families, Utnapishtim and Noah are found righteous by their God or gods, and they build an ark to certain qualifications. An example of a less obvious similarity is the location of where the arks first touche land. In the general sense, they both landed on a mountain: Noah’s “ ark rested in the seventh month, on the seventh day of the month, upon the mountains of Ararat” (Genesis 75) and Utnapishtim's “boat stuck fast beside Mt. Nimush” (Gilgamesh 57). Taking this information a Step deeper reveals that Mt. Ararat and Mt. Nimush are about 300 miles apart. Both boats land in a relatively close proximity. Further proving the idea that the Sumerians and Hebrews experience the same event. Utnapishtim’s and Noah’s lives are dramatically changed by the flood. They sacrifice all that is familiar to them in order to receive the blessings of God or the gods. The heroes are both examples of a term I will call the archetypal path of blessing. Utnapishtim and Noah are both comfortable with what they have before the flood, but as Christopher Columbus States “One can never cross the ocean until one has the courage to leave the shore.” Utnapishtim and Noah give up what is ordinary to receive what is great. The blessings of both characters exceed
“The most remarkable parallels between the Old Testament and the entire corpus of cuneiform inscriptions from Mesopotamia . . . are found in the deluge accounts of the Babylonians and Assyrians, on the one hand, and the Hebrews, on the other,” Heidel stated. A story of a great flood has been recorded by various civilizations, such as the Hebrews with Genesis, from the Bible, and the Babylonians with the Epic of Gilgamesh. The flood story, in the book of Genesis is remarkably similar to the Tablet XI of the Epic of Gilgamesh. Some people make the claim; the Bible plagiarizes The Epic of Gilgamesh, though no conclusive evidence has been found. Their storylines are quite analogous; however they have some significant differences. People wonder if the two myths are based off of each other or even based off a currently unknown, older, similar, source. Although I acknowledge it is a possibility Genesis copied parts of Gilgamesh, there is a surplus of evidence that refutes this claim. Which helps lead to the conclusion, the myths were individually written, albeit both Myths contain many parallels between each other making likely that they were influenced by a similar source.
Creation stories told in the same time period as each other expose many parallels. The Rig Veda and the Yijing, written within 400 years of one another, have many fascinating similarities. Firstly, both creation stories follow a cyclical creation process and it can be assumed that the people believed life followed the same or similar process. Second, humans appear to be simply an object of creation, though we can be powerful. In the Yijing humans have always existed or rather were not created by one entity and in the Rig Veda the excerpt does not even mention humans at all. Finally there is a somewhat unique idea found in both, the idea of oneness, the theory the existent comes from the non existent. Genesis and the Popol Vuh would have started to be told at approximately the same time. Though they are worlds away from one another, there are still similarities to be found. To start, both of these creation stories have a linear creation process which life does not appear to follow. Humans are also completely obedient to the god or gods. They were either made or promised to worship and follow the will of their creators. It should be noted that when one creation story arose, the older ones did not die out. Having said that, as time goes on the creation storie...
A good number of people know the famous story of the Genesis flood, but do they know how it resembles to the Gilgamesh flood story? It is mind bending how the main stories are so alike. The main theme is the biggest similarity between the two. They also differ greatly in the smaller details in the events that take place. In both stories the number of days for events are different, but the same basic event takes place. Along with many other similarities and differences. The stories are very much the same, but when comparing the details within they are very different.
In Genesis 6 God begin to give Noah the blue print plans to build his ark, and told Noah that it would save him and his family from the Flood. Noah and his family were to live in the Ark until the Flood ended. So Noah did as God commanded. God told Noah that he and his family are to bring two of all living creatures to allow them to repopulate. The last thing God commanded Noah to do was to find food that could be eaten. The Ark is now built, and God opened up the windows of heaven and it begins to pour non-stop. So Noah, his family, and all the animals that God sent in pairs all ran into the ark. Soon all the rivers and oceans overflowed and the water was rising. The rain continued everyday all day until the entire earth was submerged, and the highest mountain was completely covered. Nothing could be seen or saved.
The similarities begin with the creation stories, although these similarities are very minimal. In both the Christian creation story, Genesis, and in many accounts of the
There have been numerous flood stories identified from ancient sources throughout the world. The Bible and the Koran both have flood stories that are similar but also share differences. The Epic of Gilgamesh also has a flood myth that is contrary to other flood accounts. Even though these stories are all dissimilar they all start because of the faults of man.
The Epic of Gilgamesh has many similarities to the Bible, especially in Genesis and it’s not just that the both begin with the letter “g”’! One major similarity being the flood story that is told in both works. The two stories are very similar but also very different. Another being the use of serpents in both works and how they represent the same thing. A third similarity being the power of God or gods and the influence they have on the people of the stories. Within these similarities there are also differences that need to be pointed out as well.
"Noah Movie Review 2014." Kansas City Examiner (MO) 28 Mar. 2014: NewsBank. Web. 21 Apr. 2014.
Is anything in life a coincidence? In the flood stories of Gilgamesh and Genesis, they have extraordinary similarities, but still have the occasional difference between them. However, the fact that the similarities occur frequently and very alike, that these two flood stories cannot be a coincidence. The significance between both stories is that one flood story was adapted to fit other cultures and therefore, the Gilgamesh and Genesis flood stories will have remarkable similarities between them.
Frank Lorey's article, The Flood of Noah and the Flood of Gilgamesh, contains what Lorey and other researchers believe to be a link between the flood that covered the world from the Hebrew and Christian bible to a similar event that is referenced in the mythological story The Epic of Gligamesh. While Lorey does make this claim he does note that due to the relatively close geographical location of both of these civilizations, which could lead to these two events simply being a retelling of a shared mythology between the two groups, and that the depending on how you divided up the dates that the Hebrew story could possibly be older the the Epic's interpretation. He does, however, point out several very peculiar similarities between the two
Men began to increase in number.“ The LORD saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth and that every imagination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil, continually. And the LORD was sorry that he had made man on the earth and it grieved his to his heart.(Genesis 6:5-6) The LORD was going to wipe out the human race, the cattle, the crawling things and the fowl. God said “I regret that I have made them. (Genesis 6:7-8) The LORD found favor in the eyes of Noah. Noah was chosen by God to build an ark. Noah was chosen because he was a r...