In “No Exit” by Jean Paul Sartre and “Night Flight” by Antoine de Saint Exupery, love and duty can be found as a priority of each characters life. The difference between such characters is whether they choose love over duty or duty over love and revolve their actions around such choice. In each case you are able to see that the hard decision impacts each individuals life choices and ends in guilt and regret of not pursuing other aspects of life. In “No Exit” and “Night Flight” love is sought over duty by Inez and Madame Fabien while duty is sought over love by Cradeau, Estelle and Riviere. In both cases the actions deemed by each person’s choice shows that love and duty cannot function together and lead to regret and guilt.
In “No Exit”, Inez
…show more content…
Estelle chose the duty of gaining high class by marrying “an old friend of my fathers who wanted to marry me and he had a good deal of money and was rather nice, so I accepted” (Sartre 14), instead of pursuing someone her own age. When Estelle had an imperfection in her life due to a child, a coverup was necessary where “there was a balcony out over the rocks. The hotel was on a cliff over the ocean. I brought in a huge stone. He was yelling “Estelle, please, please!” and crying.” (Sartre 33). In order to maintain her reputation she decided to commit infanticide and eventually her husband killed himself, “And it wasn’t necessary. My husband never suspected anything at all” (Sartre 33). Instead of caring about her lovers suicide, Estelle focused on her prestige in society and completed actions to maintain that prestige. After being in Hell, guilt sets in of realizing those she affected did not care about her at all. Regret of killing her child linked to her lovers death acts as a torture device because Estelle decided to choose duty of a high class woman over love and its actions, therefore showing love and duty cannot work as
She no longer has a will to repress any untold secrets from the past, or perhaps the past. Since she has strayed far from her Christian beliefs, she has given in to the evil that has worked to overcome her. She believes she is finally achieving her freedom when she is only confining herself to one single choice, death. In taking her own life, she for the last time falls into an extremely low mood, disregards anyone but herself, and disobeys the church.
In Janet Lewis’ “The Wife of Martin Guerre,” the author illustrates the family dynamics of the sixteenth century. Martin would legally remain a minor for the extent of his father’s lifetime, and women’s identity and importance were only known through their husbands. However, Bertrande de Rols, the wife of Martin Guerre, is known as herself in this novel, which expresses that the novel was written according to her experience as the wife of Martin Guerre. Even though it wasn’t acceptable for women to go forward with such accusations, Bertrande de Rols did the right thing by pursuing Arnaud as an impostor because she knew he was not her husband, despite what everyone else said. In sixteenth century France, women were not independent and treated as equals as they are today.
In this paper, I’m going to talk about these two intriguing movies. The movies that I will be elaborating on is “And Then There Were None”, and “Clue”. In my paper, I will be examining the similarities and differences the plot of the two murder mysteries were different and similar. I will also try to find the similarity between the plot of these two movies. In my paper, I will be discussing the difference between the two movies murder scenes. I hope you think my Compare and Contrast paper is intriguing.
Sally is a common occurrence in Esperanza’s community; she lacks self-confidence and determination. In “Linoleum Roses,” Esperanza describes Sally’s post-marriage life. She says, “Sally says she likes being married because now she gets to buy her own things when her husband gives her money… Except he won’t let her talk on the telephone. And he doesn’t let her look out the window. And he doesn’t like her friends, so nobody gets to visit her unless he is working. She sits at home because she is afraid to go outside without his permission.” Sally lacks the qualities of self-confidence and determination; due to this, she lets herself fall into a trap disguised as marriage. Now, she has no control over her life. Her husband decides everything for her, and she is afraid to say no to him. Sally’s lack of two important qualities lets her give herself away to her husband. Now, her fate lies solely in his
The negative life changing experiences they face are a leading cause for them to refuse acting in accord with the prevailing idealistic standards which their society conveys. David suffers a lot under the oppression of Joseph, who keeps him in check by the threat of unjust force and authority that he rebels to defy the oppression present in his society. Similarly, Romeo’s banishment opens his mind to what he is forced to sacrifice as a result of the feud. He discerns foolishness of the feud that causes him to lose Juliet as a result. This illustrates how both experiences alter their beliefs and open their minds to the ugly reality of society, and therefore plays an essential role in triggering their decision to conform to its standards. In both cases, these experiences are crucial in changing their views and swaying them to transform their stance on society. Similarly, Rosalind’s and Juliet’s experiences result in the same effect. Rosalind’s fear that one of the norms will find out about her mutation causes her rebuff their sudden affection. Her experience allows her to discern the fear of rejection others like her has to endure. Juliet’s arranged marriage to Paris prompts her to reject to act in accord with her parent’s wishes. Through her experience, she perceives how blind the families’ brawl causes them to be and restricts her life. This illustrates
Vladek and Guido use their skills and intelligence to endure a genocide that killed over 6 million Jews and 11 million people in total. Although sadly Guido did not make it through the Holocaust, his wife Dora and Son Giosué survived, thanks to the help of Guido. Vladek survived by using his many talents in the prison camps whereas Guido survived by his cunning intelligence and positive attitude. In the Books Maus I and II by Art Spiegelman, the author uses his fathers story of survival to create a book that unleashes vivid imagery of Vladeks time in Auschwitz, in addition to how it has affected him since. In the movie Life Is Beautiful Directed by Roberto Benigni, Guido was an average Jewish man living in Italy. When his family got taken to a Natzi death camp he managed to keep his son Giosué hidden, while doing so he jeopardized his own life. Both of these works display two brave men withstanding the worst race extermination in history.
Some people think that if they could only change one aspect of their lives, it would be perfect. They do not realize that anything that is changed could come with unintended consequences. “The Monkey’s Paw” by W.W. Jacobs and “The Third Wish” by Joan Aiken both illustrate this theme. They demonstrate this by granting the main character three wishes, but with each wish that is granted, brings undesirable consequences. The main idea of this essay is to compare and contrast “The Monkey’s Paw” and “The Third Wish.” Although the “The Monkey’s Paw” and “The Third Wish” are both fantasies and have similar themes, they have different main characters, wishes, and resolutions.
Death is not a lover.” (57). As it is shown the woman feels hopeless so she kills herself. Although she is not the only one who wishes to die. The little boy admits to his father that he no longer wants to live in such a cruel world. “After a while he said: You mean you wish that you were
The theme of suffering is emphasized when the motif of loyalty is analyzed throughout the play. The loyalties of all the characters involved seem to work against them and
In this novel, the society is centered around dichotomies; “youth and dotage” (Balzac 67), “the young man who has possessions and the young man that has nothing” and “the young man who thinks and the young man who spends” (87). Any person who falls outside of either box is called a “[child] who learn[s]… too late” or can “never appear in polite society” (87), essentially meaning they are undesirable in a formal society because they cannot follow expectations. The titular character, Paquita, is an “oriental” foreigner, from Havana, domesticated in Paris when she was sold to a wealthy woman who desired her. She fits into no culture entirely, as she is “part Asian houri on her mother’s side, part European through education, and part tropical by birth” (122). She is bisexual, choosing neither men nor women over the other. She is controlling, dressing Henri in women’s clothing (119), but controlled as she is reduced to a possession. However, there are ways in which a person can still be desired even if they are not easily pigeonholed. With her golden eyes and sensuality, Paquita fulfills both of the main pursuits of this society, “gold and pleasure” (68). Consequently, unlike the Marquis and his irrelevance in society, Paquita is highly sought after, thus making her a valuable commodity. Her desirability is not because of who she is as a human, but instead what
Huxley 's Brave New World is an arrogant vision of a future that is cold and discouraging. The science fiction novel is dystopian in tone and in subject matter. Paradox and irony are the dominant themes used within the novel to suggest the negative impact of excessive scientific and technological progress on man and his relationship with the natural world, very similar to today 's society. It links to the title which was created from the Shakespearean play called The Tempest using the famous quote ‘O’ Brave New World’ but instead of referring to an island paradise, it now describes a nightmare of a place full of mockery for being equal and overbearing control among one another.
It is this selfishness that makes it hard for the reader to be empathetic towards her later in the play, as it is evident in this scene that her hardships were brought on by herself. If she hadn’t insisted on the murder, she would not be driven insane by guilt, which would eventually lead to her death.... ... middle of paper ... ... As we saw, it was plaguing her dreams, and taking a heavy toll on her mental health.
Her twenty-ninth birthday party is a salient example from the text. My party has come and gone bye a few years back. The author describes her focus on minor transgressions like the Madame who shows at the last moment or the disagreeable remarks made at her expense in French, also the opulence and luxury displayed and all the while so very alone but surrounded by many friends. The text describes her as having “an acute longing for the unattainable” (Showalter 219) and I understand that she wants the power and glory of the riches without the trappings and all of the lady-like ways. Hers is an existence of indulgence, magnifying as her choices which do not match up with that of someone who is connected to wealthy society and a lady.
The theme of success is demonstrated in a nearly exclusively female world, showing that women don’t necessarily need men in order to thrive and be happy. In fact, the few male characters are depicted as either dying or disappearing, which may be a comment on their lack of dependability, but may also simply be a way for the author to focus on how the female characters grow stronger with each other’s help. Estevan, of course, is the one exception to this otherwise almost exclusively female world. Estevan represents the opposite of the stereotypical chauvinistic male. A kind, intelligent man who treats women with respect, he and his wife, Esperanza, escaped persecution in Guatemala and found sanctuary with Mattie.
Kazuo Ishiguro’s critically acclaimed 2005 Novel Never Let Me Go was influenced by cloning and stem cell research in the late 20th century. Many ethical discussions were raised, and Ishiguro displayed his perspective from his about clones that demonstrate the human experience to the core. The story was adapted into a film by the same name in 2010, directed by Mark Romanek. The novel explores plot, setting, character, literary techniques and themes by telling the story of cloned organ donors, forced to die for the good of humanity, all of which are well represented in the film adaptation.