Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
No country for old men research paper
Essay analysis on no country for old men
Themes of No Country for Old Men Essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: No country for old men research paper
No Country for Old Men No Country for Old Men is a dark cynical film directed by brothers Joel and Ethan Coen. Based on the 2003 novel by Cormac McCarthy, the movie unravels in a Texas borderline town where Llewelyn Moss (Josh Brolin) discovers the remnants of a drug deal gone bad, and a case filled with 2 million dollars. Giving into his temptations, Moss takes off with the money. This sends hit man Anton Chigurh (Javier Bardem) hot on his case to retrieve the money, all along the way leaving a blood trail of innocent by standards. Anton is a vicious killer whose weapon of choice is a cattle stungun that propels a cylinder into their heads and whips it back again. The plot switches back and forth between the game of cat and mouse being played …show more content…
Bardem embodies Anton like no other could, his emotionless eyes, his monotone voice, his professional demeanor about the killing of others all sum up the perfect serial killer. Chigurh exudes evil, I found my hands would become clammy and my toes would curl when he came on screen. He rarely speaks but when he does it’ll send shivers down your spine. Brolin is also amazing in this film, he brings a sense of pathos to the character, cheering him on all along the way of his brutal journey. He’s a quiet man, always focused and thinking about what his next play should be. The audience feels for him and his greedy mistake, and as he develops into a man unwilling to go down without a fight, he manages to put us all on the edge of our seats. He’s not exactly the good guy of the plot but there’s no doubt on whose side you should be on. Jones on the other hand is the narrator and the moral center of the story. He’s a wise sheriff that just doesn’t understand all of the death and destruction laid at his feet. His eyes are always saddened and confused by what’s going on around him. His face shows his sorrow as he longs for the time when murders were easy to
Though he started out as not a very rich man, Jones became a naval commander for both America and Russia. He was very charming, but he had a horrible temper that tended to get him in trouble. At one point he was in such deep trouble that he was charged with murder, but then acquitted soon after. This is just one of the murders Jones was [allegedly, for the previous one, on account of his acquittal] involved in. The second murder he committed happened on the ship Betsy in the West Indies, where he killed the ringleader of a mutiny with his sword in a dispute over wages.
... He really sold the part and did the part justice. Furthermore in the beginning of the flashback I had no idea who the main character was, but Christian developed the character subtly yet effectively.
I liked Curley best in the first movie. In that movie the actor who played him really looked the part. He looked like the sniveling little weasel that he really is. The clothes fit the part and the mu...
Amy Heckerling’s movie Clueless focuses on an upper middle class 16-year-old girl, Cher, who lives in a nice neighborhood with her father and stepbrother, Josh. Cher and her friend, Dionne, take in a new girl, Tai, to help her fit into their high school. All of the major characters in the movie are in adolescence, which ranges from 10-19 years of age. In adolescence, teenagers undergo cognitive and emotional development. According to Piaget’s cognitive developmental theory, adolescents are in formal operational period from 11-20 years of age. During this period, adolescents develop abstract thinking and rational decision making. They experience two aspects of adolescent egocentrism, imaginary audience
Over the duration of No Country for Old Men, Chigurh kills about 12 people, and curiously enough, the violence devolves as the film progresses. During the first half of the film, the Coens never shy from unleashing Chigurh. The devolution of violence starts with Chigurh's shootout with Moss(Josh Brolin) in the motel. Aside from the truck owner who is shot in the head after Moss flags him down, both the motel clerk and Wells's(Woody Harrelson) death occur
Gender and the portrayal of gender roles in a film is an intriguing topic. It is interesting to uncover the way women have been idealized in our films, which mirrors the sentiments of the society of that period in time. Consequently, the thesis of this essay is a feminist approach that seeks to compare and contrast the gender roles of two films. The selected films are A few Good Men and Some Like it Hot.
Good Will Hunting, by Gus Van Sant, is a well-respected movie meant to inspire others. It reflects how nature and nurture work together in creating a mature human being. In the film we watch a man with a matured brain go through a struggle between his past and his future. He knows that he is highly intelligent but he chooses not to show it often due to his childhood abuse. While watching the movie, the audience doesn’t realize that there is a lot of science being depicted. The movie goes along with the theme of nature versus nurture as well as how the brain generally works. Specifically, the movie seems to focus on the general function of the brain and how different surroundings can make and break the personality of human beings.
In viewing 12 Angry Men, we see face to face exactly what man really is capable of being. We see different views, different opinions of men such as altruism, egoism, good and evil. It is no doubt that human beings possess either one or any of these characteristics, which make them unique. It is safe to say that our actions, beliefs, and choices separate us from animals and non-livings. The 20th century English philosopher, Martin Hollis, once said, “Free will – the ability to make decisions about how to act – is what distinguishes people from non-human animals and machines 1”. He went to describe human beings as “self conscious, rational, creative. We can fall in love, write sonnets or plan for tomorrow. We are capable of faith, hope and charity, and for that matter, of envy, hated and malice. We know truth from error, right from wrong 2.” Human nature by definition is “Characteristics or qualities that make human beings different from anything else”. With this said, the topic of human nature has been around for a very long time, it is a complex subject with no right or wrong answer. An American rabbi, Samuel Umen, gave examples of contradictions of human nature in his book, Images of Man. “He is compassionate, generous, loving and forgiving, but also cruel, vengeful, selfish and vindictive 3”. Existentialism by definition is, “The belief that existence comes before essence, that is, that who you are is only determined by you yourself, and not merely an accident of birth”. A French philosopher, Jean-Paul Sartre, is the most famous and influential 20th - century existentialist. He summed up human nature as “existence precedes essence”. In his book, Existentialism and Human Emotions, he explained what he meant by this. “It means that, first of all, man exists, turns up, appears on the scene, and, only afterwards, defines himself. If man, as the existentialist conceives him, is indefinable, it is because at first he is nothing. Only afterward will be something, and he himself will have made what he will be 4”. After watching 12 Angry Men, the prominent view on human nature that is best portrayed in the movie is that people are free to be whatever they want because as Sartre said, “people create themselves every moment of everyday according to the choices they make 5”.
1. Indifference: Jones does what he does regardless of the situation and its decision is expected to act as the menacing, but because he already made a decision. Therefore it was not the threat that led him to act, it was his decision. In this case there is moral responsibility and no coercion.
Mitch Brenner is the best selection out of all the characters for many reasons. One of the reasons is that he is patience about the situation. During the movie,¨The
In the Country of Men is a semi-autobiographical novel that tells the story of Libya under the authoritarian rule of Mucammar Qadhdhafi. In the Country of Men is mainly told through the eyes of a nine-year-old boy, Suleiman and what he sees in this story, no child should have to witness. The novel follows Libya in the midst of a revolution with Qadhdhafi ruling with increasing repression and violence. Since this story is mainly told through the perspective of a child, there is an air of innocence throughout the novel. The innocence of Sulieman in his younger years changes the way that he interprets situations in the novel and sets a stark contrast against the injustice and irony that surround him.
Mark Webber did well playing this role as a nice guy who gets turned into a money monster. It’s crazy the difference of the character throughout the movie and Mark really showed it. At the beginning he was looked at as a cowherd by his boss and at the end, well, he definitely isn’t the same way. Devon Graye played the role of a young man who’s autistic. Just in case you’re wondering, he’s not really autistic, but during the movie he kept it consistent and made it believable. Ron Perlman played a cop/crime scene investigator and I could definitely see him as a cop/crime scene investigator in real life by his assertiveness and his motivation that he showed to find the guy behind these incidents in the movie, too bad he’s an actor
The late 19th century on to the start of World War I is a period characterized by a mad rush by the Western Powers and the Empire of Japan to conquer overseas territories. Dubbed the age of New Imperialism, this rapid expansion reflects both the ongoing tensions between world powers and the all-consuming desire for new resources. These hasty acquisitions were largely made without consideration for the preexisting cultures and people, often resulting in the systematic exploitation of locals. The most common rationalization of these injustices took the form of a “civilizing mission”. Although seemingly humanitarian, this ethos dangerously places the supposedly civilized statesmen in a self-confirming paternal relationship with the savages abroad.
As Oskar Schindler, Liam Neeson does an outstanding job of portraying a savy buisness man and a caring human being. Ben Kingsley plays his part with heart and cleverness. Ralph Fiennes is so completely believable as Amon Goeth. I would have never wanted to cross the path of that man. The people who played the jews were so convincing in their parts. This film truly has the feel of a documentary.
Furthermore, the film is highly inclusive, giving the viewer thorough detail not only about the religious organization, but also Jones himself. To start off, the film gives detail of Jones’ upbringing, how he behaved as a child, and certain psychological traits that could potentially explain why the incident happened. For instance, it was stated within the film that Jones grew up in a very poor family. His father, James Jones was an alcoholic, leaving his mother to provide for the family alone. As a result of his dysfunctional home-life, Jones grew to be