Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Financial statement analysis of nike
Financial statement analysis of nike
Financial statement analysis of nike
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Financial statement analysis of nike
Financial Standings and Investment Decisions of Nike and Under Armour Nike and Under Armour are two of the biggest athletic companies on the market, bringing in billions of dollars in sales each year worldwide. Both design, develop, and market premium athletic wear. Nike and Under Armour have experienced considerable growth in recent years, and are expected to continue to grow as time goes onward. To measure the overall success of a company, you must measure the Profitability ratios. In 2015, Nike had a Net Profit Margin of 10.7%. This means that for every dollar earned of revenue, 10.7% of it translates into profit. Under Armour had a Net Profit Margin of 6.75%. Both companies recorded an increase in their Gross Profit Percentages from the previous year. This is a good sign because it shows both companies are retaining more on each dollar of sales to costs. …show more content…
Nike has $6.33 million in current liabilities, and Under Armour has current liabilities of 422 thousand. Liquidity ratios also include account receivable turnover and inventory turnover. Under Armour has the advantage when it comes to accounts receivable, their turnover measuring 25.19, while Nike’s is 9.01. The companies have somewhat similar inventory turnover ratios. Nike reported a ratio of 3.99 in 2015, and Under Armour reported a ratio of 3.13. Though UA has a much lower amount for current liabilities and other short-term debt ratios; Nike is still better equipped to handle long-term debts. “Nike is more suitable to meet working capital obligations compared to Under Armour, who holds a significant amount of their current assets in inventory” (Durante, 2015). Nike’s debts to assets ratio is .41, compared to UA’s .36. Nike also has a much higher times interest earned ratio, 151.18 vs. Under Armour’s
As Nike is an international company that has their product selling worldwide, they have countless of competitors, including many domestic local firm. However, not all of these companies have the power to compete with Nike, only a few international companies are Nike¡¦s major competitors, for instance, Adidas and Reebok.
They could overtake Adidas if they continue with their innovative strategy because they’re only $3.5 billion away. Since now-a-days consumers are all about technology and new innovative products, if Under Armour continues with their innovative strategy they will continue to see an increase of financial growth, become a major competitor for Adidas, and a closer competitor to Nike.
Executive Summary Introduction Kimi Ford, a portfolio manager at NorthPoint Group, a mutual-fund management firm, was considering buying shares in the fund she manages, the NorthPoint Large-Cap Fund, with an emphasis on value investing. Ford held an analysts’ meeting to disclose its fiscal-year 2001 results and, most importantly, to communicate a strategy for revitalizing the company. Nike has maintained revenue of about $9 billion since 1997. However, its net income had fallen from almost $800 million to $580 million. Moreover, Nike’s market share in U.S. athletic shoes has fallen from 48% in 1997 to 42% in 2000.
Only a week earlier, on June 28, 2001, Nike had held an analysts' meeting to disclose its fiscal-year 2001 results.1 The meeting, however, had another purpose: Nike management wanted to communicate a strategy for revitalizing the company. Since 1997, its revenues had plateaued at around $9 billion, while net income had fallen from almost $800 million to $580 million (see Exhibit 1). Nike's market share in U.S. athletic shoes had fallen from 48%, in 1997, to 42% in 2000.2 In addition, recent supply-chain issues and the adverse effect of a strong dollar had negatively affected revenue.
Under Armour has always set aggressive targets for themselves and they should not change that now. The leadership team believes that “a 3% share of the (athletic footwear) market would nearly double UA’s total revenue” (Wheelen, Hunger, Hoffman, & Bamford, 2015, 2012, 2010), and this should be another one of the metrics that Under Armour monitors and grows.
Under Amour Company ventured into a market segment that was overcrowded, it had thousands of companies that competed against each other. Out of the many companies involved in the trade, the two most formidable threats seemed to be orchestrated by Nike and Adidas. These are two giant sports apparel and footwear, which pride themselves as having been long term veterans in the industry. Nike in particular was christened as the ultimate shoe and athletic apparel company with revenues of $18.6 billion, net income of $1.9 billion and more than thirty two thousand employees globally in the year 2008. This makes it the largest athletic shoe and apparel seller in the world. This company has seen major expansions in outlets throughout the world over the years. Adidas on its part has managed to build a powerful brand through its technological innovations and aggressive marketing where they spend up to thirteen per cent of their revenue besides offering high quality services. These scenarios seem to present Under Armour with a massive competitive disadvantage.
The sports apparel and accessories industry has a highly competitive market. Businesses are constantly competing for elite athletes to sponsor, raw materials, and every opportunity to expand. Under Armour is able to not only survive but thrive in this market because of their ability to think outside of the box. They are constantly creating new and exciting products that help athletes everywhere.
Financial statements are a vital factor of any business organization; they show where a company’s money came from, where it went, and where it is now, according to Securities and Exchange Commission website (2008). In addition, four main financial statements consist of the balance sheet, income statement, cash flow statement, and statement of shareholders’ equity. These four financial statements will be evaluated from Nike Inc. and more in depth information will be included from information on the previous paper which will be link to the working capital strategies. Furthermore, a detail working capital recommendation to senior management will be included and the impact of Nike Inc. revenue increase of their working capital.
Nike does have the most sponsored players and they do have the most popular sports player on their side but just because they have Lebron James doesn't mean they have the best shoe/clothing item(s). Adidas have collabed with one of the most sensational artist out there and his name is Kanye West. Kanye West has brought up a whole new level to the shoe game and sponsorships. With creating one of the best designer shoes in the world, The Yeezy, he has singlehandedly changed the Adidas brand forever. “Kanye West is probably the most influential artist on the planet right now and sports adidas – even though the stripes are missing on his own Yeezy line.” (9 Reasons why adidas is better than nike.) No one wants to get the Lebron 13’s or Jordans when yeezy’s are out there. Adidas have several sponsorships/Collabs and they are revolutionary, way more than
Nike’s Asian operations had previously continued to soar generating US$300 million in 1994 in revenues to a whopping US$1.2 billion in 1997. However based on the Asian economic crisis, this had adversely affected revenues, while regional layoffs were inevitable. Nike also performed well in the European market generating about US$2 billion in sales and a good growth momentum was expected, however, some parts of Europe were only slowly recovering from an economic downturn. In the Americas (Canada and the U.S.A.), Nike experienced a growth rate for several quarters. The U.S. alone generated approximately US$5 billion in sales. The Latin American market at this point was exposed to economic volatility; however Nike still saw them as a market with “great potential for the future”.
Inventory Turnover: Under Armor has a lower Inventory Turnover than Nike. This shows that Nike is better at annually turning its inventory over. The reasons that Nike is better at inventory turnover is the recognition of its brand over Under Armor, Its advertising and the discounts on their inventory. Nike is an older, larger company. This means that the brand recognition is better with Nike because of the relative newness of Under
From their marketing strategies to their selling philosophies, Nike has developed one of the most recognizable and demanded name and logo tandems ever created.
Project Part-4 NIKE VS UNDER ARMOUR To summarize the financial positions of Nike and Under Armour we must look at the financial position of each and how they do better or worse in each. The profitability of Nike through the net profit margin is a solid 4% higher than Under Armour, it may not seem like a lot but when you are working with billions of dollars it says a lot about what the company takes home after all its expenses. Nikes net income far outranks Under Armour showing its ability to make more money and have more money in the Retained Earnings for investors and stockholders. UnderArmour outperforms Nike in gross profit percentage showing that it can turn sales into profit better than Nike.
Nike American Sportswear generated revenue of 7495 million US dollars in 2014, which was almost double of 2009 revenue of Nike Sportswear (Statista, 2015).The sales of (Athletic) Sportswear of Nike 90 million US dollars, however, the sale of Adidas Sportswear (Competitor of Nike) was 25 million US dollars, which was not even one third of Nike Sportswear sales (Statista, 2015).Nonetheless, the return on assets and equity are 13.41% and 26.43% respectively (Yahoo Finanace, 2015).
Right now Reebok is the closest company to Nike and is $2,459 behind in value