Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Analysis of the oj simpson case
Issues with the oj simpson case
Issues with the oj simpson case
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Analysis of the oj simpson case
On July 22, 1994, Simpson replied to the question, “How do you plead?” with “Absolutely one hundred percent, Your Honor.”
On January 24, 1995, after half a year of multiple configurations including the selection of the jury, and the decision if the media was to be allowed in the courtroom and many other factors, the trial had finally begun. Prosecutor Christopher Darden started the trial by depicting Simpson as a possessory companion, as well as an abusive one towards Nicole Brown Simpson. Later on in trial, Johnnie Cochran, Simpson’s defense attorney stated that he had such awful arthritis that he would not have been able to commit a double homicide.
During nearly 100 days of the trial, over 70 wit nesses were put to stand. Some of these people include friends and family of Brown-Simpson, his limo chauffer Allan Park friends of Simpson, and a 9-1-1 dispatch caller. They all stated that Simpson was an abusive husband.
There was a lot of incriminating evidence against Simpson, including blood, hair, fiber, footprints a bloody glove, and black socks that also had blood on them. The blood found on the socks was indeed Simpson’s.
Darden, was absolutely positive that the glove fit. During the trial, he asked Simpson to put on the gloves of Brown-Simpson. There was an apparent struggle to put the gloves on. This is where t he phase, “ If it doesn't fit, you must acquit”, said by defense attorney Johnnie Cochran came from.
After three hours the decision was made. Not guilty. The victims’ families: mortified, Simpson: relieved. According to Simpson said after the verdict that he would dedicate his remaining life to finding his ex-wife’s real killer. . According to personal.psu.edu, The effects of the O.J. trial could ...
... middle of paper ...
...the man who killed my son and Nicole responsible.'' stated Fred Goldman, the father of Goldman.
However the money was never paid back. Robert Baker, Simpson’s lawyer reported to the jury that Simpson was broke. He said that Simpson’s net worth was over negative $850,000. He would live the rest of his life on a prepaid $4 million pension plan.
After the trial was over. Simpson moved into a $1.5 million home in Kendall, Florida with his children. Brown-Simpson’s parents fought for custody of the two minors, but they lost. According to the laws of California, any money he acquired can be seized to be given to the awardees of the civil suit. Across the country , over 2,000 miles away the laws in Florida are not the same. "They can't touch my earnings here. And it will be a cold day in hell before I pay a penny." says Simpson to journalist Caroline Graham
Things only got worse when it was alleged that he transported and planted one the gloves on the Simpson estate, and the defendants legal team stating the officer wanted to frame Simpson because he was black and he disliked blacks an considering the jury was made up of mostly minorities this helped O.JSimpson even more.(2015) The key to winning a case apart from collecting evidence there must be a clear way to paint a picture that the people of the jury can understand whether or not you done the crime one must be convincing. Even though Simpson’s blood was on majority of the evidence collected it was argued that he was framed along with the contamination of evidence even if he had done it his team used all the weaknesses exposed by police involved in the case to paint a picture of innocence to the jury which proves perception of wrongdoing as persuasive to a jury as actual wrongdoing. I am sure with O.J Simpson being acquitted of the charges left a bad taste in the mouth of both police and some people in the legal field. There were too many mistakes made by the people that were tasked with the duty of collecting evidence and also in the department of how the evidence was handled but there are many lessons to be learned in every mistake the obvious one would be to not make the same ones
The papers didn't go through yet. divorce, so legally he was still married to her, while going. out with Nichole. The Evidence Against O.J. Simpson Mark Fuhrman said he saw a knife box on the ledge of the bath tub,and it wasn't collected for evidence, but the Prosecutors say they have the knife that was from the box. that we didn't need the box.
John smith, the accused, stood up in the courtroom and started yelling at the judge about what he thought of his innocence irrespective of the decision that the judge would make. He also cursed the prosecutor and kept quiet when his lawyer warned him of the negative consequences that would follow if he continued with the same behavior. Smith did not answer any question that the judge asked him. The prosecutor indicated that he had observed similar behavior when he interviewed him, in jail.
During the time that O.J was on trial for the murders of Nicole and Ronald, everyone who was following the hearing had a deep sense of fear and pity. They were fearing that the man they once adored and aspired to be like was actually capable of committing such an inconspicuous crime. Also, due to the accusations of the murder, the viewers were also feeling in the sense of pity, in both sadness and disappointment. The acts that O.J Simpson was accused of caused the audience to feel disappointed in his actions, as well as sadness towards his family. The accusations developed about O.J left people who didn’t even personally know him in tears. People were so sad about his downfall. The accusation led to the fact that O.J left his family with no mother and technically no father, as he’d be spending time in prison. Furthermore, since he was found not guilty, there was a large part of the audience that felt a sense of release and emotion, and some felt bad that he was ever accused of this, but rather he just in the wrong place at the wrong time. Due to the fact that O.J and Nicole were separated for a couple years before she died, Nicole had made new friendships, and there was no proof that someone new that she met could have caused this crime and tried to frame Simpson, due to his past accused abuse
Simpson murder trial, there are a couple of things that piqued my interests. One was the notorious car chase down the Los Angeles freeway in a white Ford Bronco driven by AL Cowlings with O.J. Simpson hiding in the back. Robert Shapiro was supposed to surrender his client to the Los Angeles Police Department, but instead it is my opinion that O. J. Simpson lawyers and friends came up with a plan to get publicity and supporters. The second was the most crucial point of the trial is when O.J. Simpson squeeze his hand into the leather glove that was linked to the killings. This led to the famous argument by Johnnie Cochran “If it doesn’t fit, you must acquit.” As the years passed by many untold stories are revealed. A recent new documentary states that “Simpson had stop talking his arthritis medicine two weeks” in advance so his hands would be swollen to persuade the jury of his innocents.
Because Simpson was the prime suspect, the judge legally ordered searches on O.J’s house as well as the crime scene. The goal was to find proof that he did commit the crime, by finding DNA or items. Shortly after the searches and tests began, evidence was found. DNA from the crime scene matched the DNA of O.J. Although proof was found, Simpson continued to plead not guilty. Surprisingly enough, O.J st...
Simpson had a great defense team, that some called the “Dream Team,” gave Marcia Clark a run for her money. Marcia Clark is the main prosecutor. Primarily, the case was led by Robert Shapiro, one member of the “Dream Team”. Throughout the case, aspiring lawyer Johnnie Cochran, did not make as many irrational decisions as Shapiro did. Prosecutor, Marcia Clark and District Attorney, Chris Darden were trying to prove Simpson guilty. A majority of America hated Marcia Clark because they thought Simpson was
On the night of the deaths, Fuhrman went to O.J. Simpson’s house and supposedly unveiled a glove that he believed took part in the murders. When the evidence of the glove was presented in court, Simpson was asked to put it on and unexpectedly the glove didn’t fit. People then began to believe that Mark was setting Simpson up and was trying to frame him.
and Brian Kaelin, who lived in Simpson’s guest house, went to get McDonald’s, shortly after 9pm on the night of June 12th. O.J. had arranged to leave on a flight to Chicago at 11:45 the same night in order to attend a Hertz event the next day. At 10:25 O.J.’s limo driver arrived twenty minutes early to pick him up for his flight. After buzzing the intercom multiple times, at 10:40 the limo driver drove around to the gate of O.J.’s house, but did not see any vehicles in his driveway. At 10:50 the limo driver paged his boss to let him know nobody was home. The driver saw Kaelin, who came from the backyard with a flashlight investigation three loud noises he had heard while he was in his room, Kaelin waved at the driver but did not open the gate. The driver then saw a dark person walk into the house through the front door, and shortly after the lights on the first floor came on. At 10:56 the driver buzzed the intercom again, only this time O.J. answered it and said, “Sorry, I overslept and I just got out of the shower. I’ll be down in a minute.” Finally, O.J. left in the limo at 11:15 and got on his flight to Chicago at 11:45
“If the glove don’t fit, you must acquit” was a popular phrase that derived from a moment in the O.J. Simpson trial where O.J. was asked to put on the bloody gloves that were believed to have been the gloves that the murderer wore. When O.J. went to put on the gloves, he struggled. After struggling to put the gloves on his hands, O.J. said: “they’re too small” (“O.J. Throws Gloves”). With the gloves being too small for O.J., the jury had to believe that O.J. could not have committed the murders. However, there is the possibility that O.J. Simpson did commit the murders of Nicole and Ron, but to try to save himself, he faked the struggle of putting the gloves on. Furthermore, after O.J. tugged harder on the gloves, he was able to get them on his hands, which means O.J. could have been found guilty (“O.J. Throws Gloves”). On the other hand, DNA evidence could not have been strong enough to convince the jury that O.J. was guilty. Tests from the blood concluded that the blood could have come from multiple sources. For example, the blood found on a pair of socks in O.J.’s room could have come from one in twenty-one billion sources, and the blood found tracing away from the murder victims could have been from one in 240,000 people. (Beard). Also, tests done showed that DNA evidence
When the trial was happening, I had no idea who he was until the trial started. I had my Dad tell me all the details of who he was, and everything else I learned was from watching television. I was young, but I still knew that racism was awful. I looked upon the television to Simpson sitting in the trial and just thought, "Oh, okay." I know it 's hard to believe, but I wasn 't brought up to believe race had anything to do with whether people judged based on race, but this case was a 101 course in proving I was oblivious to the real world. However, what I did hear based on pure evidence was that this guy totally did it. There was too much evidence that proved he was involved, and the only reasonable doubt that was brought into the case was purely based on race.
The defense succeeded at instilling reasonable doubt in the jurors’ minds. A major difference between the defense and prosecution, as stated by Dershowitz, was that the defense relied on factual evidence and scientific experts while the prosecution utilized witnesses that casted a shadow of doubt upon the whole jury (Dershowitz 97). Dershowitz claimed the prosecution knew they had falsities in their case, but kept them in order to win the case (Dershowitz 96). In all, though many people viewed Simpson as a guilty man, the allegations of police perjury and investigative errors allowed the defense to exploit and capitalize on the faults carried out by the prosecution and ultimately implant reasonable doubts in the minds of the jurors.
The people directly involved with this case are Judge Lance Ito, the prosecution lawyers, Marcia Clark and Christopher Darden, the defense lawyers, Johnnie Cochran, Robert Shapiro and Robert Blasier , the jury and the defendant, O.J. Simpson. The families of the victims have also been present in the courtroom, as well as other spectators and news media. This case has heard one hundred and twenty witnesses over a nine month period.
The evidence discovered during the investigation suggested to the police that OJ Simpson may have had something to do with this murder and they obtained an arrest warrant. The investigators believed that they “knew” OJ Simpson committed the murders. His lawyers and him were informed of the arrest warrant and agreed to a specified time when OJ would turn himself into authorities. Investigators are later admonished, by the defense, on how they handled the crime scene.
Fairchild, H. & Cowan, G (1997). Journal of Social Issues. The O.J. Simpson Trial: Challenges to Science and Society.