Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Debate on global warming
Debate on global warming
Controversy with global warming
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Debate on global warming
The controversy on global warming has been increasing almost as rapidly as the climate itself. Although greenhouse gases could have, in some aspects, positive effects in our society, it comes at the cost of environmental damage. In his 2007 article, “Our Gas Guzzlers, Their Lives”, a two time Pulitzer Prize winning journalist, Nicholas D. Kristof calls to action the negative affects western green house gas emissions have in poverty-stricken countries like Africa. Kristof effectively establishes a one-sided argument through his use of rhetorical devices such as: an accusing tone, standardized diction, loaded language, and the use of ethos, pathos, and logos.
Nicholas Kristof begins his excerpt prosing the unfair life that western countries
…show more content…
The author uses first person plural possessive pronouns through out the entire article as a way to make the audience feel as if they are part of the issue as well. Using phrases as: “ our refusal”, “our...gases are killing people”, “our environmental irresponsibility” adds to the guilt that he places in his readers as well as contributes to the accusing tone of the excerpt. Kristof uses harsh words and phrases such as: “dies”(p3), “deadly”(p15), “Dying of hunger”(p17) “Disastrous”, and “catastrophic” (p15) for it provides an emotional impact, as opposed to using less deamining words that will not provoke empathy in the reader. Kristof frequently uses negative connotation for the same effect that might occur to the reader in order to make his argument persuasive. He uses standard diction for the average person is able to understand without being too informal, he provides a hint of elevated diction in order to keep the article …show more content…
Kristof is best known for his comprehension about human suffering in third world countries. Kristof applies ethos through his article by exhibiting a handful of sources varying from local fishermen, agricultural scientist, to the President of Uganda. When discussing harvest fails in Africa, he quotes the agricultural scientist, Gerard Rusuku that has been studying global warming in Africa, presumably he does this in order to have a form of credibility. Following he introduces a somewhat irrelevant quote about “hippos being unhappy” by a local fisherman, this was done as a way to note that scientist, government officials, or specialists are not the only ones noticing this change, it is so abundantly clear that the locals, and animals are noticing. All of Kristof’s sources are people who are in Africa seeing this happen first hand rather than from another
A similar message that appears in his book that appeared in the aforementioned speech was the impact of the media speculation. The book addresses this in two examples. One was presented with the news of a lawsuit that an island called Vantu would file against the EPA; yet the lawsuit would never move forward due to it only serving a purpose to launder money and raise awareness to global warming that was never proven to affect the island. The other was shown to be environmental scientist who received their funding from environmental organizations, such as NERF in the book. These scientists would often have to go against their findings and report what the organizations wanted them to, or possibly lose their funding. Additionally, the book profoundly took opposition to the claim of global warming. This is presented in the form of the main character, Peter Evans, who has been manipulated into believing everything that the media has told him about global warming. It isn’t until John Kenner is introduced, that Peter begins got learn the truth about global warming. The author uses specific evidence to back his claims, specifically he uses a wide array of resources to verify his claim that Antarctica is not in fact melting, but getting colder and thickening. Furthermore, another essential concept that that book introduces is environmental extremists, or bioterrorism. These characters in the book would stop at nothing to make sure that everyone believed in global warming, and tried to destroy parts of the world to succeed in their mission. Bioterrorists are best represented as a warning of what could happen if people continue to buy into the media’s lies without having conclusive evidence to back up their
In his provocative article “Green Guilt”, Stephen T. Asma elaborates the sources behind why civilians of Western culture feel passionately guilty about the current norm of environmentalism. Asma’s purpose of such text is to inform readers that Western culture is taking environmentalism to the extreme by developing guilt with an association of not living a valued “green life”. Stephen Asma achieves his analysis to the audience of vast environmentalists by emphasizing this extreme guilt and self-loathing through the rhetorical appeal of pathos and ethos -- as well as using diction and tone to support his evidence.
Mr. McKibben provides a strong argument call of action for everyone to take action against global warming. But he doesn 't just want action, Mr. Mckibben is demanding action now, and lots of it. Throughout the passage, Meltdown: Running Our of Time on Global Warming, the reader can examine the many ways that McKibben attempts to persuade others to join his movement. When one examines Bill McKibben 's use of rhetoric appeals, persuasive fallacies, and counter augments, A reader can analyze and understand the real claim that the writer is attempting to address.
“How to poison the earth” by Linnea Saukko can be seen in two different aspects. The first one would be by looking at it in a literal way, in which it will make it a very harsh, inhumane and cold text. On the other hand, it could be seen as a satire, sarcastic and ironic text in which Saukko expects to catch the reader’s attention. Saukko exaggerates the sarcasm, and satire in her writing in order to make the readers realize and understand the main purpose of her essay, which is to warn readers about threats to the future of our planet.
In conclusion, McKibben’s writing style and use of pathos sway the reader to accept his argument as truth even though his arguments may not be valid. Since McKibben portrays himself as a credible author, the audience believes him especially because he is writing to the general public through a pop culture magazine. The issue of preserving the rain forest versus using the resources that it provides will continue to be in debate in the years to come.
The environment has become a popular topic this year due to our on-going drought. It has always been a serious issue; something Saukko informs us in her sarcastic essay “How to Poison the Earth”. She uses sarcasm and irony in her essay hoping her readers will do the complete opposite of what she is saying because of the stress she puts on the harming chemicals we use every day. We do not appreciate our environment and take it for granted. This ideal is what Ehrlich's essay “Chronicles of Ice” focuses on by using analogies and scientific definitions to describe aspects of glaciers. The melting of the glaciers introduces us to the topic of global warming and how our society is doing nothing to stop it from getting worse. Gawande’s “The Cancer-Cluster
He includes references from scientists with different backgrounds and public statements from government officials to support the claims that he made. Not only that, Scranton is a doctoral candidate in English at Princeton University, and he has written for The New York Times, Boston Review, and Theory & Event. Also, Scranton has published a novel about the Iraq war. His achievements and academic background certainly increase his credibility. His scientific and political sources add to his credibility even more so. The examples included in the logos paragraph is only a representation of the evidence featured in his article hence the use of the plural version of scientists and government officials in this essay. Even though Dr. Scranton has credible sources, he does fail to consider a portion of UTA readers. He mentions that the “question is no longer whether global warming exists” but instead questions how we are going to deal with it (par. 9). As a result, Scranton ignores the readers that might not believe in global warming; he does not recognize this small audience in his article, and as a consequence, readers might find Scranton to be slightly arrogant. Despite the failure to acknowledge this alternate view, Scranton does have the public’s interests at heart. The purpose of the article is to convince readers to take action and help save humanity
Bill McKibben's "The Environmental Issue from Hell" argues that climate change is a real and dire concern for humanity. His essay deals with the methods and persuasive arguments needed to spur American citizens and the government on to change to more eco-friendly choices. The arguments he proposes are based largely upon emotional appeals calling for empathy and shame, and examples of what in our daily lives is adding to the changes we're seeing in the climate.
He develops an important argument about the “origins of the third world” (p. 279). The late nineteenth century’s ENSO droughts were no mere footnote. Rather, ENSO-driven climate change intersected with a century-long erosion of pre-capitalist state structures and the simultaneous expansion of commodity production and exchange, especially in South and East Asia. Famine and ecological crisis ensued, their lasting effects found in today’s extreme global inequality. Davis says that “The wealth generated by usury and rack-renting was almost entirely parasitic, with negligible productive reinvestment in cattle, irrigation or farm equipment” Davis, Mike (2002-06-17) Late Victorian Holocausts: El Niño Famines and the Making of the Third World (pg.318). He seems to be saying that political ecology offers a holistic approach and sees the individual as responsible, but with a nod to the influence of geopolitics. The political element of the equation is all the more important when you realize that in the Third World, poor also means, poor in
“At present, the global system for carbon emissions trading is embodied in the Kyoto Treaty,” said Al Gore, which points out that Global Warming is not a national problem, but global problem. The Kyoto Treaty states that parties involved will reduce greenhouse emissions in their nation (United Nations). These facts introduce the idea of transforming this perilous world into an innocuous one. It supports his claim for having a preferable future for all, where there will be no droughts, devastations, deaths, or poverties due to global warming. His repetition of the word “reduce” engages the audience of having a solution to climate change. Mr. Gore continues with his ideas to reduce Global Warming by saying, “...Carbon Capture and Sequestration (CSS)...will play a significant...role as one of the major blocks of a solution to climate crisis.” This fact is an example of a paradox as before this statement he mentioned that CSS, a method to capture the CO2 burned from the burning coal, is an expensive method which most companies resist from using. His use of paradoxes throughout his speech makes the audience rethink their opinions. These statistics are part of many other logically statements that Mr. Gore used to support his claim. Some of these logical procedures include; electronic cars, reduction of renewable
Gardiner, S.M, (2004) ‘Ethics and Global Climate Change’, Chicago Journals, Vol. 114 ( No. 3), Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/382247 [Accessed 12 March 2014]
The conversations in “On the Wings of this Prayer” are one-sided, breaking through the fourth wall and directly addressing the reader. The main character goes on to specifically ask that the “Tar Sands” be stopped, for that is what causes “cancer to our Mother,” the Earth, as it unleashes the Wheetagos (Van Camp 16). Swiftly, the short story deliberately lays blame on the Oil Sands industry, labelling it as the root of an evil world full of pollution and merciless, evil Wheetagos. Therefore, Van Camp uses the short story to spread his message that if climate change is not brought to a halt through the dismantling of the Oil Sands, Earth is likely to fare a fate where humans quickly die out. The author not only lays blame but urges the readers to take action as well, as he lets them know that “[they] can change the future” (17). As a result, the problems that the natural world faces are all directly due to humanity; either humanity takes responsibility for its actions and repairs the damages or the natural world will rebel and cleanse itself of the human disease through the use of hideous, merciless creatures—Wheetagos. Breaking the fourth wall is readily used in this short story in order to send the message that humanity plays a major role in climate change
Looking at the article “Environmental Justice” the author says, “Hazardous wastes landfills were disproportionally located in minority and low-income.” This shows that when factory workers don’t have places to put the waste they use the poor communities with less money at their waste site because other are out of portion. Another example is shown in the article “Climate change” he states, “The oppression, the bigotry, and fuckery of that argument is that it allows rich countries to continue perpetuating unrealistic demands on the world’s “poorest”- those who “virtually have had nothing to with” climate change.” This indicates that they continue to let the countries that are rich make unrealistic statements on how to help the poor people. The last example is, “These happen to both be things that the wealthy believe they can afford to ignore.” This means that the people who are wealthy think its ok to ignore the fact that pollution will destroy their country soon.
Have you ever thought how did we create this cloud of new different thoughts that is a mix of good and bad ideas from all over the world? Well, it is a result of globalization where countries’ thoughts meet and interfere. Globalization is a great word and it has many meanings and parts. In “The Climate for Change”, Albert Gore Jr. who is a former congressman, senator and forty-fifth vice president of the United States claims that everyone is responsible to protect the environment and that we should find new source of energy to save the climate. He also mentioned a five parts plan to save the climate. In “Lessons from Lost Worlds”, Jared Diamond shares a similar idea, he declares that the environmental problems like global warming, and land
In the late 1990’s people became increasingly aware of the negative effect burning these harmful fuels and gases has on our planet, thus we have seen a rise in the number of environmentalists in recent years. The knowledge the nation has gained surrounding global warming has led to an increase in the levels of recycling, energy efficient homes and businesses and an overall attempt at reducing the negative impact on the earth. However globalisation and consumerism caused by corporate greed has left the nation believing that the economy is the most important factor ...