Niccolo Machiavelli's The Prince

596 Words2 Pages

Niccolo Machiavelli makes an attempt to convince the readers how princes should perform in order to retain their positions as rulers or how one show take over a position and maintain it. Machiavelli does demonstrate how various other princes failed to adhere to this system, which in turn led to their death or being dethroned. He considers that it’s better for princes to avoid making themselves, despised and detested because the support from the general public is a superior shield than any fortification. In Machiavelli writing he focus on what actions princes should in order to repair the current state of the country. He’s wants the prince to be aware of the ongoing exploitations and spites that occupied the Italian community, and has inscribed what he alleges to be the most realistic and effective way to fix it. …show more content…

Overall, Machiavelli’s believes that they are, “ungrateful, voluble, dissemblers anxious to avoid danger, and covetous of gain…” (Machiavelli Pg. 90). Machiavelli essentially has only a little respect for these individuals, and has an impression as though they do not deserved much either. Machiavelli exploits this as reasoning in turn to use terror in order to manipulate and organize the people. He also presumes that most men “…take pleasure in their own things and deceive themselves…” (Machiavelli Pg.116). So in this sense of fairness, it justifies breaking one’s word to men. Machiavelli additionally notes about how difficult it must be for any type of ruler to stay righteous. Machiavelli deduces that with so many distrustful people around goodness it’s challenging to establish in oneself. Overall, Machiavelli is quite negative and suspicious about the capabilities of the current community. He has a strong belief that after investigative societies through the past, his assumptions of men are in fact

Open Document