New Yor Case Study

1034 Words3 Pages

“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.” 1 Freedom of the press gives the rights to express feelings and thoughts through writing. Prior to the Freedom of Press Clause the government had authority over what could be printed in newspapers and articles.2 The government had to approve all information before it was published and released. It was a crime to print anything that contained content that was seditious libel, which is anything that criticizes the government or its officials before freedom of the press was established.3If the writing were deamed inappropriate to the government it was not allowed to be printed even if it was not libel. This clause protects “the press” from being prosecuted by all levels and branches of the government. Writers can make statements as long as they are not proven to be malice or libel.In the case New …show more content…

The misconception that Freedom of press/speech gives a person the right to post what they want is inaccurate. Freedom of Press with in the First Amendment gives a person the right to state their opinion and not be punished by the government. This means if a person makes a status criticizing a government official they will not be taken to jail unless the comment is malice, which is harmful or with a purpose to inflict injury.Also if a person is not exhibiting behavior that is considered appropriate for a company,university, or church Freedom of Press doesn't protect that person from what ever actions that are taken by the particular establishment. Recruiters checking social media pages to get information about a person is a common thing that some people don't take

Open Document