Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Censorship media speech
Censorship media speech
The freedom of the press essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Censorship media speech
Media plays a pivotal role in building the public opinion and views of millions on various topics of regional, national and international agenda and bringing into light the hidden injustices. Therefore the existence of an independent, free and powerful media forms the cornerstone of a democratic nation. Today the democratic integrity of a country is judged by the ambit of the freedom that the media enjoys in that country. It is worth mentioning here the Blackstonian concept of freedom of press which still forms the shell of the concept of press freedom. They are: 1) Liberty of the press is essential to the state 2) No previous restraints should be placed on the publications. 3) That does not mean there is freedom for doing what is prohibited …show more content…
regulation of media dates back to the times of British regime. During the colonial rule, the British Govt. passed a number of legislations to control the activities of the press. They enacted the Indian Press Act, 1910, the Indian Press (Emergency) Act and so on. In addition to this, during the Second World War, the British exercised exhaustive power under the Defence of India Act and enforced censorship on press. They also declared the publication of news related to the Congress activities as illegal. Thus having experienced the waves of repression during the British regime and realising the importance of freedom of press in a democratic India, the founding fathers of the Indian Constitution emphasised on the freedom of press in the Constituent Assembly. Despite this, it is surprising to note that freedom of press was not included as a fundamental right in the Constitution. The chief architect of Indian Constitution, Dr. B. R. Ambedkar countered the criticisms that arouse regarding this omission by stating that, freedom of press is included in the right freedom of speech and expression and it is not necessary to mention it as a separate right. Now when Article 19(1) provides the freedom of speech and expression, there is Article 19(2) of the Indian Constitution which states the reasonable restrictions to the freedom of press. Right form the history of press in India there are many major and minor cases where Govt. has employed Article 19(2) to restrict
When discussing the media, we must search back to its primal state the News Paper. For it was the News paper and its writers that forged ahead and allowed freedoms for today’s journalism on all fronts, from the Twitter accounts to the daily gazettes all must mark a single event in the evolution of media in respects to politics and all things shaping. Moving on in media history, we began to see a rapid expansion around 1990. With more than 50% of all American homes having cable TV access, newspapers in every city and town with major newspaper centers reaching far more than ever before. Then the introduction of the Internet; nothing would ever be the same.
First, the role of the media is to represent the public and intervene between the public and the government. The media is a mirror, which re...
As in speech, technology has provided another excuse for government intrusion in the press. The Secret Service can confiscate computers, printers, hard disks, and mail from electronic services they do not consider a press. Entire stores of books and videotapes are seized because of sexually explicit material. The Bill of Rights and the First Amendment exists to protect speech and press that is unpopular. “Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression (Steele).” If unpopular ideas did not exist, we would not need the First Amendment.
Russian people enjoyed the liberty to express their views in the decade of 1855 to 1865. “The press then enjoyed greater freedom” (Newth, 2002). As the years passed by of non-censorship, the image of the Russian government and leader of Tsar Alexander at first was extremely favorable (Downs, 2014). Still, soon things started to go down in later years. In 1865, the censorship came back with Russian government and Alexander wanted to keep Russian image positive. The people of Russia soon started to lose their small freedom they had with free voice. Still, there was some sort of freedom of media, but it was not entirely true. “Although freedom of the press nominally existed in the Soviet Union, the government reserved the right to prevent the publication of certain materials.” (Kassof, 2004).
We have a lot of freedom and rights in America that sometimes take for granted. I think that these are just a few of the important rights that we have in America. Freedom of speech, free education, and freedom of religion are three of the greatest things that Americans have and could sometimes take for granted if we are not careful.
The action of censoring means to examine a material in order to find and delete any objectionable content. This act has been used by many different organizations, both governmental and religious, to help push certain ideologies upon the public. It has been one of the foundations of society since ancient times, turning censoring and its institutional use as a normal facet of life. Although, in some situations, censorship by both governmental and religious institutions, can be an acceptable way to protect the public; but in most situations, it is nothing more than manipulation by a deceitful elite trying to keep their ideologies in power.
The press has no direct powers given to it by the government, it does have a very big impact on all of the other branches. The press can promote or destroy a candidate for each and every branch of government. The press will promote the candidates which they like for office positions, making it easier for the candidate to achieve their goal, while others who they don’t like as much will be slandered and made fun of, making their campaigning harder or in some cases impossible, even causing some presidential candidates to stop running for president, and stopping them from campaigning. The media can use many tactics to discourage those who they don’t like from running for political offices, in the event that they say or do something embarrassing they will play the video or “sound bite” in order to sway the public's opinion in favor of the press’s opinion. The press can also promote a congressman’s campaign through the use of political ads, usually, but not always, paid for by either the political party or the congressman. In turn for the promotion, if and when the congressman get’s elected they will usually try to vote in favor of bills that would benefit the press, while this may not be the most politically smart decision, it is a good way for the congressman to get re-elected. The press will also notify the public if an official does something that is unethical or that most people would disapprove of. The
A defamatory statement is one such restriction. With the term “reasonable restriction”, it connotes that the enjoyment of the right should not be arbitrary or excessive in nature, which is beyond what is required in the interests of the public, there should be intelligent care and deliberation in the choice of course. The Constitution and Parliament had decided to retain criminal defamation provisions as a safeguard against persons making wild and baseless allegations against others. The Supreme Court Bench led by Justice Dipak Misra and P C Pant is of the view that criminal defamation as an offence under IPC was framed in 1860 much before when the Constitution came into force i.e., 1950 and it was high time to judge its
The Frist Amendment (1791) to the Constitution of the United States (“Congress shall make no law… abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press…”) holds the importance of the freedom of speech and press as one of the most basic rights of US citizens and reporters in the process of upholding a democratic society. Freedom of expression; the ability of people to communicate their feelings and thoughts effectively, without fear of being silenced, is a titanic right the people of the United States possess and is not something that came to them so easily. Neither is the Freedom of the Press; to report on everything that is true, of importance to public knowledge and decision making and reflects on the actions of the government and in effect may hold it responsible in the eyes of the people it serves. Initially however, when British colonists were still in power over the now established region of the United States, censorship (people not being allowed to say what they wanted, particularly in criticism of the Crown or its empowered subjects) was upheld as a right of the crown, a belief necessary to maintaining a controlled empire.
One of the fundamental roles of the media in a liberal democracy is to critically scrutinise governmental affairs: that is to act as a watchdog of government to ensure that the government can be held accountable by the public. However, the systematic deregulation of media systems worldwide is diminishing the ability of citizens to meaningfully participate in policymaking process governing the media (McChesney, 2003, p. 126). The relaxation of ownership rules and control, has resulted in a move away from diversity of production to a situation where media ownership is becoming increasing concentrated by just a few predominantly western global conglomerates (M...
The power of media lies in its functions, as it can be illustrated by realizing its political power. Media is the cementing force of democracy, because it has supplemented the authority of people by giving them awareness about political system and its functioning. And this is the reason for which media is considered the fourth pillar of state. It strives for the rights of citizens to be served. In short, proper functioning of media is pre requisite for democracy.
"Freedom of the press is guaranteed only to those who own one." This quote by A.J. Liebling illustrates the reality of where the media stands in today's society. Over the past twenty years there has been an increase in power throughout the media with regard to politics. The media's original purpose was to inform the public of the relevant events that occurred around the world. The job of the media is to search out the truth and relay that news to the people. The media has the power to inform the people but often times the stories given to the public are distorted for one reason or another. Using slant and sensationalism, the media has begun to shape our views in society and the process by which we choose our leaders. There was once a time when the government used the media as a medium to influence voters, committees, communities etc. Recently, it has been the presidents of major media outlets that have not only exercised power over the public but also made their presences felt in government and in the halls of congress. When the word democracy is thrown about it usually has to do with the rights or original intentions for a group or organization. The first group intended to be influenced by the media was the informed voter. Political parties along with the government used a variety of media resources to persuade the voter or in effect receive a vote for their cause. Returning to the thought of ?democracy? the question is, what was the original intention of the media with relation to the theme of democracy and the informed voter? To analyze this thought thoroughly one must first grasp an understanding of the basic definition of democracy.
Press freedom takes influential place in a country. It represents citizen's freedom of speech and the right to know. Media can expose news without obstructor or any controls by government and organizations. There should not be control over the press and press freedom is necessary for regulation the growth of corruption, development of economy and maintenance of democracy.
In our democratic society, mass media is the driving force of public opinion. Media sources such as Internet, newspaper, news-broadcasts, etc, play significant roles in shaping a person’s understanding and perception about the events occurred in our daily lives. But how much influence does the mass media poses on our opinion? Guaranteed by the First Amendment in American Constitution, the media will always be there to inform us about the different events or issues they feel are important for the public. The media constantly bombards us with news, advertisements, etc, wher...
India has the largest democracy in the world and media has a powerful presence in the country. In recent times, Indian media has been subject to a lot of criticism for the manner in which they have disregarded their social responsibility. Dangerous business practices in the field of media have affected the fabric of Indian democracy. Big industrial conglomerates in the business of media have threatened the existence of pluralistic viewpoints. Post liberalisation, transnational media organisations have spread their wings in the Indian market with their own global interests. This has happened at the cost of an Indian media which was initially thought to be an agent of ushering in social change through developmental programs directed at the non-privileged and marginalised sections of the society. Though media has at times successfully played the role of a watchdog of the government functionaries and has also aided in participatory