Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Reasons why people engage in criminal behavior
Investigating neutralisation
Reasons why people commit crimes
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Reasons why people engage in criminal behavior
In 1957, two sociologists, Gresham Sykes and David Matza, developed a theory in regards to people neutralizing deviance. This theory represents as the five Techniques of Neutralization. “Through the use of these neutralizations social and internal controls that serve to check or inhibit deviant motivational patterns are blocked, thereby allowing individuals to engage freely in delinquency without serious damage to their self-image” (Copes). Sykes and Matza outlined five neutralization techniques: denial of responsibility, denial of injury, denial of the victims, condemnation of the condemners, and appeal to higher loyalties. Sykes and Matza studied juvenile delinquents’ behavior to understand the denial process and explain that their improper behavior can extremely benefit amongst other social groups. Through the development of the Techniques of Neutralization, there are five components that Sykes and Matza both identify. The first technique to discuss is the denial of responsibility, therefore, indicates that the delinquent acts caused by an erratic individual can define themselves by lacking responsibility for their own actions, especially when they deny any …show more content…
This gains significance when people avoid trouble or not face a consequence regardless how severe the situation played as a result. Therefore, Sykes and Matza wanted this theory to impact our society to further display that the delinquent acts caused them to deviate from the actual norms of society. From a sociological point of view, the techniques of neutralization is important in regards to how the role of thinking can contribute towards the way people avert themselves from society’s norms. Nevertheless, this can affect the decision process when composing realistic choices that results into attempting to neutralizing the
As a social process theory, drift and Neutralization sees a crime to be a part of wider social interactions. It views social order as non objective and non consensual and posits that there is not a single fundamental social goal that is held by all social groups; rather there are many different overlapping social values within a society, both conventional and delinquent: legitimate and illegitimate. Drift and Neutralization Theory posits that individuals learn values and delinquent behaviours through their exposure to sub-cultural values. “Deviant or delinquent (or criminal) subcultures do not reject ‘dominant’ values and beliefs. Instead, there is tension between inclinations to adhere to mainstream values and beliefs.” This sees that criminals can drift between deviant and conventional behaviours and how to use various techniques of neutralisation to rationalise their criminal activity. In analysing McVeigh’s motives, his learned sub cultural values can be examined to demonstrate how he was able to rationalise his violations of the law and how he came to drift from non delinquent to delinquent actions. The techniques of neutralisation; denial of responsibility, denial of injury, denial of
The study of Juvenile delinquency and the theories pertaining to it are vital for several reasons. In order to more effectively engage with youths and foster positive behavior and schemas, the individuals must first be understood. The study of theory provides a means of understanding adolescents and the factors that lead to or detract from delinquent behavior. In the case of juvenile delinquent, Jordan Brown, theory helps to provide insight into why an eleven-year-old boy murdered his stepmother.
Wiatrowski, M.D., Griswold, D.B., & Roberts, M.K. (1981). Social control theory and delinquency. American Sociological Review, 46(5), 525-541.
Throughout the history of law enforcement within the United States, theories has been explored and implemented as polices in addressing deviant behaviors produced by humans. Models such as Crime Control through the Conflict perceptive suggest the human nature is persuaded by social opportunities and considered a fundamental aspect of social life (Schmalleger, 2009, p. 347). However, social disorders must be addressed in a cordial and civil procedural fairness; thus, individual rights guaranteed by policies such as Due Process ensure that individuals under allegations are treated equally and just. Although crime and deviant behaviors exist within our communities, policies are intended to reduce such disorders by following cohesive criminal justice frameworks with the intentions of protecting individuals accused of crimes. Crime Contro...
Theories have often been developed to explain how delinquents violate social norms and still manage to maintain positive self images of themselves. Neutralization theory, developed by Gresham Sykes and David Matza in 1957 set out to do just this. Critics, however, have claims that the theory, on it’s own, is not a sufficient explanation for adolescent’s participation in crime in delinquency. It has also been claimed by critics that neutralization theory is best viewed as a components of larger theory of crime and can be incorporated into other theories such as social bond theory.
Eysenck, H.J., & Gudjonsson, G.H. (1989). The causes and cures of criminality. Contemporary Psychology, 36, 575-577.
It does not consider other factors such as criminal associations, individual traits, and inner strains, which plays significant role in determining punishment for the individuals in committing crimes. It is observed that this theory endeavours to know that whether the activities of crime as well as the victim’s choice, criminals commit the activities on start from rational decisions. The theory also determines that criminals consider different elements before committing crime. They engage in the exchange of ideas before reaching on any final decision. These elements consist of consequences of their crimes, which include revealing their families to problems or death, chances of being arrested, and others elements, which comprises of placement of surveillance systems (Walsh & Hemmens, 2010; Lichbach,
Bartol, C. R. (2002). Criminal behavior: A psychosocial approach. (6 ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
The positivist view of deviance places emphasis on individual's behavior being manipulated by outside forces (Goode, 2007, p. 23). Individual's are unable to contend with these outside forces which are beyond their control. Criminals and other deviants are created through biological defects which were responsible for their behavior, as it was something inherently organic and passed on through birth. The self-control theory of crime was developed by Travis Hirshi and Michael Gottfredson, two famous criminologists. Self-control theory, also known as the General Theory of crime, portrays deviance as stemming from the criminal's lack of ...
The theory sounds simple and understanding, but other theologist have different opinions about it. Most think the theory is underdeveloped. When the offender commits a crime, they do not use the techniques until after their acts draw attention (Assessing the Techniques Of Neutralization Theory Essay, 2015). This is one of the theory’s weakness. And they have been questions about it. The offender cannot use this theory before the crime, because that will change the theory in to rational choice theory. Changing the entire defense of the theory. The strengths of neutralization theory are the techniques and how they apply. “The theory does not only apply to lesser crimes such as, shoplifting. But to serious crimes such as, murder” (Assessing the techniques of neutralization theory sociology essay,
People who deviate from social norm are motivated by anti-social people such as criminals and drug addicted. Control theory suggests the opposite hypothesis, in that people will naturally commit crime if situation allowed doing so (Bernard et al., 2010, p. 203). The control theories suggest that every society have a set of values, norms and behavior for their citizen. A person is considered as anti-social, if s/he breaks the norms set by the society. Albert J. Reiss’s article, in 1951 described about various aspects of control theory (Bernard et al., 2010, p. 203). The researchers showed that juvenile were more violent when they were identified of lacking self-controlling capacity (Bernard et al., 2010, p. 203). Young adults with less self controlling capacities were not able show good behavior and lead to delinquent behavior. It was found that when young-adults were frequently absent from the school and the school authorities believed them as having involved in anti-social activities (Bernard et al., 2010, p. 204). When social norms are weak on an individual, then that individual may get involve in the anti-social activities. Reiss’ suggested that juveniles’ delinquent behavior rate can be influenced by several other factors outside the perimeter of control theory, however, later he was inclined towards control theories (Bernard et al., 2010,
Agnew, R. (1985). Social Control Theory and Delinquency: A Longitudinal Test. Criminology Volume 23 , 47-59.
There are five techniques of neutralization, according to Sykes and Matza. They are denial of responsibility, denial of injury, denial of victim, condemnation of the condemners, and appeal to higher loyalties. Many people can avoid the blame towards themselves and maintain their self-esteem while they are violating the law if they have not told others they had no intent in the criminal activity. These five techniques of neutralization is portrayed by Sykes and Matza that the individuals are used to prior in violating the law to then allow the offender to accept that breaking the law is right. After the crime has been committed, the individual can rationalize, however there is no need to explain it if they would have not commited the crime in
Complete free exercise of will inhibits individual and societal freedom. According to Mill, one may act as one chooses unless one is inflicting harm onto others. He argues that one is free to behave “according to his own inclination and judgment in things which concern himself” as long as “he refrains from molesting” (64). The problem arises in the freedom allowed to the individual performing the potentially dangerous act. People are often blinded by the situation in which they are in and by their personal motives which drive them to act. Humans, by nature, have faults and vices that are potentially harmful. It is the responsibility of society to anticipate harm, whether to oneself or to others. Once dangerous patterns and habits are recognized it is imperative to anticipate and prevent injury from reoccurring. To allow any individual to be inflicted harm forces citizens to lose tr...