Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
British romanticism and the French revolution
Romanticism and french revolution
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: British romanticism and the French revolution
Throughout history art has been representative of culture, serving as a barometer detecting changes within societies and civilizations of varying scale. During the 18th and 19th centuries the Western Hemisphere faced dramatic changes in politics, economics, and culture as a result of emerging Enlightenment philosophies. These changing times were reflected in the various art movements, which became popular, the most prominent of these movements being Rococo, Neoclassicism and Romanticism. The transitions between these movements were a direct result of shifts in society, and each was in effect a response to its predecessor, therefore having distinctly different characteristics.
Rococo was a movement that occurred in the 18th century, which encompassed
…show more content…
sculpture, painting, interior design, literature, music and theater. It first took root in 18th century Paris as a reaction in opposition to the symmetry and strict regulations of the Baroque period best represented in the Palace of Versailles. Rococo was defined by shell-like curves, the principal motif, and organic form. This movement against Baroque art was lead by the nobles and aristocrats of French society. The death of Louis XIV in 1715 brought change to French high society. The nobles readily abandoned the court of Versailles bringing a resurgence of aristocratic social, political, and economic power. The elite upper class looked to expand its powers in France. The aristocrats reestablished their dominance in art patronage by developing a new style, which clearly contrasted the style previously established by Louis XIV. The nobles looked to set themselves apart from the monarchy and dominate the realms the monarchy had once controlled; Rococo was the means to this end. The hótels of Paris became the center of this new, softer and more frivolous style, and Salon culture was developed. Each hótel commonly contained a Salon decorated in the Rococo style. French Rococo interior design was a “total work of art” covering entire rooms. Hostesses titled Femme Servants competed to attract the attention of famous aristocrats (“The Salons of Paris”). They lined the walls of their Rococo style Salons with pieces from the most known artists of the movement. Rococo interior design expanded outside of France to Germany and surrounding countries. An example of this is the Hall of Mirrors (De Culliviés). Rococo art was purely decorative and had little substance or meaning (Gardner). Paintings commonly depicted leisurely outings of aristocratic couples and were comedic in content, an example being the Swing (Fragonard). The color palette contained mostly pastels reflecting light heartedness. This reflected the blasé attitude of aristocrats countering the extreme poverty facing the commoners they derived their power from. France’s Middle and Lower classes were strained by aristocrats overspending, and never recovered from the expenses of the Versailles. The Rococo style exemplified the ignorance of the upper class, which would prove fatal during the French Revolution. Neoclassicism replaced the Rococo style during the French Revolution. It represented a renewed admiration for classical antiquity as well as an interest in nationalism. The movement coincided with the Age of Enlightenment during the late 18th century because of its emphasis on rationality, realism, and geometric harmony. This can best be seen in Neoclassical architecture, which rejected the previous extravagance of the Baroque style. Architecture was both simple and seamless with ionic columns and domes reminiscent of Roman and Greek architecture (Jefferson). During times of political upheaval, revolutionaries saw ancient Greece and Rome as the pinnacle of an enlightened democratic government, contributing largely to the movement’s popularity. Classical societies prized qualities such as civil virtue, liberty, morality, and sacrifice, which resonated with revolutionaries who sought to instate governments structured on the same principles and ideals. The Neoclassical style lent itself well to representing revolutionary heroes because of its strong heroic and patriotic subjects. Many influential Neoclassical painters emerged from the French Revolution, inspired by both the Enlightenment idea of participatory and knowledgeable citizenry lay, as well as the clash between the Third Estate, and the First and Second Estates over the economic crisis. The Oath of Horatii was a paragon of Neoclassical style. The narrative is both patriotic and deals with sacrifice, something rioters and revolutionaries sympathized with. The painting depicts the three Horatii brothers as they swear on their swords to win or die for Rome, exemplifying nationalism, a popular political ideology of the time. The females weeping in the background show the men’s’ choice of nationalism and patriotism over family and comfort. This reflected the cultural ideal of nationalism and its importance in society (David). Neoclassicism was in direct opposition of the Rococo style. Rococo was light hearted and whimsical representing only the upper class, while Neoclassicism emphasized courage, sacrifice, and nationalism appealing to the exploited lower and middle classes, who were coming to power at the time. The transition between the two signified a rapid shift in power from the upper class to the lower and middle class. The Romantic movement came about later in the 18th century and spanned into the 19th century.
The Neoclassical movement coincided with the Romantic movement from 1750 to 1900. Romanticism was a reaction against what defined the Neoclassical movement. Romanticism was fueled by the French Revolution and the ideologies it introduced. John Jacques-Rousseau is considered the father of Romanticism; his ideas expressed the core idea of naturalism, that happiness is brought upon by the natural emotions, and all men are naturally good and society is what corrupts them (Document 11). The nationalism of the French Revolution became a key theme in Romanticism known as Romantic “nationalism”. The most iconic example of Romantic nationalism is “Liberty Leading the People”, which depicts the Parisian uprising against Charles X. The French flag and national landmark are examples of nationalist iconography within the piece, showing the artist, Eugene Delacroix’s, favoritism of France (Gardner). The French Revolution created the context, which allowed for Counter-Enlightenment and in effect Romanticism to occur. Counter-Enlightenment was the greatest factor in the emergence of Romanticism, specifically the German Sturm und Drang movement, which held emotion and subjectivity over rationalism (Hardin). Like Counter-Enlightenment, Romanticism rejected the rigidity that characterized the principles of Enlightenment, which were based off of the scientific revolution. The economic changes in …show more content…
Europe brought about by the Industrial Revolution also had a great effect on Romanticism. Romanticism produced an escape from the modern realities of the Industrial Revolution. The peak of Romanticism came during the Industrial Revolution when the people began to revolt against mechanization of labor in their art and writing. European countries experienced overcrowding and squalid living conditions (Engels). The burning of coal polluted the air, infrastructure was in need of repair, and the lower and middle classes lived in small unpleasant apartments. Romanticism created an escape from industrialization by depicting the imagination and nature, which had been destroyed by the industrial revolution. Caspar David Reidrich’s “Wanderer above a Sea of Mist” is an example of the theme of nature in Romantic compositions. The piece depicts a solitary man on a rocky ledge gazing out at a panorama of clouds, mist, and mountains, expressing the Romantic idea of the sublimeness of nature (Friedrich). Romanticism stood against everything that defined the Neoclassical movement. Both were polarized responses to the same society. For centuries society and culture has dictated the various movements in art.
Art transcends language, and provides a depiction of cultural ideologies, fashion, and ideals in a way texts from the time period can not. Rococo, Neoclassicism, and Romanticism were all indicators of a changing time in which economics, politics, and culture were altered. The transition between each gauges the severity of the change depending on how extremely each differs from its predecessor. While the most extreme occurred between the Rococo movement and the Neoclassical, the transition between the Neoclassicism and Romanticism signified a less severe but still influential change in society. A document from a citizen criticizing art during the time of both the Romantic movement and Neoclassical movement would aid in describing public opinion of the two, and the change in popularity dependent on the classes or perception of the time period. Another document from a commoner on nationalism may have also expanded the perspective of how nationalism was prominent during the time, and how this was reflected in art. All of the movements continue to influence modern art. Rococo inspires artists in depicting the wealth gap, Neoclassicism continues to be used in architecture especially relating to government buildings, and principles of Romanticism are still used in idealized landscape paintings or other imaginative
compositions.
The 18th century is well known for its complex artistic movements such as Romantism and Neo-classical. The leading style Rococo thrived from 1700-1775 and was originated from the French words rocaille and coquille which meant “rock” and “shell”; used to decorate the Baroque gardens1. Identified as the age of “Enlightenment”, philosophers would ignite their ideas into political movements1. Associated with this movement is England’s John Locke who advanced the concept of “empiricism”. This denotes that accepting knowledge of matters of fact descends from experience and personal involvement1. Locke’s concept assisted the improvements of microscopes and telescopes allowing art students in the French academy to observe real life1. Science and experience influenced painting more so in Neo-Classicalism. Locke fought for people’s rights and the power or “contract” between the ruler and the ruled. Reasoning that “the Light in Enlightenment referred to the primacy of reason and intellect…and a belief in progress and in the human ability to control nature”1. Hence, the commence of experimental paintings such as Joseph Wright’s (1734-1797) oil on canvas painting: Fig.1 An Experiment on a Bird in the Air Pump. This image was developed through science by placing a bird in glass container and pumping air to see the effects it would have on the bird (White cockatoo)1. Throughout the late 18th and early 19th century in Western Europe, Neo-Classical art became the “true Style” and was accepted by the French Revolution under Louis XIV. Neo-Classical art was a reaction to Rococo’s light hearted, humour and emotion filled pieces.
Scientists started to study the earth and it’s positioning in the universe. This was a time when the people started taking more of an interest in astronomy and mathematical equations. During the time of the Catholic Reformation, artists began to challenge all the rules that society has set for artistic design. Artists starting with Parmigianino, Tintoretto, and El Greco began to add a wide variety of colors into their paintings, challenging the way things have been done in the past. These artists also added abnormal figures or altered the proportions in paintings.
“Romanticism, is an artistic, literary, and intellectual movement that originated in Europe toward the end of the 18th century and in most areas was at its peak in the approximate period from 1800 to 1850” (Wikipedia).
History is the story and knowledge of the past. There are individuals that are interested by history and wish to study it by learning more. It is very informative to know what has happened in the past for self-knowledge. An individual cannot be naïve to the past including but not limited to how literature came to. One can understand literature more when they understand the time period the author wrote during and the way they wrote. There are several time periods different authors have been through with each period having specific beliefs. Romanticism is the time period that interests me the most; it was a time during the eighteenth century and focused on nature along with the individual’s expression of imagination and emotion.
To understand how Romanticism changed the way society thought, you must first understand the meanings and reason behind the movement. The Romantic Movement in the late 18th and early 19th centuries was described as a movement in the history of culture, an aesthetic style, and an attitude of mind. (Fiero) Romanticism provided expression of their thoughts and ideas toward their own societies, which was in effect predominantly in Europe and in the United States. The movement was a reaction to the Enlightenment which provided strict ideology and rationalism. The Church had much to do with the Enlightenment seeing as if religion and the importance of God were incorporated into most aspects of their culture. Thus, Romanticism was a response to the Enlightenment Movement and their religious ideology.
“Philosophers, writers, and artists expressed disillusionment with the rational-humanist tradition of the Enlightenment. They no longer shared the Enlightenment's confidence in either reason's capabilities or human goodness.” (Perry, pg. 457) It is interesting to follow art through history and see how the general mood of society changed with various aspects of history, and how events have a strong connection to the art of the corresponding time.
The time period of 1800-1850 was a time of imposed conservatism and revolutionary action as a result of liberalism and nationalism becoming widely spread. As a response romantic artists, musicians, and writers conveyed their feelings and opinions on the conditions through their work. The romantic movement was one of a heightened interest in nature, individualism, emotion, and usually went against established rules. Among these romantic artists were Eugene Delacroix, Caspar David Friedrich, and Theodore Gericault.
The impressionists were greatly influenced by this. This painting shows the division between the romantic style and the neoclassical style. Romantic style emphasizes spirit and color, detachment and line. This painting is a response to the July 1830 revolution against Charles X, the King of France. According to the book Painting in the Lourve romanticisms is a movement that arose in the early nineteenth century in art, literature, and music.
This paper deals, in broadest terms, with the questions of how artwork is connected to the changes and dynamics that prevail in a society. To describe these changes, I will investigate how a specific type of art reflects its social content in contemporary societies. My analysis is carried out by closely looking at the Pop Art movement, especially with Andy Warhol, who has come to be known as one of the greatest artists of the 20th century. It will be argued that Pop Art managed to successfully articulate its time, and in so doing, it became a widely influential art movement whose effect is still very much existent in today’s world of art. In order to prove its claim, this paper relies on the theory of “the field of cultural production” by Pierre
The Romanticism the nineteenth century is often called “The Romantic era.” The “Romanticism” defines a movement in the history of culture, an artistic style, attitude of mind and it describes the aesthetic, antique artworks of history. The Romanticism era was before the modernism era, during this time, many artists show their talents to the world. Romanticism is easy to understand, and it provides a lot of information of that era. The Romantic movement is uprising against academic convention and freedom of personal.political, and artistic life. John Constable, The Haywain, 1821, Francisco Goya, The Third of May, 1808: The Execution of the Defenders of Madrid 1814, and The John Nash, the Royal Pavilion, Brighton, the Northeast, 1815-1821 are the passionate and incredible artworks in the masterpiece of Romanticism, Realism, and the Nineteenth- Century World. This era was an artistic and creative era of the art history.
The French Revolution, indeed, changed the structure of economics and social sphere of the old regime, and also the ideology of that time. In the years that followed the Revolution, the always increasing senses of both freedom and individuality were evident, not only in French society, but also in art. As stated by Dowd, “leaders of the French Revolution consciously employed all forms of art to mobilize public sentiment in favor of the New France and French nationalism.” In between all the artistic areas, the art of painting had a special emphasis. After the Revolution, the French art academies and also schools were now less hierarchical and there was, now, more freedom of engaging into new themes, not being the apprentices so tied up to their masters footsteps, not being so forced to follow them.
Romanticism started in the 18th century and was said to be influenced by the French and Industrial Revolution.
In conclusion, the art of the 19th century was composed of a sequence of competing artistic movements that sought to establish its superiority, ideologies and style within the artistic community of Europe. These movements, being Romanticism, Realism, Impressionism and Post-Impressionism, ultimately spread far beyond the confines of Europe and made modern art an international entity which can still be felt in today’s artistic world.
The Romantic Era began in the late 18th century. It was a period of literature and arts.
Toward the end of the eiteenth-century, Romanticism emerged as a response to Classicism. Even though this change was gradual, it transformed everything from art and philosophy to education and science. While the Classicsts thought of the world as having a rigid and stern structure, the romanticists thought of the world as a place to express their ideas and believes. The Romaniticists and Classicsts differed in their views of the relationship between an individual and society, their views of nature and the relationship between reason and imagination.