Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Analysis of Neil Gaiman American Gods novel
Analysis of Neil Gaiman American Gods novel
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Analysis of Neil Gaiman American Gods novel
In this modern fictional book, American Gods, Neil Gaiman writes an incredible story using what we know about classical mythology to create a more modern tale here in the present. The book begins with an ex-convict widower, named Shadow, that begins to work with a mysterious figure named Mr. Wednesday. Throughout the book we learn that all the gods known from the past are real ,and are being threatened by the new modern gods. Gaiman writes an incredible modernized tale, all the while keeping some values of the classic fantasy story we all know and love, and creates a work of art that embodies the best of both worlds. Gaiman starts his tale with an anti-hero, an ex-convict. No traditional story would have had a prior criminal be the main …show more content…
Shadow dies, also not conventional in our common story to kill off the main character, and learns that in reality Wednesday had orchestrated the whole thing. Gaiman has shifted us back in forth, making us all the more confused on who is in the right, and who we want to root for as readers. We see this ambiguity through this quote: “There's never been a true war that wasn't fought between two sets of people who were certain they were in the right. The really dangerous people believe they are doing whatever they are doing solely and only because it is without question the right thing to do. And that is what makes them dangerous.” Are there good guys and bad guys? Or are there just bad guys looking for what's best for themselves? We begin to …show more content…
Any modern tale that kills off anyone is likely to keep it that way, but Shadow is brought back, which starts to fulfill a resolution the readers are comfortable with. Even more so we have a conflict between two polarized groups, both justified in their logic and with no speculation that Wednesday is actually orchestrating the whole thing. Our protagonist can't necessarily defeat Wednesday since he’s technically “dead”, and if the old gods win, Wednesday wins, and if the new gods wins, Wednesday wins just the same. So what resolution would make the story resolve within our classical framework? Gaiman decides to diffuse the entire conflict, using Shadow as a messenger to stop the war all together. So in the end Shadow is revived, the war stops, Wednesday receives no “glory”, and Laura is finally put to rest. These are the makings of a classical, “happy ending”. And at the end Gaiman gives us a picture of Shadow walking off, starting to make a new way for himself, letting the reader imagine his fate for
The good who is not so good and the bad who is not all that bad.
Main Idea: Carter Kane, a fourteen year old boy, and his twelve year old sister, Sadie Kane, want to save their dad, and more importantly the world, from Set, the Egyptian god of Chaos. But Set sends many of his minions after them to stop them, and they also have go through many obstacles, like fighting other gods and monsters, and magicians. Also Set traps their dad in a magical coffin, which results in him being trapped with no way to get free, or getting saved by Carter or Sadie. So with the help of the Egyptian gods, Isis, Horus, and some others, they go to Phoenix, where the Red Pyramid is located, and use a spell to take control of Set and tell him to go away until he is called upon if his help is ever needed. Then they destroyed the pyramid with a powerful spell.
Between the covers of the book Night is the story of a boy who had to endure the constant threat of death. He had to watch as other perished, family, friends, strangers, everyone. Yet his God had done nothing. He remained unmoved and silent. How could a God he was taught to look upon when anguished allow such savagery to
...s in mind “A Good Man Is Hard to Come By” because a solely good man is a rarity among individuals. Regardless of the role the person may have in society, a grandmother or a criminal, perhaps, there are more intricate blends in a personality than just good or evil.
Mythology is a key part of many of Zora Neale Hurston’s short stories and novels. She researched the stories of her home town and many other areas of the world. Hurston used this knowledge of myths and stories to help her carry them on to later generations in a form that almost everybody could relate to. Through out all of Zora Neale Hurston’s stories, mythology has been a crucial keystone. Her novel, Their Eyes Were Watching God, has been influenced by three different ancient myths: the myths of Ezili Freda, Osiris and Isis, and Aphrodite and Adonis.
...t a good man or person is hard to find because they do not exist. Some people are little better than others but all are stimulated by something that causes them to be that way. The assumption is that no one is driven my malice or meanness.
The lines that define good and evil are not written in black and white; these lines tend to blur into many shades of grey allowing good and evil to intermingle with each another in a single human being. Man is not inherently good or evil but they are born innocent without any values or sense of morality until people impart their philosophies of life to them. In the words of John Locke:
Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996. Campbell, Joseph. A. A. The Mask of God: A Creative Mythology. New York: Viking Press, Inc., 1968.
The myths which prove the contradictory behavior of the gods, acting as both benefactors and tormentors of man, can readily be explained when viewed in light of the prime directive for man, to worship the gods and not “overstep,” and the ensuing “Deus ex Mahina” which served to coerce man to fulfill his destiny as evidenced by the myths: “Pandora,” “Arachne, and “Odysseus.” Humankind and it’s range of vision over the gods beauty and power portrayed them to be benefactors but unseemingly it depicted their affliction towards humans.
"Everybody has good and evil within them. All we're trying to say is that people are not all good or all bad. People are more complicated than you think, and one has to be more knowledgeable about the complexities.." Everybody has good and evil within them. All we're trying to say is that people are not all good or all... N.p., n.d. Web. 16 Jan. 2014. .
At first glance, it seems that the abhorrent destiny of the main character is at the mercy of mischievous and cruel gods.
The relationship between gods and mortals in mythology has long been a complicated topic. The gods can be generous and supportive, and also devastating and destructive to any group of humans. Mortals must respect the powers above them that cannot be controlled. The gods rule over destiny, nature, and justice, and need to be recognized and worshipped for the powerful beings as they are. Regardless of one's actions, intentions, and thoughts, the gods in Greek myth have ultimate power and the final decision of justice over nature, mortals, and even each other.
Gaiman, Neil. American Gods: Tenth Anniversary Edition (Author’s Preferred Text). Tenth anniversary Ed. New York: HarperCollins Publishers Inc., 2011. Nook.
The novel Good Omens is a satirical rendition of Armageddon in almost all aspects. The story begins with the coming of the Antichrist, brought into the world as a human infant though it is anything but. An angel and a demon, Aziraphale and Crowley respectively, and rather good friends considering their rather checkered past, have teamed up to ensure that The End is, in the very least, late. They take roles in molding the child to see both the sides of good and evil, trying to make it so that the boy will not be able to choose a side wholeheartedly when the time comes. However, when the boy is supposedly meant to start showing his powers, they realize that all their hard work had been wasted, and that this boy was an entirely normal human child. The genuine son of Satan was, in actuality, Adam Young, and was misplaced at birth into the care of two very normal parents in a very normal little hamlet in South East England. Adam grows up “not [as an] Evil Incarnate or Good Incarnate… [but] a human incarnate” (366). He is as human and innocent as an eleven year old can be; still finding himself and his three best friends provoking terror and irritation amongst their more elderly or respectable neighbours, though that is more excused as a preadolescent quirk rather than wicked. Wicked happens to be what Newton Pulsifer, a relatively newly dubbed Witchfinder Detective of Witchfinder Sargent Shadwell’s Witchfinder army, is looking for. He is given the task to search through newspapers and anything of the sort to find evidence of anything remotely witchy, which happens to be precisely what Anathema Device, actual self-proclaimed witch and descendant of the most accurate and useless psychic in history, can be found doing. Admittedly, she is ...
Many have written entire novels on the topic of good versus evil. Philosophers have spent their entire lives researching and debating and providing theories to somehow find an answer that will never be clear. What makes a person evil or good? In her short stories, “A Good Man is hard to find” and “Good Country People,” Flannery O’Connor explores the theme of good versus evil and differentiating between them and what that conveys about the complexity of human nature.