Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Negative effects of globalization
The effect of globalization on developing countries
Negative impact of globalization
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Negative effects of globalization
Negative Aspects of Globalization
Introduction
Globalization is a cultural and economic trend that seems inevitable and unstoppable, but it is not without problems. In general, economic expansion seeks the lowest costs of raw materials and cheapest labor cost, but it frequently overlooks the broader impact that dynamics of globalizing have on socioeconomic status of developing societies. The countries that adopt policies to facilitate globalization have to consider that integration into a global society is not always painless or smooth. The most common complaints against globalization are that it exacerbates the gap between poor and rich both within and among countries and undermines labor standards (Griswold, 2000). Apter (2002, p.13) stated: “The truth is that if one can’t live with globalization, one can’t live without it either. Its consequences are many and diverse. But the devil is in details”. An analysis of globalization’s impact on economies of developing countries points out that globalization is a negative trend that widens the gap between wealthy and poor, exploits resources, and makes developing countries more depressed and marginalized.
Harmful Impact of Globalization on Developing Countries
Negative Trends, Deception, and Role of Multinational Companies
Globalization facilitates integration of economies in terms not only of services and goods, but of technology, information, and ideas (Birdsall, 1999). Currently, the economies of developed industrialized countries are very much growth driven. In order to stay competitive and outperform competitors, they need new markets, more customers, and greater market share. For developed industries of the western world, saturated domestic markets provide relatively littl...
... middle of paper ...
...n99/birdsall.htm
Ghosh, B., Guven, H., O’Hara, P., Pasha, M., Nath, S.Summerfield, G. (2006). Globalization and the third world: A study of negative consequences. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
Glyn, A. (2007). Capitalism unleashed: Finance, globalization, and welfare. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Griswold, D. (2000). The blessings and challenges of globalization. International Journal of World Peace, 17(3), 3-22.
Hill, W. C. (2013). Global business today (8th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Majecodunmi, A., & Adejuwon, D. (2012). Globalization and African political economy: The Nigerian experience. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Science, 2(8), 189-205.
Robinson, W. (2004). A theory of global capitalism: Production, class, and state in transnational world. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
“To kill the Indian in the child,” this was one of the many atrocious quotes which were spoken during the peak of residential schools from 1913 to 1932. Residential schools were government-sponsored, church ran schools established to assimilate Aboriginal children into Euro-Canadian culture. This quote means what it simply says, to remove the Indian culture out of a child. There were many quotes which outlined the goals of residential schools in Canada; some of them as shown in source II for example, were made by Duncan Campbell Scott, the Deputy Superintendent General of the Department of Indian Affairs between 1913 and 1932. The quote depicts his Eurocentric views towards the Indians and his intentions on what to do with them. The first Source
Capitalism as an economic system does not exist in its pure form in the world. However, the advancements that he listed as enriching the human experience are merely a product of progression, which can occur in any economic system, not just capitalism. Goldberg then went on to discuss capitalism’s creation of “intangible capital” and the value it brings (Goldberg, 12). However, the capitalist elite control the means of distributing this “intangible capital”, and often access “natural capital” as well.
Capitalism continues to be a revolutionary form of social organization. Modes of production, the ordering of daily activities, and the material practices and processes of social reproduction have undergone numerous changes since capitalism’s inception. Mapping a history of capitalism’s different stages and forms – both social and institutional – would be an arduous task, complicated by the fact that in each of capitalism’s stages, features and characteristics of past and future stages abound. Nevertheless, the current form of capitalism marks a unique departure from previous stages. Euphemisms and catchphrases concerning late 20th century capitalism have become all too common. "Globalization" has become a catchphrase for academics, journalists, and citizens alike. However, many of the claims about a new, distinguishable form of capitalist organization – a "post-Fordist" or "flexible" system of accumulation – are overstated. Despite the dominance of Neoliberalism following the collapse of Fordism, the current epoch does not occasion an economically, environmentally, or socially sustainable regime of accumulation. In this paper I will explain, drawing from the Regulation School, the shift from Fordism to what many have termed "post-Fordism," and use this analysis to suggest future routes for capitalist organization. Indeed, until a socially reproducible compromise to Neo-liberalism is found, aggressive competition and regulatory undercutting will further amplify destructive business cycles, abject poverty, and environmental destruction.
This is an extract from the book Revolution by the famous comedian Russell Brand. In this book Brand argues that current system of global capitalism is grossly unfair and is causing the destruction of the planet. Whist the purpose of this essay is not to convey an argument that is for or against the question; Brand’s quote does raise the point that capitalism is now interwoven into most aspects of our lives. In other words the impact of globalisation has been heavily influenced by the advancement of global capitalism. This essay will explore the evolution of global capitalism and how it has accelerated the process of globalisation.
Globalization is a series of social, economical, technological, cultural, and political changes that promote interdependence and growth. Globalization raises the standard of living in developing countries, spreads technological knowledge, and increases political liberation. (Harris 5-23) The main cause of globalization is influence from other, more developed, countries. Globalization is a historical process that results from human innovation and technological progress. The social effects of globalization are clearly illustrated in Peru. Once a third-world country filled with poverty and oppression, Peru is now transitioning into a developed nation. In Peru, globalization has raised the human development index, empowered women, and created a stronger country. (Leon 90-91)
Policies meant to make the market more competitive have turned into means for the Global North countries to flood the markets with their own subsidized goods (Roy 463). Through her article, Roy argues that development in the presence of capitalism is simply a means of expanding the exploitation that exists in the already “developed” countries. This idea is further supported by the work of LaDuke, who argues that the nature of capitalism denies the equality of all persons (LaDuke 197) because there is a discord between the way capitalists live and the natural law that exists which prevents capitalists from asking the fundamental questions (LaDuke 195-197). However, as LaDuke argues, without these fundamental questions we fail to see the big picture, and without the big picture, we fail to “deal with questions of race, sexual orientation, class, geography, or privilege” (LaDuke
David McNally (2006). ‘The Invisible Hand is a Closed Fist: Inequality, Alienation, and the Capitalist Market Economy’ from Another World is Possible: globalization and Anti-Capitalism, 2nd edition, Arbeiter Ring, 60-95.
The bourgeoisie “has sprouted from the ruins of feudal society” (Marx and Engels, 1848). The bourgeoisie or capitalists are those who purchase and often exploit labour power in order to maximise their surplus value. The b...
Sassen, S. (1998). Globalization and its Discontents. In G. Bridge, & S. Watson (Ed.). The Blackwell City Reader (pp. 161-170). Oxford, U: Blackwell Publishing.
Capitalism dominates the world today. Known as a system to create wealth, capitalism’s main purpose is to increase profits through land, labor and free market. It is a replacement of feudalism and slavery. It promises to provide equality and increases living standards through equal exchanges, technological innovations and mass productions. However, taking a look at the global economy today, one can clearly see the disparity between developed and developing countries, and the persistence of poverty throughout the world despite the existence of abundant wealth. This modern issue was predicted and explained a hundred and fifty years ago in Karl Marx’s Capital.
In the story, one fault of capitalism is clearly highlighted – that of exploitation. The capitalist economy is shown to take advantage of the lack of education and affluence of lesser-developed nations, the “company exploited not just (the workers) but also thousands of country people” (187), using lower costs
Globalization refers to the absence of barriers that every country had. Yes, it has helped to demolish the walls that separated us .Globalization, which is the process of growing interdependence among every country in this planet, can be seen as a sign of hopeful and better future by some, but for others it represents a huge disaster for the whole world. That’s why we are going to see the negative effect that globalization has on culture then focus on the ethical disadvantage it brought, to finally talk about the damage it did to skilled workers.
Just imagine waking up in squalor, a once prominent society, now a desolate wasteland. All because foreign interest has raped your land of its natural resources and you seen not a cent in profit. Although, globalization is unifying the worlds developed nations and is bringing commerce to nations that have struggle in past years. True, globalization has many positive effects but do the pros outweigh the cons. In this essay I will discuss Globalization ruining the integrity of many countries and also is forcing many undeveloped nations into a bind, and is causing economic distress on some developed nations. Also, due to economic globalization the nations of the world are diluting their culture, sovereignty, natural resources, safety and political system. My goal is not to change your way of thought, but only to enlighten you of the negatives of global economic expansion.
Joseph E Stiglitz, Globalization and its Discontents, April 2003 / paperback / ISBN 0-393-32439-7/6 X8
Shawki, Ahmed, Paul D’Amato (2000), “Briefing: The Shape of World Capitalism,” International Socialist Review, [http://www.isreview.org/issues/11/world_capitalism.shtml], accessed 19 May 2012.