Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Negative impacts of imperialism
The narrative of the necklace
Impact of imperialism globally
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Negative impacts of imperialism
Driven by capitalist greed, nationalism, religious pride, and egotistical reasons, nations in Europe turned to imperialism in order to widen their influence on the world. Imperialism is defined as the extension of a country’s power by dominating a weaker country’s economy, politics, or society. Nectar in a Sieve, by Kamala Markandaya, follows the life of Rukmani, a poor indian woman who faces the challenges imperialism has brought to her rural town. Kenny is Rukmani’s old friend, a white British doctor working in India who aids her during times of need. Although the two have known each other for a lifetime, in no way does Kenny see Rukmani as an equal. Their relationship parallels the relationship between Britain and India from a social, political, …show more content…
and ideological standpoint. Deeply racist values cause Kenny to look down upon Rukmani, as demonstrated by his diction and attitude.
Social Darwinism was a widespread idea among Europeans and white people in general. This principle applies the idea of “survival of the fittest” in a social setting, where the stronger group is justified in overtaking the weaker group. Social Darwinism helped pave the way for imperialism, as Europeans did not feel guilty or inhumane for colonizing other lands. In fact, imperialism boosted their ego and made them feel superior to other races, causing them to belittle, exploit, enslave, and kill mercilessly. The belief is reflected in Kenny whenever he interacts with Rukmani. “‘Your views are so limited it is impossible to explain to you.’ ‘Limited, yes,’ I agreed. ‘Yet not wholly without understanding. Our ways are not your ways.’”(106). In this scenario, Rukmani has a discussion with Kenny regarding who is responsible for Kenny’s family leaving him. She speaks to him in a cautious manner and treats him with the utmost respect as to not upset him. On the other hand, Kenny’s manner is just the opposite. He is brusque, condescending, and often calls Rukmani a fool. The power dynamic is unequal between the two, in which Rukmani is seen as inferior by both Kenny and Rukmani. This parallels the relationship between India and Britain, as Britain is much more powerful than India so India must be careful as to how they handle relations with them. However, Rukmani’s attitude is very different in this encounter. She talks to Kenny as if he was her equal, which is demonstrated by the insight of her words as well as her unflinching tone. She defends herself and other Indians by standing up to Kenny’s generalization of them as helpless, ignorant simpletons. For the first time, Kenny realizes that the life and culture of people in India is very different from his own, and that he still has more to learn from them. Rukmani and Kenny are symbols for India and Britain. Britain
often looks down upon India as an undeveloped country that constantly needs their aid in order to function. The colony lacks the intellectual capacity to process complicated affairs and cannot properly govern themselves. In reality, although India is not technologically and economically advanced as Britain, they have their own form of technology, economy, and government that works for them. In the end, Rukmani and Kenny’s relationship return to the same lopsided state as before, just like how Britain continues to imperialize and enforce European culture in India. Britain’s attitude towards its political relations with India is reflected by how Kenny aloof Kenny is towards Rukmani. Rukmani pays Kenny a friendly visit when he returns after a long leave, but he does not return the friendliness. “Accustomed though I was to him, the brusque words, his short manner dashed the welcome from my lips”(104). Kenny’s cold, distant attitude comes off as arrogant and rude. This implies that he feels entitled to the warm welcome and respect that Rukmani gives and takes it for granted without respecting her back. Furthermore, this type of entitlement extends to how the British is callous and ignorant towards the problems and demands of India. Relations with the British were often one sided for India. For example, India’s plea for independence is completely ignored by the British government because they deem the issue too unimportant to acknowledge. It was not until after Gandhi's tireless protests that they decide to work out a compromise. Britain imperialism also changes the traditional Indian culture instilling British ideas in Rukmani, and by extension all Indians. She explains the power of Britain in India during a heated conversation with her son. “White men have power”(52). This simple yet powerful statement is spoken as if it was a fact that cannot be argued with. The idea of racial superiority is not only taught to Europeans, but also to non-Europeans through the effects of imperialism. Since the ones with power are white men, like Kenny, it is implied that Indians have no longer have power. After imperialization, all Indians are put into a large, poverty-filled working class, which decimated the traditional Indian social hierarchy. Similarly, Britain had the most power over India in the 19th century, especially during the British Raj. Though they were a foreign power, they controlled much of the country’s economy, politics, and cultural expressions. Britain had a monopoly over the salt and textile industry, thereby forcing Indians to purchase goods from British companies. They banned the practice of Sati, a tradition in which a new widow commits suicide after the death of her husband. Because of its enormous power, Britain has a lot of influence over the lives of Indians, much like how Kenny has a lot of influence over the life of Rukmani. Rukmani and Kenny’s relationship reflect the imperialistic power that Britain has over India. Whether it is social dynamics, political influence, or enforcing culture, Britain has the upper hand in all of these aspects. Although the British Empire is no longer present today, its legacy continues on in America. Right now, this very country is imperializing the world in much of the same manner by declaring its ways superior and forcing others to adapt to it. Democracy, free speech, and the American dream are all ideas America is attempting to implement into the lives of everyone around the world. In addition, many people from foreign countries view and interact with Americans the same way Rukmani interacts with Kenny. They see Americans as powerful entities with knowledge and experience worth far more than their own. However unbelievable that may sound, it is undeniably true, because these people are only told of America’s success. It is time to put an end to these myths. It is time to stop being Kenny.
When we critic something to be wicked or upright, better or worse than something else, we are taking it as an example to aim at or avoid. Without ideas like this, we would have no structure of comparison for our own strategies, no chance of earning by other’s insights or faults. In this space, we could form no decisions on our own actions. If we admit something as a good fact about one culture, we can’t reject to apply it to other cultures as well, whatever conditions acknowledge it. If we reject to do this, we are just not taking the other’s culture beliefs
There are many instances of covert racism, Social Darwinism, and sexism in the movie franchise Star Wars. For instance, native population as dispensable cannon fodder is a recurring theme in the films. During the Battle of Endor in Episode VI, Luke and his companions ally themselves with the short, cuddly, teddy-bear-like Ewoks, which are depicted as a primitive race. In the battle, scores of Ewoks are killed and sacrificed as Han Solo leads a rebel strike force to destroy the Death Star's shield generator. This illustrates Social Darwinism. The idea first originated in the Industrial Revolution, when people began applying the “survival of the fittest” principle of Darwinism to society. This is illustrated by the Battle of Endor because the primitive, less important Ewoks are sacrificed by the dozen, while most of the main heroes are barely injured. This suggests that the main heroes are stronger and superior to the weak Ewoks because the heroes are the ones who survive better than the Ewoks. This accurately illustrates the “survival of the fittest” principle of Social Darwinism. Als...
In the “Iks” by Lewis Thomas, the author describes how a small tribe of hunters from northern Uganda called the Iks tries to survive after being forced by the government to give up their homes and living area and move to a poor hills and become farmers. Society is extremely harsh towards the Iks and this causes them to rebel and become abnormal. The Iks were a bunch of selfish people who only cared about themselves, left elders to starve and die, and did not cared about the children. They didn’t share things with each other and they find joy in the other’s misfortunes. Anthropologist were sent to observe the Iks, an anthropologist described the Iks to be ill- mannered fashion. Over the two years he had studied there, he was constantly being harassed and disgraced. After he had published his book, he wrote how he despised the Iks. Thomas then went on to say that he now sees similar behaviors implying on nations and cities compared to the Iks making points saying that the Iks share common characteristics of greed, cruezl, and selfish just like different nations fighting against each other.
Introduction: The epoch of imperialism cannot be defined simply as a proliferation of inflated egos tied to the hardened opinions of nationalists, but also a multi-faceted global rivalry with roots of philosophies tainted with racism and social Darwinism. The technique of each imperialist was specific to the motivations and desires of each combative, predominantly Western power and subsequently impacted the success of each imperialist and its colonies. Driven by industrialization, Europeans are aware of the urgent need for raw materials and new markets to maintain a constant rate of expansion and wealth. Imperialism became a competition; in general, the European countries led with fervor while the non-Western regions deemed likely to be stepped on.
The theory of Social Darwinism stems from the idea that the human species can progress by following the principal of Charles Darwin’s natural selection, in which he states that plants and animals that can adapt to changes in their environment are able to survive and reproduce, while those that cannot adapt will die. Social Darwinists applied this biological concept to social, political and economic issues, which created the “survival of the fittest” attitude, as well as competition and inequality between social groups. This paper will discuss some of the proponents of this theory, the results of their interpretation and application of the theory, and why this theory no longer holds a prominent position in Anthropological theory.
He struck his forehead. "My God!" he cried. "I do not understand you. I never will. Go before I am too entangled in your philosophies.’" (Markandaya 19.39). This is another quote that shows the struggle Kenny has with accepting their culture. He has a hard time comprehending the fact that the priests starve themselves and people and supposed to tell anyone their troubles in order for their “souls to be cleansed”. This is crazy for a British guy to comprehend because he like the rest of the culture is not very religious. All in all, Kenny represents the rest of the culture because of his struggles to comprehend the Indian customs.
As Indians living in white culture, many problems and conflicts arise. Most Indians tend to suffer microaggressions, racism and most of all, danger to their culture. Their culture gets torn from them, and slowly, as if it was dream, many Indians become absorbed into white society, all the while trying to retain their Indian lifestyle. In Indian Father’s Plea by Robert Lake and Superman and Me by Sherman Alexie, the idea that a dominant culture can pose many threats to a minority culture is shown by Wind-Wolf and Alexie.
The module two, the Kwakiuti Indians had a custom in which a person who suffers hardship or loss may “lash back” at the situation by inflicting pain or trouble on another party. This custom, which may seem cruel to most, is acceptable to few. The justification for such a crude action can be found in ethical relativism. Ethical relativism is the theory that morality is based upon the standards of one’s own society. This would explain as to why this action of bringing pain upon others seems harsh to Americans but was socially acceptable to Kwakiuti Indians. An ethical relativist would argue that this action is socially acceptable because we can only judge morality from society to society. No society would have the exact same stance on morality but because the Kwakiuti Indians accepted this
Although there are many other important factors, the main cause of the rise of imperialism was most certainly economic. The Age of Empire, by Eric J. Hobsbawn, provides an interpretation of New Imperialism. Hobsbawn calls imperialism “a natural by-product of the international economy” (Sherman pg 177). He is basically saying that imperialism is dependent on the rivalries of competing industries, which continually drive the international economy. Hobsbawn also dictates the need for external markets. The Industrial Revolution created many products that needed markets, thus creating a need of colonies. Hobsbawn believed that the overproduction of the Industrial Revolution and the Great Depression could be solved. He also realized that many businessmen knew that they could make a large profit off of China’s large population. For example, if every one of the three hundred million Chinese purchased one box of tin-tacks the businessmen knew that there would be a huge profit, consequently increasing the desire for colonization of weaker countries.
The characters in the book Nectar in a Sieve had to deal with Western imperialism and they had to adapt to the changing ideas associated with Western imperialism. Throughout the book Rukmani had to struggle with her beliefs and how to cope with these changes. From the beginning Rukmani coped with these changes, from culture to her way of life, until the end of the book where even then her life was not through being changed.
There were two different time periods where Imperialism occurred. The first wave of imperialism, called the 'Old' Imperialism, lasted from around 1500 - 1800. The 'New' Imperialism lasted from around 1870 - 1914. The three main differences that we will discuss today are the differences in economics, politics, and the motive behind all of this.
As many people know, Imperialism has shaped the culture and customs all over the world. Imperialism is the dominance of one country over another politically, economically or socially. Western culture can be seen in all parts of the world; from Asia to Africa, to the Indies and the Americans. The downside of having the bits of western culture all over the world, is how it got there. Western influence was forced upon places in Asia, specifically India, Indonesia with a hellacious price; lives and poverty.
Nicholas B. Dirks. (2011). Castes of Mind: Colonialism and the Making of Modern India. Princeton University Press
...orn Brahmin—India’s highest Hindu caste. At the University of Madras, Markandaya studied history and worked as a journalist. In 1948, Markandaya moved to London, —where she wrote her novels—but made frequent trips to India (Glassman). The most popular literature work she created was her first novel Nectar in a Sieve (Glassman). American views of India aspired from her work (Glassman). In the 1980s Markandaya struggled to get her books published because “traditional realistic” type novels were not in demand anymore (Glassman). Both authors directly or indirectly have a connection with the oppression of Indians in India. Throughout the twentieth century, European imperialists took advantage of the Indian people. The novel of Kamala Markandaya and the poetry of Sarojini Naidu depict how the Indian people accepted their lives, even though they endured many hardships.
In this short story the protagonist is a newly married Indian woman who is attending a party with her husband’s western friends. Throughout the short story the reader senses her anxiety of being introduced to people who are not as conservative as her. “She longed for the sanctuary of the walled home from which marriage had promised an adventurous escape. Each restricting rule became a guiding stone marking a safe path through unknown dangers” ("The First Party"). In this quote, the narrator explains how the Indian woman did not feel comfortable or at ease with this new world she had been introduced too. She fiend to be back home but because of her tie that she made to this man through marriage she is in her mind, stuck with him. In addition to her anxiety of being with non-conservative woman, who drank, smoked, dressed provocatively, and had painted nails, the protagonist grew angry in her own head. “She had been so sure of herself in her contempt and her anger, confident of the righteousness of her beliefs, deep-based on generations-old foundations” ("The First Party"). Is this the way that the Indian people reacted to British colonialism? The things that western people found normal, was this disrespectful to the Indian people. The protagonist surely thought it was and was certain that her anger was not misplaced. She felt as her anger was a sign of her strong faith. She came to the realization that her husband was someone who would challenge her beliefs but above all she knew that her beliefs state that her life must be one with his (“The First Party”). This realization must be heartbreaking, to realize that one 's comfort is not found in their life partner. The protagonist was raised to believe that her life must be one with her husband, that she is