Nectar In A Sieve Analysis

856 Words2 Pages

Markanday does not take about any specifics of time and place to make the universal across all time periods and places. This allows her to emphasize the emotions of the story and lets many different types of readers place themselves into the story.These lack of details makes the story more universal, because it will never be outdated or misplaced. The problems the characters face are problems faced everywhere, to this day. An example of this is the eviction of the family by landlord and how it is so similar in present-day urban areas under the pretense of gentrification. The universality of the book allows the book to reach and connect with a wide audience.

Although it may seem that Rukmani is dependant on outside forces, such as Kenny, fate and her husband, Rukmani is also very self-reliant as seen by her many independent and vigorous actions. Rukmani is somewhat dependant on her husband for everything as he is the sole bread winner and later on Puli as she needs them for her protection and support. However, as the plot develops, …show more content…

The lines “Work without hope draws nectar in a sieve/ And hope without an object cannot live,” means that work without hope and a goal is fruitless. As no matter how much work a person does, it's not going to be worth it unless they’re doing it for a hopeful future in which they reach a goal. This title is very appropriate to the novel as the characters in it are always working and are hopeful toward a better future and a goal. Throughout the book, the characters have a goal and hope to achieve it whether it be their hope to buy land or a hope to live free of starvation. These goals and their overall hopeful attitude means that their work is not drawing nectar in a sieve. Not to mention, the nectar symbolizes their joys and that if they let go of their hope amid the challenges, represented by the sieve, all their joy would be

Open Document