Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
White collar crime conclussion
Literature review white collar crime
Literature review white collar crime
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
White Collar is a television drama series. Neal Caffrey is a con man and criminal informant for the FBI. Peter Burke is an FBI agent and Neal’s handler. Throughout the series these two work together going undercover and solving cases. Neal is a huge asset to the FBI. The case close rate has increased drastically since the FBI added Neal to their team. He performs very well at the FBI, but he also continuously performs heists while working for the FBI. Neal may be an very intelligent, successful FBI consultant, but he is identified as a con man. Once a con man, always a con man.
Con man, Neal Caffrey was arrested for bond forgery and theft. He was sentenced to four years. Neal escaped prison months prior to his release in order to look for
…show more content…
his girlfriend, Kate. Neal managed to negotiate a deal with FBI agent, Peter Burke. Peter Burke is the agent who caught Neal the first time, and he managed to catch him a second time after Neal escaped. Neal would be released from prison working for the FBI as a consultant. He was required to wear a tracking anklet and was restricted to a two mile radius. Peter and Neal worked well together, and although neither of them would admit it, they were best friends. There always seemed to be slight conflict between the two. Neal would always be a con man and Peter never understood or agreed with that side of Neal. While Neal is no longer in prison, he is still somewhat in rehabilitation, “Rehabilitation is a central goal of the correctional system” (Huebner). Working for the FBI is part of his rehabilitation. He is kept on a short leash and he realizes that by continuing his criminal ways he can be sent back to prison in the blink of an eye. The goal of sending an individual to prison is to rehabilitate them into a person who can live a crime free life. This is called criminal rehabilitation. What exactly drives an individual to commit a crime? “The decision to commit a crime is held to be determined, or at least heavily influenced, by a person's social surroundings, psychological development, or biological makeup (Rehabilitation - What Is Rehabilitation?). In Neal’s case, part of his criminal background may have came from his biological makeup. Throughout the television series, Neal refers to his father as a “dirty” cop, partially blaming his father for his criminal background. Confidential/criminal informants or “CI” are widely used by law enforcement in order to get information about criminal information. A CI provides knowledgeable, quality information about criminal activities to law enforcement officers. This information is often used to incriminate organized crime. Criminal informants have often been convicted of a crime, and are now being used to consult on similar crimes, “Since the inception of the FBI in 1908, informants have played major roles in the investigation and prosecution of a wide variety of federal crimes’’ (Regarding the Use of Confidential Informants). This is the case with Neal Caffrey. He was convicted of bond forgery and theft, then consulted for the FBI on similar, white collar crimes. During Neal’s work for the FBI, he often goes undercover posing as a potential buyer or investor. The FBI uses Neal to get information in order to infiltrate and arrest certain criminal groups. Going undercover can also be quite dangerous. Neal has put himself into many near death situations, but being the con man that he is, he always manages to find a way out. People often have many different thoughts about criminal informants. Using criminals to catch other criminals? Some people may not feel very comfortable about informants, but law enforcement officials have found many more pros with informants than cons, “Not many people know very much about informants: and to many people, it's a queasy area. People are not comfortable with informants. There is a tradition against snitching in this country. However, the informant is THE with a capital "T" THE most effective tool in law enforcement today - state, local, or federal. We must accept that and deal with it” (Webster). Neal Caffrey was portrayed as a very intelligent, charming con man. He uses his charm to get close to people, then he pulls a con on them. Peter did his very best to overlook Neal’s con side because he knew how much of an asset Neal was to the FBI. Informants are very beneficial and help increase the number of crimes solved, “Human sources are vitally important to our success against terrorists and criminals. They often give us critical intelligence and information we could not obtain in other ways, opening a window into our adversaries' plans and capabilities. Human sources can mean the difference between the FBI preventing an act of terrorism or crime, or reacting to an incident after the fact (Director Mueller). Peter’s success is partially attributed to Neal’s addition to his team. The FBI didn’t want to lose Neal because he was such a big asset to the bureau. Criminals often have motive for a crime they commit. In Neal’s case, his motive seemed to be success and thril. He loved the thrill of pulling a successful heist, which is why he continued to do so. Motive typically plays are large role in crimes. Why are crimes committed? What is the reason behind committing a crime? In Neal’s case, his motive is the success and being about to say “I did it, I successfully pulled that con.” Being a con man is part of Neal’s identity, he wouldn’t have been the same without that part of him. Peter Burke was always suspicious about Neal and kept a close eye on him. Throughout the series you realize how much Peter really does care for Neal. When Neal slips up or makes a mistake on a con, Peter is doing everything he can to help Neal cover it up. While Peter knows he is doing the wrong thing by helping Neal, his friendship and care for Neal tends to cloud his judgement. Neal also cares about Peter and their friendship. He doesn’t want to hurt or upset Peter therefore, Neal does everything he can to hide the truth from Peter because he knows it will hurt him. If Neal were ever to get caught for another crime, he could serve some serious jail time, “Federal criminal prosecution of FBI informants can result from the informant's unauthorized criminal conduct or from situations in which the informant exceeds the scope of his authority to engage in "otherwise illegal activity" under the Informant Guidelines. In such cases, the informants often claim in defense that the government authorized or immunized their crimes” (Criminal Prosecution of Informants). Although it’s hard to admit, at the end of the day Neal hurts Peter more than he helps him.
Peter has been put on suspension because of Neal. Neal may have a bad side some viewers may not agree to, but he uses his charm to appeal to the audience. Neal continuously puts himself in situations that require Peter to come to the rescue. If it weren’t for Peter, Neal would have most likely been caught and charged with multiple crimes. Peter also puts his job as risk, “Serious FBI misconduct relating to the handling of informants can result in criminal prosecution (FBI Misconduct Relating to Informants). For example, special agent John J. Connolly, Jr. was charged with multiple crimes after mishandling his criminal informants, “In June 2002 John J. Connolly, Jr., who served as a Special Agent in the FBI's Boston office and handled complex organized crime investigations, was convicted following a jury trial of racketeering, obstruction of justice, and making false statements arising from his mishandling of FBI informants Whitey Bulger and Stephen Flemmi” (United States v. Connolly). In September 2002 FBI agent John Connolly, Jr. was sentenced to 10 years in prison for racketeering, obstruction of justice, and making false statements to investigators. If Peter wasn’t careful, he could of ended up like John J. Connolly
Jr. So, can con men change? It depends on the situation and the crime that was committed that landed them into prison. I truly think some criminals can change and put their criminal history behind them, but also to some being a criminal is part of them, it’s in their DNA. They’re addicted to crime and can’t wait till the next heist they pull. In Neal’s case his prison time did not change or affect his behavior. Rehabilitation for others does help immensely because they realize the consequences that can occur for their criminal behavior. I think part of Neal’s mindset for continuing his criminal ways was Peter. He knew Peter always had his back and would come running whenever Neal needed him. Friendships are typically a two way street. In this particular case, Neal provides information for Peter and the FBI to solve cases, and Peter helps Neal when he is in trouble.
violations, including three prior to the case. Reese was arrested for cocaine charges in 1972, 1977, and 1980. on
Anderson along with fellow police officer Henry Tavarez was busted for “flaking” four men (i.e. in this case planting cocaine) in a Queens bar, NY in 2008 in order to help his partner, who had a low of buy-and-bust arrest record and thus was in jeopardy of losing his undercover job, and be assigned to regular patrol, which he did not welcome.
... home on August 21, however Casey was back in jail only eight days after being released, this time charged with forging checks and using a friend's credit cards without permission.
Newjack is Ted Conover’s personal memoir as a correctional officer in one of New York’s famous maximum security prisons: Sing Sing. The job of a correctional officer consists of long days locking and unlocking cells, moving prisoners to and from various locations while the prisoners beg, aggravate and abuse them. After a short time at the academy and a brief period of on-the-job training, Conover found himself working, often alone and always unarmed, in galleries housing sixty or more inmates. He heard of many stories that happen in prison. Stories include inmates beating inmates and burning their cell house, an inmate who was beaten by correctional officers after striking an officer in the head with a broom handle. Surprisingly, there are even some instances where there are voluntary sexual encounters between female staff and inmates. It is really a welcoming job for the “newjacks” and for the readers. On top of that, supervisors do not mentor or guide new officers and officers on one shift push problems off onto the next. Conover sees and realizes that correctional workers are very flexible characters, neither good nor bad, but must cope with stress and problems in a well-organized manner. As Conover points out, that at Sing Sing is against the possibility of staff getting to know prisoners. It is ridiculous to see that there are problems that prison administrators clearly could have solved but do not, instead, they care more about the inmates and officer’s relationship. In particular, enticements for better supervision and more support for effective staff are clearly needed.
When someone thinks of a typical fraudster, it is not likely he or she would describe a person like Rita Crundwell. She was born on January 10, 1953; she grew up on her family’s farm near Dixon. Her family had a good reputation in the community, and she got an internship with the City of Dixon in high school. After her high school
Culture has been defined numerous ways throughout history. Throughout chapter three of, You May Ask Yourself, by Dalton Conley, the term “culture” is defined and supported numerous times by various groups of people. One may say that culture can be defined as a set of beliefs (excluding instinctual ones), traditions, and practices; however not all groups of people believe culture has the same set of values.
By the age of 14 he was stealing cars. In his teens he took part in stealing tires, running stills, bootlegging, and armed robbery. In 1922, he was committed to a boys home for auto theft. Two years later he was released on parole, but returned in 5 months for a similar charge. He meet Helen Wawzynak in 1928, and later married her. In January of 1931 he robbed a bank in Chicago, Illinois, and was sent to prison for one year to life.
John Hamilton was sentenced to three years for felony. He was made a stonecutter on his third day and then a mason. Both he and Mathew Tavender were whipped together which may imply they tried to make contact with each other, this was strictly forbidden.
That however would not be the case with Clifford; it quickly became apparent that he had a very diminutive regard for the law. As a child he was known as a petty theft and bully in school, often tormenting the local stray cats and dogs. Growing up didn’t change much, Clifford logged an otherworldly 94 separate arrests between 1957 and 1981, his many charges included: obstructing justice, possession of firearms, forgery, possession of stolen property, parole violation, impaired driving, fraud , break and enter, armed robbery, rape, escape from lawful custody, gross indecency, finally ending with first degree
Danny Trejo. Being an action star as he is, there is no surprise that Trejo is involved in drugs, murder and robbery. The only problem is the fact that he is really the bad guy here. In reality, he is a genuine thug and was sentenced to spend 11 years in prison for a lot of mischief including drugs, murder and robbery. But despite being the thug that he was, Trejo had no reports of mischief after his incarceration and released.
The relationship between law enforcement and prosecutors, which goes hand-in-hand, can’t be overlooked. Evidence of a crime that detectives and law enforcement discover is as equally important as a good trial on part of the prosecution. If detectives aren’t able to find good solid evidence – that case usually isn’t bothered in being pursued. Several years ago, in the late 80’s, there was a murder case in Southeastern Oklahoma which now serves as a tragic example to the need for honest, constitutional work in the criminal justice system. Disreputable investigative procedures, fraudulent sources, and bad evidence were the foundation of this case that shattered innocent lives.
Dick presents our main character, Commissioner John Anderton, as the balding, pot-bellied founder of a revolutionary new crime detection system who's been showing his years for longer than he'd care to remember. In the short story, he has just acquired a new assistant, Ed Witwer, and fears being replaced by the younger man. In the beginning, Anderton is portrayed as slightly insecure about his job (to the point of near paranoia of being set-up), as well as his importance to society, though by the e...
White collar crime is a term created by Edwin Sutherland in 1939 that refers to crimes committed by people of higher social status, companies, and the government according to the book “White-Collar Crime in a Nutshell” by Ellen Podgor and Jerold Israel. White collar crimes are usually non-violent crimes committed in order to have a financial-gain (Podgor and Israel 3). A very well known white collar crime that has even been taught in many history classes is the Watergate scandal. This is a white collar crime that was committed by government authorities. Watergate was a crime that shocked the nation.
How many shows on television do you know that offer a guilt-free antihero as its protagonist? Well, I certainly cannot think of many, and I believe that is the inaugural case as to why NBC’s The Blacklist has been this Fall’s number one show. The idea behind it is that an ingenious, criminal mastermind for some apparent reason starts to assist the FBI catch the world’s most wanted criminals, some of which they did not know existed. Although I am already a fan of the show, I do think that The Blacklist does borrow much of its premise from USA’s White Collar. I feel Andy Greenwald describes the show best when he says, “It’s a cop procedural with a criminal as the lead investigator.”
This case illustrated that there were real consequences to white collar crime. In addition to paying the fifty million dollar fine, he relinquished another fifty million dollars of his illegal trading profits. (He still had millions remaining, however, from his illegal gains.) His actual prison sentence was three years, yet he served only twenty-two months in the federal prison at Lompoc, California, which was known to have a “country-club” atmosphere.