Nature Vs Nurture In Frankenstein Essay

609 Words2 Pages

Many people believe that psychopaths are creations. People have genetics that make them, though people also have home lives that shape their mentality. The hate that humans receive from their guardians is their first look at life. Throughout existence, different circumstances add attributes to human character. Life is a toss up of Nature vs Nurture; people are born one way, but peer influence makes a person’s well-being. In Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, Shelley creates Victor to be a non-nurturing creator in order to suggest that care in the early stages is fundamental to the development of character.
In Frankenstein the Creature is thought of as a cold-blooded killer, a lunatic, his “nature” is seen as psychopathic. However is it really the …show more content…

You, my creator, abhor me…” (Shelley 69). This quote shows how the Creature’s creator affects him. Since Victor does not nourish him nor care for him, he assumes all of mankind will be exactly the same. The Creature is at first a very kind being, but after awhile the lack of care from other humans causes that kindness to slowly wither away. The quote shows that the Creature is in fact not born with a vicious mindset, instead his violent being is created through the absence of a “father” figure. Considering this the Creature is more of a sociopath, if anything, and not a psychopath. Psychopath is a very overused term, and usually, the term is flung about without meaning.. The definition of psychopath is a person suffering from a chronic mental disorder with abnormal social behavior. Many a time the terms “psychopath”and “sociopath” are confused for each other or used as the same thing, although the terms do generally describe a lunatic, they are different medical terms. Psychopaths are more severe than sociopaths, a psychopath is always a sociopath but a sociopath is not always a psychopath. A psychopath is a person with the

Open Document