Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
THREE Different theories of child development
Developmental Theories Overview And Critique
Developmental Theories Overview And Critique
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: THREE Different theories of child development
The Nature Nurture Debate occupies a central role in explaining how both environmental, experiential nature factors and how inborn nurture factors affect the growth, change and development of a child. The debate shows how the course of human development is influenced by numerous experiences early on in life. Psychologists agree that early experiences identify developmental milestones and describe the processes of growth and change that occur in the three childhood domains of development which are physical and perceptual development, socio-emotional development, and cognitive development. I will discuss two of these domains in detail throughout my assignment. Also during my essay, I will discuss the theorists who have contributed their ideas …show more content…
His most well-known theory is the ‘Evolutionary Theory’ which began with the assumption that species vary in many characteristics. He believed that most species produce more off spring than the environment can support, which means that they must all compete to survive. He called this ‘Natural Selection’. Darwin used the environment in his studies to reflect on child language acquisition to furthermore understand the mental development of the child as well as language development of mankind. In contrast to Locke who I will be discussing later on, Rousseau believed that all children are born with different ideas and an innate sense of morality that develops naturally as they get older. He believed that this process of development should not be interfered with. He also believed that a child is born innocent and pure. Rousseau concluded that whatever knowledge the child does not posses innately is acquired from interactions with the environment due to the child’s own interests and developmental level. Rousseau’s theory would be referred to as ‘Nativism’ in todays world. He suggested three ideas for education a child: 1) a child should be exposed to new knowledge and ideas after they show ‘cognitive readiness’, 2) The best way for a child to learn is if they obtain new ideas through their own discovery processes. 3) ‘’Both education and child …show more content…
In comparison to Watson who looked to attempt to build a theory of child development based on learning principles. His model was also based on the conditioning of reflexes but failed to succeed. Skinner focused more on respondent behaviours including reflexes such as sucking in response to contact with the nipple and grasping in response to touching the palm. He also researched older children and adults who showed very few respondent behaviours such as blinking, sneezing and emotional responses such as anger or fear. Skinners theory is based on habits that have been developed in result of exclusive operant learning experiences. He believed that children’s behaviours stem from these experiences and referred to them as voluntary responses. Operant behaviours are controlled by the consequences they produce. Pleasant and positive consequences make the behaviours more likely to show again, these are known as reinforcers. Unpleasant, negative consequences will most likely not reoccur and are referred to as punishers. Skinners theory applies that development relies on external stimuli for example reinforcers and punishers, rather than internal forces such as instincts or biological maturation. Some believe that Skinner placed too much emphasis on operant behaviours caused by external stimuli whilst ignoring cognitive contributors to learning. Locke proposed a theory that all children are born
In the well-received novel “Pudd’nhead Wilson,” Mark Twain skillfully addresses the ancient argument about the origin of one’s character and whether it’s derived from his nature or his surroundings. We can best see this battle between nature versus nurture by inspecting the plot lines that follow the characters Thomas a Becket Driscoll, Valet de Chambre, and Roxana the slave. Thomas was born into a wealthy white family while Roxy birthed Chambers into a life of slavery. It seemed as though each would have gone their separate ways into opposite walks of life, but Roxy secretly swapped the children, which destined each to their counterintuitive fates. Through their words and actions, Tom, Chambers, and Roxy have proven the idea that one’s behaviors and desires are a result of his upbringings and the environment he lives in rather than by his innate nature.
The nature vs. nurture controversy is an age old question in the scientific and psychological world with both camps having evidence to support their theories. The controversy lies in which is more influential in the development of human beings. While there is no definitive answer for this, it is interesting to look at each of them separately.
According to Skinner’s theories, “Reinforcement does not strengthen the response instance that produces the reinforcer.” Rather, reinforcement can increase the likelihood that a comparable response may occur within the future. For one bottom-line, “behavior is not caused by something that has not yet happened.” Similar to operant conditioning, “the emission of a response reflects past conditioning, so the response occurs because similar responses were reinforced earlier, not because it will be reinforced later.” Skinner agreed that the “initial high response rate seen in extinction sessions exemplified this important aspect of operant conditioning” (Iversen, 1992, pp. 1325-1327). Theoretically, Skinner identified two aspects of reinforcement, one is the “pleasing effect of reinforcing stimuli, the other is their strengthening action.” Furthermore, Skinner emphasized that “feeling pleased by an event does not necessarily make a person want to repeat the respons...
Piaget presents the argument based on the influence of nature on the development of human intelligence. According to this theory, children actively contract knowledge as they manipulate and explore the world. Based on the principle of adaptation, the theory asserts that just as the body is adapted to fit the environment, it so does the structures of the mind to fit the mind. To Piaget, development is a progressive reorganization of mental processes resulting from biological maturation and environmental experiences. It is, therefore, clear that the theory puts emphasis on the importance of the environment in nurturing children. Piaget believed that children construct an understanding of the world around them, experience disparities between what they already know and what they discover in their surrounding and then adjust their ideas as the need may arise. Parents should, therefore, maintain a stable, but yet varied and exciting environment for children to fully explore and unfold the inborn or rather biological
Piaget theory explains four stage of learning i.e. Assimilation, Equilibrium, Disequilibrium, and Accommodation. Operant conditioning by skinner is based on the system of negative and positive reinforcement. This implies that during learning good actions should be rewarded and the bad actions should be punished in order to avoid them. According to Watson, by birth every individual
How adoption and twin studies have influenced the “nature verses nurture debate” has been a focal point for many researchers and people around the world which has caused controversy and many views regarding the topic. “Twin studies look into behaviour in identical and none identical twins and adoption studies separate the effect of nature from nurture, or at least do more successfully than twin studies.” ("The Usefullness of Twin Studies and Adoption Studies | psuea7", 2011, p.1) These studies are used to provide plenty of strong and reliable evidence that and positively influence the Nature vs. Nurture debate. “The Nature vs. Nurture debate is the scientific, cultural, and philosophical debate about whether human culture, behaviour, and personality are caused primarily by nature or nurture. Nature is often defined in this debate as genetic or hormone-based behaviours, while nurture is most commonly defined as environment and experience.” (("Nature vs. Nurture", 2014, p.1) Many controversial debates have surrounded this issue and many researchers are trying to find evidence to justify if twin and adoption studies have an effect on the nature vs. nurture debate. Twin and adoption studies have had a positive influence on the nature-nurture debate because research and evidence has identified different issues and quality information to help the nature-nurture debate evolve. This essay will outline these positive influences and will elaborate on the research and evidence that has helped the nature-nurture debate. The three influences of twin and adoption studies that will be discussed are the influence of researching the affects of behavioural issues such as schizophrenia, the influence of undergoing research on the drinking affects an...
Albert Camus once said, “Man is the only creature who refuses to be what he is.” But what makes man what he is? Is it his sheer genetic makeup, or is it the way he was raised? The nature vs. nurture debate has raged on for centuries, but neither side has been able to prove their point indefinitely. Even today we see displays of the contrast between genetics and learned behaviors, some of which are athletics, intelligence, medical histories, etc. Every person is completely unique, a combination of genetic makeup and environment make an individual who they are.
The nature nurture debate is defined as “the question of the degree to which inborn biological processes or environmental events determine human behaviour” ( ). The nature nurture debate has been an ongoing escapade for many years, effecting people’s opinions on a vast range of topics including but not limited to mental illness, addictions and susceptibility to diseases ( ). The debate looks into an event or characteristic to determine whether it was ultimately caused by a individuals genetics or the surround environmental influences. When the debate first began individual’s options where very holistic either the characteristic was caused by nature or nurture; however In more modern times it has become obvious that it a majority of cases
People can get their blue, hazel, or brown eyes from one of their parents, and their freckles from the other. But where does their talent for singing, or knack for craftsmanship come from? In other words, what makes individuals who they are? Is it predetermined in their genes or was it taught to them by family or friends? My General Psychology instructor recently explained this contest of nature and nurture as won by neither side. “The nature versus nurture debate is one of the oldest issues in psychology. The debate centers on the relative contributions of genetic inheritance and environmental factors to human development.” - (Kendra Cherry). So far the evidence collected from years of research and data suggests a resolution of equal importance between the two factors as fifty/fifty.
This process brings an infant to full adulthood. Maturation according to general psychology is primarily based upon individual genetic makeup, universal maturation, and predispositions (Sigelman & Rider, 2014). Cognition is a vitally important element in mental development. Without the ability to acquire an obtain knowledge one cannot gain a sense of consciousness. Both nature and nurture play a role in mental development. Sigmund Freud believed that humans have an unconscious instinct and a requirement to fulfill an urge. He believed that as a child develops there energy is divided into ID (the selfish part of the personality at birth), ego (irrational way of satisfying urges), and superego (moral standards). Erik Erikson’s theory derived from the works of Sigmund Freud. His theory differs from Freud in two major ways. One, he believes that children develop through social demands and biological maturation. Two, he believes that there are eight stages and that the unsuccessful completion of a stage will not hinder you from advancing to the next stage, but will cause complications in the rest of the developmental cycle. B.F Skinner believes that children develop through consequences. As simple as these principles sound they are backed by the logic of operant conditioning. This states, learned behaviors become more or less probable depending on the consequences it produces (Sigelman & Rider,
B. F. Skinner concluded that people could mentally have control over all of their responses. He believed that a reinforcement and/or consequence given after a behavior would influence future behavior (Roblyer,2003, p.57). In other words, reinforcements and/or punishments can shape human behavior. For example, if a child eats all of his vegetables at dinner and his parent’s reward him with positive words and a cookie, then the child will probably eat his vegetables at the next dinner.
Skinner’s theory operant conditioning is a theory that I feel most can say they agree with or they like the way he thinks. Speaking for myself I think his theory of operant conditioning is right on point. Although as I said in my discussion last week a lot of his theories and experiments were done on animals and not a lot done on humans and I think that plays a big part in his theory of why I agree and disagree with it. I only disagree because of the simple fact that humans are completely different from animals, obviously. What I do agree with in his theory are the positive and negative reinforcements, and the positive and negative punishments because although those were tested on animals as well a lot of that can relate to humans and how we act as far as our behavior. In my own opinion of his theory I feel like his operant conditioning would work rather well on children. I know for instance as positive reinforcement for my son I will give him a snack that he loves if he doesn’t act like a wild monkey in the store. Therefore, I see it working better on children rather than adults. In the video I watched from week 5 of operant conditioning in the first video he talks about how the bird received a reward every time the bird pecked or turned but he also says that this worked very well with the bird because every time he pecked and turn he didn’t get a reward each time only
Child growth and development is a process that consists of some building blocks, which are components that combine in an infinite number of ways (Cherry, n.d.). As a result of the variations of building blocks in a child’s development, educators, psychologists, and philosophers have been constantly engaged in the debate of nature versus nurture debate. Many researchers agree that child development is a complex interaction between his/her genetic background (nature) and his/her environment (nurture). In essence, some developmental aspects are strongly affected by biology whereas other aspects are influenced by environmental factors. From the onset of an individu...
The first core concept suggested by the web article depicts human development forming from the interplay of an individual’s biology and experience. Early scientists in this particular field created testable hypotheses to understand the dynamic interaction between the nature-nurture phenomenon. Nobel Prize winner Ivan Pavlov’s and North American scientist B.F. Skinner’s research in behaviorism contain principles in classical and operant conditioning which can help further explain this occurrence.
John Locke talks of the gradual opening of conscious mind which according to him is initially empty (a tabula rasa). This empty mind, a tabula rasa, is shaped by sensations and reflections or experiences in general. In some thoughts concerning education, Locke expressed his belief on the importance of education in development of man. He says that the extent of their goodness and usefulness boils down to their education (Piel, 2002). The impressions that the mind gets in childhood are lasting and form the basis of self. He expressed this in his “associations of ideas” and his views on this later came to be known as “assocationism”. Associationism as a theory was very influential and warned parents from allowing their children have to develop negative associations.