Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Nature nurture on an individuals development
Nature and nurture your own development
Effect of nurturing nature
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Nature nurture on an individuals development
Louie Schwartzberg, an award-winning cinematographer, director and producer who captures magnificent images that divulge the exquisite beauty of nature, gratitude, and the universe. In Louie’s Ted talk show, he clearly delineates his ideas of preserving the nature, appreciating the nature, and be grateful of the nature. Louie want to inspire others to do the same thing as him, to see the beauty of nature, to appreciate then, and to thank the nature for what they did for us, instead of taking the nature for granted. These ideas and principles that Louie illustrated in the video can be applied to our own life.
Louie’s idea of preserving the nature is a very important issue of the human world. Humans thought that nature is just a tool for them to be more advance in technology, a resource that they can use to create things that would not exist without the help of nature. Louie stated that, “Beauty and seduction, I believe, is nature’s tool for survival, because we will protect what we fall in love with.” I agree with Louie, however I do not think that nature needs tools to survive nor protection from human, for that we are part of nature, and we need it to survive. Humans and nature have a symbiotic relationship. Plants need the carbon dioxides from humans in order for photosynthesis to occur, and humans need the oxygens that the plants produce to survive. Therefore harming the nature indirectly harms ourself. The principle of preserving the nature can be applied to my life. When I was in 5th grade, I started recycling cans, papers, and bottles. When I was walking in the park, I saw a boy who littered. I told him to pick the chip bag and throw it into the garbage can. I explained to him how dangerous littering is to the nature, I ...
... middle of paper ...
... nature is another principle that can be applied to my life. Everytime I eat, I think of, "Thank you food for existing, and thank you nature for creating them." I do this because without food, humans will not survive. Humans needs fuel which comes from food, and food came from nature. Therefore, the next time anyone eats, they should thank nature for creating these food.
In conclusion, humans have take so many things from the nature for granted that they do not preserve them, appreciate them, and be grateful of them. In the Ted talk show, Louie Schwartzberg want everyone to acknowledge the beauties of nature, and what it had done for us. Louie want to inspire everyone to start doing themself a favor and start preserving the nature for it is connect to everything that we need in life. To inspire them to be grateful of nature and start to appreciate their beauties.
He thinks that the humans have destroyed the beauty of the nature. The speaker is also showing us his in depth experience of the place. The audience is everyone in this world who wants to learn about the nature and the contact of the people living generations before us with the environment. People who want to learn about preserving the environment can also be considered the audience. What is the purpose of the author’s message?
The bond between humans and nature, it is fascinating to see how us has humans and nature interact with each other and in this case the essay The Heart’s Fox by Josephine Johnson is an example of judging the unknown of one's actions. She talks about a fox that had it's life taken as well as many others with it, the respect for nature is something that is precious to most and should not be taken advantage of. Is harming animals or any part of nature always worth it? I see this text as a way of saying that we must be not so terminate the life around us. Today I see us a s experts at destroying most around us and it's sad to see how much we do it and how it's almost as if it's okay to do and sadly is see as it nature itself hurts humans unintentionally
The battle between humanity and nature began when the industrial civilization started threatening our environment and natural resources. Hunters, like Theodore Roosevelt and Aldo Leopold, were the first Americans to realize that nature is something that we need to preserve. Leopold’s awakening was seeing a fierce green fire in the eyes of a wolf he had shot. He was able to understand what it means to take away pieces of life and how it affected the important role of earth’s grand scheme of nature. People started to become environmentalists when they experienced the same realization as
In Emerson’s “Nature” nature is referred to as “plantations of god” meaning that nature is sacred. Also mentioned, is that “In the woods is perpetual youth”(#) conveying that nature keeps people young. Therefore, these excerpts show that nature is greatly valued by these transcendentalists. Transcendentalists would likely care significantly about the environment. In contrast, nowadays nature is often and afterthought. Natures’ resources are being depleted for human use, and the beauty of nature is also not as appreciated by modern people as it was by transcendentalists. The threat to nature in modern times contrasts to the great appreciation of nature held by authors like Emerson and
Man has destroyed nature, and for years now, man has not been living in nature. Instead, only little portions of nature are left in the world
From the lone hiker on the Appalachian Trail to the environmental lobby groups in Washington D.C., nature evokes strong feelings in each and every one of us. We often struggle with and are ultimately shaped by our relationship with nature. The relationship we forge with nature reflects our fundamental beliefs about ourselves and the world around us. The works of timeless authors, including Henry David Thoreau and Annie Dillard, are centered around their relationship to nature.
We should treat nature with the same respect that us humans should give another human or any other living thing, but instead of doing that we ignore
Human beings have made much of purity and are repelled by blood, pollution, putrefaction (Snyder, 119). Nature is sacred. We are enjoying it and destroying it simultaneously. Sometimes it is easier to see charming things than the decomposition hidden in the “shade”.We only notice the beautiful side of nature, which are benefits that nature brings us: food, fresh air, water, landscapes. But we forget the other side, the rottenness of human destruction. That is how human beings create “the other side of the sacred”. We cut trees for papers, but we fail to recognize that the lack of trees is the lack of fresh air. Therefore, it is crucial to acknowledge “the other side of the
In Ralph Waldo Emerson’s “Nature”, he develops his own perspective on the interconnection between humans and nature. As an admirable essayist and transcendentalist, he believed that man can have the ability to go and find the Truth in solitude and nature, and can return to reason and faith. “You cannot see the mountain near.” When one is near a mountain, it looks enormous; however, you can see it in its entirety from a far distance. There is no need to even perceive it as a challenge, especially if instead we focus on one rock at a time; loving and appreciating the journey. Having the right perspective towards things can help form a healthy reality. He believed nature could positively change people’s outlooks in life. In Emerson’s view, “Nature always wears the colors of the spirit.” In other words, he is saying that however someone feels is how they will view nature. From his experiences, he believes if a man becomes part of nature once again, loses his egotism and becomes a lover of beauty, then he has become a “transparent eyeball.” Having experience as Emerson did with nature can make one’s perspective more valuable and precious in this
As artwork has become more accepted in popular culture, we begin to see more and more creative artists portray their opinions of what is really going on in today’s society. By the rights granted to us based on the foundation of this country, there is the right to release opinions of how the world is viewed. A major part of this is what goes on in the atmosphere of which we live. The environment plays a vital role in the daily lives of citizens of the world and what happens to our environment in the future will continue to have lasting affects on future generations to come. Through artwork, the advertising industry has been releasing more frequent campaigns of what is going on in the world we live with an aspect of how nature is surviving as people are as well. There is an ongoing relationship that we rely on nature just as nature sometimes would seem to fit into our lives more than we would begin to realize. There are usual two sides to every story and it seems that either one is of nature or one is against nature. This is evident in some aspects of television, movies, advertising, and music.
However, some only have this appreciation due to the fact that the nature provides a service to them, usually involving an escape from the busy reality that many deal with constantly. Perceptions of nature include an oasis from the stresses of real life, and for that reason, support the protection of certain pieces of land. In William Cronon’s essay, “The Trouble With Wilderness,” he claims that modern interpretation of wilderness is “quite profoundly a human creation” (Cronan 1). This phrase underscores the notion that humanity created the conception of wilderness as something particularly special and enchanting, and that the definition is not inherent. Even many people who are considered to have valued the environment to the utmost degree were actually acting this way due to their own human-centered uses for the natural world. For example, one of the sole reasons Theodore Roosevelt spearheaded the movement for a National Parks System is not due to his appreciation for the natural world, but because he was an avid hunter (NPS.gov). If urbanization would have continued, without preserving many areas of the United States, the ability to hunt in the United States would be very difficult if not impossible. If humans did not understand wilderness as “the remote corners of the earth,” that supply an “experience of wonder and
Such ploys seek to undermine any legitimate eco-consciousness in the audience, replacing it with rhetoric that is ultimately ambivalent toward the health of ecosystems, but definitively pro-business. These tactics assume a rigidly anthropocentric point of view, shutting out any consideration for the well-being of non-human existence; they seem to suggest that nature lies subordinate to our base desires. In addition to upholding the subordination of nature to business and leisure activities, this view establishes nature as something privately owned and partitioned (243), rather than something intrinsic to the world. Our relationship with nature becomes one of narcissism.
The sunset was not spectacular that day. The vivid ruby and tangerine streaks that so often caressed the blue brow of the sky were sleeping, hidden behind the heavy mists. There are some days when the sunlight seems to dance, to weave and frolic with tongues of fire between the blades of grass. Not on that day. That evening, the yellow light was sickly. It diffused softly through the gray curtains with a shrouded light that just failed to illuminate. High up in the treetops, the leaves swayed, but on the ground, the grass was silent, limp and unmoving. The sun set and the earth waited.
To understand the nature-society relationship means that humans must also understand the benefits as well as problems that arise within the formation of this relationship. Nature as an essence and natural limits are just two of the ways in which this relationship can be broken down in order to further get an understanding of the ways nature and society both shape one another. These concepts provide useful approaches in defining what nature is and how individuals perceive and treat
section, I will consider Paul Taylor’s, respect for nature argument to defend the natural conservancy organization mission statement. The argument goes as follows; Paul Taylor argues that all living organisms have inherent value, a good of their own. He says “I argue that, it is the good (well-being, welfare) of individual organisms, considered as entities having inherent worth, that determines our moral relations with the Earth’s wild communities of life.” (Taylor, 102) In these quotations, Taylor asserts the possibilities of a life-centered system through the working of two ideals. The first concept being that “good, well-being of individual organisms.” This ideal involves doing necessary actions for the well being of nature. This does not require one to take the action to make the nature feel good but the action that could be done to ensure the existence of it for today and for many years to come. An example of this would be to find and catch animals that are endangered in order to foster them in a well-ensured environment. Even though these animals that are kept in captivity will be miserable, it will ensure the existence of their spices as well as keeping the echo system in balance. Another example of this would be to saving a part of...