Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effect of nurturing nature
Psychological theory of criminal behavior
Effect of nurturing nature
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Effect of nurturing nature
Nature and nurture has been a longstanding debate in the psychological community. While some believe that our personality is inherited others believe it is formed. Nature is the philosophy that we acquire our characteristics from our parents or relatives while nurture says our environment and outward stimuli shape us. This particularly comes into play when discussing the role of criminal behavior in an individual. What makes someone have criminal tendencies, can it be blamed on their genetic code or is it a result of their surroundings? Researchers say that criminal behavior is a result of both nature and nurture interacting together. This relationship between nature and nurture in the case of criminal behavior was proven by a researcher named Avshalom Caspi. In 2002, Caspi and his colleagues conducted a longitudinal study of children who possessed a gene said to hinder the production of an enzyme called monoamine oxidase (MAO). This enzyme, MAO, when not produced properly can result in an increased risk of someone developing into a violent criminal. Caspi and his colleagues studied children who had committed violent crimes and some who had not, all …show more content…
Children who only possessed the gene without the factor of maltreatment, and even those who did not posses the gene but were maltreated, were not at risk. These findings helped illustrate gene-environment interaction, which states that the effects of a gene are dependent upon the environment in which they are expressed. This investigation concluded that genetics is not the sole cause of criminal behavior, while a gene may increase the risk of becoming a violent criminal it has to be accompanied by a bad environment in order to produce results . Caspi was able to deduce through research that nature and nurture work hand in hand where criminal behavior is
Nature vs. nurture has been one of the oldest and most debated topics among psychologists over the years. This concept discusses whether a child is born into this world with their developmental work cut out for them or if a child is a “blank slate” and their experiences are what shape them into who they are. Over the years and plenty of research, psychologists have all mostly come to agree that it’s a little bit of both. Children are both born with some genetic predispositions while other aspects of the child’s development are strongly influenced by their surrounding environment. This plays into the criminal justice system when discussing where criminal behavior stems from. Is a criminal’s anti-social behavior just part of their DNA or is it a result of their upbringing? The answer to this question is not definite. Looking at research a strong argument can be made that criminals developed their anti-social patterns through the atmosphere in which they were raise, not their DNA.
The issue of whether or not criminal or aggressive behavior and violence is caused by biological or environmental factors has proven to be one that has caused a dispute for many years now. The biological or genetic factor of violent/criminal or aggressive behavior is certainly a much talked about topic. The idea that certain individuals could be predisposed to violence is something definitely deserving of doing research about. The nature vs. nurture topic has been a continuing debate for many aspects of human behavior, including aggression/violent behavior and criminal behavior. There have been many studies indicating that chemical relationships between hormones and the frontal lobe of the brain may play a key role in determining aggressive behavior as well as genetics, while other studies have explored environmental and social factors that have been said to control patterns in human aggression. Aggressive/violent behavior can’t be answered directly if it is caused by either nature or nurture; instead it is believed that both cause it.
1. Cesare Lombroso applied the methods of natural science (observation, measurement, experimentation, statistical analysis) to the study of criminal behavior. Lombroso rejected the classical theory of crime, associated with Cesare Beccaria and Jeremy Bentham, which explained criminal activity as freely chosen behavior based on the rational calculation of benefit and loss, pleasure and pain. Critically analyze both schools of thought and provide an opinion as to what theory you believe is more relevant.
Criminal behavior can mostly be explained by the Biosocial Branch of Trait Theory. Individual traits by themselves cannot determine criminality. Outside factors such as the environment along with certain personality traits is what causes criminal behavior.
Having understood that genetics do play a part in the actions of an individual, solving the question of how much of it is in part of the biological makeup. There is clear evidence from studies that about 50% of the deviation of antisocial behavior is derived from genetics. The question has now been changed to “Which genes predispose to which kinds of antisocial behavior?” (Raine, 2008)
Nurture versus nature has been a subject of debate for some time when it comes to serial killers. One of the most interesting studies regarding whether traits are a results of nurture or nature comes from the Minnesota Study of Twins Reared apart. This study was led by Professor Thomas Joseph Bouchard Jr. of Minnesota University. The study evaluated identical twins who were separated at birth and raised in different families. The study found that an identical twin reared away from their co-twin had an equal chance of being similar to one another in relation to their personality, interests, and attitudes as a twin who was raised in the same household with their co-twin.
Within the past decade there has been a wide range of research and evidence available based on both sides of the nature or nurture debate. Along with further research that identifies a number of determinants that have some form of influence towards criminal behavior and activity. This researc...
In conclusion, offenders are who they are now by nurture. Although some factors of criminals with biological influences make them more likely to commit crime. However, it can clearly be seen that family and media plays a big role in influencing criminal behaviour in this era where it was proven that when violent acts are frequently observed or thought, it will increase the risk factor on normal people and even more on people with aggressive genes to commit a crime. Therefore, it can be clearly seen that the nurture of the offender outweighs their nature to commit deviant crimes.
Genes can cause violent crimes because they influence people development. There are about 20,000 to 25,000 protein-coding genes in human body, and the human genome contains many different regulatory sequences. In “A Family Secret That Has Been Murder to Figure out,” Dr. Fallon studies 20 genetic markers. Gautam Naik states, “One marker, which has been become a big target for research, is MAOA, or the ‘warrior gene’. Because of the way a high-risk variant of the gene gets inherited, more males than females have it” (167). From most of the violent crime, we can know that the
The nature versus nurture debate continues, whether it is one view or the other, but what if the best perspective is a combination of the two? Genetic factors related to delinquency and environmental factors related to the social world and delinquency both have their positives and negatives when it comes to the perspectives; but neither of them 100 percent explain delinquency. Genetic (or biological) factors may lead to delinquency, but if we included the sociological perspective in this idea; things like antisocial personality disorder and other conduct disorders, or genetic mutations could be triggered by the surrounding environment (most likely negative environments) making the cause of delinquency to be explained by both perspectives. It is said that in a behavioural genetics study that antisocial personality disorder or “antisocial behaviour” is partly due to genetic factors (41%), partly due to factors in a shared environment (16%), and partly due to non-shared environmental factors(43%) (Orfano, 2010). These statistics show that delinquency can be caused by a combination of nature and nurture. The environment can also affect genetics (and the other way around as well). Since some genetics increase the risk of delinquency, it is possible that environmental influences (like
It is a fact that criminals have a smaller brains than law abiding citizens. Often, offenders share particular physical traits such as, being young males, muscular, having lower than average IQ, and a impulsive personality. Serial offenders are usually hyperactive and difficult children If a person has a low IQ, it is proven to be directly related to their tendency to be commit impulse actions that provide an immediate payoff. For instance, a rape or a mugging would provide a criminal with an immediate payoff. It is proven that crime often runs in families. In fact, chronic criminals are proven to be three times more likely to have criminal children. However, despite this information, scientists have no basis to come to any conclusions with this data. Therefore, one must consider other possible factors that may create a criminal mind, to come to a reasonable decision as to how one is developed.
Psychological theories of criminal behavior emphasize criminal thinking patterns or personality defects. These theories emphasize individual differences in behavior and the approaches to thinking, feeling, and decision-making that make some people predisposed to committing criminal acts.
These theories represent part of the classic psychological debate, nature versus nurture. Are individuals predisposed to becoming a criminal or are they made through their environment. There are various theories within the biological explanation as to why individuals commit criminal behaviour, these include: genetic theory, hereditary theory, psychosis and brain injury theory. In the next few paragraphs examples of each will be shown. The first theory to be explored is the hereditary theory, which stems from Cesare Lombroso (1876) father of criminology, (Feldman, 1993) whose studies were carried out by morphology.
The distinction between nature versus nurture or even environment versus heredity leads to the question of: does the direct environment or the nature surrounding an adolescent directly influence acts of delinquency, later progressing further into more radical crimes such as murder or psychotic manifestation, or is it directly linked to the hereditary traits and genes passed down from that individual adolescent’s biological parents? To answer this question one must first understand the difference between nature, nurture, environment, and heredity. Nurture, broken down further into environment, is defined as various external or environmental factors one is exposed to which can be more specifically broken down into social and physical aspects. Nature, itself broken down into heredity, is defined as the genetics and the individual characteristics in one’s personality or even human nature.
Criminality constitutes strategic mannerisms characterized by apathy to misery inflicted on others, egocentricity and depressed self-control. Habitual criminal behaviour seeks to satisfy the offender’s desires for material prestige, power or pleasurable feelings regardless to damage inflicted to victim or society. Such behaviors extend mistrust, fuel prejudice, and largely corrupt social cohesion. Biological, psychological and environmental attributes are thought to heavily influence antisocial and criminal behaviour. Numerous studies have proven that active emulation, genetic predispositions and psychosocial labeling are all complementary to development and expressions of criminal behaviour. There has historically been a myriad of theories that attempt to explain criminal behaviour through different perspectives, all which constitute intricate paradigms that play a role in expressio...