Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Research on impacts of different cultural backgrounds on communication
Roles of gender in interpersonal communications
Body language and personal language
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Naturalistic Observation
Naturalistic observation involves recording subjects' naturally occurring behavior while they are in their natural environment. This experiment revolves around this type of observation. Specifically, it involves the observation of the various human dyads (male-female, male-male, female-female,) social interaction, within in a public environment. Focal points of observation included conversation space (distance between individuals heads,), and body language.
All behaviors were observed in an unobtrusive manner.
Introduction
The acceptable distance for a conversation between adults is greatly affected by the cultural background of the participants and the gender of those involved (Hall, 1966, Reidhead, Good, & Stopka, 1984; Sommer, 1969). Previous work has shown that, "observational studies in real life situations have found that individuals in Arab and Latin American countries, in general, stand significantly closer to one another during conversations than do Americans and Northern Europeans (e.g., Hall, 1966; Sanders, Hakky, & Brizzolara, 1985). Within the American culture, studies have shown that male-female dyads stand closest, female-female dyads are intermediate, and male-male dyads are most distant (e.g., Baxter, 1970; Sommer, 1962).
Based upon these former studies, observation was undergone in roughly the same manner, with a new hypothesis in mind. The hypothesis is that when engaged in conversation, male-female dyads make more of overt effort to appear interested in conversation. Since actual conversing was not overheard, and distance between individuals was virtually irrelevant, the significant variables in this study a...
... middle of paper ...
...s not determined. It could possibly rely solely upon an individual's awareness of how attracted they are to the other individual.
One possible source of error for this experiment could be sexual preference. This study does not take into account for any type of homosexuality. However, it is reasonable to surmise that the same hypothesis will hold true for homosexual- same gender dyads.
References
1. Baxter, J.C. (1970). Interpersonal spacing in natural settings. Sociometry, 33, 444-456
2. Hall, E.T. (1966). The Hidden Dimension. Garden City: Doubleday.
3. Sanders, J.L., Hakky, U.M., & Brizzolara, M.M. (1985). Personal space amongst Arabs and Americans. International Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 8, 360-393.
4. Sommer, R. (1962). The Distance for comfortable conversation: A further study. Sociometry, 25, 111-116.
On June 8, 2016, a child welfare agency conducted a parent/child observation with Ms. Sophia Mendez and her three children. Ashley M. Mosgrove, social work intern, did the intake and completed the biopsychosocial assessment.
There are two important areas in this research- territoriality and use of personal space, all while each have an important bearing on the kinds of messages we send as we use space. Standing at least three feet apart from someone is a norm for personal space.
In the introduction of Deborah Tannen’s “Conversation Style: Talking on the Job”, she compares and contrasts the ways men and women communicate. This reminds me of what I tell people that are struggling in their relationships. Women and men express themselves differently. Women think, but men act. If you can’t wrap your head around this, being in a relationship with anyone is going to be hard. Yet, this is such a basic way of looking at this issue. Not only are the genders vastly different, but each person relates to the world around them in a certain way. He or she also needs to be related to in a specific way. Looking at personalities and personal histories can give a better look at the way we communicate with each other. Tannen examines
H1 - There is a statistically significant difference in touching behaviour between male and female couples when observed in social situation.
Faculty Researchers want to know Does sexual orientation have an impact on nonverbal behavior in interpersonal communication? Yes, sexual orientation does have an impact on nonverbal behavior in interpersonal communication. People can detect sexual orientation in homosexual or heterosexual rather they speaking verbally, nonverbally or can be engaged in both communication skills at the same time. However, women and men have different ways of using body gestures and we will learn more about it throughout my paper. The method was used in this study half women and half men participants in the sexual orientation nonverbal test. All dyads consist of individuals of the identical sex. All homosexual participants were conscious of their own sexual orientation
Do men and women effectively communicate in the same way, or is it just a conversation of misunderstanding? There is constantly a new interest in whether men and women converse successfully. Professor and journalist, Deborah Tannen writes, “Sex, Lies, and Conversation: Why Is It So Hard for Men and Women to Talk to Each Other?” Tannen compares and contrasts all conversational styles, and explains how the expectation of dialogue affects how men and women converse. Tannen focuses on the subject of marriage and the imbalance of interest between male and female couples. The contrasting perspective however comes from, Deborah Cameron, author of, “What Language Barrier”. Cameron conveys that the stereotypes left upon male and female communication
Women communicate to establish or maintain relationships. They talk longer than men and spend more time on one subject to fully understand where each person is coming from. This is evident in the use of nonverbal cues to further build a connection, like touching one’s arm or engaging their audience by nodding. Women also use more emotional language than men, apparent in the compassionate, warm, and concerned word choice that women use. Clearly there are great differences in gender communication. One could argue it is the greatest difference between men and
Deborah Tannen is the author of the book You Just Don't Understand where she analyzes the different meanings of communication between men and women. Her research shows that women and men use the same words and phrases and yet can interpret and react to those same words and phrases differently. Tannen compares the two sexes to find men use their conversation as a type of competition or to preserve their independence. For example, men talk about their knowledge regarding sports, cars, women, exc. Meanwhile, women try to foster intimacy through communication. For instance, women often talk and relate on a personal level. Throughout Tannen's book she uses "cross-cultural communication" to describe the differences between the language of men and women. Tannen observed that, "For males, conversation is the way you negotiate your status in the group and keep people from pushing you around; you use talk to preserve your independence. Females, on the other hand, use conversation to negotiate closeness and intimacy; talk is the essence of intimacy, so being best friends means sitting and talking. For boys, activities, doing things together, are central. Just sitting and talking is not an essential part of friendship. They're friends with the boys they do things with" (Tannen 95).
"This report . . . is concerned with the structure of social encounters--the structure of those entities in social life that come into being whenever persons enter one another 's immediate physical presence. The key factor in this structure is the maintenance of a single definition of the situation" (1959,
To study a group of people in their natural environment without disturbing or influencing their usual behavior is called naturalistic observation. Consequently,
Adler, Ronald B., Lawrence B. Rosenfeld, and Russell F. Proctor II. Interplay. The Process of Interpersonal Communication. 12th ed. New York: Oxford UP, 2013. Print.
Lieberman, Simma. “Differences in Male and Female Communication Styles” Simma Lieberman Associates (undated). Retrieved February 25, 2010<
Genetics, biology, and upbringing are all key aspects in determining one’s sexual orientation. Many of the factors are combined to make up how a person feels or who he or she is attracted to. There is no definite answer to why someone has a particular orientation, but there are studies that sugge...
In fact, attitudes in interaction between men and women are extremely diverse among verbal and non-verbal interactions. The verbal interaction is spoken and written interaction; and nonverbal interaction is facial expressions, gestures, body movements, sounds, eye contact, etc. For verbal interactions, the researchers’ ( Tannen, 1990; Wood, 1996; Brownlow, Rosamon, & Parker, 2003; Colley, Todd, Bland, Holmes, Khanom, & Pike 2004; Herring, 1993) findings outline that women speak a language of connection and intimacy to achieve “instrumental” goals while speak a language of status and independence to acquire “instrumental” goals within the sociolinguistics . As the result, it is very crucial for everyone to understand the spoken interaction so that man/woman is able to how to interact correctly and appropriately with each other by using language. Let’s analyse an example of ‘mhmm’, the women use ‘mhmm’ quite often with regard to the meaning “I’m listening” whereas the men use ‘mhmm’ so as to show ‘I’m agreeing’, (Maltz and Borkers, 1982, p. 202). In addition, Stenstrom (1994, p. 1) mentioned that spoken interaction is a joint, speakers take turns and speakers cooperate are two key principles through social activities. Another verbal interaction example is computer-mediated interaction, such as email, chat rooms, and computer-mediated discussion groups and so forth. The
Tannen, D. (2007). You Just Don’t Understand: Women and Men in Conversation. New York, NY: Harper.