Natural Law

679 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: "john locke" second essay

Natural Law

The School of Natural Law Philosophy was an intellectual group of philosophers. They developed new ways of thinking about religion and government.
Natural law was based on moral principles, but the overall outlook changed with the times.
John Locke was a great philosopher from the middle of the 17th century.
He was a primary contributor to the new ideas concerning natural law of that time. He argued that humans in the state of nature are free and equal, yet insecure in their freedom. When they enter society, they surrender only such rights as are necessary for their security and for the common good. He also believed that each individual retains fundamental prerogatives drawn from natural law relating to the integrity of the person and property. This natural rights theory was the basis of not only the American, but also the French revolution. 1 During his lifetime, he wrote many essays and letters to his colleagues on a variety of topics:2

• Letter on Toleration (1689)
• Second Letter on Toleration (1690)
• Two Treatises of Government (1690)
• Essay Concerning Human Understanding (1690)
• Some Considerations of the Consequences of Lowering of Interest, and Raising the Value of Money (1691)
• Third Letter on Toleration (1692)
• Some Thoughts Concerning Education (1693)
• Further Considerations Concerning Raising the Value of Money (1693)
• The Reasonableness of Christianity (1695)
• A Vindication of the Reasonableness of Christianity (1695)
• A Second Vindication of the Reasonableness of Christianity (1695)
• A Letter to the Bishop of Worcester (1697)
• Discourse on Miracles
• Fourth Letter for Toleration
• An Examination of Father Malebranche's Opinion of Seeing All Things in God
• Remarks on Some of Mr Norris's Books
• Conduct of the Understanding

Locke's greatest philosophical contribution is his Essay Concerning
Human Understanding. In the winter of 1670, five or six friends were talking in his room, probably in London. The topic was the "principles of morality and revealed religion," but arguments arose and no real progress or serious discussion took place. Then, he goes on to say, "it came into my thoughts that we took a wrong course, and that before we set ourselves upon inquiries of that nature, it was necessary to examine our own abilities, and see what objects our understandings were, or were not, fitted to deal with." At the request of his friends, Locke agreed to write down his thoughts on this question at their next meeting, and he expected that a single sheet of paper would suffice for the purpose. Little did he realize the importance of the issue which he raised, and that it would take up his free time for nearly twenty years.

Show More
Related

  • Common Law vs. Political Law vs. Scientific Law

    1738 Words  | 4 Pages

    Common Law vs. Political Law vs. Scientific Law Americans are no longer aware that there are two kinds of legal systems, political and scientific. America was founded on principles of scientific law. But these principles have now been submerged in today's legal system. What is taught today as law is political law. To understand the difference between a scientific legal system and a political one, it is necessary to know that scientific law developed in the absence of any legislature or Congress or Parliament whatever.

    Read More

  • The Individual vs. Big Brother in 1984

    1184 Words  | 3 Pages

    To the future or to the past, to a time when thought is free, when men are different from one another, and do not live alone — to a time when truth exists and what is done cannot be undone:

    Read More

  • Benjamin Franklin & Henry David Thoreau

    1056 Words  | 3 Pages

    Benjamin Franklin and Henry David Thoreau have been thought of as two powerful philosophers in history. Both men were alive centuries ago, but their unique ways of life and ideas still exist in some of history’s most admirable figures. Each man had a judgment that went beyond the era they existed in, but is still obvious in today’s culture. Even though both men are credited for their wise principles, their beliefs do not always coincide with one another. However, one thing they do have in common is that they both revolutionized America through their thoughts, actions, and distinctive opinions on how to improve the world around them.

    Read More

  • Thomas Hobbs's Beliefs On Life Without Government

    340 Words  | 1 Pages

    without government. He said that life would be “war of all against all,” and that life would be

    Read More

  • John Locke and the American Revolution and Glorious Revolution

    2176 Words  | 5 Pages

    Locke claims the state of nature exists in a non-political society, where men are free individuals who are bound by no government or poli...

    Read More

  • How Did Frederick Douglass Change America

    825 Words  | 2 Pages

    figure for women’s rights because he thought everyone should be equal no matter the race of the

    Read More

  • The Natural Law Approach to Ethics

    1330 Words  | 3 Pages

    way in which the world works. An example of this in the world can be

    Read More

  • John Locke's The Second Treatises Of Government

    514 Words  | 2 Pages

    He believed that every individual is equal before the law. In his book, he mentions that every individual has a legal right in owning property and the possessions that they desire as long as the possessions of others are not harmed. “So he has by nature a power not only to preserve his property, that is, his life, liberty and possessions, against harm from other men” (Locke, 87). This passage showcases how what once was a collective possession becomes more of an individualistic one, such as property and liberty. He also states that the nature of property and his possessions without a man’s own consent cannot be taken from him or harmed by other individuals: "Every individual man has a property in his own person; this is something that nobody else has any right to" (Locke,

    Read More

  • Why Is Martin Luther King Jr Important

    727 Words  | 2 Pages

    person’s life in the U.S. He had made life as equal as he could, putting all he had in his speeches.

    Read More

  • Descartes 'Change In Heraclitus Logos'

    436 Words  | 1 Pages

    He stated that everything is in a state of flux. Everything is constantly moving and changing and there is no such thing as stability. That’s when the quote he’s most famous for comes in, “You cannot step into the same river twice.” At first you may think that it’s a lie because you can physically step into the same river twice, but taking a closer look at it it’s not possible because the water is not the same because when you moved your foot you changed the flow of the water making his statement true. Think about it this way, like the world it connects to the idea of the river; it’s constantly moving. You step again into what seems to be the same river but in reality it is not the same water into which you step. Meaning every day nothing is the same and it’s the start of something

    Read More

  • The Importance Of Social Awareness

    770 Words  | 2 Pages

    can draw the conclusion that he had contemplated the subject to have the capacity to think of the

    Read More

  • Law In Society

    1347 Words  | 3 Pages

    Law is a tool in society as it helps to maintain social control, promoting social justice. The way law functions in society and its social institution provide a mechanism for solutions. There are many different theories of the function of law in relation to society in considering the insight they bring to different socio-legal and criminological problems. In the discussion of law’s role in social theory, Leon Petrażycki and Eugen Ehrlich share similar beliefs in the jurisprudence of society. They focused their work on the experience of individuals in establishing meaning in their legal relations with others based on the question of what it means to be a participant in law. Jürgen Habermas presents a relationship between law and morality. From a certain standpoint, law is a key steering mechanism in society as it plays an educational role in promoting conducts, a mean of communication and it

    Read More

  • Nature is as Man Decrees

    1165 Words  | 3 Pages

    I found this assignment far more difficult than I thought it would be at first glance. While thinking about it on the way home from class, I discarded one idea after another because technology had touched nearly everything I would think of. As Dennis Baron, author of From Pencils to Pixels wrote, once we are used to certain technologies “we come to think of them as natural rather than techEven thinking about going to a national park, the truth is that just by setting it aside as a "natural" state...makes it in essence, not natural because were it not for the decrees of humanity, it would be over run with fast food stores and gas stations. In fact, sadly, writing is in one sense both creative and destructive to nature. A tree is destroyed for the very paper we write on. The question arose, is there really any such thing as natural in the 21st Century or is that a word that no longer applies in its truest sense. That, of course, led to thoughts on just what is "natural." My instinctive definition of natural is that it is not influenced or hampered or changed by humanity. So in some regards I think my initial conclusion is correct, that at least here in the Midwestern area of United States, finding something in nature that was not influenced in some way by technology or human interference might prove impossible. So the words that would end up being my project ran round and round in my head on the long ride home, “Nature is as man decrees, hedged by his technologies.”

    Read More

  • Platos' Theory of Human Nature

    1040 Words  | 3 Pages

    his definition of justice. I agree with his theory of human nature but not his

    Read More

  • What Does Sovereignty Mean

    385 Words  | 1 Pages

    State of Nature - Theories about how humans were before society changed us. Hobbes believed it was ‘man v. man’, while Locke believed people were equal, and would not harm each other.

    Read More

More about Natural Law

Open Document